/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>22255186
>It's organic and changing, and I agree that it's not a perfect metric, but it's a hell of a lot better than anything else i've seen.
Some hubris you've got there, I'll assume what you did is "better than anything else" you saw because you never seen anything else at all.

What you are doing is exactly what Social blade does, see for instance
https://socialblade.com/youtube/compare/UCckdfYDGrjojJM28n5SHYrA/UCHsx4Hqa-1ORjQTh9TYDhww
for the Kiara / Vox comparison.

Look at pic related and understand why you are being called a retard: you spent an inordinate time to reinvent SocialBlade subs comparison, and it shares the same flaw
>it uses a linear extrapolation
when, in reality, the growth tapers off after a while.

The thing is: you are not even wrong, despite not being right. Maybe Vox will catch up to Kiara in October, maybe he will catch up with her even earlier, maybe he will take longer but a linear extrapolation of his current growth means fuck all.