/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>>>>>>>>>Cry me a fucking river you whore.
>>>>>>>>>>I don't give a shit about doxx and I sincerely hope some lunatic schizo doesn't take things to far someday, BUT, you're a public figure on the internet, you ARE going to get shit on by thousands of people.
>>>>>>>>>>Grow a fucking spine and learn to ignore it.

>i understand and agree that is bullshit but when most lolicon get hyperdefensive about an individual's opinion on them, it shows insecurities in their beliefs on the matter, especially when nyanners isnt the one bringing the opinion up, its literally anytime shes brought up by anyone someone brings it up, living rentfree.
>if you want to just enjoy your lolis that fine but you should fully understand the price of doing so means people will see you as a pedo, you may not be a true pedo but being a psudo-pedo is more then enough for people to dislike you.
>anon... thats literally part of my whole point. art is art but art does affect people, not into becoming child molesters obviously but it does affect how you see the world.
>Lolis are designed to give off child-like qualities like how chibis do, so people equating the lolis to children is intentional to the design.
>some people do not like the idea of a child-like beings being lewded, fictional or not.
>the sooner lolicons who get offended at the accusation get over it the better because its not going to go away and arguing is just a circle of "I-im not a pedo because they're fictional" and when anyone points out the flaws in that argument they just repeat the same shit again in hopes enforcing their point will get people to stop arguing with them.
>at this point i hate lolicons more for their retardation disillusionment with what fiction is then i care about the morals of lolis.
>my point was to point out the why in why she doesnt like lewd lolis, the argument is always the same shit about fiction and what not but no one asks why would she have the opinion she does and why she disavowed her old fans, people get stuck so much on the loli part but ignore the rest of her reasoning.
>whether or not you think those reasons are justified doesnt matter, my point is that the whole context is important for make up an opinion, not just one part people decided to focus in on.
>and if what >>8233048 says is to be believed, the idea she posted herself nude as a child would make her connecting lewd lolis to herself even more likely, she clearly hates herself so her hate of lewd lolis may not just be a moral but also a self-hatred fulled reason too.