/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

>>49004024
>Gen5 stronk
>>49004445
>So what you're saying is that sub growth stagnate a lot faster
It is clearly proportional to the time passed since debut. It is obvious too, the more time passed, the more time to acrue more subs and offset the first four months.

Here is an attempt to "normalize" that data, and take the ratio in question per the ratio between 4 months and months since debut
>pic related
It shows
>IRyS and Ame
then
>Gura, Ina and Kiara
then
>Kronii and Laplus
with a very "top heavy" set of subs, while
>Koyori and Nene
then
>Zeta, Kaela and Kobo
with a slower start and a late pickup

Of course that's a rough normalization, subs don't evolve linearly but it provides for a crude way to compare and changing the function wouldn't significantly change the relative positions between them