Conker's Bad Fur Day

[Anonymous No.6726635]

This game was pure SOUL. The last good RARE game.

[Anonymous No.6726636]

>>6726635
Has Twelve Tales been leaked yet?

[Anonymous No.6726638]

>SOUL
>>>/v/

[Anonymous No.6726643]

>>6726638
>/v/

[Anonymous No.6726651]

>>6726635
>soul
ugh more with this /v/ shit?

[Anonymous No.6726669]

>>6726636
Nope, and not likely to ever happen unfortunately.

[Anonymous No.6726737]

>>6726669
God that sucks. Would be a bloody ride I'm sure.

[Anonymous No.6727775]

Not quite the last good rare game but the last great one. Dinasaur planet would have been good had they finished and Kameo passed the sniff test I guess. They cut so much from Conker too, if you watch the making of in rare replay its seems like they cut half the game. As far as linear 3d platformers go its the best of the best, cant think of anything else that really compares. Best graphics on N64 hands down. Rare showed it could do what nintendo couldn’t, put adult humor in games not to mention better graphics and how did the big M reward them again?

[Anonymous No.6727789]

It was a degenerate pile of shit for edgy 12 year olds.

[Anonymous No.6727835]

>>6727789
That’s why I liked it so much lol

[Anonymous No.6727849]

Nintenshit64 obsessed retards have no soul. Or brains.

[Anonymous No.6727865]

>>6727789
This, Rare were better when they were making charming games with the odd suggestive joke here and there, Conker is just disgusting projectile vomit start to finish and retroactively sullied everything they ever made, Nintendo were right to drop them after that. Bongs got too cocky, keep your low IQ pub banter to yourselves next time. Oh wait, there won’t be one.

[Anonymous No.6727953]

>>6727789
>>6727865
This unfortunately. I grew up on Beavis & Butthead, Ren & Stimpy etc. but even back then I just felt like Conker was too cringe and tryhard.

[Anonymous No.6727971]

Eh it was ok. Nothing special, a few funny bits. Unique and fun for a playthrough. Unfunny and tryhard at worst parts. What I dont get is why people are always talking about 12 tales and how we missed out. Yeah like we needed a shitty proto banjo kazooie with a kiddie squirrel collecting acorns. At least it broke the mold, so it gets remembered. Wonderful game? Not really. Passable? Yeah

[Anonymous No.6727998]

>>6727971
it's a great game, but even "adult" Nintendo fans would prefer bing wahoo so long gay bowser to anything with poop and guns, so they will forever long for 12 tales

[Anonymous No.6728037]

I remember being so hyped to play this like 10 years ago after hearing so many good things about it, and then when I did I just thought it was just a mid-tier 3D platformer. Aside from swearing and some lame poop jokes it's not really all that interesting or good, probably one of the most overrated games on the console

[Anonymous No.6728081]

>>6727998
What makes it a great game? It has some fun moments, but the second to second gameplay just feels loose and shoddy. The basic movement mechanics of Mario 64 feel really satisfying, which is why people will always go back to it, and make romhacks, just to get more of that particular gameplay. Once you've laughed at the poopoo jokes and the gore, you've kind of experienced everything Conker has to offer.

[Anonymous No.6728121]

>>6728081
It's a fun game full of interesting setpieces before that was really a thing. I wish CBFD leaned more on its platforming roots, but what's there is still challenging if a little undercooked. I think it's more about the presentation, characters, humor, and seeing what they throw at you next. I also like the moodiness of the second half of the game which contrasts with the slapstick violence of the first half - Conker feels like a real character who changes over the course of the journey, and not in ways you expect. Conker just did a lot of things you didn't often see in games back then, let alone 3D platformers

[Anonymous No.6728236]

>>6727953
He wasn't until Seavor started kneeling to the black-cock-sucking soijournos and ruined not only this franchise/character but the entire company's future with it.

[Anonymous No.6728246]

>>6728236
Did Conker really ruin rare? I thought it was long development times and losing money. This game sold ok didnt it?

[Anonymous No.6728319]

>>6726635
Absolute overrated garbage

>Terrible gameplay
>Shit story
>Unfunny jokes
>BUT BUT HE SAID SHIT ON THE N64 ON MY GOD!

