/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>25489960
just because there's a market of it doesn't mean it would actually be lucrative. Remember that all who hold of the keys of power have basically banned any right wing thought from their domain. Almost all Internet-related companies are ought to follow an unwritten rule against all content that slants into any non-mainstream right wing thought. If you haven't seen the absolute dystopia that is web 3.0, you are either living in a rock, a fucking fed on the lookout, or a stupid fucking lolbert who sucks off corporate dick

>>21753796
That sucks.