Which is the worst?

[Anonymous No.7710328]

[Anonymous No.7710329]

>>7710328
SA

[Anonymous No.7710343]

III>SA>VC

[Anonymous No.7710359]

III>VC>SA

[Anonymous No.7710368]

>>7710343
What this anon said, VC ain't that bad tho but it's more flawed than the other 2.

[Anonymous No.7710371]

In terms of engine and basic mechanics they're all pretty similar but III easily has the least balanced and polished gameplay.

I know it's not /vr/ yet but it needs to be said that GTA IV has aged fucking incredibly considering it's only as few years younger than San Andreas as San Andreas is younger than III. GTA has always made absolute leaps between generations.

[Anonymous No.7710456]

>>7710328
3 and it's not even close

[Anonymous No.7710459]

>>7710328
Technical standpoint, it's 3. How much I prefer them? VC is last. Still an 8.5 title.

[Anonymous No.7710483]

>>7710371
San Andreas.
Vice City felt like a step up from 3, while SA felt like spreading out thin.
Still a great game, better than 90% of games and I put dozens of hours into it, but still the weakest of the trilogy imo.

[Anonymous No.7710496]

>>7710328
SA > VC >> III

[Anonymous No.7710510]

>>7710368
VC is really fun but it feels more like a glorified expansion of III. All three are worth playing but VC is the weakest.

[Anonymous No.7710530]

>>7710328
The jigaboo one of course

[Anonymous No.7710534]

>>7710456
You mean it’s San Andreas, and it’s not even close.

[Anonymous No.7710538]

>>7710328
>Which is the worst?
you dont answer a dumb question.

[Anonymous No.7710673]

>>7710328
III, but I think LCS is the worst 3D era game, and I prefer all of them to V.

[Anonymous No.7710719]

>>7710328
All of them ruined gaming for the worse

[Anonymous No.7710730]

>>7710328
none of them

[Anonymous No.7710735]

>>7710328
Personally I'd say III even though it's a great game. The atmosphere and soundtrack of Vice City singlehandedly make it superior, and San Andreas's gameplay additions also make it feel like a big step up over III, really pushing the PS2 to its limits.

[Anonymous No.7710739]

>>7710328
Gta3 is the pablo honey of the radiohead discography

[Anonymous No.7710775]

>>7710739
truly the ringo starr of the gta games

[Anonymous No.7710807]

>>7710328
I prefer the city landscape of GTA3. I hated the color scheme of Vice City, I also can't stand the city of Miami. San Andreas wasn't that great or awful, it's somewhere inbetween. So the worst is Vice City.

[Anonymous No.7710814]

>>7710371
gta 4 has always been awful to play

[Anonymous No.7710830]

>>7710814
Not really. It’s far and away the most immersive game in the series.

[Anonymous No.7711289]

>>7710328
Vice because it has the smallest map of the three

[Anonymous No.7711302]

>>7710814
GTA IV is the only GTA where the driving/shooting/flying isn't pancake thin in depth.

[Anonymous No.7711342]

>>7710814
Just because you don't have to do stupid shit like spraying tags, collection oysters nor having over the top weapons like a flower bouquet, a cane or a fucking dildo, doesn't mean that GTA IV is a bad game, it's more realistic, Niko can get ejected out of car when he crashes into something, Niko feels like he actually has weight, the same goes to cars, as much as people gave shit to the driving, it's very satisfying ince when you get the hang of it, also, entering stires without loading times was great as well, the minimal HUD and stuff like dynamic shadows made the gameplay much more immersive to previous titles.

[Anonymous No.7711347]

san andreas was a downgrade, espocially when it came to interoirs and buildings

[Anonymous No.7711526]

>>7711302
It's also the only GTA where none of those things are fun.

[Anonymous No.7711534]

>>7711526
Retards don't find them fun because they take a little time to learn and git gud at.