[Anonymous No.6728370]

>>6728246
BFD was a huge thorn in Nintendo's side, especially since it didn't sell well and cost a shit ton to market even though it was (technically) in development for 4+ years. I realize Nintendo helped to get the game to fail, but had they not changed the entire game design to "Reddiit: The Game" (contradicting not only Pocket Takes, but also DKC and references to Conker and Berry in B-K), Rare would most likely not have been sold and would have contributed greatly to the Gamecube's library, Star Fox Adventures arguably aside. Moreover, I would bet money that had Nintendo not sold their Rare share, most of the classical team would not have moved on from working there. Fucking Chris Seavor hasn't even made a game since BFD, for goodness' sake! And before BFDtards bring it up again, the multiplayer modes were already part of Twelve Tales (pic related). On the plus side, I strongly suspect Twelve Tales was finished in 1998 and that Rare still has it and will release/leak it someday, finally restoring the series canon which this released forced memeathon caused it to crash and burn.

[Anonymous No.6728415]

>>6728370
*DKR

[Anonymous No.6728460]

>>6728370
Neat, never seen that screenshot before. Greatly disagree that BFD had anything to do with Rare's demise, but here's hoping Twelve Tales gets leaked someday so we can all move on from the blue balls

[Anonymous No.6728462]

>>6728370
I’d love to see twelve tales. I’ve always been on the fence, is it shitty banjo? Or did we miss a good game? Hope it gets leaked but its not likely. Man, yall really all hate bfd, I thought it was immature but a decent time, it reminded me of old south park when they were less satirical and more dancing poop. I bet 12 year olds loved it. But I played through it once ten years ago. I chuckled at a few parts, found it mildly enjoyable and then finished the game and never played it again except multiplayer a few times. Saying its great is overselling it. Definitely not worth four years of development. Best n64 graphics for what its worth. I wouldn’t call it garbage, its just aiming for low brow humour akd succeeding.

[Anonymous No.6728471]

>>6726635
My only real complaint with CBFD is Conker's shadow. Instead of having it just be a circle that stays under him at all times like with most platformers, they wanted to be special and made it a dynamic shadow. It looks good, but it makes platforming waaaaay harder than it needs to be because you can't see where you're going to land.

[Anonymous No.6728494]

>>6728462
>I’ve always been on the fence, is it shitty banjo?
According to one of the developers, it was supposed to be a "living cartoon", so it's probably somewhat like BFD regarding the cutscenes but the rest like Banjo (and possibly Zelda, since it seems you can change tools and equipment; Berry's gameplay was supposed to be something of an RTS). Pocket Tales seems to be a scaled down version of what Twelve Tales was.

[Anonymous No.6728508]

>>6728460
I have no issue that you guys like BFD or find it funny and have great memories from it, by the way. I just genuinely believe it both ruined Rare and destroyed a great game from being released and sequels to come of it, as well.

[Anonymous No.6728567]

>>6728508
Rare was still going strong years after BFD released. Nintendo was never going to purchase Rare outright. Most ex-Rare staff cite Microsoft overreach as the reason they left. The corporate structure at Rare fell apart after Microsoft implemented a new chain of command and the Stampers left. It didn't have anything to do with BFD or Twelve Tales.

[Anonymous No.6728639]

>>6728567
I’m not the guy you replied to but I think Conker might have been the end of “good” rare. They were going strong with what? Half finished bastardized stardox adventures? Dont get me wrong parts of it are good but they didnt finish. Grabbed by the ghoulies? They lost money on that and its repetitive af. Perfect dark zero was objectively poop, wasn’t it? Kameo was ok. I guess people liked those fkn pinata dancing sex garden games. Kinect? Nuts and bolts? Am I missing a big one? Which one of those was “going strong” a la goldeneye, banjo 1 and 2, dkc 1 abd 2, killer instinct, perfect dark, conker etc.?

[Anonymous No.6728670]

>>6726635
The platforming in it was abysmal. Can't believe it was made by Rare.

[Anonymous No.6728687]

>>6728567
I'm saying that it was the main catalyst that caused Nintendo to want to end their relationship with Rare.

[Anonymous No.6728694]

>>6728639
Pay attention to what I said. The company was going strong financially but Microsoft hamstrung their development efforts by restructuring the whole company. I'm not arguing the quality of their games didn't go off a cliff after the buyout, although Star Fox Adventures is pretty underrated imo. Dino Planet would have been better, but they were still turning out quality games up until PD Zero

[Anonymous No.6728707]

>>6728687
And you would be wrong. Nintendo supported BFD, they even gave it a big presence at E3 and its own ad campaign in Playboy. Retailers were the ones who abandoned the game post-release. Rare made enough money for Nintendo that an underperformer wouldn't (and didn't) affect their partnership. Rare went on to develop GBA and DS games for years

[Anonymous No.6728716]

>>6728707
I thought that was all funded by Rare themselves, though.

