/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>45876314


You lack sufficient IQ to carry this logic to its natural conclusion, because it's a sword that cuts both ways.

If they don't owe you anything, then you don't owe them anything either.
Everytime a simp tries to defend against criticism with the last argument of simps, '[content creator] does not owe you anything', the unspoken corollary is 'but YOU are still on the hook for THEM', and that you must consoom regardless or quality, content, or circumstance, or at the lest never publicly object to this process.
Actually, no, you don't. They have the 'right' to do whatever they want; and patrons have the 'right' to leave them as broke washed-out 1views in turn.

>>44418951
>>44419235
>>44419799
I can't imagine working sun up to sun down for just enough until you die, coming home to someone who's been getting railed out in your bed while you're at work, and your (probably isn't) kid are at school all for a cut of your own money and no intimacy