[Anonymous No.7711549]

>>7710814
>gta has always been awful to play
yes

[Anonymous No.7711584]

The shooting in 3 makes it almost unplayable in my eyes.

SA > VC >>>> 3

[Anonymous No.7711585]

>>7710368
No its way better than the other 2. Its like 3 with more polish. SA added way too much crap and was kind of a regression. Generic boyz in the hood nigger story too

[Anonymous No.7711590]

>>7711302
4 fags need to understand that GTA isn't a simulator and that more realistic doesn't mean more fun

[Anonymous No.7711594]

>>7711342
So what? None of that makes a game more fun faggot

[Anonymous No.7711602]

>>7711590
>realistic doesn't mean more fun
In this case it does

[Anonymous No.7711612]

>>7711534
Let me guess, IV was your first?

[Anonymous No.7711648]

>>7710328
entire series is trash

[Anonymous No.7711672]

>>7711602
I dunno I've never actually played 4 but I know burnout is way more fun than gran turismo

[Anonymous No.7711912]

>>7711342
MUH REALISM

go outside.

[Anonymous No.7711948]

>>7710329
fpbp

[Anonymous No.7711953]

>>7711672
no, you just think burnout is way more fun.

[Anonymous No.7711959]

>>7710328
SA

[Anonymous No.7711967]

3 is the worst to replay. Some of those 100% requirements will kick your ass. Vice City added things that should have been in the first.

[Anonymous No.7711991]

>>7711967
III isn’t so bad to 100% if you have a basic idea of the order to get it done. Mainly it’s the gang members with shotguns that will fuck your world up if you decide to put off side missions like ambulance or firefighter. 100% in Vice City is easier to attain as it’s less strict on when you do things, you can pretty much get anything done any time you choose without gang members one shotting your vehicle. As for what was added, the bikes, the economy system, wardrobe system, and the expanded arsenal are all welcome additions. I personally think it’s a much better game than III even if it loses a little simplicity with its focus on earning money and building your empire. The one thing I actually do think makes Vice City harder to 100% than III is the hidden packages. They can be hidden deviously well in Vice City where you basically trip over them constantly in III.

[Anonymous No.7711995]

>>7711612
No, 2 on PS1 was

[Anonymous No.7712006]

>>7711953
I think that because its true. Arcade style games are better than simulators.

[Anonymous No.7712009]

>>7712006
According to a faggot like you.

[Anonymous No.7712014]

Where my vice city pc niggas at? How fucking gay was that remote control helicopter mission with a keyboard. Pissed me right off cause I had played it on ps2 as well and it was just so much easier with a controller.

[Anonymous No.7712018]

VC had the best soundtrack and probably the best story
SA had the most to do, though a lot of it is pissing around like the train and tractor trailer missions
I feel that III kind of lags behind, story is very good but it's still the first game of the series to enter 3D and has it's jank and awkward controls
Of course this is only my opinion

[Anonymous No.7712161]

Normal playthrough:
VC>SA=>III
100% playthrough:
VC=III>>>>>>>>>>>SA (fuck plane races and billions of collectibles)

[Anonymous No.7712178]

>>7710359
>III>VC>SA
This is it. Well maybe this:
III>VC>>>>SA

[Anonymous No.7712180]

>>7711302
>GTA IV is the only GTA where the driving
I don't love IV, but the driving is the best in the series

[Anonymous No.7712189]

>>7711995
Good God you grew up with the worst one.

[Anonymous No.7712206]

I just can't look at SA.
I think it's the best game, and I appreciate most of the things that it added, but fuck is it ugly.

[Anonymous No.7712215]

>>7710328
III of course

[Anonymous No.7712353]

>>7710328
VC >>>>>> SA > III

[Anonymous No.7712914]

VC and SA are equally great, III is my least favorite because it's a little too dark for my taste.
All the buildings look abandoned and grim. Bridges, alleys, parking lots, houses, stores, etc are dark and depressing, they just make me want to get the fuck out of there

[Anonymous No.7713039]

VC is by far the worst out of the three and those who says it's the best are deluded nostalgic fags

also Tommy is a shitty character

[Anonymous No.7713086]

>>7710343
This. VC had the best radio and story, but I can't forgive its awful map, which is the most important part to me in a GTA game. III had the best balance in its map and I love flying around with the dodo to find the last bits and pieces of the map like Ghost Town.

