[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

Search:


View post   

>> No.25999874 [View]
File: 61 KB, 378x505, takonavalmine.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
25999874

dont mind me

>> No.7428768 [View]
File: 62 KB, 378x505, takonavalmine.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7428768

iirc third party content (mostly music) are licencing nightmare for streaming purposes.

In the same way that you can't put your itunes songs in a will because you don't actually own the digital files, you just have the right to listen to them yourself; a game company can't give free streaming permission to anyone because, usually, the songs in that game are licensed for the end user/player ears only and not to be broadcasted to an audience. This even fucks with marketing campaigns sometimes. This is also the reason why some movies/anime/games localisations use different soundtracks from the original and why "online tv" can't air some of it's shows

Even if you try to get broadcasting permissions for this content like an honest man, there's isn't always a unique owner to request it from. A single song can have it's ownership shared between multiple companies. Check the license section for this song on youtube for some context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJ9rUzIMcZQ.. People grab to the rights of this stuff as if it were a money printer... well it kinda is. Checkout Taylor's Swift songs rights drama for some entertainment about the topic

TL;DR: Don't be so hard on management for permissions trouble, it's a fucking landmine out there. Blame the mouse

>> No.2817354 [View]
File: 62 KB, 378x505, takonavalmine.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2817354

>>2817303
tread carefully

>> No.707955 [View]
File: 62 KB, 378x505, 1609271681898.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
707955

>20 mins till priestess
ww@ takos?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]