[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vr/ - Retro Games

View post   
File: 5 KB, 259x194, Dirge_Eyes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
742469 No.742469[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Old games the scared the complete shit out of you

>those eyes
>that sound
>fuck this entire game

>> No.742503

What is this shit? Twilight Princess? Not /vr/

>> No.742507

That is a PS2 game.

>> No.742513

>>742507
Some people see PS2 as retro. Who are you to police thoughts?

>> No.742516

>>742513

I agree with you but it's a losing battle. The line is arbitrary, yes, but because it's part of the rules people will spit on this thread

>> No.742517

>>742513
The sticky you dumb ass. It doesn't matter what you think when it goes against the rules.

>> No.742527

>>742517
>it doesn't matter what you think

Easy there, Kim Jong.

>> No.742531

fuck you /vr/ i thought you were cool

>> No.742534

>>742527
And why did you decide to post it here instead of /v/?

>> No.742535

I want /v/ to leave

>> No.742543

That's a PS2 game OP.

>> No.742539

>/blames /v/ because it's easy

>> No.742541

Damn, that ending.

>> No.742545

>>742534
Because the game is old. Your definition of "old" differing from mine doesn't elevate the pedestal at all.

>> No.742549

Not retro.

>> No.742553

>>742545
Old games? Just because it is old doesn't make it retro.

>>742535
I agree, I want /v/ to stop breaking the rules. They have their own board that they shit on, which is theirs.

>> No.742556

>>742545
Yeah, very retro, there.

GB2/v/

>> No.742558

>>742545
but your definition of "old" is different from this board's rules. I know you think you are being a cool and defiant teenager but it serves no purpose here

>> No.742564

>>742513
It's just against the rules. We have to hold a line somewhere, otherwise people will start talking about any system they want. Technically some people can view the Wii as retro now.

PS2 and GBA are both systems that some people may think should be allowed, but by the standards we set at the board's creation, neither of those are /vr/'s definition of retro.

I understand /v/ probably hates the PS2 -- I wouldn't know, I don't go there -- but that's not reason enough to break the rules here.

>> No.742561

>>742553
It does to me. Doesn't have to to you.

Doesn't make you right. Quit being autismrage.

>> No.742562

>>742553
but /v/ is shit.

>> No.742565

>>742562
and you are making this board shit by somehow thinking you can make your own rules

>> No.742567

>>742553

>Just because it is old doesn't make it retro

What am I read

>> No.742571

PS2 isn't considered retro HERE.
That's a damn fine game, though, OP.

>> No.742572

>>742564
>PS2 and GBA are both systems that some people may think should be allowed
to be honest I don't think anyone except this obnoxious troll thinks the PS2 should be allowed
in fact I'm pretty sure most people here would agree that it marked when the focus of gaming changed

>> No.742578
File: 4 KB, 186x139, 2013-05-20-23-48-21--799183154.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
742578

Thread re railing time chaps?
This here motherfucker is disturbing

>> No.742579

>>742562
No kidding, and you are bringing it to here because of your disregard of the rules. A part of what makes /v/ shit is the disregard of rules. Hence why you shouldn't make these threads.

>>742567
So yesterday is retro? It is to someone. How old something is or new something is will range wildly depending upon the person, especially with their age.

>> No.742583

>>742561
>It does to me. Doesn't have to to you.

I think we got a tiny missunderstanding here. It doesn't matter what YOU think, nor what HE thinks, all what matters are the rules which are posted in the sticky. They aren't optional. They are the essentials of the whole board since this would be pretty much /v2/ if we break them.

>> No.742584

The only "6th generation" (and I use that term loosely) system that should be allowed here is the Dreamcast. Otherwise, the board rules should stand.

>> No.742591

>>742579

You are fucking stupid

>> No.742597

>>742591
Why thank you for the explanation, though at least I have enough reading comprehension to understand the rules in the sticky for this board.

If you want to voice a complaint about the rules then go to >>>/q/

>> No.742602

Please, OP. Read the damn sticky.

>> No.742605

>>742597

I'm not voicing a complaint, I follow the rules. That doesn't change the fact that you are a blathering idiot.

>> No.742603

>>742584
Why Dreamcast?

>> No.742607

>>742603
9/9/99

>> No.742617

>>742591
This whole thread is fucking stupid. Not OP's intentions, besides the fact that he used a PS2 game, his topic of games that scare the shit out of you is a good one, but the degeneration of the thread is stupid.

>> No.742618

>>742605
That is pretty neato, I can toss insults around without explanation around as well.

>> No.742630

>>742618

I grant you no explanation because I don't have any desire in trying to show an invalid like you how stupid you are.

>> No.742634

>>742469
>>742513
>>742527
>>742531
I agree with you.
One day, /vr/ will follow the PS2
One day, they will join you in the sun.


But that isn't today. That isn't now.
Also, you are being a douche. Plz leave.

>> No.742635

>>742630
You're look more like an idiot than that gy ever did.

>> No.742638

>>742617
It's mostly the collosi's eyes that do it. Dirge sneaking up and having huge eyes makes him exceptionally heartracing.

>> No.742645

>>742617
True, we should just stop replying and wait until the janitor deletes this mess, also OP should stop being a babby, admit he did a honest mistake and open another thread with a board related game.

But, alas, of course we won't do that. What's with channers and following simple rules anyway.

>> No.742642

>>742630
In other words "I don't have an explanation".

No reason to lie, dude. We're all Anon.

>> No.742643

>>742634
I agree. Someday it will fall under the boards topic, but it doesn't thus it is against the rules. So don't post about it until the rules are changed.

>> No.742654

>>742642

More like his argument stems from the idea that "if it's in the past, someone will think it's old. EVEN YESTERDAY. YESTERDAY IS OLD ISN'T IT? IS YESTERDAY RETRO? I DIDN'T THINK SO" is in itself very stupid shit, the rest of his post is a whole different train wreck