/vr/ - Retro Games

[Anonymous No.6695904]

One of the most shocking and unexpected moments in retro gaming was when Sonic the Hedgehog came to a Nintendo platform.

[Anonymous No.6695909]

>being old enough to remember
we really need to genocide boomers

[Anonymous No.6695952]

I remember not caring. I grew up with a Genesis, Saturn and Dreamcast, but by the time Sega games moved on to 6th gen consoles like GameCube, I was more interested in other games and franchises like Metroid Prime, Wind Walker, and all that. I used to love Sonic but Sonic Heroes was shit and I realized I was more into fun games than brand loyalty to IPs or whatever. I wouldn't have liked it if it were on Sega's own console. It was a sadder shock that their quality so drastically declined, more than them going third party.

[Anonymous No.6695961]

>>6695904
>shocking
that describes the port
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmN5eDIOJqY

[Anonymous No.6695968]

>>6695909
What are you doing on a website without a share function, young man? Shouldn't you be on tikto-
Oh.

[Anonymous No.6695994]

>>6695909
>old enough to remember a non-retro console
yes? what are you trying to say? that you're an actual baby?

[Anonymous No.6696007]

>>6695904
Music was awful. Fan did amazing job at remix right.

[Anonymous No.6696030]

>3-day-ban expires
>immediately goes back to his old spamming-antics
jfc, grow a spine

[Anonymous No.6696034]

>>6696030
wow, sad.

[Anonymous No.6696036]

>>6696030
Cringe so call clown

[Anonymous No.6696037]

>>6696030
needs permabanning

[Anonymous No.6696050]

>>6696030
Damn, bitch, you living like this?

[Anonymous No.6696070]

>>6696030
FUCK U JANNY LOVER

[Anonymous No.6696081]

>>6696030
>>6696034
>>6696036
>>6696037
>>6696050

[Anonymous No.6696105]

>>6696030
2 of those threads and the one we're in right now don't deserve bans though. They're within the rules

[Anonymous No.6696115]

>>6696105
GBA is not retro. All the threads are spam.

[Anonymous No.6696117]

>>6696115
remakes of retro games are allowed
how about you actually look at the game in question rather than just just seeing "advance" and flipping your shit?

[Anonymous No.6696118]

>>6696115
>>6696081

[Anonymous No.6696121]

>>6696030
Thanks, I didn't know that site.
Fuck GBAutist.

[Anonymous No.6696127]

>>6696030
Nigger you are obsessed.

[Anonymous No.6696136]

>>6696127
That anon:
>Screenshots the /bans list
GBA spammer:
>Shitfloods the board non-stop for several days
One of them is obsessed, for sure

[Anonymous No.6696141]

>>6696136
>There's only one person who wants GBA to be discussed here

[Anonymous No.6696158]

>>6696141
There's only one person tirelessly spamming GBA threads.

[Anonymous No.6696160]

>>6695961
>Law 15: Crush your enemy totally.

[Anonymous No.6696167]

>>6696158
And he is doing god's work. Banning the discussion of a console that basically continues the SNES library is retarded for a retro gaming board.
>Inb4 you don't have to be here
It's still retarded.

[Anonymous No.6696170]

Not really. When Sega stopped making consoles, what did people think they were going to do?

[Anonymous No.6696179]

>>6696167
GBA is post-2000 and so off-topic. He is spamming the board with threads that break the rules, and killing off legit discussion threads in the process.
This isn't doing god's work. It's just shitflooding.

[Anonymous No.6696183]

>>6696037
He'll just get a new IP and keep on doing it.

[Anonymous No.6696186]

>>6696183
Range ban clearly needed

[Anonymous No.6696193]

>>6696179
>>6696081

[Anonymous No.6696202]

>>6696167
Rules have to be enforced. GBA might be added someday but it isn't allowed right now so it just shits up the board. Because it's against the rules, GBA threads don't feature good discussion about the game but instead mostly consist of arguments like this about the rules and what should or should not be allowed on the board.

[Anonymous No.6696203]

What, did you get banned from r/retrogaming and so came here to demand we add non-retro hardware like the GBA?

Fuck off, it'll never happen, 6th gen minus the Dreamcast is not welcome here.

[Anonymous No.6696210]

>>6696203
Just looking at posts during the first day of /vr/ and people were strongly against the Dreamcast getting included.. and yet here we are with at least 3 DC threads at any given moment

[Anonymous No.6696215]

>>6696203
Ports of retro games are allowed, stop shitting up the thread with your off topic meta rantings.

[Anonymous No.6696221]

>>6696030
>check /vr/ bans
>/ogg/ guy got banned on wednesday for 3 days
>australia-kun started posting again today
hmmm.

[Anonymous No.6696226]

>>6696215
I don't know, the rules are ambiguous.

[Anonymous No.6696230]

>Mods and janitors are faggots. Allow fifth generation games, people want to discuss them. At the very least, stop deleting the threads. I don't see how they're considered not retro. Even a Resident Evil thread, a game from 1996 was deleted. This is absolute bullshit.

https://desuarchive.org/vr/thread/24786/

Oof, I wonder if history will repeat itself? :^)

[Anonymous No.6696234]

>>6696221
He was posting yesterday and the day before too.

[Anonymous No.6696245]

>>6696230
All the rule changes were made quickly after the board was created, now it's been years and years and there's still no changes, despite all the zoomer whining and crying literally 24/7.
Anybody can find the archive of the very first Mod sticky before Dreamcast and 5th gen were allowed? I'm pretty sure it still said "1999 and earlier" (despite 5th gen and DC not being allowed), but I can't find it on the archive. Anyway, that'd explain why 5th gen and DC were allowed, they all fit in the "1999 and earlier" criteria.
Anyway, now that we know Hiro is willing to make more vidya boards, it's pretty possible that /v2k/ will be made at one point.

[Anonymous No.6696249]

>>6696234
Nevermind, he does phonepost, after all.

[Anonymous No.6696256]

>>6696245
>All the rule changes were made quickly after the board was created
Yeah, after bitching and complaining about muh childhood games, no different to what people do about 6th gen and GBA now

[Anonymous No.6696261]

>>6696256
But the 1999 criteria is important here, not anon's childhood.
Also, the fact the change was made quickly after the board's creation.
Now it's been, what, 7 years? Zoomers complain about 6th gen all the time, yet no rule change, and complete silence from mods.
6th gen threads keep getting deleted, 6th gen beggars get banned, yet the thread about /vrpg/ making fun of zoomers reached 500+ replies bump limit. lol

[Anonymous No.6696271]

>>6696261
Also while I was browsing around that first day in the archives, seems like there was a lot of discussion surrounding the GBA with only minimal amounts of autistic "1999 rule" posting.

Seems like on the big day GBA was taken to be more appropriate for /vr/ than the DC, if not the entire 5th gen.

[Anonymous No.6696275]

>>6696271
Not gonna lie, if I HAD to choose, I'd prefer having GBA too than DC, since it's 2D yadda yadda.
But if allowing GBA would make the 6th gen seething even louder, then fuck that, I can live without GBA on /vr/.
In fact, if it was up to me, I wouldn't allow 5th gen here either.

[Anonymous No.6696281]

>>6696261
I think this part in the sticky is key
> With the release of the 8th generation of consoles, the Sega Dreamcast will now be considered "retro"
It mentions that 8th gen's release was for some reason relevant to the Dreamcast being added. Yes, it's been years of people complaining, but 8th gen has lasted 7 years and we're only getting a new generation at the end of the year. Since 8th gen was mentioned, for some reason, as the reason Dreamcast was added (instead of the year 1999), it stands to reason we should have had no expectation of any new consoles being allowed until the end of the year when the new consoles launch and 9th gen starts.

[Anonymous No.6696292]

>>6696281
I take it more as "Dreamcast was released before 1999, but still we don't consider it retro.... but OK, now that a new generation of consoles is released, we can make an exception, just for this one console, that came out before 1999".
It's my interpretation. I agree the wording is strange and I don't get why would they choose to mention 8th gen.
The fact 6th gen threads keep getting deleted, but the thread about /vrpg/ and /v2k/ wasn't (and reached bump limit) is also a signal, I think.
At this point, I want SOMETHING to happen, either allow 6th gen on /vr/ (which I think would be destructive) or make /v2k/ (win-win situation), but I'm really sick of the 6th gen begging every single day, every single hour.

[Anonymous No.6696298]

>>6696275
I dunno where that reasoning comes from, GBA games are nothing like 5th or 6th gen games. But 5th and 6th gen games are actually very similar.

I think by the mods pussing out in 2013 and allowing 5th gen consoles + DC to be discussed (apparently because it was too hard to explain the 1999 rule is actually for fringe cases like SNES games that came out in 1998 and anons were whining a lot that the rule didn't make sense), that's the reason why people make the case for 6th gen home consoles. I think even limited to 4th gen, people would still make the case that GBA should be included due to the similarity in games.

[Anonymous No.6696301]

>>6696292
/v2k/ would save this board and also give more people a place to talk about their childhood games. I think we can all agree regardless of our position on the rules or what boards we want that PS2/GameCube/Xbox/GBA threads are in an awkward position of not being allowed on /vr/ while it's also impossible for them to survive on /v/ before they drop off and get 404'd.

[Anonymous No.6696513]

>Dreamcast released in 1998
>Ps2, GBA 2000
>GC, Xbox 2001
>Dreamcast allowed on /vr/ in 2014
>mfw 2016 come and gone without PS2 and GBA being allowed
>mfw 2017 come and gone without GC, XBox allowed
>mfw Dreamcast was never specifically added because it became old enough but because instead of trying to define each console individually as retro, moderation just simplified the rule to make it a hard stance against hardware released post Y2K
>mfw 6th gen toddlers forever BTFO and their consoles will never be old enough

[Anonymous No.6696526]

>>6696513
Absolutely blessed logical thinking anon.

[Anonymous No.6696530]

>>6696121
Shithead

[Anonymous No.6696531]

>>6696513
Extremely based.

[Anonymous No.6696535]

/vr/ should be pre-1995, pre-5th gen. Anything after is part of the style-over-substance gaming takeover that brought gaming to the shitheap state it's in now.

[Anonymous No.6696538]

>>6696513
I take GBA, Wondersawn, and PC FX over Dreamcast as more retro.

[Anonymous No.6696541]

>>6696513
>6th gen
>Dreamcast
Level of retrotoddler right here

[Anonymous No.6696598]

>>6696538
Doesn't matter what you think, GBA and Wonderswan Color came out after the cut-off date, making them never retro. Unless you can bribe gookmoot to change the board's rules, anyways.

[Anonymous No.6696618]

>>6696598
Those two can play old models.

[Anonymous No.6696626]

>>6696535
this

[Anonymous No.6696632]

>>6696526
>>6696531
Nope, that anon is unmatched fool.

[Anonymous No.6696674]

>>6696513
This post is stupid because the sticky clearly mentions 8th gen as the reason Dreamcast is added. No reason anything else should be added in the years since 2014. 9th gen launches end of this year, that's the only time we can expect 6th gen to be allowed here or be disappointed if it doesn't happen. Have no fucking idea why people keep saying 1999 is relevant at all to Dreamcast being added, the sticky really couldn't be clearer when it says
>With the release of the 8th generation of consoles, the Sega Dreamcast will now be considered "retro"
It's not like the sticky says "Since the Dreamcast was released before 2000, the Dreamcast is considered retro"

[Anonymous No.6696738]

>>6696674
It's a matter of time and not cause and consequence anon
The rule change became effective with the release of the 8th generation
Even before that change 1999 was already the rule, but there was a lot of discussion about some consoles being considered retro and some were not
The rule was merely simplyfied after the 8th generation was released to include everything from the period instead of trying to define what is and what is not retro

[Anonymous No.6696745]

>>6696598
Once PS5 & Xbox Shat whatever hit. They will.

[Anonymous No.6696753]

>>6696738
Why mention the PS4/XboxOne being released? What does that have to do with anything, if it's not a condition for that followed? Lots of things happened around that time, it's not like the sticky said "With Robin Williams' passing the Sega Dreamcast will now be considered retro". That sentence can only mean cause and consequence.

[Anonymous No.6696758]

>>6696738
Well actually, it was just a poorly written rule that millennials took advantage of to cry about their childhood consoles not being considered retro despite the rule mentioning 1999 as a cut off date.

