/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>43727929
Lurking

>>42338707

I could go for some soup right now

Does this game end at the New Years party?

>Dead on Arrival MV coming
neat!

>>29971598
Mahjongchads? Is it our time to solve piracy one ron at a time?
>>29972112
What is that about being unable to pursue trade in /nasfaqg/? /nasfaqg/ conducts its trade globally and locally.
>>29999320
/meat/ probably has surprisingly little presence in /nasfaqg/ due to practical reasons: culturally, /nasfaqg/ is a hyper-mutative environment, where everything becomes a quick fad, spawns four cultural descendants, and then dies with a tiny number of people who stick to it. /meat/'s cult would get 5 different heresies immediately that'd start proselytizing in other nations, carving away at their own networks. It's a 'cancer gets cancer' situation. A lot of major religions from other countries have some weird /nasfaqg/ offshoots.
>>30015962
/nasfaqg/ will not enter into a military cooperation/alliance outside of protecting trade, whatever it may take.
>threatens our sovereignty
You mean, your foreign invasions, state-funded piracy, and rampant imperailism? I don't see a tariff zone hurting anyone's sovereignty.
>>30016872
As Clocks said, there are a lot of companies like that in /nasfaqg/, you could set up an Onobot venture capital company in one of the /nasfaqg/ cities and probably write some companies into existence.
>>30017290
/2434/ and /nasfaqg/ have a trade agreement, and I didn't think /morig/ nor /infinity/ had major issues trading with you. Moreover, think of what the Nijilands have done in the past, and how that would have impacted the world if any thread took the extremely imperialistic and protectionist stance you have.
>>30017628
Piracy primarily relies in quick strikes, not open sea battles. The sea already has a lot of /ahoy/ pirates, /ahoy/-rented privateers, and also /vnug/ + /kr/ pirates. I don't think it's possible to eliminate piracy in full.
>>30018290
For the record, Tripoint had no involvement in /pcg/ since several years before the /2434/-/pcg/ war. I have suggested that there logically would be smugglers in the lands if it was profitable, at a small scale, to which suggestion /2434/ overreacted completely and retroactively closed off their ports, massively exacerbating the problem. >>30018468 is correct that if the trade is closed off in /pcg/, meaning that there is both free trade with /2434/ and closed ports in /pcg/, then some /nasfaqg/ merchants, primarily smaller companies and mercenaries, would massively profiteer for this, with larger companies getting involved if the deal was not retroactive and instead /nasfaqg/ was operating in those lands for a time before they were barred from their investments, then you'd have much larger companies conducting espionage and sabotage to get them back.

Moreover, I'd like to state that it was a purely hypothetical situation where I wanted to offer the Phase rep more tools to write the war, if he wanted.
>>30018634
>>30018862
Correct.
>>30019459
?????
>>30019540
Some people really, really need to chill out. Apparently even suggesting that smuggling would happen in trade-locked regions is a declaration of war now, to a very specific group of posters.
>>30020536
Refer to the above. a) Tripoint was not involved in phase, b) I suggested a perfectly natural consequence of the setup that was put in place, and I have downscaled/backed off it when it was clear that you as the /pcg/ rep did not want it involved.
Trying to conflate me with Tripoint, then Tripoint with /nasfaqg/ overall is plainly wrong.
>>30020936
I'd like to highlight the fact that Alice has instantly altered a deal on behalf of a thread because someone discussed a meta-thing without in-universe consequences.

I'll be real with you, I was supposed to be off and resting today, and having this stupid drama made ex nihilo isn't exactly ideal.