[Anonymous No.7713150]

SA

[Anonymous No.7713157]

honestly SA but everything after it was way worse

[Anonymous No.7713169]

>>7710328
3 is the worst. Atrocious mission design.

[Anonymous No.7713171]

>>7711302
God I love the driving in GTA4. Did so many of those singleplayer races for Brucie.

[Anonymous No.7713802]

>>7713171
seriously, everyone complains that it's so stiff and clunky, probably because they're fresh off SA. once you get the turning down, it's probably my favorite driving in any gta game.

[Anonymous No.7713895]

>>7710343
Based as fuck.
10/10
this
/thread

[Anonymous No.7713898]

>>7710328
3. GTA: SA is the best

[Anonymous No.7713905]

>>7713895
Dumbass. What made 3 so great. Shitty house music, dumb missions, tank controls

[Anonymous No.7713913]

>>7711347
Altered photo. It looked nothing like that in the game. And everyone knows the 1990s are better than the 1980s

[Anonymous No.7713954]

None of these games are retro

>>>/v/

[Anonymous No.7714598]

>>7713905
best atmosphere
tightest gameplay

[Anonymous No.7714602]

>>7713954
Do you really have this much difficulty with the passage of time anon??

[Anonymous No.7714610]

>>7713039
ok retard we really value your retarded opinion

[Anonymous No.7714624]

I stick my head outta /fit/ for one frickin second
and anon shovels shit in my face

[Anonymous No.7714815]

>>7710329
Fpbp
>>7710359
Third post also best post.

[Anonymous No.7714848]

mmm lets see
which one is a pretty much carbon copy from one of the other games? VC
which one was made in like 8 months unlike the others who took 2-3 years? VC
which one Rockstar itself said it was made just as a cashgrab and glued together as fast as possible? VC

gee i wonder which one is the bad one

[Anonymous No.7714880]

>>7710329
>>7710359
>>7710483
>>7710534
kill yourself
you'll never be a woman or be with one

[Anonymous No.7714891]

>>7714880
you will never be white.

[Anonymous No.7714896]

they're all fantastic

t. bought all 3 on release

[Anonymous No.7714898]

>>7714891
good, wh*tes have inferior iq to southeast asians.

[Anonymous No.7714941]

>>7714880
imagine seething over something so stupid

[Anonymous No.7714946]

>>7714848
>dev time correlates directly to quality
based duke nukem forever retard

[Anonymous No.7715276]

>>7710328
GTA 3 is easily the worst - It just feels like it was released prematurely.
San Andreas has the most refined gameplay, but it's full of niggers.
Vice City is still the best GTA game ever released, even despite its minor flaws.

[Anonymous No.7715282]

>>7713954
Read the sticky, faggot.

[Anonymous No.7715290]

>>7713039
Patrician taste

[Anonymous No.7715316]

SA is easily the best game honestly, the level of video game cannot be matched, though Vice City rides it's ass pretty close with how likable the writing is. That being said, I don't hate III, I can really respect what Rockstar did with that game and I love the grimy aesthetic of it.

So in short: SA above VC above III, all good games and I almost feel like it's unfair to rate this when IV is vastly superior to all of them.

[Anonymous No.7715407]

>>7710329
(You)

[Anonymous No.7715418]

>>7715282
"hurrr a random newfag mod said it so it must be fact even though the rest of the internet disagrees"

No... Just... No. Not retro.

[Anonymous No.7715435]

>>7714880
Man, no one but you, mentioned those disgusting mutilated Genderless monster abominations, sorry they live rent free in your head, you should probably join them in the 41% since they are always on your mind.