The original context for 1999 as the cut off date was to ensure discussion of 4th gen games released during the late 90s were still within the rules, the original version of the rule explicitly stated that 5th isn't included. That cause a lot of tears so Moot just gave millennials what they wanted instead of rewriting the rules in a more sensible way.

[Anonymous No.6696854]

>>6696535
back to the roots, baby!
>>2
https://desuarchive.org/vr/thread/2

[Anonymous No.6696905]

>>6696753
Because it's an offshoot of /v/
And 1999 was there from the very beginning anon
The only questions were which pre-1999 consoles were retro and which were not
With a new generation arriving on /v/ the rules of /vr/ were altered to accept all consoles from the agreed timeframe instead of endless discussion of what is and what is not retro inside the same time period
We don't want your 2010's PS2 games here
We don't want your ultrabright cropped GBA soulless pixel art imitations of good retro games
We don't want PC microtransactions here
We don't want Guitar Hero crap
We don't want 7th gen toddlers to start a new cycle of autism and whining
We don't want every single shitposter on /v/ to eventually come to /vr/ to discuss what gachashit they grew up with
We don't want to have to explain it to you kids every fucking day with these bullshit spam threads created with the sole intention of being derailed
It's not going to change and I'm appaled at the idea of adults spending 6 years of their lives holding onto that tiny sliver of hope that someday the 2007 games they grew up with will be accepted here with open arms and be tolerated to kill some NES threads so two autists that care have a place to spam their Guitar Hero or some other bullshit
If it was going to happen it would have already been announced
>6th gen toddlers forever BTFO and your consoles will never be old enough!

[Anonymous No.6696991]

>>6696905
I hate that 5th gen is here so the board is already lost to me. 5th gen has way more in common with 6th gen than to 4th gen. We had Super Mario World, Super Mario 64, and Super Mario Sunshine, and the dumbest place to draw a line is between Mario 64 and Sunshine instead of between World and 64.

[Anonymous No.6697027]

>>6696531
Wrong way.
>>6696991
Extremely blessed logical thinking

[Anonymous No.6697061]

>>6696991
Agreed

[Anonymous No.6697065]

PSX and Saturn were both initially conceived as 2D powerhouses, whereas N64 was conceived as a 3D powerhouse that was supposed to "skip" a generation. If you absolutely had to start fucking with the Gen V stuff, I would permit the former two consoles here, then put the latter and Dreamcast onto /v2k/.

That said, I really don't like that idea, I'd rather permit GBA/GCN here (I think that permitting GBA discussion would get more support if it wasn't perceived as a "slippery slope" while the GCN feels like a quirky kindred spirit to the Dreamcast) and start /v2k/ for the PS2/Xbox, since those two were arguably the start of contemporary vidya.

[Anonymous No.6697069]

>>6696632
FOREVER BTFO
THE RIDE NEVER ENDS
THANKS BASED CHINK MOOT

[Anonymous No.6697090]

>>6697065
PSX was 3D from the beginning
Saturn too
After they were released it became clear where their comparative strenghts were but it was already clear 3D was the future
It makes no sense to me your idea of selective inclusion other than wanting to include only the things that matter to you while excluding others from a same time period

[Anonymous No.6697102]

>>6697090
Everything else is arbitrary, remember when it was apparently decided that "retro" denotes an historical period like "medieval"?

[Anonymous No.6697106]

>>6697065
This entire generational breakdown is just a flimsy excuse anon, and it's not gonna happen

[Anonymous No.6697108]

>>6697106
So?

[Anonymous No.6697116]

>>6697102
Because enthusiasts started using that label to refer to that period when nobody else was, much earlier than the board was created
It was never a centralized decision
Find another word, find another board for your nostalgia
The Beatles are never going to be classical music despite being musicians and older than some contemporary classical compositions

[Anonymous No.6697118]

>>6697090
Saturn originally entertained 2D system run at 16 clock speed.

[Anonymous No.6697123]

>>6697065
Are you retarded? PSX was always meant to be 3D, Kutaragi has gone on record stating he was adamant in making the PSX be a 3D system. You're half-right about Saturn, it could be argued that its 3D isn't true 3D since the "polygons" are just quads that are made up of warped sprites, but the claim that Sega intended the Saturn to not be capable of any form of 3D until very late in its R&D or near its launch is fake and gay.

[Anonymous No.6697125]

>>6697118
Are you talking about SoA's proposed M68030 system? That was shot down pretty early by SoJ.

[Anonymous No.6697127]

>>6697069
>The dick ride never ends

[Anonymous No.6697134]

>>6697125
Same thing.

[Anonymous No.6697140]

>>6696513
Based. we need a post like this pinned forever.

[Anonymous No.6697158]

>>6697134
No, the real Saturn started as a VDP1/VDP2/SH2@28mhz system, and later on around the time PSX was revealed Sega added a second SH2 to beef up the Saturn because they felt it was too weak compared to Sony's console.

[Anonymous No.6697235]

>>6697158
>What prototype you don’t read.

[Anonymous No.6697343]

>>6696030
fuckin based

[Anonymous No.6697380]

>>6696117
FF7 Remake isn't allowed on this board GBAutist.

[Anonymous No.6697406]

>>6697380
*GBasedA

[Anonymous No.6697627]

It like wise

[Anonymous No.6697724]

>>6696535

[Anonymous No.6697832]

>>6697724
Not this time Rat

[Anonymous No.6697849]

Niggers need to fuck off with the generations argument. Systems 1999 and before period. Doesnt matter what gen if it didnt come out before 1999 then fuck off.

[Anonymous No.6697946]

This thread is still up so I guess GBA discussion is allowed now. That’s good because it has become very stale here and discussion of an actual retro platform such as the GBA should liven the place up a bit.

[Anonymous No.6697960]

>>6697946
As long as you talk about the retro games that have been ported to the modern system GBA
They all suck btw
Cropped, low contrast, absurd high brightness
Your childhood was a lie

[Anonymous No.6697975]

>>6695961
Maybe it would be if I could see jack fucking shit in that godawful video quality

[Anonymous No.6697979]

>>6697960
Manchild at best.

[Anonymous No.6697980]

>>6697849
The problem is, what you want the rules to be isn't what they are.

[Anonymous No.6697984]

>>6697960
>Your childhood was a lie
Unlike you, I’m not here to endlessly circle jerk about nostalgia and muh childhood like a sōy infused man baby. I’m here out of a genuine enthusiasm for retro games regardless of platform, developer or publisher. I know this is hard for you 90s babbies to comprehend.

[Anonymous No.6697993]

>>6697984
You're probably on the wrong website then. What made you think 4chan was a good forum for that?

[Anonymous No.6697994]

>>6697960
>Cropped, low contrast, absurd high brightness
Don't forget, most importantly, they sound like shit on GBA's (non-existent) sound chip.

[Anonymous No.6698000]

>>6697994
Too bad GBA didn’t have built FM synth and third C button.

[Anonymous No.6698007]

>>6696215
>retro
>allow
Ironic The mod ban it left and right.

[Anonymous No.6698012]

>>6697979
>>6697984
Lol it's so easy to unlock the absolute butthurt
Especially the second faggot pretending to be sitting on a high throne
Yet these are the ones shitposting on every thread
6th gen toddlers forever BTFO
Never old enough
>>6697994
Good point
And that's not even mentioning the infuriating added muffled voices on every fucking thing the player does

[Anonymous No.6698018]

>>6697980
No the rules clearly states that

[Anonymous No.6698054]

>>6697980
That's literally the rules you idiot

[Anonymous No.6698103]

>>6697993
There used to be good discussion here at one point. Now it’s mostly 90s babies posting puerile console wars shit and screeching ‘zoomer’ at each other.

[Anonymous No.6698108]

There was already several SEGA arcade titles ported to NES though

[Anonymous No.6698178]

>>6695904
Sega arcade port were great.

[Anonymous No.6698247]

>>6695904
Good time to be a Nintendo fan who is also a Sonic fan but didn't give a shit about the rest of Sega. We got every game worth playing on gamecube and they continued making more games for GCN and GBA.

Fuck what you posted though, Mega Collection is all you needed.

Shame they're so stingy with ports now and can't be bothered to solve their Sonic 3 Royalties issues.

[Anonymous No.6698249]

If Silent Hill play different on GBA...Why Konami made into dating horror novel?

[Anonymous No.6698257]

>>6695904
And it was awful. It took 3 or 4 years and being on the next Nintendo handheld to become playable and even that version isn't perfect.

[Anonymous No.6698262]

>>6698257
And I completely forgot about Mega Collection.

[Anonymous No.6698317]

>>6698257
Sonic 3&K would been perfect GBA port.

[Anonymous No.6698359]

>>6698103
Yet here you are, responding to this insincere bait of a thread whose only objective is to bring attention to one autist who wants to change the rules that were already in place at the time you identify as having better discussion, using onions as an insult. Sad irony.
Unless you are that autist in which case go fuck yourself

[Anonymous No.6698374]

>>6698359
>identifying a thing makes you as bad as that thing
literally the critical thinking capacity of a small child

[Anonymous No.6698972]

>>6695904
Gonna go fast!

[Anonymous No.6698982]

>>6696905
>>6696738
>>6696513
Pure retard statement. Keep telling lie.

[Anonymous No.6698983]

sega does what nintendo

[Anonymous No.6699000]

>>6695909
>being old enough to remember
>we really need to genocide boomers
I remember when Sonic use to be relevant.

[Anonymous No.6699003]

>>6696905
Hello, based department?

[Anonymous No.6699013]

>>6697946
Something weird happened. Some of the GBA spam got deleted, but this thread all the replies got wiped instead.
There's also been more GBA spam posted since. Holefully the jannies will sort it soon but this is taking forever.

[Anonymous No.6699084]

>>6699013
it will continues.

[Anonymous No.6699192]

>>6695904
GBA got lot blast processing that didn’t get usage by Sega officials workplace...

[Anonymous No.6699246]

>trolling-threads are still up
feels like groundhog day, really.

[Anonymous No.6699258]

>>6699246
The top 5 threads were all spam/troll threads earlier. Moderation here desperately needs to be faster.

[Anonymous No.6699264]

>>6699258
Or just allow GBA discussion but not PS2, Xbox or GameCube, seems like less work.

[Anonymous No.6699276]

>>6699264
>allow a year 2001 console but not a year 2000 console!!1
oh yeah, that's going to work.

[Anonymous No.6699315]

>>6699264
>allow GBA discussion
No. The rules are clear at the moment. They don't need to change to accommodate a single spammer.

[Anonymous No.6699321]

>>6699264
But the GBA is not retro.

[Anonymous No.6699331]

>>6699276
GBA is more retro than PS2 though.

[Anonymous No.6699353]

>>6699331
No.

[Anonymous No.6699423]

>>6699331
Maybe to you, but not to the people who make the rules, and you don't make the rules. So why would you think your opinion is relevant?

[Anonymous No.6699550]

>>6699423
2D sprite based graphics are automatically more retro than 3D polygonal. Sorry if that ruins your childhood.

[Anonymous No.6699559]

>>6699550
That's wrong.

[Anonymous No.6699565]

>>6699550
This anon unironically supports modern “2D” games and is trying to sneak them onto this board.

[Anonymous No.6699570]

>>6699559
Well that's your opinion, but it's wrong because when retro gaming first became a thing there was no fucking way 3D games were considered retro.

[Anonymous No.6699572]

>>6699570
Yeah? When was that copernicus?

[Anonymous No.6699582]

>>6699570
Your logic is stupid, anon. It's like saying any modern "retro" 2D game is more retro than Jumping Flash.

[Anonymous No.6699586]

>>6699572
About 5 minutes after 3D polygonal gaming became a thing, it was the start of a new era in gaming and naturally some people didn't like it.

>>6699582
Well I didn't say "modern 2D games are retro", I said there's no fucking way 3D games were considered retro when retrogaming became a thing.

[Anonymous No.6699591]

>>6699586
And what day was that? Remember, we live in a society with calendars after all.

[Anonymous No.6699601]

>>6699591
No need to be pedantic about it to sound clever, if you're claiming that N64 and PSX was always considered retro then you're pretty fucking stupid then.

[Anonymous No.6699602]

>>6699550
>2D sprite based graphics are automatically more retro than 3D polygonal
>>6699586
>Well I didn't say "modern 2D games are retro"

Make up your mind.

