[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

Search:


View post   

>> No.41221162 [View]
File: 263 KB, 1196x1234, meatmap admin.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
41221162

>>41217513
Founder, I have some ideas for a way to streamline /meat/'s administration and government lore. Which are both lacking and fuzzy in some parts. Climeat and PG, if you guys are around you can join in. Non-/meat/ writers can chime in their thoughts if you wish.

>Problems
1. Assumptions of unitary government
Just like every other people who do not read, is that everyone assumed that /meat/ is one unitary state that bows down to the central government in Nacatlah.
2. Vague separation of power
While we established that /meat/ is a federation of multiple administratives, we have not fully flesh out these divisions which led to some confusion. Are these divisions states, districts, counties? To top it all of some are still in the dark about diplomacy as they assume that everything has to go through Nacatlah first, when in practice each division is free to carry out their diplomacy independently.

>Real life inspiration
We have established that /meat/ takes inspirations from the Aztec and the Norse. This is actually a great boon for us for these two powers have the solutions we need.
1. Triple Alliance
The Aztec/Mexica is NOT a single unitary power. It is in fact an alliance of THREE separate similarly likeminded powers (Tlacopan, Tetzcoco, Mexico) under the guidance of the tlatoani. In practice, these states are autonomous entirely, with the capital being the military leadership. The Hueytlatoani deals with external matters of the alliance, while the Cihuacoatl is the leader of each alliance member.
2. Norse Thing/Council of Four
We've established in lore that leadership is an elective theocracy, from the intelligentsia caste through merit, in a bottom-up hierachy.
Town clergy elects district clergy, elects state clergy, elects realm clergy.
However we have not established the system in whole.
In Aztec society, the Hueytlatoani is elected from the Council of Four. This inspiration fits seamlessly well with what we have. But instead of FOUR, it will be made up of the realmly ministers you have written prior; Rikitnahualli, Rikitlachixqui, Rikitlaeknir, Rikitpochteca, Rikitemachtiani, Rikitlalchiuhqui.
Recall the number of Realm Ministers, SIX.
But it needs one more function.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thing_(assembly)
In Norse society, legislative is done through an assembly, the thing. I propose that things are the method inn which the leaders are elected. A town thing elects the town clergy. A national thing elects the national leader, our Council of Four shall enter an alliance-wide allthing to elect the Rikittlatoani.

>Solutions
Supranational Theocracy
/meat/ is not a single unitary nation. Inspired by the Triple Alliance, it is in fact a supranational alliance of SIX separate clergy states;
- Nacatlah (Including the island of shadows)
- Nacatlan
- Matiriki
- Atoyavik
- Ryonaheim
- Namakubi
SIX separate states, SIX Realmly ministers. And our flag has SIX eyes.
The Realmly ministers ARE the leader of each clergy state (the Rikitlaeknir is the king-priest of Atoyavik etc) with the Rikittlatoani being the alliance leader, our EU chairman of sorts. Who are elected through things of varying stages.
Each state is allowed to freely carry out their tasks independently as long as they do not go against the Rikittlatoani. This clear separation of power will allow for more complex diplomacy and arrangements. Such as Matiriki being friendlier with /nasfaqg/ and /morig/, but Namakubi despises /nasfaqg/ and /morig/ for it is also a mercantile trade power being pestered by the Black Fleet.

That is my proposal for the confusion of our government and its administration.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]