[Anonymous No.7715513]

>>7710329
Fpbp

[Anonymous No.7715517]

>>7711584
PC version has mouse aim and the shooting in VC is nearly the same exact thing.

[Anonymous No.7715523]

>>7714898
Ok flatnose

[Anonymous No.7716519]

>>7710368
VC had so many empty and crap areas to just fill the space. Half the game is beach, golf course or hispanic suburb.

[Anonymous No.7716523]

>>7710328
All of them, GTAII was the pinnacle.

[Anonymous No.7716526]

>>7715517
Not sure what Anon is referring to, but III is the only one where enemies have hitscan superweapons.

[Anonymous No.7716527]

>>7710456
Source: Smooth brain who has never played 3

[Anonymous No.7716531]

>>7716523
Based.

[Anonymous No.7716538]

>>7713905
It's a feeling. An aesthetic. If you don't feel it in your soul, then you just won't get it.

[Anonymous No.7716541]

>>7716526
>III is the only one where enemies have hitscan superweapons
and that's a good thing

[Anonymous No.7716542]

>>7713905
>tank controls
excuse me, are you fucking retarded or something?

[Anonymous No.7716682]

>>7716541
If you're a masochist.

[Anonymous No.7717093]

>>7711991
Wasn't just talking about the gang mechanics. Some missions/side quests are more difficult than others. Rockstar took a while to figure out balancing, many missions in Vc can be gimped with a helicopter.
>>7712014
PC controls for flying are shit.

[Anonymous No.7717208]

>>7712014
I played all of the 3D GTA's again on a PS2 for authenticity factor and found that many of the most infamous missions that get memed about across all of the 3 games were really easy or only mildly difficult on a pad. It's clear that old GTA gameplay was made for a pad first. Also, PCfags are probably unlocking the framerate which also fucks a bunch of shit up. That's why it's so easy to get arrested in VC the cops are literally moving faster than intended.

[Anonymous No.7717274]

>>7717208
>game mechanics dependent on framerate
FUCKING COCKSTAR

[Anonymous No.7717536]

>>7717093
>PC controls for flying are shit.
1. git gud
2. you can reconfigure them
3. git gud

[Anonymous No.7717626]

>>7710328
Grand theft TURD

[Anonymous No.7717698]

>>7717208
>>7717536
Like this mission for example on a gamepad is straight up easy and a pleasure. The game gives you several more minutes than necessary needed to complete and it's almost impossible to lose. I remember being amazed at completing it on a single try. To me the driving is more important than shooting in 3D GTA for control purposes, which is 1-dimensional anyway.

[Anonymous No.7717721]

Hmm... Nice Kike!

[Anonymous No.7717737]

>>7717536
This mission was a pain with a gamepad. I can't imagine without it.

[Anonymous No.7717987]

>>7717536
I did and I beat it doesn't mean it was enjoyable though.

[Anonymous No.7717997]

VC. The map feels like GTA V in that a good portion of it is just irrelevant and forgettable.

III's radio is very underappreciated, also.

[Anonymous No.7718047]

>>7710328
the only way you could think the third game is best is if you played it around release prior to the other games and have nostalgia-goggles.

[Anonymous No.7718107]

>>7717208
I had a girlfriend in high school who dropped GTA III because she couldn’t get the grenade through the window lol

[Anonymous No.7718127]

>>7710775
Ringo Starr is almost inhumanly on-beat, though. He's a much better drummer than most.

[Anonymous No.7718147]

>>7718127
I never got the Ringo shit. He always came off as the most chill of the 4 of them.

[Anonymous No.7718157]

>>7710719
Bad sentence; dumb take

[Anonymous No.7718162]

>>7717721
Take that shit to /pol/, ya fuarking walnut

[Anonymous No.7718326]

>>7718127
>>7718147
I don't have anything against ringo, its just a shitty inside joke that 2 other guys on the retro fps general get

[Anonymous No.7718363]

>>7710328
Of the 3, I never beat Vice City. At least twice I've gotten to the part where you need to expand you're business operations because dude it's so immersive lawl and stopped. Always had enough at that part. Just give me the stupid missions.