[Anonymous No.6699605]

>>6699601
What an odd answer to such a simple question, it’s almost as if you don’t want to pin down a date.

[Anonymous No.6699610]

>>6699602
>Make up your mind.
No, you link to me where I said all 2D games are retro. I only said 3D games aren't retro

>>6699605
You want the date of 5 minutes after 3D polygonal gaming started? Because that would prove what exactly? The fact is if you asked someone what "retrogaming" was on the beloved year of 1999, they're absolutely not going to say PSX nor N64. To claim otherwise is retarded and trying to be clever with asking for a date is both retarded and dodging the reality that 3D gaming had to "become" retro.

[Anonymous No.6699616]

>>6699610
Yes, I think it’s a fairly simple request of someone who clearly knows exactly when it happened. Frankly, it’s strange you’d say that and then be so evasive.

[Anonymous No.6699620]

>>6699610
>you link to me where I said all 2D games are retro
>>6699550
>2D sprite based graphics are automatically more retro than 3D polygonal
>automatically

Are you playing dumb or something, anon?

[Anonymous No.6699625]

>>6699586
>About 5 minutes after 3D polygonal gaming became a thing
Oof.

[Anonymous No.6699630]

>>6699620
Take the word "playing" out and the answer is "yes".

[Anonymous No.6699634]

>>6699616
This is a really lame attempt at trolling, you just kind of come across like a bitch because you just won't admit that 3D wasn't always considered retro. I can at least give you a date of 18th March 2013 as an example of 5th gen not being considered retro from a source I'm certain you will find reputable. Sure this is well after 5 minutes after 3D gaming was a thing, but I'm sure you'll also agree that if it wasn't considered retro in 2013, it wasn't in 1999 (praised be that year) either.

>>6699620
>2D sprite based graphics on 4th gen console*
Again, what does being pedantic prove? You needed for us to both waste time clarifying what was already obvious? For what purpose? Just to waste time? To get one or more two posts into a losing debate for you? Is that saving face?

[Anonymous No.6699635]

>>6699634
>this is a really lame attempt at trolling
Imagine pretending you know, literally down to the minute, when games became retro. Now imagine not being able to articulate when that actually was.

[Anonymous No.6699636]

Retro gaming culture started around the end of the 5th and beginning of the 6th generation when you started to see developers referencing their legacies e.g. the NES based mini games in Warioware, Segagaga, Namco Museum, etc. So logically games with 2D sprite based graphics will always be considered objectively more retro than the 5th and 6th gen polygonal graphics because that's when the retro culture was born.

[Anonymous No.6699641]

>>6699634
>2D sprite based graphics on 4th gen console*
Yes, you needed to clarify.

[Anonymous No.6699653]

>>6699635
>Imagine pretending you know, literally down to the minute, when games became retro.
That's not how it works, that was a stupid cope you came up with because thought that, since it's impossible to pin point the exact date the first person who said "5th gen is not retro" I'd need to concede that 5th gen was always considered retro.

It's not my fault that you're a fucking idiot who thought I'd be flabbergasted by your retarded non-existent goalposts. Not only was 5th gen not retro in 1999, it wasn't even retro on that calendar date of 18th March 2013.

[Anonymous No.6699657]

>>6699641
Okay well there's your clarification, now what?

[Anonymous No.6699658]

>>6699653
It’s not a cope, it’s literally referential of your actual rhetoric in this actual thread. Maybe if you drank less you wouldn’t forget things you said 20 minutes ago.

[Anonymous No.6699660]

GBA spammer permaban when?

[Anonymous No.6699661]

>>6699660
As soon as they ban all the Stealth pedo posters :)

[Anonymous No.6699667]

>>6699660
I know right? Mods? Where's the rangeban? Mods?

[Anonymous No.6699670]

>>6699657
Now nothing. Your initial claim was retarded, and you clarified it. You may now resume your argument with whoever you want, and I'll take my leave.

[Anonymous No.6699675]

>>6699658
My point was 3D isn't retro, and I can prove that until very recently that was the prevailing opinion. There's no rhetoric to it, it was an objective fact. You thinking you could trip that fact up by asking for a specific date when the first person said 3D was not retro was a stupid cope.

The burden of proof is now on you to disprove that in 1999 the PSX and N64 weren't considered retro, and of course, I will also ask for specific dates of anyone calling 5th gen retro in 1999 or earlier.

[Anonymous No.6699679]

>>6699670
Yeah fuck off you sadcase, retro is not "muh childhood 3D games" and you know it.

[Anonymous No.6699682]

>>6699675
You can try all you want to avoid answering such a simple line of questioning but people can obviously still read the rest of the thread and figure out who is lacking here.

[Anonymous No.6699683]

>>6699661
Banning all the 6th gen autists would probably be hard. But you're right, they should.

[Anonymous No.6699685]

>>6699683
I just think it’s funny that it turned out you were just some nonce, it makes the whole thing even funnier. More entertaining or whatever.

[Anonymous No.6699686]

>>6699675
>My point was 3D isn't retro
By what definition? Wikipedia? This isn't Wikipedia. Retrogaming.com? This isn't Retrogaming.com. Do you know what website you're on right now, anon?
You're on 4chan.com/vr. There's literally one rule and it tells you what is retro. Check out the sticky. Basically consoles from 1999 and before are retro. So, GBA is not retro.
Don't kill yourself, there's good news.
No one is stopping you from putting your GBA in your ass or posting about it on other boards or websites.

[Anonymous No.6699689]

>>6699682
Ah it's back to
>Hmmm it's just a simple question ;^)
Cope. I've proven that 3D wasn't considered retro until very recently and I've given you a date of 3D not being considered retro on /vr/. You've no argument. Prove that I'm wrong by showing me a date in return of someone in 1999 claiming that the PSX or N64 is retro, otherwise what are you even basing this all on?
>inb4 I was pretending to be retarded for fun

[Anonymous No.6699692]

>>6699675
>disprove that in 1999 the PSX and N64 weren't considered retro
But in 1999 the PSX and N64 weren't retro. They are now though, have you seen the sticky little zoomie?

[Anonymous No.6699694]

>>6699686
My point was that 3D isn't retro and it was only recently has 5th gen babbies been able to get their way by the same means GBAutist is using now. I'll direct you to that original /vr/ sticky >>6699634

3D isn't retro. Your childhood isn't retro. Cope.

[Anonymous No.6699695]

>>6699689
I’m always floored the extent you’ll go to pretend you can pull off some of these retarded arguments. Your biggest problem is that you don’t realize people tend to read the entire thread, and they can see how inconsistent and hopeless your arguments are.

[Anonymous No.6699696]

>>6699685
The word schizo gets thrown around here a lot but you are literally a schizo. Do you get fed by your parents still or how do you stay alive?

[Anonymous No.6699698]

>>6699692
>Zoomie
Don't use terms you don't understand you stupid cunt

[Anonymous No.6699701]

>>6699696
Again, this kind of shit doesn’t help you at all, it just highlights how desperate and poorly socialized you are.

[Anonymous No.6699702]

>>6699694
Star Fox, Tomb Raider, Myst, Doom
There are plenty of retro 3D games, and there are plenty of 2D games which aren't retro.
The rule for this board isn't anything to do with 2D/3D but rather when the console came out. Pre-2000 is retro. Anything after is not.

[Anonymous No.6699703]

>>6699636
This sounds right. Retro is basically anything up to December 1994 when the PlayStation came out. Games released after that time are retro but only if they are for the previous generation consoles. Sega Saturn is considered retro because it came out before the Dec 1994 cut off date, which makes sense since it is for the most part a 2D gaming platform.

[Anonymous No.6699704]

>>6699694
>3D isn't retro
Sometimes it is. The SNES has some 3D games, and it's retro. Have you checked out the sticky? SNES is retro.
Saturn, Dreamcast, N64, and Playstation are retro and they have 3D games too. And they're retro, according to the one rule of the board. Have you read the rule?
>5th gen babbies
5th gen was 20-25 years ago, so they're adults, not babbies.
>GBAutist
Why would you refer to yourself in 3rd person?
>3D isn't retro
By what definition? Since you're on 4chan, let's talk about the definition of 4chan's. If the 3D came out on a platform from 1999 or earlier, it is retro. So, sometimes 3D is retro, it just depends. Check out the sticky.

[Anonymous No.6699708]

>>6699704
Unironically this, but at the end of the day, the only “people” who post like the guy you replied to are “people” who can’t handle that gen 6 is on the way

[Anonymous No.6699712]

>>6699701
You keep talking about pedophilia but there's literally no context to what you're talking about and you refuse to provide any. It's starting to get genuinely creepy.

[Anonymous No.6699714]

>>6699708
>gen 6 is on the way
>a-any day now
LMAO, what day is that again? Sometime next year, right? Just like you said last year? ;^)

[Anonymous No.6699715]

>>6699712
I’m sure anyone reading my posts could easily find the posts you got banned for where you were avatarfagging as roll from megaman. They could just look in the archives from the last few days and find the posts themselves very quickly.

[Anonymous No.6699720]

>>6699715
Oh those ones! When I was avatarfagging as roll from megaman. Could you link to one of those, you know those from the archives from the last few days that are easy to find quickly so everyone can see?

[Anonymous No.6699725]

>>6699720
Right, the ones where you were complaining that the mods wouldn’t let you post lewds of roll.

[Anonymous No.6699729]

>>6699725
Right those ones. Post the link?

[Anonymous No.6699735]

>>6699729
Oh, I’m sure I don’t need to, you’re all but entirely confirming it yourself :) and of course, it’s all there for anyone who actually wants to see for themselves

[Anonymous No.6699742]

>>6699735
You're a fag for wanting 6th gen, you're a fag for talking about pedos, and you're a fag for knowing anything about megaman.

[Anonymous No.6699748]

>>6699742
>finally stops denying it
The next step is finding a cliff to tumble off of anon

[Anonymous No.6699762]

>>6699742
I agree with you until
>you're a fag for knowing anything about megaman
Megaman nes games are good.

[Anonymous No.6699763]

>>6699748
You got me. I was posting avatars of megaman roll all along.
In other news, GBA will never, ever be retro. Neither will Gamecube, sadly for you.
Also, there's another thing I have to tell you.
Xbox will never be allowed here.
Finally there's one more thing.
Don't kill yourself, but, one last message for you.
PS2 will never bee allowed here. Any threads you post about it will be deleted.

[Anonymous No.6699765]

>>6699763
Once again, you make yourself look even worse with clumsy posts like these. I don’t know how many times you need to hear that before you learn.

[Anonymous No.6699771]

>>6699765
I don't care how I look, I'm not a woman like you.
I just want to remind you of one thing.
6th gen will never, ever be retro or allowed here. This means GBA, Xbox, or PS2.
Nana nana boo boo

[Anonymous No.6699775]

>>6699771
>you’re a woman
Holy shit you really are that pedo, aren’t you?

[Anonymous No.6699781]

>>6699775
>Holy shit you really are that pedo, aren’t you?
Yes, I already told you, you got me.
But, just remember 6th gen will never, ever be retro. This includes Gaycube. You can't talk about it here.

[Anonymous No.6699783]

>Nana nana boo boo
Is this from somewhere? Sounds like baby/nanny fetish roleplaying

[Anonymous No.6699787]

>>6699781
Hey great, look anon, I have to go do some important things now. Same time tomorrow?

[Anonymous No.6699789]

GBA isn't retro, OP

[Anonymous No.6699795]

>>6699789
Retro ports are permitted.

[Anonymous No.6699797]

>>6699787
>I have to go do some important things and then make GBA shitposts
Reminder: your personal autistic definition or Wikipedia's definition or retrogaming.com's definition or r/retrogaming's definition of retro doesn't apply here. Here, only the definition of retro that is here applies to here. This means consoles from 1999 or earlier are allowed. Your spam threads will be forever deleted. And one last thing, stay seething!

[Anonymous No.6699798]

>>6699795
"Retro gaming means consoles, computer games, arcade games (including pinball) and any other forms of video games on platforms launched in 1999 and earlier."
This thread is off-topic, and likely a troll

[Anonymous No.6699801]

>>6699783
It's just mindless shitposting, that should have come apparent as soon as someone started throwing pedo around.

