/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>24539443
But noctyx (is that how you even spell it? the fuck comes up with these horrendous names?) also didn't do well as expected. The first lot from a company tends to do best and then you have to luck out on a Kobo.

>>24544910
No he is right, they've done much worse than the first batch. Chances are without a real star the next will follow the trend. Plus the first lot had a pretty poor start until they lucked out on the Chinese audience, not like their are infinite audiences to expand to. While NijiJP has successful men the numbers are top heavy as fuck. There are a selection of successful men and women, then a load of 2/3views. It is certainly not a company where any man is guaranteed a level of success, many get similar or worse numbers than stars.

Previous >>24472012

>>24455227
>Another question is, why not Noctyx? They clearly also have a good amount of chinese fans.
Surely this would mean any non-botting explanation is false? If it was just non-english/japanese fans, vpns or some bug then we'd see an equal effect with a second wave of Chinese focused streamers. Alternatively, if Fungus and the Fungals didn't do so great, well there would be fewer paying for bots. Still some, but a less noticeable effect.

>Yet none of their streams are like that at all.
No they do. Just less often, less extreme.

>>24437432
yes

So noctyx didn't perform as well as expected