/vr/ - Retro Games

[AC !zYSTXAtBqk No.769209]

So I have this cool setup with a good CTR TV and all my consoles from NES up to PS2~GCN hooked in there.
I recently installed the latest RetroArch on my GCN on a SD card. It works flawlessly.
I just made a comparision of NES Mega Man games running on actual hardware in one channel and running on my GCN on another, and it looked amazing, almost identical to the original. Better than any filter.

I was thinking of getting a NES flashcart soon, but this changed my mind. I have a PS2 gamepad adapter for GCN, so I have my favorite joystick in there too.

I'm making this thread because I keep seeing here people trying to hook up a laptop to a CTR TV. Well, if you have a modded GCN or a Wii, you don't have to. Just buy this $3.40 SD card reader http://dx.com/p/wiikey-sd-card-adapter-for-wii-3993 and you're good to go.

RetroArch is amazing. That is all.

[Anonymous No.769219]

>>769209
No smb support? No deal.

[Anonymous No.769428]

>CTR

>>769219
What?

[Anonymous No.769467]

>>769428
SMB support is in a lot of Wii emulators, lets you connect to a windows network share instead of putting ROMs on the SDcard/disc. It's a handy feature and probably the main one Retroarch for Wii/GC lacks.

You're setting the resolution to the appropriate native res for the consoles you're emulating, right? That's key for not getting a blurry interlaced mess.

[Anonymous No.769495]

>>769467
I've actually never tried RetroArch on my Wii. I use it on my PC extensively, though, always at 4x native resolution.

[Anonymous No.769567]

>>769495
It's great, especially through component. Supports every retro resolution you can imagine and has the best NES emulation of any I've tried for Wii, perfectly smooth compared to the janky/discolored mess that is FCEUGX.

Mednafen is better for PCE/TG-16 emulation though, for some reason the core in retroarch isn't as smooth.

[AC !zYSTXAtBqk No.769863]

>>769428
Can't believe I made the same typo twice

[Anonymous No.772485]

>>769428
>that filter
gross

[Anonymous No.772495]

>>772485

[Anonymous No.772505]

>>772495
The developers created these games fully aware of window glare and intended the games to be played with it.

[Anonymous No.772512]

>>772495
Absolutely disgusting. Do you honestly think that's what the developers intended?

[Anonymous No.772514]

>>772495
Absolutely disgusting. Do you honestly think that's what the developers intended?

[Anonymous No.772524]

>>772514
I DID but seeing that I can see how the other one wasn't as authentic as I thought it was.

[Anonymous No.772557]

>>769209
Thanks for the tip! I was also considering buying a nes flashcard, but this does look like a better deal.
Is there a guide to installing retro arch on the gcn somewhere?

[Anonymous No.772565]

GCN is as stupid as PSX
What's with this board a retarded abbreviations?

[Anonymous No.772598]

>>772565
The Nintendo GameCube (ニンテンドーゲームキューブ Nintendō Gēmukyūbu?), officially abbreviated to NGC in Japan[7][8] and GCN in North America,[9] is a video game console released by Nintendo...

[Anonymous No.772605]

>>772565
Some retarded thought that NGC would be confused for NeoGeoColor, so they used GCN instead and it forever stuck.

[Anonymous No.772616]

Filters are required to get the full retro experience.

[Anonymous No.772619]

>>772616
See how shitty it look unfiltered. You can't even read the sign.

[Anonymous No.772638]

>>772619
>Can't even read the sign
You may need glasses. I can read it just fine.

[Anonymous No.772643]

>>772619
>old trul is old
0/10

[Anonymous No.772659]

>>772616
>>772619
you
http://archive.foolz.us/vr/thread/530765/#534290
are
http://archive.foolz.us/vr/thread/630258/#631272
a
http://archive.foolz.us/vr/thread/496007/#496584
pathetic
http://archive.foolz.us/vr/thread/648054/#648123
loser
http://archive.foolz.us/vr/thread/570065/#570296
.

[Anonymous No.772660]

>>772619
>>772616
fuck off

[Anonymous No.772873]

>>772659
>>772660

[Anonymous No.772894]

>>772873
>>>/a/

[Anonymous No.773923]

>>772485

You really can't have a civil discussion about emulation filters on 4chan, can you?

[Anonymous No.773948]

>>773923

[Anonymous No.774007]

>>773948
There is sometimes an argument that could be made for filters like that, but that's just fucking terrible.