[Anonymous No.7718371]

>>7718363
To expand on this why, did so many 6th gen games try their damnedest to get you to drop in the last act with lame ass hunts?
>Triforce pieces in Wind Waker
>Prime 1/2's artifact hunts though I did push myself to get these

[Anonymous No.7718664]

My vote goes to SA solely because of the gang war part of the game. It brings progression to a grinding halt and you cannot do anything until you clear the minimum required territory but in practical terms you have to grind out the entire city because otherwise you keep getting notifications about attacks. Some areas being tiny and with the dodgy spawning system SA uses it is such a bad gameplay element.

[Anonymous No.7718747]

>>7718363
But businesses give you missions. Some of them are pretty simple of course like boatyard or ice cream factory but anyway

[Anonymous No.7718773]

>>7718107
That one doesn't get any easier on the intended format unfortunately.

[Anonymous No.7718778]

>>7718363
If you had bought the properties you would have realized that some of them give missions on par with the main game content, or basically ARE main game content just locked behind a purchase.

[Anonymous No.7719075]

>>7718363
Get a load of this retard

[Anonymous No.7719091]

>>7717208
Yeah if you choose not to have the framerate capped at 30 you can't dive underwater, this makes certain missions impossible unless you turn the option off, this then means that you have to lag your way through the underwater sections.

[Anonymous No.7719096]

>>7718664
I forgot how messy the gang wars in SA were. There was one tiny territory next to the port where no thugs even spawned and you had to lure ones from across the road there to even trigger a gang war which I'm not sure was possible if you had already taken over the territory across the road. Overall the Los Santos portion of the game was oozing with soul though, my main criticism of San Andreas is that it lost direction and became too ridiculous afterwards.

[Anonymous No.7719247]

I haven't played VC in aeons. Am I going to need some widescreen fix? Does it run ok on Windows 7?

[Anonymous No.7719263]

>>7719247
Just look into Vice City Definitive Edition, it’s got all the modern necessities

[Anonymous No.7719278]

this nigga inducing seething after all those years

[Anonymous No.7719469]

>>7719247
>>7719263
reVC is the version you want - game pressure is mirroring it. Just need a copy of the game installed and dump reVC over it.

[Anonymous No.7719487]

>>7717536
why the hell do people think this mission is hard?

the one where you had to get to the ice cream roof was WAY harder (if you didn't use a helecoptor to skip the guys.)

[Anonymous No.7719939]

>>7719469
thanks a bunch! appreciate it

[Anonymous No.7719951]

>>7717737
I can't remember ever not beating it first try. People who complain about vehicle missions in any GTA with any controls are helpless fucking scrubs. Late game foot combat missions with developers running out of ideas and simply sending more and more thugs and police after you each time are far more difficult and annoying.

[Anonymous No.7719962]

how are the PC ports on steam?

[Anonymous No.7719965]

>>7719487
because they haven't attempted SA's Berkeley missions

[Anonymous No.7719967]

>>7719962
I have them all but they're trash and cut a lot of content out AFAIK

[Anonymous No.7720016]

>>7719962
Don't ever buy GTA off of an online distribution service, they have a tendency to publish versions that are incompatible with most mods and to remove radio songs that the license ran out for.

[Anonymous No.7720142]

>>7719951
The people who complain about GTA flying missions typically haven't played any other games that involve flying or have never engaged with flying logic. They try to drive the helicopter like a car and get frustrated. It's really easy once you realize that L2/R2 is for turning the nose and the stick is for tilting the vehicle.

[Anonymous No.7720150]

>>7711289
This. The 80s atmosphere is excellent though.