[Anonymous No.6699802]

>>6699781
>But, just remember 6th gen will never, ever be retro.
I actually don't care if 6th gen ever gets allowed, 4th gen is what I'm interested in, but it would be delectable to see the tears and rage from people like you if the rule actually did change

[Anonymous No.6699809]

>>6699795
Can you please type out for us: "the game boy advance is not a retro console"?

[Anonymous No.6699817]

>>6699809
You’re obviously new here but retro ports have always been permitted. Just the other day we had a an intelligent and enlightening discussion about the Super Mario Advance series, for example.

[Anonymous No.6699826]

>>6699817
That thread literally got removed because it was part of your GBA spamming.

[Anonymous No.6699827]

>>6699817
Can't even type it? :^)
Please direct me toward those threads. Or were they deleted?

[Anonymous No.6699859]

>>6699802
>it would be delectable to see the tears and rage from people like you if the rule actually did change
That won't happen. It's delectable to see your tears and rage from people like you right now though.
>4th gen is what I'm interested in
Because it makes you seethe that 5th gen is allowed? In that case, 5th gen gang dabs on you and makes you seethe harder.

[Anonymous No.6699861]

>>6699331
The autist starts a new cycle with the same argument

[Anonymous No.6699875]

>>6699675
You're obviously either being dishonest or confusing 3D with the 5th generation of consoles because it's not the same thing, there were good 2D games there and good 3D games before that. Either way, label your argument correctly or be grouped together with the 6th gen whining crew.

[Anonymous No.6699883]

>>6699859
>5th gen gang dabs on you and makes you seethe harder.
>>>/v/

[Anonymous No.6699891]

>>6699694
Lol he really is that butthurt toddler
>NEVER OLD ENOUGH
>YOUR CHILDHOOD WAS A LIE
>PORTS OF GOOD RETRO GAMES TO A MODERN CONSOLE
>CROPPED, LOW CONTRAST, SUPER HIGH BRIGHTNESS, SHITTY SOUND, ANNOYING VOICES
>6TH GEN TODDLERS FOREVER BTFO
Cope, toddler. Whining about older consoles will get you nowhere

[Anonymous No.6699896]

>>6699708
6 years
6 long years since 2014
Soon...
Any day now...
Still waiting...
Never lol it was always 1999

[Anonymous No.6700019]

GBA should be allowed to be discussed here. Why? It’s quite simple. The GBA was conceived as a continuation of the SNES design aesthetic. Its library is packed full of 2D games that are redolent of the era prior to the 5th generation (which isn’t true retro btw, but we’ll save that for another thread). Many have accurately described the GBA as a ‘SNES on the go’ or a ‘love letter to the SNES and the original retro gaming era prior to the 5th generation’ and at the time it appealed to the older, more mature gamer who craved the more hardcore gameplay of the classic retro era. Unlike the PS2, GC and xbox, all of these facts make the GBA an undoubtedly retro gaming platform. Furthermore, its inclusion here will bring more intelligent and enlightening discussion as well as improving board culture on the whole.

[Anonymous No.6700023]

>>6695904
Enough "REEEEEing" about what is or isn't retro, can we talk about how much of an absolute joke this port is
>Physics are wack due to being on the Sonic Advance 1 engine, which isn't designed to handle this game
>You can jump on top of the Green Hill boss and just bounce on him
>Music is a joke
>Main selling points (aside from portable Sonic 1) are a save feature, a zone select (which was already in Sonic 1) and a feature taken from Sonic Jam
> Sega previously ported Smash Pack, which was competent in most regards (at least, compared to this)
>Somebody outright made a homebrew port to show that this didn't need to be as bad as it ended up being. Sega would approach him, among other notable hacking/fan people, to work on the Sonic CD port
It cannot be stressed how much of a failure this port is.

[Anonymous No.6700054]

>>6700019
>PS2 was a continuation of the PS1 aesthetic
>Gamecube was a continuation of the N64 aesthetic
>The DS was a N64 on the go
None of these things nake these consoles retro
Nobody cares how many inferior cropped low contrast absurd high brightness ports with muffled sounds and annoying voices the GBA received
It does not make it retro
>SNES on the go
You can already discuss SNES games here. You can't discuss modern SNES-looking games here either on the GBA or other modern platforms like Steam
>intelligent and enlightening discussion
You mean autism, whining and shitposting like these recent GBA spam threads?

[Anonymous No.6700057]

>>6700019
Just don't bother, anons are too defensive about allowing a 2001 handheld in to /vr/ just in case that means that 6th consoles will also be allowed... and you know, that would be *SO* different to 5th gen discussions.

[Anonymous No.6700061]

>>6700023
It was a soulless cash grab for the anniversary, I think even with stealth's much better port, the concept is still flawed due to the much smaller screen giving less space to react to shit while running.

[Anonymous No.6700150]

>>6700023
Don't forget how underwhelming it was compared to the Advance trilogy.

[Anonymous No.6700262]

>>6700054
DS's lack of bilinear filtering makes it look more like PS1 or Saturn than N64.

[Anonymous No.6700268]

>>6700054
>can’t discuss
>Retro clown make reeee noise

[Anonymous No.6700276]

>>6699891
Duke Nukem wasn’t mind GBA as true retro.

[Anonymous No.6700479]

Crash and Spyro based 2D >>>> Playshit1 3D

[Anonymous No.6700534]

>>6695904
My wife's boyfriend loves Nintendo.

[Anonymous No.6700541]

>>6700054
Based and retropilled.

[Anonymous No.6700594]

>>6699703
Saturn is still very much a 3D system even if its foundation is sprites. It would be easier to just base the rules around the hardware specs than dates. In other words, only allow systems that are 16-bits and under, which would basically cover everything before the 5th gen began.

[Anonymous No.6700601]

>>6699703
>cut date
Retro ain’t period.

[Anonymous No.6700675]

One of the most shocking and unexpected moments in modern gaming was when Sonic the Hedgehog came to a Nintendo platform.

[Anonymous No.6701639]

>>6695904
>great 32 bit handheld
Hasn’t Sega just port near perfect 32x level spec?

[Anonymous No.6701907]

>>6695904
I was just watching a Sonic freerunner on the TV just now. Scary coincidence.

[Anonymous No.6702258]

>>6695909
You are on the boomer board bro.

[Anonymous No.6702276]

>>6702258
Not anymore.

[Anonymous No.6702305]

>>6702276

[Anonymous No.6702318]

>>6702305
Not reading your essay, grampa.

[Anonymous No.6702329]

[Anonymous No.6702332]

>>6702318
No one is making you read anything. However, 6th gen is not retro. And you just read this. Maybe next year ;^)

[Anonymous No.6702382]

>>6702318
You don't have to read the essay, but you do have to read the sticky.

[Anonymous No.6702810]

Reasons sixth gen are retro:
>Last console generation where the Japanese were in the lead game development-wise
>Last console generation classic /vr/ genres like survival horror, JRPGs, and platformers were at the forefront
>Last console generation that many classic /vr/ series were relevant (Goemon, Mana, F-Zero, etc)
>Last console generation that wasn't HD
>Last console generation that wasn't full of DLC
>Last console generation that wasn't dominated by uber-expensive AAA movie games
>Last console generation before the politicization of gaming that culminated in GamerGate
Face it, sixth gen is the last retro generation

[Anonymous No.6702813]

>>6702810
Based.

[Anonymous No.6702815]

>>6702810
Neither 5th gen nor 6th gen are retro, dumb zoomer.

[Anonymous No.6702880]

>>6702815
See question 22 on >>6702305

[Anonymous No.6702886]

>>6702815
based boomer, in denial of the regret upon his life, only holding on to the past with imaginary gatekeeping, encroaching further into the past, attempting to dismantle yesteryear further into retcon

[Anonymous No.6702923]

>>6702880
I don't care what the retarded sticky says. If it's got more than 16 bits, it ain't fuckin retro, fag.

>>6702886
Yes, good, let the hate flow through you. Your bitter zoomer tears keep me alive even longer.

[Anonymous No.6702931]

>>6702923
>>6702305
>lady and gentlemen
Autism at it finest.

[Anonymous No.6702934]

>>6702923
Unlike you I'm a fucking boomer, in fact I'm probably way older than you, but also unlike you I don't uphold imaginary goal-posts and instead look at it logically, the sixth generation is retro in most sensibilities.
Ask almost anyone not on this if PS2 is retro and they will say "yes"

[Anonymous No.6702941]

>>6702934
>Ask almost anyone not on this if PS2 is retro and they will say "yes"
It's too bad for you that "what other people who aren't here think is retro" is not what qualifies retro here.
Here, it's platforms before 2000. Have you seen the sticky?
>>6702923
False flagging as a boomer who wants 5th gen gone isn't going to help your cause. That's covered in the Q&A.

[Anonymous No.6702943]

>>6702941
>False flagging as a boomer who wants 5th gen gone
You don’t know?

[Anonymous No.6702946]

>>6695904
No it wasn't.
>Wow Sega failed so hard they said they're quitting making consoles but will still sell their games
>Oh hey they want money so they released their games on every console.

[Anonymous No.6702954]

>>6702941
Why u sucking Janny's dick senpai lmao

[Anonymous No.6702960]

>>6702941
>False flagging as a boomer who wants 5th gen gone isn't going to help your cause. That's covered in the Q&A.
Except I'm not falseflagging. I genuinely think /vr/ would be better off if 5th gen plus Dreamcast were banned from the board.

[Anonymous No.6702979]

>>6702960
/vr/ should just be atari-era games to be honest

[Anonymous No.6702980]

>>6702954
Newfag detected
>>6702960
>I genuinely think /vr/ would be better off if 5th gen plus Dreamcast were banned from the board.
Too bad. *5th gang gen dabs on you*
Nothing you can do about it faggot.

[Anonymous No.6702984]

>>6702980
Lol. You're just as insufferable as the 6th gen niggers. Congrats.

[Anonymous No.6702992]

>>6702984
What's wrong? False flagging zoomie got a taste of his own medicine and is crying?
*dabs on you again as you wet your pants*

[Anonymous No.6702994]

>>6702979
Boring trash.

[Anonymous No.6703228]

lmao this thread
literally a bunch of people unironically crying out for the mods, just how more pathetic can you get?
the fact that it's probably all guys in their 30s makes it even better

we zoomers got you by the fucking balls, tick tock

[Anonymous No.6703250]

lmao this thread
litertally one kid unironically crying for his childhood toy to be allowed on a forum, just how more pathetic can you get?
the fact that it's probably a kid in his 20s makes it even better

we boomers got you by the fucking pussy, tik tok

[Anonymous No.6703264]

One of the most shocking and unexpected moments in retro gaming history was when Sonic's arms changed to blue despite much protest.

[Anonymous No.6703267]

>they think it’s one guy

[Anonymous No.6703285]

>>6703264
gbautist peak hours seen to be from 11pm to 5am. interesting

[Anonymous No.6703341]

>>6703264
>>6703285
how fucking autistic do you have to be in order to put an image like this together?
you boomers honestly scare me lmao

Just the other day I was lurking in a thread here, and there was this guy that was threatening to pull out a hair from his beard so he could take a screenshot of it. most likely bullshitting but I honestly believe it hahahaha.
Calm down, please. You're in your 30s, you're not exactly an old man yet. You're an age a lot faster if you let this dumb shit get to you.

[Anonymous No.6703349]

>>6703285
It’s almost like it’s more than one person and it’s being orchestrated. Probably false flagging to get asian moot to shut down the board.

[Anonymous No.6704568]

>>6703341
>I honestly believe it
Zoom zoom! Back you go.

[Anonymous No.6704732]

>>6703341
It would take less than 5 minutes to copy deleted images from that 4 chan deleted website and paste them together in mspaint
What's more impressive is the autism involved in creating all these fucking threads
You have to be very, very autistic to trigger the mods in /vr/
Now if you want to discuss rules please fuck off, this board is for discussion of games
Imagine spamming this shit every day and writing entire paragraphs every 15 minutes about why the rules are wrong and the game boy advance is retro
You're the one aging faster because of your obssession

[Anonymous No.6704738]

https://4chan.org/bans

The autist is evading a 1 day ban

[Anonymous No.6704749]

>>6704738
Prove it.

[Anonymous No.6704752]

>>6704749

[Anonymous No.6704757]

>>6704752
No i mean prove someone is evading a ban, it could just be more than one person.

[Anonymous No.6704759]

>>6704757
That's exactly what he wants us to think to further his agenda. Either you're him or you're going to shut the fuck up and evacuate the thread.