[Anonymous No.774019]

>>774007

How is it "fucking terrible" when it looks better than what the real console could produce?

You can't honestly tell me with a straight face that it looks bad.

[Anonymous No.774048]

>>774019
2lumpy4me
I prefer the actual pixels over this.

[Anonymous No.774045]

>>774019
Allow me to use you last post as an example:
>>773948
>Mario is no longer a baby on Yoshi's back but rather a growth sprouting out of his neck
>Yoshi has removed his boots to reveal severe burn scars on both his feet
>The once round counter reduced to a hexadecagon
>Uneasy smile on flower
I know you're trolling but there are people who actually believe that looks nice.

[Anonymous No.774068]

>>774045
>there are people who actually believe that looks nice.

such as squarepusher, one of the retroarch devs
he got into an argument over it on /vg/, and he thinks anyone who likes crts are just "blinded by rose-tinted nostalgia"

[Anonymous No.774082]

I have a modded Wii.
How do I get retroarch installed onto it?

[Anonymous No.774087]

>>774019
Not as bad as the YI one, but still worse than what you would see on a SNES.

[Anonymous No.774084]

>>774019
>looks better

[Anonymous No.774089]

>>774068
they are hipsters who never owned a CRT

[Anonymous No.774090]

>>774045

It still looks closer to the developers intent with Yoshi's Island, this is what it would have looked like if they weren't limited by the SNES
Also, the vast majority of people actually like these filters and "HD remakes" tend to use them. Only on 4chan is autistic "pixel purism" so widespread.

[Anonymous No.774093]

>>774084

That image would look worse if it were pixelated, as if it were resized in paint.

[Anonymous No.774091]

>>774082
boku no google

[Anonymous No.774103]

>>774068
>Some guy used an ad hominem
>That means that one filter is better than unfiltered in every game ever no matter what your tastes or opinions are

[Anonymous No.774109]

>>774090
The vast majority doesn't know what a Yoshi's Island is. Modern remakes use a cartoony story book style, not a vaseline smear.

[Anonymous No.774107]

The aspect ratio is more important than the filter.

[Anonymous No.774113]

>>774109
>vaseline smear

Except that's not at all what it looks like, are you blind or something?

[Anonymous No.774115]

>>774019
smoothing filters ≠ better looking

[Anonymous No.774118]

>>774115

Better looking than those horrible CRTs that this board circle jerks over

[Anonymous No.774126]

>>774118
>He actually believes that

[Anonymous No.774124]

>>774113
Yeah, from your filter.

[Anonymous No.774131]

>>774124

No, my filter is only enhancing the image. A "vaseline smear" would make everything blurry and hard to see. Not too much unlike crts..

[Anonymous No.774132]

>>774019
Hey, I've got a Van Gogh too!

[Anonymous No.774141]

>>774131

[Anonymous No.774150]

>>774019
>>773948
This shit looks like some unholy Macintosh pirate version of Mario.

[Anonymous No.774153]

>>774141
>he think's I'm trolling or joking

I'm completely serious, shit head.

You pixel purists are nutty.

[Anonymous No.774165]

>>774153
Im personally not fond of SNES graphics, but that filter is absolute shit.

[Anonymous No.774164]

does retroarch on wii allow you to use filters?
Some of the less extreme ones might be cool

[Anonymous No.774172]

>>774164

No, it doesn't. Wii doesn't have the ability to run shaders.

You'll have to do it on PS3, Xbox 360, or PC versions of RetroArch

[Anonymous No.774179]

>>774172
nah it's fine, I'll stick to using the regular Wii emulators unfiltered. thanks.

[Anonymous No.774192]

Filters look better in motion than in still screenshots

[Anonymous No.774202]

>>774153
Your filter looks like garbage.

If you want that effect, without shitting on all the detail, use something like AdvanceMAME Scale2x.

>>774192
Excuses.

[Anonymous No.774209]

[Anonymous No.774218]

I gotta stop using my phone to take these pics but...

[Anonymous No.774235]

>>774202
>Your filter looks like garbage.

Sorry but no, that filter looks almost perfect in my eyes. We're just going to have to agree to disagree

[Anonymous No.774250]

I like fake display filters (NTSC, scanlines, fake LCD, etc).
I prefer aspect ratio to be corrected (ie on the NES and SNES).
I prefer at least some scanlines to straight-up nearest neighbor filtering, but I get why people like that.

