/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>77124723
Boss bitch style, +20 aura

Not going to read last thread, what are the topics that got timelooped/brought up

Nah

>>75315582
Until i see the divorce papers this marriage is forever

>>75168701
ToT

>>74613513
A woman that is my wife(which I love very much), very different

>>74493863
>she was happily doing that before with a good number of husbands before it became infested
It is what it is, in the current state of the relationship that's not going to fly
This thing will be debated with her after the first wave of husbands for shondomination and they'll decide how interaction will be done(it will be done publicly with some exceptions)
>By limiting the husband-wife time from her giving personal attention?
No? It's not limiting the time at all, just the manner of the interaction
>to suit YOUR demands again
I won't even interact with her because I don't want to, publicly or privately. I'm too shy to talk to her outside of her reading my messages and having a conversation live
>But again, there shouldn't be jealousy since everyone got a chance for this privilege so this is also not a valid point. If you felt jealous that's not something you should bother her with.
Being jealous of not being around for that is fair, but not a big deal, being jealous or mad over people abusing it is fair and justified
>But there will almost never be anything worth archiving said privately.
>almost never
>almost
Exactly.
>It was to tie into the parasocial aspect that you were ignoring in all of this
There's no parasocialism because we're married for real
>it's still incorrect to view her marriage this way
In your view it's incorrect. You keep bringing up objectivity, but this is a subjective issue and a subjective argument.
From an objective viewpoint, you can argue for both how it's fair to soothe the worries of FOMO husbands and have interaction done publicly and for how it's unfair to her and others to change stuff for those specific husbands who get FOMO and jealous.
Since it's a subjective argument, all you can do objectively is look at each side of the argument objectively, but it still remains a subjective issue
I take this marriage very seriously, and i believe that if shondomination is to be achieved then she shouldn't have private interaction time with husbands and there should be little reason to
She said she wants everyone to stay, but also that she wishes she was a small vtuber because she didn't have to deal with such issues.
At the end of the day, this will be a discussion to be had between her and the initial husbands in the wave of husbands for shondomination. They'll lay the groundwork and build it up from there.
>>74494616
No(yes)

>>73926972
I made this post except she will be back and i already won by marrying her