[Anonymous No.7720189]

>>7710329
Fpbp

[Anonymous No.7720208]

WOW, look at all these contrarians saying SA is the worst GTA. Do you guys feel special yet? want me to play some Creep by Radiohead for you?

[Anonymous No.7720242]

>>7720208
I know rite? Different opinions are not allowed. Pray tell anon, what is your resetera username?

[Anonymous No.7720258]

>>7720242
Thinking SA is the worst is objectively false. You can dislike a game and still accept the fact that it's well-made.

[Anonymous No.7720267]

>>7720258
>Thinking SA is the worst is objectively false. You can dislike a game and still accept the fact that it's well-made.
Neither of those two claims refute each other. I can say GTA SA is the worst 3D GTA but you are somehow assuming this opinion means it is a bad game - a claim that nobody has said.

[Anonymous No.7720281]

>>7720267
>I'm a creep, I'm a weeirrrdooo

[Anonymous No.7720784]

>>7717536
I first played this on PS2. Never understood why people said this mission was hard, it was harder on PC but still easy. The flying controls just sick.

[Anonymous No.7720878]

>>7710328
SanAndreas
>setting: bland
>story: bland
>graphics: bland
>gameplay: okay
>controls: small improvement over the previous titles

even III with the generic mafioso theme had more character and memorable scenes then SA. the only ones you see people mention are the annoy train chase(for obvious reasons) and big foot.

[Anonymous No.7720884]

>>7710328
3 is the worst in that it's the foundation which every GTA game (and it's clones) going forward is built upon so it's going to look obsolete compared to everything that came out after it.

4 is considered the worst because it had a bigger emphasis on realism on top of cutting back on what you can do compared to SA.

GTAO is the real worst GTA game.

[Anonymous No.7720952]

>>7720878
Just watch menace II society and boyz in the hood and you've experienced SA.

[Anonymous No.7720974]

>>7720878
>memorable scenes
Name five.

[Anonymous No.7721092]

>>7720974
>GIBE UP DA MONEY, DIS A RAID
>ryder, not this again.
>it aint me fool
>no one else is that small. I feel sorry for your dad.

[Anonymous No.7721470]

>>7721092
The only memorable scene in GTA 3 is with Luigi's Hookers, and the Yakuza chick being killed by Catalina. GTA 3 is obviously not on par with Vice City and San Andreas, the only fun part is the Dodo flying, but it's broken as all fuck because of the stunt camera.

[Anonymous No.7721473]

aesthetic/atmosphere: 3 > VC > SA
story: VC > 3 > SA
gameplay mechanics: SA > VC > 3
features: SA > 3 > VC
actual time i've spent playing: 3 > SA > VC

[Anonymous No.7721480]

>>7721473
>features: 3 > VC
Huh?

[Anonymous No.7721484]

>>7721480
quality not quantity

[Anonymous No.7721485]

Aesthetic/atmosphere: VC > SA > 3
Story: SA > VC > 3
Gameplay Mechanics: SA > VC > 3
Features: SA > VC > 3
Actual time I've spent playing: SA > VC > 3

I like Vice City the most, aesthetic goes a long way.

[Anonymous No.7721490]

>>7721484
Ok, but in what way are 3's features better than VC's?

[Anonymous No.7721494]

>>7721490
He doesn't have an answer for you anon, he just wanted to feel special.

[Anonymous No.7721495]

>>7721484
Fails in that department too.

[Anonymous No.7721504]

>>7721490
from my memory of how much i enjoyed doing side missions and collecting

[Anonymous No.7721510]

>>7721504
Reasonable answer, thanks for actually responding.

[Anonymous No.7721570]

[Anonymous No.7721638]

>>7712014
Quit the game there I think back in the day

[Anonymous No.7721659]

>>7710328
SA. It's filled with filthy niggers and their niggerness, niggerhoods, nigger """music""" (farting into a mic for 12 hours achieves the same result), niggerspeak, nigger'tude, etc. The only acceptable nigger is the nigger that has left both their inner & outer nigger with their primate parents and willingly joined the community they wish to be involved in as one with his or her non-nignog neighbors.

