[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vr/ - Retro Games

View post   

File: 40 KB, 640x480, worlddriver_image3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7771334 No.7771334 [Reply] [Original]

>"PSX had better graphics than N64-"

>> No.7771338

Your post makes no sense. The statement was made in full, so how is this image interrupting anything? Please try again.

>> No.7771490

>Posts graphically mediocre PS1 game
Okay... and?

>> No.7771701

one job

>> No.7771708

How embarrassing.

>> No.7771710

but that looks like shite m8 innit

>> No.7771713

who says this though?? most people hold an opinion that n64 had better graphics, and isn't that how it was marketed too?

>> No.7771880

Why is the difference between PS1 and N64 less than the difference between N64 and Dreamcast?

>> No.7771897

N64 games would look great if it wasn't for the bilinear filtering. The console being unabe to ouput RBG signal natively didn't help as well.

>> No.7771905

PS1 had better lighting, better video effects, better particle effects, only problem was that it warped the textures.

>> No.7771906
File: 376 KB, 1280x960, alKCKFT.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>N64 games would look great if it wasn't for the bilinear filtering.

>> No.7771920
File: 110 KB, 1280x960, PSXGT4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>PSX had better graphics than N64
Yeah? No shit. Unless you're saying that blurry turd you posted looks better than this. The PSX was literally a generation ahead of the N64. Fucking idiot.

>> No.7771931

game wouldn't have looked like that in 1998, kiddo
people played on CRT TVs in case you ignore it, youg boi

>> No.7771934
File: 17 KB, 265x376, Gran_Turismo_4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>Gran Turismo 4 in the bottom right corner
This is a PS2 game, an actual generation ahead of N64.

>> No.7771939
File: 4 KB, 411x60, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

What do you think a PSX is? You fucking retard.

>> No.7771941

Do you know what backwards compatibility is, retard?

>> No.7771948
File: 36 KB, 720x435, 1598681762158.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>it's another PS1/PSX autist
This thread is doomed.

>> No.7771956

On paper N64 could push polygons way more effectively than PSX (fuck poser above with his obscure DVR), but many programmers struggled to achieve good results effectively. Add on top of this blurry low-res textures widespread in vast majority of games and you get the impression that PlayStation had better graphics.

>> No.7772017

The fuck does that have to do with the N64 being more powerful than the PSX? It's demonstrably fucking not. You fucking idiot. Shut the fuck up.

>> No.7772029

PSX and PS1 mean the same fucking thing! Why do you think all the emulators have PSX in their titles? ePSXe, pSX, PCSX, PSXeven.

>> No.7772035

Anon can't grasp the concept of homonyms.

>> No.7772053
File: 46 KB, 806x629, PS1RE1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Resident Evil 1 on PS1/PSX has better graphics than any N64 game even though the PSX came out before the N64 was released.

>> No.7772056

Do the world a favor and kill yourself before you pollute the gene pool

>> No.7772059

No it doesn't. This doesn't even look better than Turok 1 which is an early n64 game

>> No.7772062

It's okay anon he's baiting. Don't worry about that autist.

>> No.7772063

>Resident Evil 1 on PS1/PSX has better graphics than any N64 game
Are you fucking retarded?

>> No.7772070
File: 169 KB, 1280x720, Turok.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Turok 1 graphics look like shit to me.

>> No.7772072

Look dude, you’re even correct but you act like such a pedantic jackass that’s it’s impossible to sympathize with you. Literally everyone knows what OP was talking about.

>> No.7772074

Shut up autist

>> No.7772075

RE1 graphics look shittier

>> No.7772093

And to think, this is what you spend your day doing. Cheers schizo, I’m going to the beach.

>> No.7772105

I disagree.
I don't spend my day on here, but I can tell that you do.

>> No.7772301

That's either an emulator or HDMI modded N64 with de-blur you faggot, now stop >implying because you're obviously a moron.

>> No.7772370

If I remember correctly that N64 game has some pretty bad frame rate drops.
Well, it would need more memory for better textures too of course.

>> No.7773624

If you were in a competition with unlimited time to make the nicest looking graphics and could use Sat, psx or 64 which console would you want?

>> No.7773654
File: 908 KB, 960x720, rl.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>World Driver Championship
>Released for the N64 in 1999
Let me remind your retarded ass what the PS1 had in 1999.
And this is just obscure shit. Not even going to bother slapping you with R4 yet out of pity.

>> No.7773660

Easily playstation. The "best" looking games on the N64 run at single digit framerates.

>> No.7773664

We're all waiting for the PS1 screenshot. You can do it, anon, we're all rooting for you!

>> No.7773667

Like that faggot could ever get pussy

>> No.7773669
File: 9 KB, 241x210, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Yes, it had.

>> No.7773672

>uhhh I know you are but what am I?!?
Pathetic faggot.

>> No.7773701
File: 673 KB, 700x525, rl2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

What, you want native res, little boy?

>> No.7773843

what game is that? O_O

>> No.7773971

You're actually scared to post a screenshot of a real PlayStation, aren't you?
I can understand console wars, but a console war you're emulating? That's like going to going on holiday to Vietnam with a Nerf gun and waging war on the waiter.

>> No.7774034

>noo those screenshots dated from the year the game came out with the developers' fucking watermark on them don't count!
Shut the fuck up.

