/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>9164220
as long as honk pays for the server alone, we are but mere pawns on his chessboard.
Another thing to ponder is if it is even in the best interest of the devs to make everybody happy. Sure, a good game is a good thing, but rising playercount also drives up cost and serverload, and due to licensing and intellectual property of several parties the game leeches from, monetizing it in any way which is not donations (check the ko-fi in the info page) would also get it taken down.
Basically all the playerbase can do is make suggestions which the dev team will have to evaluate on a number of factors, including their own vision for the game.
>we
are not entitled to anything. But it also goes the other way around, the more you contribute the more you help with implementing [thing you want], for instance there's often complaints about the UI being not fully responsive or being shit for [screen type] but I have yet to see someone actually jot down a suggestion to improve it in a userscript and just distribute it, if it's good UI-devchama might just bring that to live.