[Anonymous No.7721660]

>>7710328
Left to right
>>7710329
>>7710359
Contrarians are Niggers

[Anonymous No.7721671]

>>7721659
That's what makes it good, cracker. Niggers are based.

[Anonymous No.7721676]

>>7721671
Niggers are shit, but nice assuming what I am. Made an ass out of you.

[Anonymous No.7721683]

>>7710329

[Anonymous No.7721690]

>>7720878
gta 3 is a terrible game. only your nostalgia biased brain to cope with the idea of enjoying it nowadays.

[Anonymous No.7721698]

>>7721676
Sounds like I guessed right. But hey, crackers are based too

[Anonymous No.7721767]

>>7719278
Fuckin' Chad.

I'll kneel for this N word.

[Anonymous No.7721816]

>>7721485
Aesthetics/atmosphere: VC > 3 > SA
Story: who knows, who cares
Mechanics: essentially all the same until IV's driving
Features: each game has vehicles, running, shooting, and a radio

Worst in the series: SA

[Anonymous No.7721892]

>>7710329
Too much soul.

[Anonymous No.7723260]

>>7721892
SOUL food: the post

[Anonymous No.7723374]

>>7721892
Just buy a fucking handheld at that point

[Anonymous No.7723475]

>>7711602
IV driving isn't even realistic. It just sucks balls.
Easily one of the most overrated game on 4chan.

[Anonymous No.7723810]

>>7723374
In 2004?

[Anonymous No.7723925]

>>7723810
>he thinks that image is actually from 2004

[Anonymous No.7724017]

>>7723925
Well if not someone needs to upgrade their potato camera.

[Anonymous No.7724038]

>>7711590
>>7723475
To be fair the GTA IV driving wouldn't be as fun without the crashing, the ragdolls and the NPC reactions, but it's really enjoyable because input has weight and errors have consequences. But if you want horse shit kart driving that's impossible to oversteer or understeer feel free to play ANY OF THE OTHER TITLES IN THE SERIES YOU FUCKING TWAT, YOU'RE SPOILED FOR CHOICE.

[Anonymous No.7724217]

>>7710328
VC > 3 > SA

[Anonymous No.7724313]

>>7710328
Vice City.

[Anonymous No.7724469]

SA>VC>>>III

[Anonymous No.7725517]

>/vr/ gta thread
>not about looking for some to play on gamehunter

[Anonymous No.7725576]

I loved the absolute shit out of III back in it's day, but I find it the hardest to go back to. I loved all the immersive shit they added in SA, the multiple cities and all the wilderness to explore in between. I used to love going on road trips from Los Santos all the way around to Las Venturas, just listening to the radio and enjoying the scenery. I loved the setting and story of VC the most, but SA could be the comfiest.

[Anonymous No.7726419]

>>7711594
Then what is it, nigger?

[Anonymous No.7726432]

>>7719075
Maybe, either way I had gotten my fill of the game after two attempts, so maybe GTA3 but dude-80s only goes so far for me.

[Anonymous No.7726436]

>>7712161
>100% playthrough:
>VC=III>>>>>>>>>>>SA (fuck plane races and billions of collectibles)
This, also, driving school and The Chilliad Challenges can go fuck themselves.

[Anonymous No.7726439]

>>7710328
All. Gta only got good at 4

[Anonymous No.7726454]

>>7726439
Which is the better one, though? Vanilla IV, TLAD or TBOGT?

[Anonymous No.7726795]

>>7712189
no wonder his taste is so shit

[Anonymous No.7727114]

>>7710328
San Andreas has the best gameplay but the 90s rap gangsta aesthetics are uninteresting.

Vice City looks great, good atmosphere, and original music was good.
But the map was too small and you could die in fucking water just by falling in it.

GTA III some of the same problems as Vice City but revolutionary when it came out.