I have no idea why people play with HQ#X filters and such and turn games into Jackson Pollock's vomit.

You can make a case for the artists intending their art to be displayed on a TV or handheld display, on the RGB workstation monitors they drew on, or even that they really intended the game to be seen on a perfect LCD monitor.

None of them had any idea that idiots 10 years in the future would be tossing their art into the HQ#X blender. They did not at all take that into account. So, if you play with 2xSai, not only are you making the art look like shit, you're doing so in a way that the artists never could have possibly intended for you to. It'd be like taking a photograph of the Mona Lisa, making the whole thing brown, and adding a few lens flares. Then, when someone tells you you're an idiot for doing that, you say "I didn't want to look at this gay ass painting anyway, I wanted to watch The Avengers."

[Anonymous No.774259]

>>774250
>It'd be like taking a photograph of the Mona Lisa, making the whole thing brown, and adding a few lens flares

Oh please. Most games had shitty artwork to begin with, filters just bring it out more. At least they're not intentionally making games look worse like NTSC and scanlines do...

[Anonymous No.774269]

>>774259
stop posting

[Anonymous No.774276]

>>774269

You first?

[Anonymous No.774282]

>>774235
>We're just going to have to agree to disagree

this is what everyone should do, because nobody is ever going to agree on this shit, it's too subjective.

[Anonymous No.774286]

>>774259

[Anonymous No.774293]

>>774259

[Anonymous No.774301]

>>774286
>>774293
>>774269

I'm sorry for not conforming to the circlejerk on here but my opinion stands

[Anonymous No.774306]

>>774301

[Anonymous No.774316]

>>774301
Never play a retro game again.

[Anonymous No.774331]

>>774306
>>774316

Stop shitposting please, I'm not going anywhere

[Anonymous No.774346]

>>774331
No amount of our shit posting even holds a small light to your own faggotry.

"Most games had shitty artwork to begin with" - Cum guzzling faggot, 2013

[Anonymous No.774345]

>>774301
Go back to >>>/v/, loser.

[Anonymous No.774349]

>>774345
>cat macro
>internets
>GTFO
>fail
>ironic formality

If he goes back to /v/, will you fuck off back to Reddit?

[Anonymous No.774350]

>>774331

[Anonymous No.774357]

>>774346

I guess what you're saying is my opinion isn't allowed on here because it goes against the hivemind.

I love how 4chan claims it's better than forums because "it isn't a circlejerk", and yet here we are...

[Anonymous No.774358]

>>774349
>you fuck off back to Reddit?
I have had that cat macro in my hard drive since before reddit even existed. Back when your mommy still didn't let you use the internet unsupervised.

[Anonymous No.774361]

>>774357
Just fuck off.

[Anonymous No.774365]

>>774357
I don't think you know what a circle jerk means when talking about a forum.

[Anonymous No.774368]

>>774357
If this were a circlejerk we'd be telling you that you have a valid opinion. You don't. You have a completely retarded opinion and we are just letting you know.

[Anonymous No.774371]

>>774361
>>774365
>>774368

[Anonymous No.774372]

>>774368

>valid opinion

What's not valid about it? Other than you don't like it of course.

[Anonymous No.774375]

>>774358
>1331768754374.jpg
sure.

[Anonymous No.774376]

>>774368

elitst circlejerks are still circlejerks

[Anonymous No.774384]

Which platform does RetroArch work best on?

[Anonymous No.774393]

>>774384
Whichever one supports HQ3X filters.

[Anonymous No.774390]

>>774259
>>774301
>>774331
>>774357
>>774372

[Anonymous No.774397]

>>774390

Is this some kind of ironic shitposting?

[Anonymous No.774402]

>>774384

PC, Windows or Linux

It's supposed to work well on iOS too.

[Anonymous No.774404]

>>774090

[Anonymous No.774424]

Sad face :(

[Anonymous No.774437]

>>774404

I must have made you really upset or something.

Sorry but filters look infinitely better than pixelated crap, I'm not backing down from that.

