/vr/ - Retro Games

[Anonymous No.8708736]

In my opinion, Crash Bandicoot 1 aged better than Mario 64.

[Anonymous No.8708743]

>>8708736
Sonic Adventure aged better than both.

[Anonymous No.8708750]

>>8708743
Too bad that the vast majority of people played the shitty gamecube port, and not the original Dreamcast version.

[Anonymous No.8708776]

Sonic Adventure, Crash Bandicoot, and Super Mario 64 did not age. They were great on release date and they're great now.

[Anonymous No.8708823]

>>8708736
No. Your opinion is shit.

[Anonymous No.8708838]

>>8708823
I just think Crash bandicoot 1 has stronger level design than Mario 64.

[Anonymous No.8708845]

>>8708736

Super Mario 64 is better just for the fact that you don't have to collect tokens to go to a bonus level just so you can save your game.

[Anonymous No.8708860]

>>8708845
Yeah, I will admit that Crash 1's saving system is jank, but thanks to emulators and save states, that flaw can be bypassed now and the game's strengths can truly shine now.

[Anonymous No.8708878]

>>8708776
In my opinion, Alex Kidd games aged better than Sonic Adventure, Crash Bandicoot, and Super Mario 64

[Anonymous No.8708898]

>>8708878
Until you play CalArts Kidd(tm) in Soulless World DX(c)

[Anonymous No.8708903]

Crash is not even that good of a Hugo clone.
Jumping Flash>Mario 64>Floating Runner>>>>>>>not even real 3D platformers>>>>>>Crash

[Anonymous No.8708916]

>>8708736
>>8708743
Replayed them all in the past few years 100%ing and thoroughly enjoyed them all.

[Anonymous No.8708925]

>>8708903
What makes you think this?
What do you not like about Crash Bandicoot?

[Anonymous No.8708938]

>>8708743
>>8708903
End your life.

[Anonymous No.8708994]

>>8708743
Fpbp

[Anonymous No.8709001]

>>8708736
>Crash Bandicoot 1
>Mario 64

Why choose between shit and shit?

[Anonymous No.8709031]

>>8709001
Some people like Bandicoots more than plumbers.

[Anonymous No.8709065]

>>8708838
CB is an on rails game, basically 2.5D. you can't really compare the level design directly.

[Anonymous No.8709127]

>>8708736
It was less ambitious. Not hard to fuck up if you barely even pioneer anything besides a couple of toys to life.

[Anonymous No.8709128]

>>8708743
>>8708750
here's the (you) now out

[Anonymous No.8709132]

>>8709128
Sonic Adventure dreamcast aged better than Sonic Adventure DX

[Anonymous No.8709134]

>>8708736
In my opinion you should kill yourself

[Anonymous No.8709139]

>>8709134
No arguments, I see.

[Anonymous No.8709140]

>>8708736
I'd agree in terms of controls, but that mostly has to do with the fact that Crash's moveset is far simpler than Mario's.

Mario 64's design has aged a lot better. Crash really doesn't do that much with the fact it's a 3-D game and requiring you don't die to get gems in a game designed to be difficult is bullshit straight out of the "How do we make a 60mb file worth $60" days.

[Anonymous No.8709626]

[Anonymous No.8709631]

>>8708878
Maybe Miracle World and it was bloody hard. I couldn't get into the rest.

[Anonymous No.8709689]

In my opinion, Pitfall aged better than Mario 64.

[Anonymous No.8709707]

>>8708878
Alex the Kid is very underrated.

[Anonymous No.8709890]

>>8709127

Naughty Dog's ethos hasn't changed in 25 years. They put their entire focus into production values while not breaking any mold in terms of gameplay.

That famous making-of blog post goes into heavy detail about their elaborate animation systems and per-pixel occlusion culling but when it gets to the gameplay it's mostly "we just copied what DKC did and then flipped the perspective".

[Anonymous No.8710002]

>>8709031
Do bandicoots wear ties?

[Anonymous No.8710180]

>>8710002
probably not.

[Anonymous No.8711605]

>>8708878
>comparing 2d games to 3d games

[Anonymous No.8711667]

I have a big soft spot for the original Crash. There's just something about the music and atmosphere that I didn't feel with Crash 2 and 3.

[Anonymous No.8711710]

[Anonymous No.8712235]