[Anonymous No.7727217]

>>7727114
Seriously, what the fuck was Rockstar thinking when they made the player die while touching water? It's fucking stupid, especially since in III, the map is 3 islands and VC you play in a fictional version of Miami with water everywhere.

[Anonymous No.7727325]

>>7727217
>when they made the player die while touching water?
Couldn't get the animation working and it was a dirty way of halting unintended progression.

[Anonymous No.7727340]

>>7726454
TLAD and TBOGT automatically stopped being contenders when Rockstar wiped any trace of them being GTA IV addons from the internet and repackaged them as EFLC with absolutely RUINED radio stations.

[Anonymous No.7727403]

>>7726795
You can fuck yourself

[Anonymous No.7727451]

>>7710328
I see the GTA games as being like a Golden Corral buffet:
The food itself is not great, but there's so doggone much of it that it's a good deal.
With GTA, nothing is really that much fun to do, but there is just so much to do and explore, that it somehow becomes a pleasure.

[Anonymous No.7727453]

>>7712914
Welcome to Liberty City

[Anonymous No.7727464]

[Anonymous No.7727521]

>>7720016
>Don't ever buy GTA off of an online distribution service, they have a tendency to publish versions that are incompatible with most mods and to remove radio songs that the license ran out for.
This.
I have both the Steam version and an old pirated windows disc. When I feel like playing, I'm gonna find out how to get the original radio stations off the pirate disc.

[Anonymous No.7727537]

>>7710328
I was 28 when I first played GTA3 at my younger cousin's house. I was flabbergasted at moving around a realistic environment with NPCs cursing at me and all, traffic lights that worked... I didn't even "play" the game. I just walked around in-game and marveled at the world around me

I never looked at video games the same after that. GTA3 gave me the news flash that video games had become what I dreamed since I was 12, that they would become one day.

Zoomers will never feel this lift

[Anonymous No.7727546]

>>7727217
>Seriously, what the fuck was Rockstar thinking when they made the player die while touching water?
The river was very polluted but the game designers decided that watching the player character die in the hospital of sepsis would interrupt play rhythm.

[Anonymous No.7727636]

>>7727537
Had a similar impression of the game myself. I was 13 at the time and it was my first open world game. Blew my retarded 13 year old mind.

[Anonymous No.7727659]

>>7727453
Liberty City in GTA IV is miles better than in GTA III and LCS

[Anonymous No.7727682]

>>7720016

>not just torrenting the entire collection from 3,vice city, SA, IV, and V, commercials and all, and then playing it in the workplace regularly pretending it's the actual radio.

I have done this.

[Anonymous No.7727754]

>>7727682
Did HR call when you played the Rise FM song with the girl making sex sounds

[Anonymous No.7727828]

>>7727754

I worked in a factory on nights and would play it in the laboratory regularly, I had stations, actually the best laughs were from Lazlo of course, would always get funny looks because talk radio is usually so incredibly tame.

[Anonymous No.7727832]

>>7727754

Playing pumped up kicks over the PA DID cause a meeting with my boss though.

[Anonymous No.7728138]

>>7727828
>I worked in a factory on nights
Perfect for Rise FM

>we're never going to sleep!

[Anonymous No.7728363]

>>7728138
Based GTA III Chad

[Anonymous No.7728392]

>>7727537
i'm almost a zoomer and i remember playing it on my brothers ps2 when i was like 6. i remember just stealing cars and shooting people and not doing any of the actual missions. Oblivion is was what really blew my mind as an open world game later on though.

[Anonymous No.7728492]

The real question is, Why is the PS2 version of San Andreas so orange?

[Anonymous No.7728498]

>>7728492
SOUL

[Anonymous No.7728516]

>>7710328
none

[Anonymous No.7728831]

>>7728492
90's Hollywood Movie LA aesthetic

[Anonymous No.7728842]

>>7728492
I dunno, looks awful though. Glad I had bought the Xbox version.