[Anonymous No.6728723]

>>6728716
Nintendo bankrolled the ad campaign, E3 floorshow and even toured the game to different colleges at the time. Source: Chris Seavor's twitter and the BFD commentary

[Anonymous No.6728817]

>>6728694
Oh you meant going strong financially, not necessarily game quality wise. I think we’re on the same page mostly then. Yeah I’m completely of the opinion sfa/dinasour planet got screwed when it was rushed out. I like parts but it feels really unfinished, its disappointing because it has potential.

[Anonymous No.6728837]

>>6728817
Yeah, it sucks we'll never be able to play the true Dinosaur Planet as Rare intended. That leaked 30-minute gameplay video that surfaced a few years ago just proves how much better the game would have been in its original form. Nintendo can fuck off for ruining it what could have been the N64's swansong. Hopefully somebody hacks Rare's servers and releases all of those hidden SNES and N64 prototypes

[Anonymous No.6728875]

>>6728837
I don't even hate Starfox Adventures, by man, what a fucking misjudgment,
>push Rare to rework a project that was probably pretty much done, just to put Starfox in it, and move it to the GC
>game clearly lacking polish in the later parts
>Starfox fans hate it for not being real Starfox
How was any of that a good idea?

[Anonymous No.6728881]

Played it for like an hour a few years ago. His voice is insufferable. Would've been better to just use banjo style dialogue. Don't remember too much else other than it was boring.

[Anonymous No.6728891]

>>6728875
Those arwing segments should have just been a 5 minute black background screen with the text “Fuck you - signed Rare and Nintendo”

[Anonymous No.6728895]

But parts of the dungeons were oot level

[Anonymous No.6728916]

>>6728891
The biggest buzz kill was not fighting general scales. Im still pissed

[Anonymous No.6728969]

>>6728916
Serious question: was fighting andross better on the snes that in starfox Adventures?

[Anonymous No.6729040]

>>6728370
>>6728236
>>6727953
>>6727865
>>6727789
The S.0yp.0d people are here! YOU ARE NEXT, YOU'RE NEXT!

[Anonymous No.6729050]

>>6729040
Mostly just sóys like this game. It's like movie trivia for them. A disgrace to this series and Rare.

[Anonymous No.6729151]

>>6729050
By this series do you mean pocket tales?

[Anonymous No.6730406]

>>6727789
Honestly that's why I like it. It takes me back. That and Postal 2 are probably the two dumbest edgiest games I can think of and just scream late 90s/ early 2000s edginess.

[Anonymous No.6730548]

>>6727775
Aside from Conker's facial animations, which no other character had, the graphics weren't really that much more impressive than their other 3D platformers.

[Anonymous No.6731186]

would the alternate universe where this came out instead be better?

[Anonymous No.6731201]

>>6731186
No way of knowing. Maybe Chris Seavor wouldn't be utterly embarassed by the series if it was just another funny animal platformer but he'd probably still be disinterested in revisiting it. I don't know if Rare would have been bought by Nintendo or not had they not published such a filthy game for their console, but if they were, maybe they would still be in a state that at least somewhat resembles the glory days. Sure they took a dip in quality around the gamecube era but maybe they could have recovered had they not been swept under the rug doing shitty kinect junk after they couldn't find footing on the Xbox. There's a lot of variables. For all we know it could be exactly the same, but Conker was more friendly and that's it.

[Anonymous No.6731283]

>>6731186
Probably not, they scrapped it for a reason.
Also that CAT!

[Anonymous No.6733519]

>>6731283
Seavor scrapped it due to being gay, not due to the game being bad.

[Anonymous No.6733525]

>>6729151
Yes which is supposed to be a spinoff of Twelve Tales. We'd have several more games in the series had BFD not ended it.

[Anonymous No.6733527]

>>6731186
Probably, though it might not have sold too well.

[Anonymous No.6733741]

damn, now I want to play conker again. I really hated his voice but it was a fun game. you have to appreciate edgelord shit but it was a part of the times. with ren and stimpy and south park being the trend back then, crude humor was accepted and no one got upset and "cringed" like a little girl at it.

[Anonymous No.6733747]

>>6733741
Cope: the post

[Anonymous No.6733757]

>>6733741
I just cringed that they mutilated a series and a finished game to release this. There would be no difference in quality had they made same game with different characters.

[Anonymous No.6733761]

>>6733757
I dont think the n64 needed another kiddie platformer. this was a way to attract more adult gamers and edgelords to the n64, and in the end, it made for a very memorable game

[Anonymous No.6733792]

>>6733761
>I dont think the n64 needed another kiddie platformer.
Why? Might as well made another sale with their "established base." Game was fucking finished, anyway.
>this was a way to attract more adult gamers and edgelords to the n64, and in the end, it made for a very memorable game
Then why didn't they just make a non-Conker version of BFD in the 3 years they spent revamping (and parodying) Twelve Tales?

