/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>63469207
this soundpost contains him unironically saying non binary

Am I missing something here? All he said was that he doesn't sexualize underage characters, and that he prefers that characters are sexy as an actual part of their character as oppressed to just being shallow fan-service.

I interoperate "characters that don't have a say in it" as it being thrust upon them as part of their role in the story, not literally asking a fictional character if its ok to sexaulize them. Something like slave Leia for example.

Nonbinary stuff aside, was this really such an offensive take? Even the dramafags are starting to jump in on it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALouniQSq4I
I get that there are a ton of twittertards who actually can't distinguish fiction from reality, but that's not the vibe I got here.

>>63421170
Cruze

>>63342931