/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>29885590
What do you think

uuuuuuuuhhh bros?...

>>3980737
it's a pretty obvious conclusion. it removes the birth-made identifiable physical aspect of the feminine or masculine state. big breasts, small breasts, huge chin, no chin -- it matters little. what matters most is your vocals and personality, as well as intelligence.

i greatly enjoy that v-tubers don't have to worry about anything they say being tied down to their real self. i enjoy that everybody knows their oshi won't fuck them and could be ugly as hell.
why?
because i'm sick of horn dogs ruining the relationship between men and women online. why would a woman want to be a normal streamer when they know their purse will be heavier if they wear a revealing top?
those dumbass fuckheads ruined female streamers. and now it's back again. don't be mistaken, part of why v-tubers are so great is the filtering of retards and fuck wits. yes, you still get horny or simp. but it's not the same, we both know it. there is no real revealing cleavage, it's just a drawing.

i have a mentally disabled person in my life who genuinely just goes after almost every woman he can. it is really quite sad to look at. he gets about 250 dollars a month and some months it all goes to random women online in hopes he'll somehow score some. i fucking hate that. both that people like him enable this shit and that people are all too happy to make some dough on his basic nature.

sorry this is a bit scattered but it's such a basic assumption in my mind... the simpler things are, at least to one's self, often the harder they get to expand on.

>>3912751