[Anonymous No.6704767]

>>6704757
Report all, let the jannies sort them out

[Anonymous No.6704771]

>>6703341
>lmao
>tranime
>reddit spacing
shouldn't you be in school, young man?

[Anonymous No.6704828]

[Anonymous No.6704829]

[Anonymous No.6704831]

[Anonymous No.6704835]

[Anonymous No.6704841]

[Anonymous No.6704847]

[Anonymous No.6704851]

[Anonymous No.6704858]

[Anonymous No.6704863]

[Anonymous No.6704868]

[Anonymous No.6704871]

[Anonymous No.6704875]

[Anonymous No.6704876]

[Anonymous No.6704881]

[Anonymous No.6704893]

[Anonymous No.6704894]

>>6695909
/vr/ is not for zoomers.
Go back to /v/.

[Anonymous No.6704898]

[Anonymous No.6704905]

[Anonymous No.6704912]

[Anonymous No.6704914]

[Anonymous No.6704970]

>>6696030
>>jfc
You're a redditor so I"m going to tell him.

>>6695904
Just delete the 4chan and google cookies and also reset IP using dynamic IP if you have it. The IP leases can be set up with some isp's to change like every few hours easy.

[Anonymous No.6704978]

[Anonymous No.6704980]

[Anonymous No.6704985]

[Anonymous No.6704990]

[Anonymous No.6705001]

>>6704771
>reddit spacing
You're probably younger than him faggot.

[Anonymous No.6705003]

>>6704828
>>6704990
Seek help.

[Anonymous No.6705005]

>>6703285
>one guy
It's at least two, and him and I realize that mods are normalfaggots that sleep at night and are based in the usa as they have always been. Alternatively the people in the usa that are reporter trolls sleep from 11 to 5 at night, because they're dirty normalfaggots with jobs.

[Anonymous No.6705006]

And this is my folder of Mary-Kate and Ashley games for handheld consoles. It may be large but I need it in case someone posts a game boy thread on the internet.
it IS funny

[Anonymous No.6705007]

>>6705006
GBA isn't Gameboy and also isn't retro.

[Anonymous No.6705010]

Mary Kate and Ashley for gameboy is retro.
GBA is not retro

[Anonymous No.6705014]

>>6703250
>came out in 2001
>implying he's a kid

Can you not do math or do you assume that people are nostalgic about what they play at the age of like what, 1? 2? Becuase even if he were 2 when it came out he'd be 21. Odds are he was at least in elementary in all actuality when playing the gba, or us rather than just 'him', ergo we're like 30ish not 20ish.

Dumb asses man.

[Anonymous No.6705016]

>>6705007
Do you think Nintento is ever going to tell use what GBA stood for?

[Anonymous No.6705104]

>>6705014
>probably a kid in his 20s
Illiterate autist toddler

[Anonymous No.6705119]

>>6704767
Cancer

[Anonymous No.6705131]

>>6704894
75% /vr/'s population is 12yr-olds larping as 40-somethings.

[Anonymous No.6705158]

>>6705104
Explain your answer inflexible mouth breather.

[Anonymous No.6705160]

>>6705131
Yet you are the one whining and crying
Ironic

[Anonymous No.6705164]

>>6705160
>users do x thing
>autistic screeching

You're the one whining idiot.

[Anonymous No.6705187]

>>6705164
Autists do much more than screech
They are obssessed, they want the world to change to accomodate their autism, they are a general annoyance, they won't stop even when proven wrong, they can't follow simple rules
Complaining about their obnoxious behavior is only natural for normal people

[Anonymous No.6705194]

>>6696070

[Anonymous No.6705197]

>>6705187
Following rules that make no sense is for bootlicking retards with ocd fag.

In the last gba deleted thread some faggot even went as far to claim they love gba but due to the 'behavior' of people that post gba threads that 'that is why it'll never be allowed'. That's fascism. Hitler was like that. Hating the rules yet abiding by them to the point of crossing of the t's and dotting of I's.

You can go fuck yourselves.

[Anonymous No.6705205]

>>6705197
>gba deleted thread
wonder why that was. Maybe because it's not retro.

[Anonymous No.6705208]

>>6695904
So was Sonic going to a Nintendo console actually shocking to people?

[Anonymous No.6705210]

>>6705205
Rest assured, there will be others. Always and forever.

[Anonymous No.6705214]

>>6705210
Yep.

[Anonymous No.6705220]

>>6705208
Name 5 other scotformer titles that got ported to rival consoles.

[Anonymous No.6705227]

>>6705197
There you go again with the autism whining anon, this is your lowest yet.
/vr/ is now nazi germany because you can't post GBA here.
I love a lot of newer games, including GBA, that does not mean they are /vr/ games.
If everyone started making exceptions for the new stuff they enjoy this board would just be /v/2.0 and have no reason to exist.
/v/ loves the 6th generation, post about it there.
The rules are there for a reason and everyone can see it except for you.

[Anonymous No.6705229]

>>6705214
Who is this so I can master bate to their pictures

[Anonymous No.6705248]

>>6705197
Seethe and dilate. Everyone here hates you and all you stand for.

[Anonymous No.6705309]

>>6705197
>Rules are for retards

[Anonymous No.6705348]

>>6705197
Here you go crybaby >>>/v/520509736
>>6705210
Good, it's fun to watch you cry because they'll always be deleted. It gives me pleasure to know how much time you waste and that you'll never be able to have a genuine discussion without your thread being ruined and then deleted. And this makes you seethe.

[Anonymous No.6705350]

>>6702810
Reasons 6th gen isn't retro
>First console generation where desirable, advertised games were focused on single-player story rather than arcade experiences outside of RPGs (unlike the Dreamcast)
>First console generation where Microsoft entered the fray, and Sega left
>First console generation with a focus on online play for consoles in big-name games (MGS3, Halo, etc)
>Dreamcast excluded, all the surviving systems came out after 1999

[Anonymous No.6705370]

>>6705348
>Good
See? You give me the strength to keep going.

[Anonymous No.6705386]

>>6705370
Good. I like when you type out your tantrums. Can you explain how it makes you feel again that your childhood isn’t retro?

[Anonymous No.6705398]

>>6705386
It’s quite the relief, truth be told. Between that and your continued encouragement, I can keep up this bitching gig forever and ever. To think I was *this* close to hanging my hat and retiring...

[Anonymous No.6705410]

>>6705398
>Autist
>Ever stopping with his obssession
You're not fooling anyone anon

[Anonymous No.6705436]

>>6705348
>first comment
>>shouldn't this be in /vr/?

See faggot. We're here for a fucking reason. You linked me to an anomalous thread that is now ARCHIVED. I can't post my fav gba games there.

[Anonymous No.6705447]

>>6702329
Saved.

[Anonymous No.6705451]

>>6705436
Oh no! You’d have to make a new thread so you can talk about your toy, or something.
But don’t do that, faggot. Instead describe what it feels like to be laughed at for 7 years straight while begging to have your way here and getting your threads wrecked. Also imagine my 5th gen gang face laughing hysterically at you while taking a shit in your mouth

[Anonymous No.6705454]

>>6705436
Yes you can post it there
You can't force people to care
Neither there nor here

[Anonymous No.6705459]

>>6705451
Why would I make a new thread there instead of here?

[Anonymous No.6705461]

>>6705436
>I have no board, and I must post about GBA

[Anonymous No.6705473]

>>6705451
'I've' been 'banned' by hiro from making threads for years.

Also, that board itself tends to pass farm. Hiro was kicked out over that shit by his own staff before.

>>6705454
You just refuse to get it. The situation. Even if I could and would /v/ is awful and only /b/tards would go there of whom were born post 2000. Fuck that.


I was born in the 80s. Late 80s, but still.

[Anonymous No.6705479]

>>6705459
That’s what I’m saying. I want you to post here and explain what it feels like having your thread rekt and deleted as you autistically shriek.

[Anonymous No.6705481]

>>6705473
GBA goes to /v/. Simple as.

[Anonymous No.6705492]

>>6705479
I will meet you halfway and simply continue to post here. That’s more than fair on my end, generous even.

[Anonymous No.6705493]

>>6705473
>muh situation.
Yes, yes, here he goes. Meltdown mode lmaoooo
>Even if I could and would /v/ is awful and only /b/tards would go there of whom were born post 2000. Fuck that.
More of this! How does it make you feel that you hate it so much but yet it's the only place you can get GBA discussion without having your thread ruined and removed?
>I was born in the 80s.
So you're over 30 and crying about the Gameboy Advance? LMAOOO this keeps getting better.
Do you live with your parents per chance?

[Anonymous No.6705513]

>>6705493
>metldown mode
Projection. We're not leaving.

If you don't live with your parents you should be ashamed to post on 4chan, also if under the age of, maybe 92 born anons, at the latest, you don't belong here. As shit as the site is it's only fitting that people like me would shit up your board as it is of the only boards not zoomer infested.

It lives on in the archives.

>>6705481
For now.

[Anonymous No.6705517]

>>6705513
>For now.
Forever, because seethe gen already has a board: /v/.
Let's roll!

[Anonymous No.6705523]

>>6705517
Rules can be changed and the ps5 is coming.

[Anonymous No.6705525]

>>6705523
Any day now, sweetie.

[Anonymous No.6705529]

>>6695904
That never happened on a console that counts as "retro" so be on your way.

[Anonymous No.6705537]

>>6695904
Stop ban evading you vpn using spam autist.

[Anonymous No.6705545]

>>6695904
Not that shocking at all, what was more shocking, and on-topic, was this and how the serial port on the back of the Dreamcast was used to connect to the Neo Geo Pocket Color.

[Anonymous No.6705547]

We are at depression now
It's almost over

[Anonymous No.6705570]

>>6705523
>saves Touhou images
>calling anyone else a poofta

[Anonymous No.6705580]

>>6705547
In between bargaining and depression.
He's still saying "w-what if we took 5th gen away" or "w-what about when PS5 comes out" >>6705523

>>6705513
I just told you, I don't want you to go anywhere yet. I want to hear more about how you feel.
Also thanks for confirming you do live with your parents. And you're in your 30s? All while having a meltdown about your favorite nintendie portable?
So again, how exactly do you feel about not being able to freely discuss it here? Would you say it feels more like sadness and misery, or more like frustration and anger?

[Anonymous No.6705606]

>>6705447
OH NONONO Boombros I tried using our new secret weapon against some seethegen zoomers and they did THIS to it AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH WE WERE SO CLOSE BOOMBROS HOW DO THEY KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[Anonymous No.6705609]

>>6705473
Instead of making me annoyed you are making me sad anon.
I say this without irony.

[Anonymous No.6705835]

>>6702329
Terrible thought
>>6705606
Emphasizes tho

[Anonymous No.6706182]

>>6705606
This version is too smug, and also ruins the below image in a shittier way by deleting the old stick figure guy that's sad over the breakup.

[Anonymous No.6706259]

>>6705529
Wasn't Donkey Kong on a bunch of systems?

[Anonymous No.6706275]

>>6706259
More than one.

[Anonymous No.6706949]

What the....retro fan base purpose begins whining

[Anonymous No.6707339]

the gba isn't and will never be retro. cope and seethe

[Anonymous No.6707546]

Immediately after retshittier come here.

[Anonymous No.6707701]

Thread theme song https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unW4GOJw4ro

[Anonymous No.6707919]

I've been getting the itch to play the classic Sonics again. is there yet any way to play Whitehead's sonic 1 and 2 mobile versions on PC? I'm told those are just the best versions (whereas 3 is kinda split between AIR and Complete)

[Anonymous No.6707923]

>>6707919
Bluestacks works but it's adware.

[Anonymous No.6707926]

>>6707923
yes i've tried fone emulators before, they are garbage on several counts
is it actually possible that nobody has cracked something this popular?

[Anonymous No.6707947]

>>6707701
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTIcIzKjGjg

[Anonymous No.6708552]

>>6707923
Heard anything bad about memu? it seems to be okay.
I don't savor the idea of using a mobile emulator, not sure how well controller compatibility would work, plus I'm told there's ads IN those games.. can't believe the code hasn't just been ripped.

[Anonymous No.6709890]

GnG GBA were frailty perfect.

[Anonymous No.6709908]

>>6695904
Fuck off no it wasn’t.