[Anonymous No.774447]

>>774437

[Anonymous No.774445]

>>774437
>proving with out a doubt you're a shitty troll by using Metal Slug

[Anonymous No.774454]

>>774447
STOP USING THAT FUCKING FACE I KNOW ITS THE SAME GOD DAMN FAGGET TOO. GO FIND SOMETHING ELSE TO EXPRESS YOUR DISTASTE PLEASE

[Anonymous No.774450]

>>774437
Your gay

[Anonymous No.774451]

>>774445
>opinions you don't like == trolling

lol

[Anonymous No.774458]

>>774437
>That image

Oh god, I thought you were serious and mentally retarded for a bit.

[Anonymous No.774460]

>>774454

[Anonymous No.774462]

>>774458

I'm serious and not retarded, but maybe you are since you can't do anything except post reaction faces.

[Anonymous No.774469]

>>774437

[Anonymous No.774474]

>>774462
You need to calm down and get a big fat dose of the D. Really you're body is craving for the D if you know what i mean.

[Anonymous No.774476]

>>774460
I think that filter looks like shit to but not half as bad as that stupid little girl. Why is that your reaction for everything?

[Anonymous No.774482]

>>774462
You're already dumb enough to believe that mess is "almost perfect", so any argument with you would be futile. You just have shitty taste.

Keep posting though, I'm laughing my ass off here.

[Anonymous No.774492]

>>774476
.................

[Anonymous No.774498]

>>774437
Backgrounds look pretty good, but the sprites look like shit
1/10

[Anonymous No.774501]

>>774451
It goes so far past opinion it's not even funny. If anybody actually thinks that filtered Metal Slug looks better then they shouldn't be playing these games because clearly they are no older than 8 and are still too impressionable for the violence.

[Anonymous No.774503]

>>774424
6/10 a bit to blurry.

[Anonymous No.774505]

>>774492
seriously its so fucking stupid. she looks more like she has a flu than she is showing distaste. It's stupid and you are stupid for using it.

[Anonymous No.774517]

>>774505

[Anonymous No.774513]

>>774482
>shitty taste

People who jack off to CRTs are really in no position to make such judgements.

And I'm laughing too, because it's funny how something as simple as filters causes some autistic moral outrage on here. This elitist attitude pixel purists have only makes /vr/ look like a hipster circlejerk even more.

Sorry, but I'm not backing down. To, filters improve the images, which is a low res pixelated mess to begin with.

[Anonymous No.774520]

no talking about shenmue

[Anonymous No.774534]

>>774526
Well that and the fact that filters are foolish,yeah

[Anonymous No.774526]

Stupid filter discussion like this one is the reason we can't have nice things, like a filters general thread.

[Anonymous No.774527]

>>774513
Obviously you have nothing worth while to post on /vr/ because nobody is interested in your shitty opinions.

[Anonymous No.774530]

>>774501
>because clearly they are no older than 8

I'm 24 FYI. You sound like you wallow in confirmation bias.

[Anonymous No.774539]

>>774530
I'm 67, see how easy it is to lie on the internet, kid?

[Anonymous No.774541]

>>774539
>63
300 master race here.

[Anonymous No.774546]

>>774527
>shitty opinions.

I'm sure you're a patrician on this subject...

[Anonymous No.774558]

>>774498

The whole thing looks amazing in motion

[Anonymous No.774564]

>>774546
Whatever makes you feel better, look, clearly you don't like it here, you don't like retro games, and you don't like 4chan, who's stopping you from going back to Reddit?

[Anonymous No.774573]

>>774558
Just like when somebody cums in your eye and you look around the room right?

[Anonymous No.774578]

>>774573
No, it's more like when I fuck your mom and her pussy juice is in my face :)

[Anonymous No.774581]

>>774564
>clearly you don't like it here
I like it here when we're talking about games. When it comes to filters, this place is a crt/nearest neighbor circlejerk.

>you don't like retro games
How did you come to that conclusion? If I hated retro games, I wouldn't play them and I wouldn't be here. That doesn't mean I'm not going to try to make them look better with filters and shaders.

>you don't like 4chan
4chan is fine when it isn't a circlejerk and you don't get dogpiled.

>who's stopping you from going back to Reddit?
I've never posted on that site in my life, and I'm not starting now.

[Anonymous No.774595]

>>774581
>A lot of people find your shitty opinion shitty
>OH MY GOD WHY AM I BEING SO OPPRESSED EVERYBODY BUT ME IS WRONG I AM A SPECIAL LITTLE SNOW FLAKE AND NOBODY IS SMARTER THAN ME
Why don't you just leave?

