/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>63004180
>there's nothing proving that cover forces them to stream due to these fan coordinated harassment campaigns
I mean yea, if you wanna say that conveniently, in all of these instances, when people started spamming and loudly talking about [person here] ghosting for weeks-months in a row, and they suddenly come back when it gets super loud, is all coincidence with no proof, then yea you're not wrong.
It is all coincidence with no proof, no one /here/ can prove anything.
But it's a weird cooincidence that happens every single time fans get rowdy when the talent specifically just ghosts for months and they only "return" when fans get loud about it

>This thread
All this does is affirm the notion that complacency is the biggest killer for all creatives. They get a somewhat good inflow of money and fans and then the work gets mediocre.
I don't know what it'll take to reignite the spark but I hope it happens.

>>14692084