/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>77251858
I inferred too much because your phrasing and overall idea pushed the concept that contracts were not involved during the setting up of the Offkai Expo event which is most certainly not true if those involved abided by any sort of standard. Contracts are seemingly invisible cause you agree to them without really realizing it. Like scrolling quickly through a EULA and just pressing "I agree", or the contract is implied via use of software. However, the legal rules and contract have to be cemented somewhere on some level in the case of a lawsuit.
>If I tell you "we should meet at this place for lunch", and I don't show up, am I breaking any laws?
No thats fucking stupid. Are you mentally deficient? My point is that by using any company's service you are agreeing to a contract. I said in my post that for example, by making a YouTube account, you are a agreeing to a legal contract saying you will abide by Google's rules or lose access to your account or face other repercussions.
By signing up as an offkai attendee for example, you agree to follow their rules or lose access to the event you paid for. For example, if they have a rule that says no harassment, and you violate that rule, then the fact that you paid to attend gets voided since you violated your end.
I feel like you're arguing for the sake of argument at this point, there's a difference between two people meeting up for lunch and two organizations entering a legal agreement to sponsor or collaborate with money being exchanged.
>The Constitution will not deflect a bullet, it's just a piece of paper.
It's defended by patriots who will step in the line of fire before the paper is hit. People who want to live in an orderly society and not chaos where anyone can do anything at anytime.
>>77251872
That doesn't mean there are no contracts however, the venue would require a contract. Like I said above, there are contractual agreements. Obviously there's some legal scuff, but there are contracts in place on some level.
>>77252001
You're right that was an impressive event, I'm just saying that much of the digital infrastructure is likely from other services, such as the stream being hosted on YT potentially, I really don't know. It was a good event.

>>75967387
guar?

>>75843752
i guess so

>>75809412
yes the most based of them all

>>75621554
I think if you have physical effects like a super fast heart beat or sweating, or if you wake up but are sort of half asleep but still feeling the fear from the dream. I have dozens of stories of horrific nightmares and sleep paralysis. Just this week I had a nightmare so surreal and personalized to be as horrific as possible that I truly believe it was a demonic force infecting my mind and concocting the truly worst scenario for me.

>>75455904
Come oooon anon, what are you so busy with?! Surely you can at least listen with headphones and your phone

>>74835082
you watch males?

>>73865947

stop UUUUUUU'ing

stop UUUUUUU'ing

we live in a sick world, bros