[Anonymous No.774605]

>>774595
>someone makes an opinion you don't like
>STOP LIKING WHAT I DON'T LIKE NO ONE SHOULD LIKE THAT MY OPINION > YOUR OPINION

This is you.

[Anonymous No.774612]

>>774605
You can like bad filters all you want but when you say shit like " Most games had shitty artwork to begin with" and "it's what the devs intended" you're being a retarded faggot.

[Anonymous No.774616]

why do people get so emotional over filters?

[Anonymous No.774627]

>>774612

The people on here who say that devs intended people to play on shitty ass cancer tubes are just as bad.

[Anonymous No.774629]

>>774616
Because they think they are right and hate being told they are wrong.
Also when you hear a guy say the sky is brown, you kinda want to call him on it.
When someone posts a blurry screenshot with black lines all over it and says it's how its supposed to loole, they will always be called out on it

[Anonymous No.774635]

welp, It was a nice couple of weeks before the board turned to a shitfest.

[Anonymous No.774646]

>>774627
Those "cancer tubes" were the only possible way to play games back then, anybody who thinks the devs intended anything other than that must be retarded.

[Anonymous No.774657]

>>774635

"Enjoy your future Sonic! It's gonna be great!"

[Anonymous No.774652]

Oh, and there's a ton of hipocricy when it comes to filters because people put down enhancement filters then turn around and praise 3D enhancements.

Inb4 b-b-but 3D is different!!!

No, no it isn't.

[Anonymous No.774665]

>>774652
>praise 3D enhancements
Nobody does that, /vr/ hates 3D remakes.

[Anonymous No.774661]

>>774652
Yes it is.

[Anonymous No.774662]

>>774635
Fuck everybody who has ever said this, /vr/ has remained the same from the start with the exception of the first few hours when we were just happy to have a board.

[Anonymous No.774671]

>>772505
Is that a Game Maker game?

[Anonymous No.774668]

>>774629

>right
>wrong

The only person wrong here is you. Filters are totally subjective, there is no right and wrong, only opinions. Unfortunately, morons on here don't get that and pitch a shitfit when someone likes a filter they don't like.

[Anonymous No.774672]

>>774498
It's because the backgrounds were probably not carefully crafted pixel by pixel like the sprites.

[Anonymous No.774676]

>>774661

Using a shader to smooth jaggies on 3D games is exactly the same as using a shader to smooth jaggies on 2D games, don't kid yourself.

[Anonymous No.774685]

>>774089
No, those are people who play with scanlines.

[Anonymous No.774690]

All this hate is getting me all hard as diamonds.

[Anonymous No.774695]

Using filters to recreate the authentic retro experience, like the developers intended: good.

Using shitty, smoothing, shit-smearing filters to "enhance" the graphics: bad.

Any other questions?

[Anonymous No.774717]

>>774695

That's your opinion but not a fact. The "authentic retro experience" is overrated and is mostly based in nostalgia. I grew up with these games, the "authentic retro experience" wasn't anything special like it's made out to be here.

[Anonymous No.774718]

>>774250
The Mona Lisa is a mediocre artwork that's only well known because of a successful marketing ploy.

[Anonymous No.774723]

>>774676
No it isn't and you know it.
In pixel art every pixel has a purpose. A smile can be implied with a single carefully placed dot, Costumes are crafted with each pixel in mind. Smudging all that together destroys the image. "BUT IT'S SMOOTHER!" So what, it's a smooth SHITTY image.

People who like the way that shit looks are the kind of person who only watch full screen movies because they think the black bars cover parts of the picture in widescreen.
RETARDS I think is the colloquial term.

[Anonymous No.774730]

>>774723
> Smudging all that together destroys the image.

That's where you're wrong. It isn't smudging anything together, just smoothing things out, and some other post processing.

>People who like the way that shit looks are the kind of person who only watch full screen movies because they think the black bars cover parts of the picture in widescreen.

Strawman, has nothing to do with the discussion.

[Anonymous No.774734]

>>774730
>It isn't smudging anything together
How can you even make that argument when so many people in this thread have posted pictures of just that?

[Anonymous No.774736]

>>772505
This one is hilarious.

[Anonymous No.774743]

>>774730
Wrong on both accounts.

It wasn't a strawman, just a plane ol' insult

[Anonymous No.774747]

>>774717
>I grew up with these games,
Bullshit. You are an underage faggot who shouldn't even be here in the first place.
Reported.

