/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>21357623
>a thread celeb said he didn't like it and that was enough to get people against it. no argument, no discussion.
>miss me with that shit.
You first. After you read this >>10605733
>this one, along with the smart fandead one, are the only good arguments against it.
All of the explanations have been saying the same thing - differently. Sometimes in not as many words. The fact that you couldn't understand them makes them poor explanations for you, not bad arguments. None of the walls of text no offense intended, (You) all just have far more patience left than I do and I salute you for it written beyond "all coins will eventually equalize" offer anything that isn't implied by that very fucking sentence to anyone who can answer "yes" to
>did you even finish highschool?
>>21357806
It's in the thread where it was originally brought up. The entire "discussion" has been based on a false premise that nobody bothered checking, and letting this nigger continue to carry on sperging out and wasting everyone's time. We danced.
>>21357819
How do we know it isn't Inaposter? see: >>21357889