>> No.7774041
File: 1.37 MB, 1087x606, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>this whole post

>> No.7774301

>misnames the PS1
>complains when he's called out
Only retards call the PS1 the PSX when a separate PSX exists.

>> No.7774340

PSX is Sony’s event they call PlayStation Experience.

>> No.7774348

How the fuck do you get to be your age and still think bullshots are representative?

>> No.7774353

He's back.

>> No.7774360

i thought he left with the coming of the sixth gen, i'm glad he's still around, we need our autists

>> No.7774414

Don't lump me with your rent-free boogeymen, you retard.

>> No.7774454 [DELETED] 


I somehow mistook you for the guy (who I hear is well-appreciated) who was saying that PSX and PS2 are the same thing. I misread your post as calling me a pedantic jackass for no reason. I can see that we agree on who spends all their time on here.

>> No.7774459


I somehow mistook you for the guy (who I hear is well-appreciated) who was saying that PSX and PS2 are the same thing. I misread your post as calling me a pedantic jackass for no reason. I can see that we agree on who spends all their time on here.

>> No.7774712

>Posting PS1 screenshots from an emulator powered by a PC that 1000x more powerful.
Seems legit.

>> No.7774713

kys, not gonna tell you

>> No.7774714

Ps1 had better textures but worse geometry, almost everything was flat squares

>> No.7774720

>rent free boogeyman
What a suspiciously specific denial.

>> No.7774752
File: 3.00 MB, 426x240, 1540337276108.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.7774756

kino, namco's lightning was on another level compared to other ps1 games.

>> No.7774757

Which emulator?

>> No.7774764

You missed the point of his screenshot
I guess you weren't alive in the 90s
Everyone called it psx

>> No.7774792
File: 6 KB, 206x245, 1608080686086.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>Let me remind your retarded ass what the PS1 had in 1999
• no hardware texture mapping
• no hardware antialiasing
• no hardware z-buffer
• no mipmapping
• no trilinear filtering
• no perspective correction
• no environment mapping
• no 32 bit rgba framebuffer

>> No.7774807

that one square racing jarpig

>> No.7774839
File: 2.99 MB, 700x436, 1553294018193.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]


>> No.7774848

What system are you emulating?

>> No.7774883

you forgot no raytracing

>> No.7774921

Hydro thunder is a good example of a good looking n64 game

>> No.7774952

God, I can FEEL the image wobbling.

>> No.7774961

PCSX reloaded

>> No.7775007

Sega Saturn

>> No.7775036
File: 1.45 MB, 800x780, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]


>> No.7775254

>no hardware texture mapping
Factually incorrect.
>no mipmapping
>no trilinear filtering
The textures are so low resolution that it's not needed. N64 games hardly even use these features.
>no 32 bit rgba framebuffer
Holy waste of resources. Most N64 games use a 16-bit framebuffer for that reason.

The other stuff is pretty fair. Although it should be noted that the PS1 was released about one and a half years earlier than the N64.

>> No.7775359

PS1 Games look better on real CRTs with real hardware, so using an emulator is actually a handicap, not a benefit.

>> No.7775368

That was a good trap.

>> No.7775506

what game is that? O_O

>> No.7775534

>Comparing something that takes realism into account to the cartoon games made for babby that Nintendo do

>> No.7775535
File: 10 KB, 480x480, PSX_Dith_RidgeSM1-dith.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Only if you enjoy massive amounts of noise from the dithering.

>> No.7775606

kys, not gonna tell you

>> No.7776469

Racing Lagoon.

>> No.7776515

What does this guy do when scans of old magazines are posted with articles calling the playstation the psx for short, or PSX magazine itself being posted? Does he just ignore that he does think its shooped or something?

>> No.7777469

He claims no one read those magazines.

>> No.7777483

Hes 13 years old mate.

>> No.7777501

fuck you

>> No.7777508

You can disable dithering in beetle and if you have a 4K TV use CRT-Royale or another one, get the best of both worlds.

>> No.7777669

I never saud it was a benefit. These retards, think that playing these games on emulators with every fancy setting turned on actually looks good.

>> No.7777681

god I wish this would get translated already

>> No.7777730

I miss this Ridge Racer style. I don't give a fuck about your guys' graphic dick comparison, i just want the good old days of PSOne games back

>> No.7777735

But why is it that racing games on the PS1 looked so much better than on the N64 when it was the opposite for most other games?

>> No.7777749

He's not wrong. Everyone called the Sony Playstation the psx well before the Playstation x came out and failed miserably.

>> No.7777796

The texture looks like that BECAUSE of the filtering. If it didn't have the filtering they would have made a different tree texture

>> No.7777804

I prefer no loading times

>> No.7777928

Racing games are much easier to depth sort and occlusion cull.

>> No.7777938

OP BTFO yet again

>> No.7777946
File: 234 KB, 1198x1000, 1610854562890.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Dithering is not visible while playing on a CRT. It's only visible while playing on an emulator.
>Disabling dithering while playing on emulator
ISHYGDDT. Only complete and utter faggots would ever do such a thing.

>> No.7777963

maybe if you're using composite, but composite sucks. the dithering is completely visible using RGB.

>> No.7777980

Bullshit, it's not visible because the resolution is so low
oh yeah i learned only like 2 weeks ago americans don't have Scart.
Lmao and i thought american was better cause 60hz

>> No.7777982

Dithering is half the charm of PSX graphics.