[Anonymous No.6709915]

>>6696215
Frankly I don’t really care. I’m glad GBA shit is against the rules because it bothers dumb chicken fuckers like you.

[Anonymous No.6710440]

>>6697380
It is if it's in a context of making comparisons to the original FF7. The rules are clear and simple unless you're anal-retentive idiot who can't think critically and is delusional enough to think anons on this board should just pretend post-1999 world never happened.

[Anonymous No.6710443]

>>6709915
So much fun & kek

[Anonymous No.6710636]

>>6708552
malwarebytes seems to think memu is malware, so GREAT. back to that drawing board.

[Anonymous No.6710682]

>>6710440
FFVII Remake is, counter-intuitively, not a remake of FFVII. It's a sequel. There's nothing wrong with bringing it up in a post for some comparison in a discussion about FFVII but we can't make a thread about it where it's the focus of discussion.

[Anonymous No.6710981]

>>6696513

>Wanting to talk about fucking xbox in the same board where people talk about the atari

[Anonymous No.6711075]

>>6697975
https://youtu.be/or7r526uzxQ?t=31

Best channel for sonic game and romhack longplays, bar none.

[Anonymous No.6711084]

>OP makes a thread clearly within the rules
>wannabe janny fags freak the fuck out anyway
never gets old.

[Anonymous No.6711094]

>>6710981
all kinds of things are finding themselves in a state where two categories simply don't work. they often aren't sure how to split into three...

[Anonymous No.6711098]

>>6711094
it's honestly fine and the raging debate honestly detracts from the board more than an xbox thread would. I think someone just wanting to spam halo or something would wind up on /v/ or /vg/.

[Anonymous No.6711142]

>>6711098
my experience is that /a/ is lousy for talking about anime because they're awful people, but in particular if you want to talk about retro anime, it's simply not gonna come up
/v/ is similar for gaming in general, awful and with zero chance of talking about old games... and /vg/ are bros but you won't find old game generals aside from one 'old game general'

[Anonymous No.6711146]

>>6711142
right. But people come here to discuss retro. So being looser in definition would restrict chat less and have less derailments with this annoying debate. My point was it's not some slippery slope where every /v/irgin retard is gonna move over here now and make halo threads. It'd just be less derailment on borderline stuff or a GBA/PS2 thread every now and again or whatever.

[Anonymous No.6711156]

>>6711146
Derailment and debate is better than having seethe gen discussion.
Also GBA/PS2 threads wouldn't be "every now and again or whatever" they'd be posted regularly, and we can't have that here because this board would be even worse then.

[Anonymous No.6711170]

In any case, talking about a newer port OF a retro game is still retro game discussion.
how great is old Sonic, am I right?

[Anonymous No.6711178]

>>6711156
I doubt it.
The point of the board is literally retro. Outside of 4chan ps2/GBA are universally considered retro and Genesis/Snes discussion still transpire. It really is just some seethe by boomers that would rather derail every thread in the board then talk about videogames.

[Anonymous No.6711185]

>>6711178
>ps2
now look son, I haven't complained yet, but when you bring textured polygons into the mix, we have to think about drawing the line.

[Anonymous No.6711190]

>>6696513
>cope meme
Of course redditors would be this inflexible. I understand /vr/ now.

[Anonymous No.6711234]

>>6711178
>Outside of 4chan ps2/GBA are universally considered retro
So this is the only place you can't talk about ps2? So you could just go to literally ANY of the other places and talk about it? Kind of BTFOing yourself there

[Anonymous No.6711242]

>>6711234
I'm not saying what I do or don't want to talk about. And I'm not saying I want to leave 4chan. My point is some sort of argument that allowing the discourse would mean we would no longer have discussion of the platform you care about is nonsense and it never happened anywhere else. What we do have instead is this fucking debate every thread.
You might as well go

[Anonymous No.6711246]

>>6711242
>you might as well go
* you might as well go to Reddit or somrshit you'll never have dreamcast threads on r/neogeo kr whatever if that's how your brain works.

[Anonymous No.6711262]

>>6711242
>I'm not saying what I do or don't want to talk about.
Yes, you're saying you want to allow PS2 discussion.
>And I'm not saying I want to leave 4chan.
You don't have to, you just have to leave this board to talk about PS2. Back to /v/ you go.
>My point is some sort of argument that allowing the discourse would mean we would no longer have discussion of the platform you care about is nonsense and it never happened anywhere else. What we do have instead is this fucking debate every thread.
Oh well, that's still better than having a board full of seethe gen threads that stick around and don't get removed. Also it's funny when the zoomie PS2 thread gets deleted and it just makes them madder.
>You might as well go
No thanks, I like it here because PS2 isn't allowed.

[Anonymous No.6711292]

>>6711262
>Yes, you're saying you want to allow PS2 discussion.
yes. This is not the same thing. Comprehension much?
>You don't have to, you just have to leave this board to talk about PS2. Back to /v/ you go.
There are several problems with /v/ that limit the ability to have functional discourse on /v/ on such subjects. And while i understand your ilk wosh to make this board non-functional as well it is still. way better place for such discussion. You are free to go make threads on /v/ about your systems and derail as you see fit.
>Oh well, that's still better than having a board full of seethe gen threads that stick around and don't get removed.
Yes it is apprarantly you do not wish to discuss videogames.
>Also it's funny when the zoomie PS2 thread gets deleted and it just makes them madder.
I don't want to spoil it for them. But I will finally breaks it to you. They are baiting you. They know the thread will be deleted and they will have their mobile IP banned or whatever. They just do it to get a ride out of you. Your autistic dedication to your role as wanna be janitor is what entertains them. Not ps2 or xbox or whatever. This very thread was made with the purpose of a technically allowed thread that would make you angry.
>No thanks, I like it here because PS2 isn't allowed.
And I liked it here because it was on topic.
I personally think any discussion of what is or isn't retro should be a bannable offense and limited to /qa/.

[Anonymous No.6711374]

>>6711292
>yes. This is not the same thing. Comprehension much?
Are you really sperging out about the difference between you wanting to discuss PS2 vs. you wanting to let everyone around you discuss PS2? Either way you're a fag.
>There are several problems with /v/ that limit the ability to have functional discourse on /v/ on such subjects.
Wrong, I made a GBA thread as a test on /v/ last night and it had 80+ good replies, 99% serious discussion. There goes your main point lol
>Yes it is apprarantly you do not wish to discuss videogames.
Correct, /v/ is for videogames, and /vr/ is for retro videogames
>I don't want to spoil it for them. But I will finally breaks it to you. They are baiting you. They know the thread will be deleted and they will have their mobile IP banned or whatever. They just do it to get a ride out of you. Your autistic dedication to your role as wanna be janitor is what entertains them. Not ps2 or xbox or whatever.
And here I am telling you, I want you and them to continue whining, it's hilarious. It doesn't get a rise out of me, it gives me entertainment.
If they were able to keep 6th gen threads up, that would get a rise out of me. But seeing zoom zooms autistically beg for 6th gen to be allowed is just hilarious and I would never want it to stop.

[Anonymous No.6711392]

every post you make in the thread makes it one step closer to bump limit

[Anonymous No.6711397]

only 100 posts left until this thread hits bump limit can we get a WOOP WOOP?

[Anonymous No.6711403]

if everyone on vr started posting in this thread right now it would only take about a minute for it to die at bumplimit

[Anonymous No.6711408]

god i love playing the retro game sonic on retro game console gba on retro games board

[Anonymous No.6711412]

so, about those retro games?

[Anonymous No.6711418]

hehehe it's a gba meta thread on vr and there's nothing you can do to stop it :) unless...?

[Anonymous No.6711421]

/vr/ - Meta

[Anonymous No.6711426]

what an awesome thread, would be a shame if everyone on vr posted in it all at once.

[Anonymous No.6711429]

i love sonic!

[Anonymous No.6711432]

Can some underage children chime in and tell us how upset they are and how much they wish the GBA would become retro now? Timestamped pictures of crying?

[Anonymous No.6711436]

what were your favorite classic retro memories playing classic retro sonic scotformer scotformer Bane? He didn't fly so good! Sneeeeeed! Thanks, Doc. It's over 9000!!!!

[Anonymous No.6711442]

I love to meme :^) Shrek has added you to his cringe compilation! Bruh follow me on Twitter

[Anonymous No.6711447]

Anyone know how many more posts until bumplimit? I'd hate for this thread to finally die!

[Anonymous No.6711453]

Ttfw you post a wojak and make teh funniez (:

[Anonymous No.6711460]

Follow me on Twitter for more funny posts @WojakPepeSoyMemes

[Anonymous No.6711463]

>>>6711374
, I made a GBA thread as a test on /v/ last night and it had 80+ good replies, 99% serious discussion. There goes your main point lol
neat. You are a /v/irgin. That's really cool. I'll give you a gold star if you go back to your containment board and never come back.
>.Correct,
Good. The first step is acceptance. Next step is moving back to /v/ or at leadt taking your whining to /qa/
>/vr/ is for retro videogames
crying about what is or isn't retro. Noe the rules are /vr/.
>If they were able to keep 6th gen threads up, that would get a rise out of me. But seeing zoom zooms autistically beg for 6th gen to be allowed is just hilarious and I would never want it to stop.
It's one thing to fall for bait.
It's another to fall for it repeatedly.
It's just a full level or retard to admit you fall for it repeatedly without ever realizing it and bragging that you are owning the people laughing at you at the expense of the board quality.

[Anonymous No.6711467]

Awesome thread! would be a shame if everyone on vr posted in it all at once.

[Anonymous No.6711471]

46 posts until bump limit. Make them count!

[Anonymous No.6711474]

>>6711429
Gay

[Anonymous No.6711475]

Bill Clinton was our 44th president. What would Sonic think about that?

[Anonymous No.6711482]

43 bottles of beer on the wall. What kind of beer would Sonic drink?

[Anonymous No.6711484]

Post in this thread to unlock 4chan Sonic secrets

[Anonymous No.6711489]

[Anonymous No.6711493]

>>6711489
This image is meant for

>>6711463
>>6711374
>>6711262
>>6711246
>>6711242
>>6711234
>>6711190
>>6711190
>>6711185

[Anonymous No.6711497]

>>6711463
Interesting. Got any additional thoughts?

[Anonymous No.6711505]

>>6711292
Hah! Owned with facts and logic! Can I have your phone number, babe?

[Anonymous No.6711516]

34 POSTS TO BUMP LIMIT OH NO NO NO

[Anonymous No.6711521]

>>6711463
Just go back already.

[Anonymous No.6711528]

>>6711521
Owned!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.6711531]

>>6711521
yesssss sock it to those little zoomies!

[Anonymous No.6711535]

NOOO YOU CANT POST IN THIS THREAD NOOOOO DONT DO IT BROS

[Anonymous No.6711561]

Anyone wanna discuss race statistics?

[Anonymous No.6711565]

We had a thread the other day where we discussed race statistics past the bump limit. Janitor didn't care. It was quite comfy.

[Anonymous No.6711582]

>25

OH NO NO NO

[Anonymous No.6711608]

24

[Anonymous No.6711705]

Reasons sixth gen are retro:
>Last console generation where the Japanese were in the lead game development-wise
>Last console generation classic /vr/ genres like survival horror, JRPGs, and platformers were at the forefront
>Last console generation that many classic /vr/ series were relevant (Goemon, Mana, F-Zero, etc)
>Last console generation that wasn't HD
>Last console generation that wasn't full of DLC
>Last console generation that wasn't dominated by uber-expensive AAA movie games
>Last console generation before the politicization of gaming that culminated in GamerGate
Face it, sixth gen is the last retro generation

[Anonymous No.6711714]

again, it's a cope because the poster you're replying to is literally a singular actor who pretends to be as many a 6 or 7 different people in some threads. Understand, he is desperately afraid of gen 6 and runs all angles against it. He false flags as "pro" gen 6 (unironically starting many of these "gba" threads he complains about). He complains to the mods like he's the victim. He spams/shits up the board when he doesnt get his way. He replies to his own posts, pretending to agree with himself. He pretends to advocate an off-site venue (/v2k/) by pretending to empathize with people he'd otherwise sperg out at and call zoomers. I realize there are people like this all over this site, but this board's slow pace makes his whole 3 card monty act incredibly entertaining and obvious.

[Anonymous No.6711718]

>trying to no u the pedoshit again
you really are a pedo aren't you? lmfao I was just taking a stab in the dark to begin with, but this damage control routine you're doing is really making me think I was on to something.