[Anonymous No.6733802]

>>6733792
because it was ready and 12 Tales wasn't being talked about or anticipated by many people. CBD gave them publicity and a game with notoriety.

[Anonymous No.6733813]

>>6733802
>because it was ready
What was? If you mean Twelve Tales' assets, again, it took them 3 years to revamp a finished game instead of just making a new game. Also, Banjo fans, etc would have bought Twelve Tales no problem, especially since Twelve Tales was advertised in Banjo-Kazooie.

[Anonymous No.6733824]

>>6733813
no I see what you mean. youre right. they just wanted the attention that CBD would give em and hoped that instead of putting out another 3D platformer that might come and go, to put out something people would talk about. be trail blazers on the n64 or what have you.

[Anonymous No.6733939]

>>6733824
>to put out something people would talk about
Again, why couldn't they do that without altering (and ending) an established series and not releasing a finished game that would have sold decently if not very well for the next 3 years? I swear, some BFD retards are NPCs, mindlessly defending it with "at least it wasn't KIDDY! Also, friggin POOKLE RICK!!!!!!!"

[Anonymous No.6733946]

>>6733939
>would have sold decently
they wanted more. the rare name is supposed to mean something, its not there just to put a stamp on another generic platformer and call it a day.

[Anonymous No.6733957]

>>6733946
>its not there just to put a stamp on another generic platformer and call it a day
Proof it was just another generic platformer, or are you just retarded and have nothing but redditoor arguments in defense of BFD replacing TT?

[Anonymous No.6733963]

>>6726635
Rare had plenty of soul, but not nearly enough sole.

[Anonymous No.6733973]

Rare had plenty of soul, but what they truly needed was more sole.

[Anonymous No.6733978]

>>6733957
are you okay? youre getting worse each time. rare took a risk, and it was to stand out. not everybody is going to play it safe all the time.

[Anonymous No.6734018]

>>6733978
>rare took a risk,
>and it was to stand out
Again, why not both? They were capable of doing both, and yet shot themselves.

[Anonymous No.6734036]

>>6726638
>>6726651
>can’t understand the concept of soul

White liberal detcted

[Anonymous No.6735982]

>>6726635
I remember having so much fun with the multiplayer

[Anonymous No.6736221]

>>6726635
fuck you, sea of thieves is great. I bet you're one of those fags who whine for pve servers

[Anonymous No.6736230]

>>6726635
Not retro, but Viva Pinata was great

[Anonymous No.6736267]

>>6733757
Mutilated a series? What series? Fucking Pocket fucking Tales?? It just seems like such an ancialiary little game boy game. How can you ruin a series that hasnt really properly started? I cant imagine many people played bfd like oh no they ruined the story of Pocket Tales! I need to know what was gonna happen to the acorns! BFD is the series, to most people.

[Anonymous No.6736748]

>>6736267
>How can you ruin a series that hasnt really properly started?
Technically started with Diddy Kong Racing, mate, and Pocket Tales is the same character featured in DKR and also in Banjo-Kazooie. Bad Fur Day is supposed to be a parody of Twelve Tales and the short lived but actually existent Conker series, regardless of your goalpost moving.

[Anonymous No.6737245]

>>6726635
Conker was full of cool ideas which were poorly executed half of the time. Some chapters expected you to do mindbogglingly retarded stuff, such as pissing on the boulder guys in the nightclub. I ended up using cheats to skip some of those shitty chapters. The vampire chapter was also trash and I remember having problems with one of the objectives there as a teenager.

It didn't help that the game was extremely linear, with nothing meaningful to discover outside of the main path.

[Anonymous No.6738234]

>>6736748
Conker isnt in Banjo Kazooie, is he? There’s a picture of Berri on the wall in rusty bucket bay. Are you thinking of Nabnuts the squirrel in click clock wood? He’s a wrong answer in one of the questions on Gruntys quiz. He’s in Diddy kong racing but apart from a squeakier voice he has no personality, because his series hadn’t started and he had no games out. I don’t know what goalposts are moving when people say that Conker didn’t matter before BFD

[Anonymous No.6740612]

best girl

[Anonymous No.6740913]

>>6738234
>There’s a picture of Berri on the wall in rusty bucket bay
Artwork from Twelve Tales.
>apart from a squeakier voice he has no personality
Non-sequitur. Uses same design for Conker from Twelve/Pocket Tales.

[Anonymous No.6740919]

>>6738234
>Conker isnt in Banjo Kazooie, is he?