[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

Search:


View post   

>> No.33257603 [View]
File: 167 KB, 850x1249, mori eeehhhh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
33257603

>>33251119
I like this idea in principle, but I have one issue and one remark.

First, the remark: maybe try to involve the threads themselves rather than individual reps when it comes to map placement, or rather try to have the reps consult it with their home threads. Otherwise, some nations might be permanently located at a place only one person has chosen - yes, I know that right now countries don't really choose where they are placed, but it's much easier to be dissatisfied with "wrong" placement when a decision could have been made. This also plays into what the Lunaito said - by placing the burden on the thread in question rather than a single person, you could avoid that incentive. Plus, people who'd swing by their own thread wouldn't say "hey does anyone want to write for our project from your thread" but rather "hey, I'm writing for our thread in /vtwbg/, any preferences to the location"? Additionally, I'd want to encourage nations to write a short overview of their thread and culture before choosing their placement to avoid situations where the barely any lore is written, yet space is claimed. If they go inactive afterwards, c'est la vie, but at least the nation will be "alive" in this world.

The issue: wouldn't that make some areas of the world completely barren? I feel like people will pick places closer to other nations, which will lead into very "blobbed" developed areas. How would the provincial system address that, if it is the case?

>> No.21944395 [View]
File: 167 KB, 850x1249, mori eeehhhh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21944395

All of you talk big game with the "mating press", but let's see you top the trading section in the Returns Report before you try topping anything else. Put in some effort, will ya? I cannot take it seriously otherwise.

>> No.19373852 [View]
File: 167 KB, 850x1249, mori eeehhhh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19373852

>>19373829
Wait, why are you using my filename?

>> No.18109895 [View]
File: 167 KB, 850x1249, mori eeehhhh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18109895

>>18109709
Oi. I still haven't processed what the hell happened, don't hit me with this filename.

>> No.17724078 [View]
File: 167 KB, 850x1249, mori eeehhhh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17724078

>>17723856
Huh?

>> No.17667380 [View]
File: 167 KB, 850x1249, mori eeehhhh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17667380

>>17667275
Huh? I didn't do anything. What?

>> No.17183152 [View]
File: 167 KB, 850x1249, mori eeehhhh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17183152

>>17183060
Applause, what the fuck.

>> No.15839523 [View]
File: 167 KB, 850x1249, mori eeehhhh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15839523

>>15839453
Oi. This implies I'd throw during tactically invalid times which is also not true.

>> No.14588342 [View]
File: 167 KB, 850x1249, mori eeehhhh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14588342

>>14588321
stfu, spaghet

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]