/vt/ - Virtual Youtubers

I know it's against the rules but I'm going to do a mean and unironic tierlist for the aspies.

First I'll explain the tiers/terms. "Unique" is a tier that is self explanatory, but I should say that I think uniqueness exceeds issues of 'scuff/quality' here, which is why I put it on top. "Scuff" here means 'overall quality and production value', so I took into account overlay, microphone and video quality, presence of absence of significant dead air, and so on. I put "low scuff" below "good content" because I think good content defeats any minor quality/production issues as long as the overall quality is passable.

Also I tried to keep my personal tastes out of the rating (so I didn't dock or add points for my personal taste in design of the avatar for instance).

Unique:

Odette - she is a unique experience, and if you don't like it that is fine, but that unique experience is a serious draw for anyone who does like it.

Nelson - similar to Odette. I had not seen Nelson yet so I watched 10-20minutes of his content on x2 speed, so this rating isn't fully informed, but from what I saw his approach is very unique compared to the average chuuba.

Low Scuff, Good Content: Basically everything seems to be in place and they have interesting discussions/personality. Nothing to say about the specific people here.

Good Content: As above, interesting discussions or personality but there are some aspects of microphone, overlay, or dead air, or something else like that that detract slightly from the experience.

Low Scuff: This means that their mic, video, overlay and lack of dead air are all good but they're a bit plain in terms of the actual discussion and their personality. I put Mona here but they currently don't have an overlay. You don't need an overlay but if they did add an overlay that wasn't very good I'd drop them to passable. Reda, I'm actually surprised. So many people shit on Reda and put him very low on tier lists, I guess it's just antis or babi haters? His setup and production is actually really good, and they're very good at keeping the air alive despite having basically a completely dead chat in most of the random clips/vods I skimmed. When he does have people in chat he is very engaged and responsive to chat. The only issue I see is that he just seems soft spoken and not the typical loud/boisterous streamer personality, not a jokester/comedian, so comes across somewhat plain/chill.

'Passable' means basically that there is nothing so glaringly bad that it needs to be fixed or people literally won't even show up, or will leave instantly. Basically your mic isn't so bad that people will instant leave, the video quality isn't so fucked that people can't watch you, etc. It's actually a very good place to start at, and you can definitely easily work up to the other tiers. The difference between the tiers is not that large. Everyone in this tier would move to 'Low Scuff' if they up some of their production quality, none of them had content or personality at a level to jump into Good Content. They all come across as basically 'regular people playing games'.

Couldn't find: Couldn't find that dude.

Unwatchable: I'm impressed and surprised I didn't have to put anyone here. A lot of new chuubas go in this spot. I guess /asp/ helped them out pretty well.

If I missed an aspie let me know.