/vr/ - Retro Games

[Anonymous No.6881545]

Will they ever make another Goldeneye-style Bond game?

[Anonymous No.6881570]

You know that the answer is no.

[Anonymous No.6881590]

Daniel Craig is a pathetic manlet that gets bested by an empowered black woman, who the fuck wants to play that.

[Anonymous No.6881740]

Probably not.

[Anonymous No.6881758]

>>6881545
No.

>Bond licence has been tarnished by too many shit EA games
>The modern Bond movies dont really lend themselves to a good game (not enough action, too much mopey shit)
>No soul anymore in videogame developers

You got Perfect Dark, TimeSplitters 1 2 3 and Second Sight, then Crysis 1 2 3 if thats your bag, enjoy them,thats as close as you will get

Theres a few pretty cool romhacks of goldeneye out there - goldfinger 64 looks like a laugh.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKg7hOLDqIE

[Anonymous No.6881771]

Well, there IS GoldenEye: Source and it's free

[Anonymous No.6881787]

>>6881771
In what sense is it free? It's no more "free" than Halo.

[Anonymous No.6881808]

>>6881787
Free in the sense that you can download it for free and play it online without a subscription you retard

[Anonymous No.6881840]

>>6881545
>there will never be a series of Goldeneye style games made for each film
>Goldeneye will never have a re-release that includes all the content they wanted to put into it
And now I'm sad.

[Anonymous No.6881870]

The smartest business move they could pull with James Bond is a $60 4:3 Switch port of Goldeneye with zero improvements made to the game or graphics.

[Anonymous No.6881972]

They're still making James Bond movies?

[Anonymous No.6882054]

>>6881870
This, but unironically, except the $60 part.

[Anonymous No.6882063]

>>6881545
>no proper Bond game in 8 years
Not a chance

[Anonymous No.6882382]

Why is there 3 (three) Bond threads on the catalog?