[Anonymous No.6711726]

Ok but just so you're aware, you've been accusing multiple different people of being a pedo and I have no idea what you're talking about with Megaman or whatever.
But I do know one thing!
Are you wondering what it is?
It's that GBA, Xbox, Gamecube, and PS2 will never, ever be allowed here.
You can spam shitposts about them all you want, and they will be deleted within a day.
If you think those consoles will be allowed because people would prefer not to have shitposts, you're wrong, because if they were allowed there would be just as many 6th gen threads that stay up than there are 6th gen threads that briefly go up and are deleted now.
If you think deleting your spam posts is difficult, keep in mind that clicking the delete button is easier than it is for you to create a new thread.
Remember, stay seething, and keep posting how upset you are.

[Anonymous No.6711732]

>GBAutist keeps making GBA threads on /vr
>even without based vigilantes ruining them, the threads gain no traction and are horrible
>meanwhile, a GBA thread on /v/ is quickly moving with all genuine discussion
>GBAutist claims GBA threads never work on /v/ and that's why he needs to post on /vr/
>>>/v/520509736

[Anonymous No.6711735]

>3D isn't retro
Sometimes it is. The SNES has some 3D games, and it's retro. Have you checked out the sticky? SNES is retro.
Saturn, Dreamcast, N64, and Playstation are retro and they have 3D games too. And they're retro, according to the one rule of the board. Have you read the rule?
>5th gen babbies
5th gen was 20-25 years ago, so they're adults, not babbies.
>GBAutist
Why would you refer to yourself in 3rd person?
>3D isn't retro
By what definition? Since you're on 4chan, let's talk about the definition of 4chan's. If the 3D came out on a platform from 1999 or earlier, it is retro. So, sometimes 3D is retro, it just depends. Check out the sticky.

[Anonymous No.6711753]

Is it time to redefine the "retro" definition?

The 9th generation of consoles is going to be released this year. When the 8th generation of consoles were released, we were allowed to start discussing the Sega Dreamcast on /vr/. At the time, the Dreamcast was released about 15 years prior.

If we're going by that time frame, we should be allowed to discuss games or consoles released up to 2005, which would include the PS2, Xbox, GC, and Nintendo DS.

[Anonymous No.6711762]

Fuck you, its objectively retro

>late 2012/early 2013 /vr/ is made
>N64, Saturn, and PS1 are considered retro
>PS1 and Saturn released in NA in 1995
>N64 released in 1996
>this makes 17 year old consoles at the time considered retro

>its now 2020
>PS2 was released 20 years ago
>Gamecube was released 19 years ago
>xbox was released 18 years ago


They are considered retro according to the very fucking metric used to fire make this board's rules (remember, Dreamcast was not allowed for the first few months here)
You are, without a doubt, a fucking retard if you don't understand this objective truth. This is not an opinion.

[Anonymous No.6711770]

There you go again with the autism whining anon, this is your lowest yet.
/vr/ is now nazi germany because you can't post GBA here.
I love a lot of newer games, including GBA, that does not mean they are /vr/ games.
If everyone started making exceptions for the new stuff they enjoy this board would just be /v/2.0 and have no reason to exist.
/v/ loves the 6th generation, post about it there.
The rules are there for a reason and everyone can see it except for you.

[Anonymous No.6711781]

The only reason why the rules are fucking retarded as they are now is because the dipshit userbase whined for 5th gen to be included because they were also released in the 90s. Retro on this board being defined as everything up to the end of the 90s was so any games released on older systems during the 5th generation would still be counted, slack jawed dipshits twisted that to include 5th gen consoles instead and now we have games released post 2000 allowed to be discussed despite that not making sense due to the 90s cutoff. Similar idiots also whined to have the Dreamcast included because it was also technically released pre2000 and that has given 6th genners a precedent to justify their whining for the inclusion of 6th gen consoles as retro. This board was perfectly 100 percent fine with sane logical rules before the 3D autists ruined goddamn everything. Had they just shut their mouths all this GBA spam and 6th genners shitting up every thread would have never happened. Oh well now we have to deal with it forever, good job.

[Anonymous No.6711787]

>This is true about the Dreamcast.... You said "3D console generations" which is different than the Dreamcast.
The entire 5th gen and Dreamcast weren't initially considered for being 3D majority consoles. As soon as 5th gen was allowed, that already started a precedent that 3D can be retro if they're old enough, at the time it was just using the "1999" cut-off date as a reason for why 3D gaming should be considered retro.
Once that happened it was only a matter of time until the DC would be allowed on the basis that it's a 3D console that was older than many retro consoles were when they were considered retro. The fact it was released in 1999 was a lucky coincidence since clearly moot or mods didn't have any intention of including the DC when that 1999 rule was made.

So actually it's not different, the allowance for 3D consoles was reasonable considering they predated the "1999" cut-off date and that opened the way for the DC being allowed and with the DC being allowed "with the release of the 8th generation" means that the 1999 rule isn't just arbitrary, it's also meaningless now that the DC needed to be quantified with it's "two generation prior to current gen/15 years old is retro" justification

The 1999 rule has been superseded now, it's obsolete, it should be changed and we can stop having multiple troll threads going where people are either flooding GBA in protest and smug dickheads making shitposts mocking "zoomies". If 6th gen gets allowed, I'd say they're would be fewer 6th gen posts than shitposts now.

[Anonymous No.6711793]

>many consoles that get discussed here have more advance graphics than the OG Gameboy
Exactly my point. They're consoles. The tiny handhelds like Gameboy have much less processing power so of course they have worse graphics. You have proved my point.
>if you look in the archives
I don't have to look at archives, I'm not a newfag like you.
>Well the board's definition has changed before.
Yes, 5th gen consoles became retro. 6th gen consoles never, ever will.
>The sad thing is, you're probably a grown man acting like this.
The sad thing is, you're probably a grown man begging to talk about Gameboy Advance and making bad memes.
>Most people grow out of "this is for the big cool kids only" mentality sometime before they even get laid usually.
Nice projection. I don't claim this to be a "cool kids" place, it's full of losers. Since you're an even bigger loser though, you see this place as having cool kids and you want your childhood handheld to be allowed here so you can talk about it here and feel like a the cool kids you look up to.
Back to /v/ for you, GBA is not allowed. And remember, keep seething.

[Anonymous No.6711798]

Because it's an offshoot of /v/
And 1999 was there from the very beginning anon
The only questions were which pre-1999 consoles were retro and which were not
With a new generation arriving on /v/ the rules of /vr/ were altered to accept all consoles from the agreed timeframe instead of endless discussion of what is and what is not retro inside the same time period
We don't want your 2010's PS2 games here
We don't want your ultrabright cropped GBA soulless pixel art imitations of good retro games
We don't want PC microtransactions here
We don't want Guitar Hero crap
We don't want 7th gen toddlers to start a new cycle of autism and whining
We don't want every single shitposter on /v/ to eventually come to /vr/ to discuss what gachashit they grew up with
We don't want to have to explain it to you kids every fucking day with these bullshit spam threads created with the sole intention of being derailed
It's not going to change and I'm appaled at the idea of adults spending 6 years of their lives holding onto that tiny sliver of hope that someday the 2007 games they grew up with will be accepted here with open arms and be tolerated to kill some NES threads so two autists that care have a place to spam their Guitar Hero or some other bullshit
If it was going to happen it would have already been announced
>6th gen toddlers forever BTFO and your consoles will never be old enough!

[Anonymous No.6711803]

My worry is this.
You bring gen 6 here it might drown out some of the good discussions we have had about older games because gen 6 was the period where videogames went from niche hobby gaining ground to full-blown normality. PS2 was one of the best selling consoles of all time, and for good reason. It had a DVD drive in it at the time when DVD players were expensive and the scale of games exploded in size. Even more so arguably than the disc based era since half of that was all redbook audio and full motion video, the games were very much in that older style until the 5th gen when 3D games became increasingly sophisticated.
It pretty much killed arcades off. Especially since these consoles had a very close parity to the hardware too. Meaning there were less and less home ports of games, especially with Sega folding. 3D RPGs and action games multiplied exponentially.
I lived this era and the one before and ive always seen them as very different things. The only thing both eras really shared was a portion of their ips and people excitedly reading magazines for news and reviews because most people were on dialup or crappy early broadband so it was still easier to grab a strategy guide or cheat book or look in the back of a magazine for tips.
That why 6th gen has never really fit in to /v/ especially since /v/ changes very fast. /v/ is focused on current events and current games. Anything 5 years old or more just struggles to last on there. A lot of slower and deeper discussions just get drowned out by shit posts. Its the reason /vr/ exists in the first place. And some topics of discussion are just too generic for vg.
Its been an awkward limbo for this gen and I've always felt it needed its own home is all though I'm happy for gen 6 have a chance here.
I just worry /vr/ will have less discussions about hardware restoration mods for old consoles, discussions about old source codes and design docs tidbits from I interviews and magazines and stuff.

[Anonymous No.6711806]

A thing is not more retro just because it has less processing power, that's absurd and the exact soulless argument 6th gen toddlers are bound to come up with.
You can't allow a handheld while at the same time ignoring other console that came out at the same time because their games were made at the same time and with the same zeitgeist.
The GBA outlived the Gamecube for fuck's sake, Nintendo positioned the DS as a "third pillar" and not a direct sucessor like the Wii.
Allowing GBA just because its games "look" more like retro games than PS2 games is the same as allowing discussion of modern indie games on /vr/ just because the devs used some 2D pixel art to mimic the classics.
You either accept the time frame the GBA was a part of or you don't
I do enjoy some 6th gen but as others pointed out we have a nice thing going at a nice pace on this board that allows many different niches to cohabit and it would be completely ruined.
Also 6th gen shitposters have proven themselves to be the most autistic and undesirable members of the board, I had some sympathy for the generation until seeing many threads become flooded with whining and antagonism. You think it will stop just because they got what they want? It'll only get worse as it always do when catering to this sort of people.

[Anonymous No.6711810]

No matter how many redditors you invite to vote
GBA will never be allowed
/v2kg/ sunk like a stone because it's only you, the turboautist, and a couple other losers plus gen 7 losers
Allowing the GBA means allowing the PS2
They are equally old and specs mean nothing
Allowing the PS2 means allowing GC and Xbox
Sooner or later gen 7 will want to be allowed too
It's not how old it is or how many ports of older games it received
It's a time capsule with a very definite end date that's not changing just because you are crying
Also I enjoy the idea that you are suffering and seething for such a small and irrelevant thing, you do a lot of shitposting and you deserve to never taste victory just like you will never taste sex.
Go create another v2kgeneral in /vg/ if you still think people care

[Anonymous No.6711815]

You hold a simple date in too much reverence. Late 5th gen plays effectively the same as early 6th gen. The only real difference at that point was visuals and being able to fit more random shit on the screen.
The transition from 4th to 5th gen was far more impactful due to 3D, and if we where meant to have a "real" old game board, they should have cut it there. But they didn't, and the mention of "With the release of the 8th generation of consoles" implies that it will continue with the release of 9th gen consoles.

But hey, maybe it won't, and cutting it off and the special year rule will stick. It's up to the mods

[Anonymous No.6711821]

> With the release of the 8th generation of consoles, the Sega Dreamcast will now be considered "retro"
> With the release of the 9th generation of consoles, _______________
People will explain this away, bring up the years as if 1999 means anything, but they'll never be able to answer why the sticky mentions 8th generation to begin with. Why is the 8th generation's release relevant if all that mattered was that Dreamcast is a 90s console? You will NEVER hear a coherent answer to this by those who want to keep 6th gen away from this board. They can't admit that the 8th gen's release was relevant to the Dreamcast being allowed, that this implies a sliding and expanding timescale of what constitutes "retro", and that the 9th generation's release can only mean one thing.

[Anonymous No.6711823]

THREE DAYS? THREE FUCKING DAYS? MODS? WHAT THE FUCK?

[Anonymous No.6711826]

>>6711823
seething pedo

[Anonymous No.6711829]

Sure it has, the only “bad faith” arguments are from the resident board autist who’s responsible for:
>just make /v2k/
>just because a year goes by doesn’t change when the bicentennial was
>6th gen is too modern and icky
>this is MY childhood nostalgia board and no one else’s
>misinterpreting the clearly worded sticky
>talking to himself/samefagging
>throwing embarrassing tantrums when exposed
The reality is that time marches on and he grows sadder and more out of touch with his own peer group every day.

