/vr/ - Retro Games

[Anonymous No.8212237]

Which console had the definitive version of Rayman 2?

[Anonymous No.8212239]

>>8212237
The Dreamcast version of course

[Anonymous No.8212249]

>>8212239
/thread

[Anonymous No.8212273]

>>8212237
Dreamcast = 3DS > PS2 > PC > N64 > PSX > DS > iOS

[Anonymous No.8212284]

Dreamcast is the only correct answer.

[Anonymous No.8212287]

>>8212237
n64 version is king

[Anonymous No.8212289]

>>8212287
wtf

[Anonymous No.8212291]

>>8212287
the cultists have arrived

[Anonymous No.8212293]

>>8212239
>>8212284
Dreamcast version has no voice acting.

[Anonymous No.8212296]

>>8212293
No voice acting = Soul

[Anonymous No.8212314]

When it comes to overall graphics and feel, the Dreamcast version wins out. Doesn't have voice acting, but you ain't missing much.

[Anonymous No.8212680]

>>8212273
>Dreamcast > PC > 3DS > N64 > PS2 > PS1 > DS > iOS

Fix'd.

[Anonymous No.8212695]

>>8212287
If we're talking 5th gen purely it wins.

>>8212291
Kill urself

[Anonymous No.8212732]

N64 (original) and Dreamcast (remake/enhanced port) are the only versions that matter.

[Anonymous No.8212745]

>>8212732
It's a shame the 2D proto demo is only unlockable in the otherwise forgettable PS1 version.

[Anonymous No.8212753]

>>8212293
>>8212314
>voice acting
Literally the worst thing that happened to gaming.

[Anonymous No.8212763]

>>8212293
That's a good thing.

[Anonymous No.8212793]

>>8212273
>>8212680
Didn't the 3DS version have a major bug affecting 100% completion? Why are you ranking it so high?

[Anonymous No.8212871]

>>8212237
How many threads are going to ask this same exact question?
The answer is the PS1 version.
The true "all killer, no filler" experience.
Anyone who says otherwise is just a graphics whore.

[Anonymous No.8212915]

>>8212293
Raymanise IS voice acting, you mong!

[Anonymous No.8213458]

>all posts about the Dreamcast version
>it's missing content, but that's okay
What the actual fuck

[Anonymous No.8213472]

>>8213458
>missing content
That's the gimped PS1 port.

[Anonymous No.8213731]

>>8212293

[Anonymous No.8213741]

>>8212237
PC is the best version. The minor improvements of the Dreamcast are undermined by poor design changes, like adding more combat.

[Anonymous No.8214001]

>>8213458
is the voice acting really that significant to you that you'd play an inferior version just to have it?
i'm also fairly certain michel ancel has said that the dc version was closest to his original vision

[Anonymous No.8214849]

>>8212237
The Dreamcast version might technically be the best but I always preferred the N64 version's level selection screen. There's just something about it that I can't really describe.

[Anonymous No.8214856]

>>8213458
>missing content
huh?

[Anonymous No.8214871]

Objectively teh PS2 version is the ideal version of the game. Key word is "ideal". Because of it's limitations that is the PS2, there's issues. But that can be fixed, it's called emulation

And because of that, DC native is the only direct competition it has. But becase I prefer narration/hub world/world building over Mario inspired level select maps n shiet, PS2 is the only one that matters.

[Anonymous No.8215324]

>>8212291
>two people argue for "Dreamcast version is the best" before the post you replied, and no problem
>one person says the same for the N64 version, but Nintendo BAD
You need actual meds for your issues, not HRT, anon.

[Anonymous No.8216965]

All I know is when I feel like playing Rayman 2 I boot up my N64. It's so soulful I've never felt the need to explore other versions.

[Anonymous No.8218490]

>>8212237
Dreamcast, no doubt. Widescreen support, 60 fps, overworld map, no specialized edition tier of bullshit.