/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>49244263
>wow, grats my dude. You hitting the big time.
Ty. Although the gens that got his attention where from all the back when we used good shit because the poses were more interesting kek
>>49243569
>I actually hadn't considered the "big monopolies like disney springboarding the copyright argument" angle at all, and I think that's a very compelling one that would honestly spur a lot of artists in the direction of support for it... you know since the VAST majority of artists -fucking despise- the existence of Disney nowadays.
Exactly. Like look at what this artist friend is saying here >>49244530
>His main point was AI art was stealing artist's works without their permission and compensation and that AI art derived from their work should have to pay royalties
Meanwhile there's a ton of art created using copyrights of which the artist does not own the IP for (see: Disney characters). If AI artists have to pay compensation for using another artists intellectual property, the next step is obviously that artist will have to pay mega corporations for using their intellectual property too. Additionally, any fines against AI artists might be a big deal for someone like you or me but these fines will be practically pennies for big corporations. So not only are companeis like Disney using AI as a way to increase their control off copyright, they're also the best postioned to take advantage of any restrictions on AI in the future.