[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

Search:


View post   

>> No.75474543 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 1.25 MB, 1440x2355, Screenshot_20240423-103629.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
75474543

>>75473968
Cute
Here's her viewership from January btw

>> No.74470415 [View]
File: 1.25 MB, 1440x2355, Screenshot_20240423-103629.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
74470415

>>74469887
Jan stats for comparison

>> No.74342737 [View]
File: 1.25 MB, 1440x2355, Screenshot_20240423-103629.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
74342737

>>74337412
Lol no she was hovering in the 3k range before this so her actual viewership got cut by half

>> No.74336183 [View]
File: 1.25 MB, 1440x2355, Screenshot_20240423-103629.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
74336183

>>74336018
No it's a full 2k below the numbers she used to get

>> No.74289946 [View]
File: 1.25 MB, 1440x2355, Screenshot_20240423-103629.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
74289946

>>74289894
Funnily enough she got about the same numbers from her return stream as she did on her streams prior to the 12th, and then she quickly dropped off to sub 1k

>> No.74270123 [View]
File: 1.25 MB, 1440x2355, Screenshot_20240423-103629.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
74270123

>>74269967
Closer to 2k, but yeah turns out the negligible impact wasn't so negligible after all

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]