[Anonymous No.774751]

>>774734

They aren't. This is what smudging looks like

[Anonymous No.774753]

>>772598
Super cool wikipedia link. It's still stupid as shit.
Gamecube
Game...Cube
GC there. Why does there need to be an N in there at all!? Like with the DS. NDS? As opposed to all those OTHER DSs? "Man did you get the new Mario game for the QDS?"
Is there a rule that the abbreviations NEED a third letter?
PSX!?!?!? WHAT IS THE X FOR!?!?!?

[Anonymous No.774758]

>reading this thread
>get asked to change the water filter in the fridge
>filter
>mfw

[Anonymous No.774756]

>>774751
Stop, that is also smudging yes, but both are effectively smudging.

[Anonymous No.774757]

>>774747
>Bullshit. You are an underage faggot who shouldn't even be here in the first place.

There's that confirmation bias again. Whatever helps you sleep better at night.

>Reported.

I don't even need to say it.

[Anonymous No.774759]

>>774751
No. There is no smudging in that. At least not to the degree of >>774437
Entire details are LOST because the pixels are getting fucked around with

[Anonymous No.774762]

>>774676
One is a rendering that is interpreted through pixels, the other is actually made of pixels.

Now, out of these 2, which one do you think is safer to go and smooth out the pixels?

[Anonymous No.774765]

>>774758
>open fridge

"Not enough scanlines."

[Anonymous No.774763]

>>769209
I just use my old computer monitor cord and hook it up to my flat screen tv and lap top.

[Anonymous No.774768]

>>774759

>Entire details are LOST

There's no detail being lost, you're fucking retarded, you pixel purists are started to appear delusional.

[Anonymous No.774770]

>>774751

[Anonymous No.774774]

>>774770

Yeah it doesn't look good by itself, but you can do some cool things with it in a multi-pass shader setup

[Anonymous No.774772]

>>774765
>not keeping your 15KHz monitor in the fridge

[Anonymous No.774782]

I wish the RetroArch DOSBox core wasn't so buggy. I want to use this shader with DOS games, but a lot of games make it crash.

[AC !zYSTXAtBqk No.774786]

>>772557

I'll spoon-feed you, becuase this whole thing gave me a lot of headaches, and I want to save someone the trouble. The first few guides you'll find googling around will mislead you into thinking you either need an Action Replay disc to boot and run stuff from the SD card, a tedious patching proccess, etc... Actually, the process can be much simpler.

The thing is, most of these guides are obsolete now that the apps continued to be developed for the Wii, and adding GCN compatibility somehow ended up working just as well.

So here's all you need to buy

- Get the Wiikey from dealxtreme (see OP)
- Get a SD card (contrary to the "only old non SDHC cards work" stuff pointed out in various guides, thanks to new versions of homebrews you can use almost any SD card, I use a 32 GB Sandisk)
- A XenoGC chip, or any modchip, in case your GCN isn't modded yet.
- Optional: PS2 gamepad adaptor easily found on ebay

Here's the files you need:
http://www.mediafire.com/download/osj34jlfvcfgmyv/gamecube.rar

(Included:
- Bootable "swiss" disc
source: https://code.google.com/p/swiss-gc/downloads/list
(I'm providing mine instead of you giving you the source because I made it into a bootable disc myself. There's an iso provided in the official developers website, but it didn't work for me)
- Latest retroarch for gamecube
source: http://forum.themaister.net/viewtopic.php?id=347

And here's what you need to do.
- Burn a bootable disc with "swiss", which is a homebrew that let's you run both homebrew apps (.dol format), and GCN games (.iso or .gcn format), so if you have a big SD card, this is pretty much the only disc you'll need from now on (doesn't work with the Gameboy Player Start-up disc though).
- Put the retroarch folder in the SD card with some roms (check the website for emulators and formats supported), and to the GCN through the Wiikey.
- Every retroarch core has its own .dol. Run the emulator you need for the system you want to play and that's about it.

[AC !zYSTXAtBqk No.774795]

Wow I just responded to that one anon asking a legit question early on the thread without looking at all the shitposting that makes the rest of it

This is probably the worst thread I've seen in /vr/. What have I done.

[Anonymous No.774803]

>>774795

Delete it and start a new one, that will cleanse it of shitposting