/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>48442099
This looks reasonable, I support this claim. me thinks luknights might also comission /ahoy/ for ships and possible mercenary vessels as privateers

I need to piss but Hime is on screen

>>41056611
That seems to be the trend of this thread eh?

kek

>>40102959
Anon I literally don't understand this, its too vague. Be sly and sarcastic but do it so that I can still understand you

>>39677051
Perhaps...you forgot to take your meds?

>>39480171
Luna moved most if not all her personal tweeting over to her sub account as soon as she made it
It's fascinating how much more she posts about her daily life ever since then

>>39233982

>>38345104
>Are we not good enough for you
My lawyer has told me to not answer that nanora. I haven't seen any discussion about those though and the thread is still slow so now might be the time to discuss them.
>is it that you just wants matuli nation more
Yes.

>>37407871
>>37407944
Another clear failure of the rep system nanora, needs dismantlement correction.

>>37241793
I am sorry Arctic, I will cease such vulgar behavior unfitting of a knight and will superchat Fauna 3 month's penance nanora.
Not apologizing for those previous discussions tho, those were very civil and contained no choco slander nora.

>>37063307
What the fuck?

>>34009590
Is there anything that's actually verifying me nanora? I'm not sure I get it.
https://rentry.org/Lunaito_vote
>>34009882
The problem is that the major problems of the province system haven't had nearly as much discussion as they should have for it to actually make it to a vote, it feels more like they were acknowledged and then just hand waved more than waiting until these have been buffed out to put it up to a vote.

>>33823364
before i head out I do wanna say that I like this proposal alot and that I dont think you should feel like its widely hated because some trolls are replying to you nanora.

>>33335246
That's only a fix for one problem in regards to one nation, nora, and even then the Candy Kingdom is still surrounded with nulls of dead land. That doesn't fix the same problem for future nations or for nations in a similar situations or address the other problems with the provinces nanora

>>32842058
we're healing. perhaps...i judged it too harshly nanora.

>>32688705
>>32688705
I honestly didn't realize I was a rep until people started calling me lunaito rep, nanora

>>32574474
smol to smol communication

>>32532742
>Every bait post you’ve read heard about Kindreds being disgustingly parasocial is genuinely 100% true.
Oh we know kindred, nora. we know...
Good morning!

>>32469776
Hmm, sounds interesting nora, but how would that work?

>>32455031
I don't know much about the nation admittedly but I'll attempt a review of it for the sake of it.
>Primary Sector:
I think that this did a good job creating an idea of what the nation's farming culture is like and alot of the little details give way to easily imagining what some of these communities might be like, the denotations of where the most profitable harvests come from can lead to creative thinking about where routes of trade might be and there's some nice logic behind farms being grouped up together and that lets other writers get a nice idea for how these communities might operate if they wanted to write a story involving one.
One thing I noticed though was that a repetition of details is prevalent in a way that confused me into thinking I was rereading bits of it. An example of this is the "Livestock within this region is common, as their uses for manure..." bit which gets repeated three times in a copy and paste manner. Another thing was that some of the resources are listed in a way that almost makes it seem like it's everything that could potentially grow in the region instead of what would most likely grow in the region given the economic demand and culture, I was going to bring up that the diversity in the amount of trees was odd however I was in the FFA for a while and still have a book of trees that grew in my region and they were about as diverse, I think a small addition of how the soil's quality helped aid the growth of certain resources would make it seem less strange. The section on metals also mentions ores that I'm not entirely sure how they would be used if they are actively mined in the context of the time period, (lithium, molybdenum, uranium, kaolinite), it was kind of vauge as to which resources actually got used and which were just present in the environment.
Overall, it's still pretty good.
>Secondary Sector
I really like how this section sets up possible conflict between traditional artisan workers and the technological advancements which are slowly but surely encroaching on their lively hoods, specific denotations of the locations where industry was major in and what products were most profitable are nice touches to help other writers envision the setting.
This explained certain things that weakened the Primary Sector like how new different metals are being used for refinement but the chemical section was pretty short so it didn't go into much detail.
>Tertiary Sector
Love how this section sets up for conflict between the upper and lower class through the feudal tax system and how its very easy to follow without losing much information or nuance. Other factions are also introduced and the ways that they'll interact with each other is something future writers can speculate and predict with relative accuracy given how much information was given regarding the circumstances of the nation's inhabitants. The element of pseudo-superstitious natural disasters is another fun thing that I personally like to see a lot in writing.
The entry itself did really good, I usually don't pay much attention to economics but looking over my own review of the paper and taking to note what boons and banes i recognized makes me feel like I can now spot similar things in my own lore writings. The best thing about the entry is what it implies outside of economics in my opinion and I'm going to actually pay more attention to how it develops now than I would have before posting. I am eternally scorned by autism to write out massive blobs of not lore while staring at the first paragraph of my own lore works like a recently diseased raccoon.
>>32456360
>>32458904
coward chamas, you hurt your own cause by feigning weakness and do more to create an idea of a clique by presenting anons with similar worries as weak willed and cowardly. Pull up your trousers, tighten your belt, and start critiquing other's work if you don't want the same people critiquing only each others works, either that or stop trying to revive feedback arguments because you make a reasonable position seem weak. If you don't answer the people directly asking to review your work than you have no right to complain about it not getting reviewed.
Your opponent being on slippery ground doesn't really matter if you're trying to fight them in quicksand or something i dont know, just be less whiny.

you cant prove who made this thread
Anchor post for issues to be voted on next time.

>Vote Results
https://rentry.org/t7gqwu (most recent)
https://rentry.org/b5gex
https://rentry.org/44do6
https://rentry.org/np9ke
>Bylaws
https://rentry.org/kuygt
>Vote post archive
https://rentry.org/ofx2x

- - -
Note:
> For the Anon who owns the bylaws rentry please change it in accordance with the latest voting results

>>31608247
I like Foggy Mountain Breakdown.

>>31364341
>Honest question, are you a bad writer if you cannot make ways to use chuubanite
No.