/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>33845444
>>33845553
Besides you being a porn riddled coomer, its also worth noting porn is one of the single worst representations of reality out there. They also use angles and perspective to make dicks look bigger or smaller. Go outside it'll be good for you

>>33787665
NO

>>33772213
This entire board just plain forgets or ignores shit that happened two or three days ago. We're long past the 'retarded' stage.

>>33754602
What's your favorite color, Name? For writing purposes.

>>33535798
>

>>33472259
No it's not

>>33268383
forgot your picture

>>33259578
First, let’s define what the word wet means. The word wet is defined as, “Covered with, or saturated with liquid (such as water).” Using this definition, we will attempt to prove why water cannot be wet. I believe that water feels wet, but is not in and of itself wet. The nature of something being wet, means that the water on the surface of it can be dried. If you go out in the rain, then your hair gets wet, but if you go inside and dry it, the wetness is removed. Water cannot be removed from water or else the water itself ceases to exist. To make something wet is an ability that water has, but it is impossible for water to become saturated with itself. If you poured water onto water, you wouldn’t say that the water has become wet, you would just continue to call it water. To continue with this logic, let’s define the word saturated. The word saturated can be defined as, “(a substance) to combine with, dissolve, or hold the greatest possible quantity of another substance.” Based off this logic, one substance cannot become saturated with itself. Since the word wet is defined as being saturated with a substance, it is impossible for water to be wet. Water can saturate things and can also be saturated by other substances, but it is impossible for it to be wet.

Another train of thought we can pursue similarly is with fire. Fire can burn things, but it itself is not burned. If something is burned, that means that it has come into contact with fire. If fire comes into contact with itself, it just becomes a larger fire. Water holds the same qualities, it can make things wet, but since it cannot be saturated with itself, it is not possible for it to be wet.

>She felt the gura warmth on those spoons

>gura project is just her twitch channel where she becomes react andy

Oui

>>32697581
you're gay

>>32612441
Takos..

You are now aware that you are sharing this board with 15 yeard olds from reddit that came to screech and virtue signal about womens liberation in the world of Vtubing.
Another hobby completely ruined by normies.

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact "World of Linux," or as I refer to it, "Linux Fantasy XIV." Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather a role-playing game around which those with no accomplishments can desperately form some sort of identity. You start off with your OS in an incomplete state, then you perform easily searchable, tedious manual quests trying to piece it together into something that is barely functional for a small set of tasks. Other Linux players congratulate you on playing the game and on your level progression, giving you a real sense of accomplishment for your virtual progress.

If you thought you were getting a real OS, you just don't understand Linux.

>>32140952
First, let’s define what the word wet means. The word wet is defined as, “Covered with, or saturated with liquid (such as water).” Using this definition, we will attempt to prove why water cannot be wet. I believe that water feels wet, but is not in and of itself wet. The nature of something being wet, means that the water on the surface of it can be dried. If you go out in the rain, then your hair gets wet, but if you go inside and dry it, the wetness is removed. Water cannot be removed from water or else the water itself ceases to exist. To make something wet is an ability that water has, but it is impossible for water to become saturated with itself. If you poured water onto water, you wouldn’t say that the water has become wet, you would just continue to call it water. To continue with this logic, let’s define the word saturated. The word saturated can be defined as, “(a substance) to combine with, dissolve, or hold the greatest possible quantity of another substance.” Based off this logic, one substance cannot become saturated with itself. Since the word wet is defined as being saturated with a substance, it is impossible for water to be wet. Water can saturate things and can also be saturated by other substances, but it is impossible for it to be wet.

Another train of thought we can pursue similarly is with fire. Fire can burn things, but it itself is not burned. If something is burned, that means that it has come into contact with fire. If fire comes into contact with itself, it just becomes a larger fire. Water holds the same qualities, it can make things wet, but since it cannot be saturated with itself, it is not possible for it to be wet.

No