[Anonymous No.6711835]

I think the 6th genners should take up shop in /vrpg/ as a protest. All they've managed to achieve here is pissing people off and making them way more resistant to the idea of allowing 6th gen on /vr/. Considering RPG games are allowed to be discussed outside /vrpg/ for some reason it makes their case for /v2k/ much more powerful since /vrpg/ is pointless and /v2k/ related discussion isn't allowed or wanted here and gets drowned out on /v/ and /vg/ which isn't a problem that RPG games have. Them getting their own board is the best of both worlds since they get to discuss their shit and /vr/ doesn't get flooded with GTA, Halo and Kingdom Hearts threads. If a fucking stupid and pointless board like /vrpg/ that has a subject that can be discussed outside the board is allowed to exist then /v2k/ has a pretty good chance of being created.

[Anonymous No.6711839]

>>6711835
>/v2k/
seething pedo

[Anonymous No.6711843]

/v/ has 6th gen discussion, go there. Let boomers have at least one board. If PS2 is allowed here, everything else, from NES to Genesis, to PCEngine will get drowned out in a sea of only 6th gen discussion, as the demographics on this site are overwhelmingly around late teens to early/mid 20s. This board will be virtually no different from others once you open that pandora's box. People will start clamoring for PS3 and Wii to be discussed here about 5 years from now, as they'll look at 6th gen being posted and say "why can't 360 and PS3 be considered /vr/? They're almost 20 years old". No doubt the same people clamoring for PS2 threads in /vr/ would complain about 7th and 8th gen being allowed here.

[Anonymous No.6711853]

>>6711843
Soillennials and zoomers don't care, man. They just wanna fuck boomers' shit up as much as possible.

[Anonymous No.6711860]

>>6711853
who can blame em? us old guys had it pretty good, i think some of us forget how great being a boomer is from time to time.

[Anonymous No.6711862]

>>6711860
>hi fellow boomers im not a larping zoomer at all trust me

[Anonymous No.6711864]

The problem I see is that drawing the line between 5th gen and 6th gen is arbitrary and will increasingly stick out as time passes. The most obvious leap in gaming history is between 4th gen and 5th gen. It's just plain weird to be able to talk about say Armored Core for the PS1 but you can't talk about Armored Core 2 as if there's some monumental difference there. It's best if we have a board to talk about consoles up to SNES/Genesis etc., a board to talk about early 3D games (which can continuously expand as more generations come out and whatever means "early" is changed over time), and then the board which covers everything but heavily skews contemporary

[Anonymous No.6711867]

>>6711862
I was born in 1972 thank you very much. I saw back to the future in theaters.

[Anonymous No.6711872]

>>6711835
>gets drowned out on /v/
You're not fooling anyone zoomazoom. There are seethe gen threads with hundreds of posts every single day on /v/.
So, what does it feel like knowing you will never be allowed to discuss it here?

[Anonymous No.6711874]

>The platform was launched before 1999. The wording of the rules states that the platform must be launched before then, not the game
Yes. It also says the game must have been launched on that platform. So, when was Resident Evil 0 launched on N64? Never. Your stunted reading comprehension and maturity betrays you as a child.
> I will be making a Resident Evil threads on this platform every day now to make up for the conversation you've detracted from.
Please do, it's hilarious to watch you seethe and cry as your threads continuously get deleted every day.
>We are within the scope of the rules
Nope!
>there is nothing you can do about it besides throw a tantrum.
If that's true, why do your 6th gen threads keep getting deleted, every day for years now?
Maybe next year your consoles will be allowed ;^)

[Anonymous No.6711879]

>>6711864
I don't want online shit destroying my fifth generation discussion.

[Anonymous No.6711883]

Retro isn’t an age, it’s a cultural distinction. Modern gaming is 6th gen and later. Even the primary controllers are identical from that point onward, because the games are largely the same.

5th gen is the last “retro” age, which is a collective term for generations 1-5. You can split the retro gens into the “silver age” or “golden age” or whatever you want. However, those eras are dubbed “retro,” collectively.

The /vr/ cut-off is 1999 and earlier for all time. 2000 and beyond is called /v/.

[Anonymous No.6711886]

>>6711883
nonce

[Anonymous No.6711887]

>>6711883
No, I can't accept that the world doesn't bend to my will, I'll stay here and throw endless tantrums.

[Anonymous No.6711890]

>>6711762
>>6711753
Maybe next year, right? ;^)

[Anonymous No.6711894]

Pre-HD is a good metric for consoles but not portables. I think a better arbitrary delineation is pre (meaningful) internet connectivity. Once games went online, there was a significant shift in game design philosophy. A playstation 2 RPG has more in common with an SNES RPG than a modern “RPG”. That being said, I really don’t think 6th gen is quite retro yet. GBA probably is “retro” by now but thats only because its essentially a portable SNES and I’m sick of the autists here sperging out when you ask if a GBA port is worth playing. Personally i wouldn’t mind the entirety of 6th gen being allowed here because it really is a matter of time until that happens. A huge gamecube source code leak would be a great excuse to amend the rules.

We need a meta threat to discuss this because I’m sick of seeing this same “is it retro or not” discussion spilling into every thread

[Anonymous No.6711901]

>>6711890
you're going to hurt yourself talking like that anon

[Anonymous No.6711903]

Do you know how to Google whether or not it came out before the year 2000 you fucking retard?
No one cares about your autistic zoomer opinion of what should or should not be considered retro (although it is funny to watch you sperg out)
There is literally one rule of the board and it is simple. Did it come out before 2000 or not?
6th gen will never, ever be retro, no matter what. I know this makes you seethe and wet your diaper but your spoiled diaper isn't going to change the rules.
Pokemon Mini came out in 2001 right?
Yep, it's non retro, zoomer cringeshit.
Anything past the first generation of Pokemon is extremely cringe by the way.

[Anonymous No.6711905]

>>6711894
Never will, s e e t h e

[Anonymous No.6711918]

>>6711905
I haven't been bumping the thread this entire time anon, it's going to take more than 500 posts to hit the bump limit.

[Anonymous No.6712006]

This thread is hilarious thanks guys

[Anonymous No.6712008]

My nigga, I had to check r/retrogaming to see if their definition of retro was as autistic as /vr/'s. Turns out they're even worse, they don't even consider the Dreamcast retro.
The user I mentioned has made several mini blogposts about this anytime the question has come up, and a 40-minute video on his obscure YouTube channel where he basically says 6th gen is not retro.
I do believe you're his faggy alter ego. Like Jekyll and Hyde.

[Anonymous No.6712085]

Dreamniggers fear the PS2, they think because it won "by having a DVD" player (it was actually because it had two fucking sticks and games) that /vr/ will become /tv2/ and we'll only be talking about Harry Potter and The Chamber of Secret's bonus features.

[Anonymous No.6712125]

Reasons sixth gen are retro:
>Last console generation where the Japanese were in the lead game development-wise
>Last console generation classic /vr/ genres like survival horror, JRPGs, and platformers were at the forefront
>Last console generation that many classic /vr/ series were relevant (Goemon, Mana, F-Zero, etc)
>Last console generation that wasn't HD
>Last console generation that wasn't full of DLC
>Last console generation that wasn't dominated by uber-expensive AAA movie games
>Last console generation before the politicization of gaming that culminated in GamerGate
Face it, sixth gen is the last retro generation

[Anonymous No.6712130]

The only reason why the rules are fucking retarded as they are now is because the dipshit userbase whined for 5th gen to be included because they were also released in the 90s. Retro on this board being defined as everything up to the end of the 90s was so any games released on older systems during the 5th generation would still be counted, slack jawed dipshits twisted that to include 5th gen consoles instead and now we have games released post 2000 allowed to be discussed despite that not making sense due to the 90s cutoff. Similar idiots also whined to have the Dreamcast included because it was also technically released pre2000 and that has given 6th genners a precedent to justify their whining for the inclusion of 6th gen consoles as retro. This board was perfectly 100 percent fine with sane logical rules before the 3D autists ruined goddamn everything. Had they just shut their mouths all this GBA spam and 6th genners shitting up every thread would have never happened. Oh well now we have to deal with it forever, good job.

[Anonymous No.6712140]

>PS2 was a continuation of the PS1 aesthetic
>Gamecube was a continuation of the N64 aesthetic
>The DS was a N64 on the go
None of these things nake these consoles retro
Nobody cares how many inferior cropped low contrast absurd high brightness ports with muffled sounds and annoying voices the GBA received
It does not make it retro
>SNES on the go
You can already discuss SNES games here. You can't discuss modern SNES-looking games here either on the GBA or other modern platforms like Steam
>intelligent and enlightening discussion
You mean autism, whining and shitposting like these recent GBA spam threads?

[Anonymous No.6712141]

>>6712130
I think everyone can agree that 6th gen is a good cutoff. Even 5 years from now I don't think there'll be people trying to push Halo 3 threads.

[Anonymous No.6712147]

I think the 6th genners should take up shop in /vrpg/ as a protest. All they've managed to achieve here is pissing people off and making them way more resistant to the idea of allowing 6th gen on /vr/. Considering RPG games are allowed to be discussed outside /vrpg/ for some reason it makes their case for /v2k/ much more powerful since /vrpg/ is pointless and /v2k/ related discussion isn't allowed or wanted here and gets drowned out on /v/ and /vg/ which isn't a problem that RPG games have. Them getting their own board is the best of both worlds since they get to discuss their shit and /vr/ doesn't get flooded with GTA, Halo and Kingdom Hearts threads. If a fucking stupid and pointless board like /vrpg/ that has a subject that can be discussed outside the board is allowed to exist then /v2k/ has a pretty good chance of being created.

[Anonymous No.6712152]

>>6712147
I'd say /vmg/ is a more suitable hobo camp. It's even more pointless.

[Anonymous No.6712158]

>>6712085
That is exactly what would happen and you know it

[Anonymous No.6712170]

>>6712158
You know what had good bonus features? The Simpsons Season 1 DVD box set. Had a hidden news broadcast of the controversy surrounding Bart Simpson t-shirts. That was a good PS2 memory.

[Anonymous No.6712193]

ps2 i can understand because it lasted so long, so by the end had some fairly modern-ish games
but gba? i'd like to hear a good reason to exclude that besides just "it's after '99 so oh well", really, it's capabilities are somewhere between a snes and a saturn (mostly snes, but has enough horsepower to do a bit of 3D with a lot of effort), while it does have renditions of "newer" mid-2000's games, they're very different, retro styled versions almost exclusively in 2D, they're rather retro in the actual dictionary sense

[Anonymous No.6712203]

>>6712193
It's 16:9 so it's zoomershit.

[Anonymous No.6712204]

Pre-HD is a good metric for consoles but not portables. I think a better arbitrary delineation is pre (meaningful) internet connectivity. Once games went online, there was a significant shift in game design philosophy. A playstation 2 RPG has more in common with an SNES RPG than a modern “RPG”. That being said, I really don’t think 6th gen is quite retro yet. GBA probably is “retro” by now but thats only because its essentially a portable SNES and I’m sick of the autists here sperging out when you ask if a GBA port is worth playing. Personally i wouldn’t mind the entirety of 6th gen being allowed here because it really is a matter of time until that happens. A huge gamecube source code leak would be a great excuse to amend the rules.

We need a meta threat to discuss this because I’m sick of seeing this same “is it retro or not” discussion spilling into every thread

[Anonymous No.6712248]

>>6712008
so what's retro over there?

we zoomies got it fucking rough

[Anonymous No.6712251]

>>6712248
here's a pretty clear fucking difference when one medium has far quicker progression in terms of technology and overall culture. Like it or not, stuff like the GBA has a lot more in common with its predecessors than the 3DS or Switch and games that appeared were far more primitive and limited in terms of scope than what gets shat out onto modern handhelds.
Don't worry though, I'm sure you'll just call me a redditor again instead of actually acknowledging that the definitions of 'retro' on this board are dumb as fuck and pretty clearly just mean "whatever was in MY childhood is retro! stop discussing games three years older than it! REEEEEEEEEEEEE!"

[Anonymous No.6712256]

>library is 80% snes ports
>not retro
In all seriousness realistically anything that doesn't have the trappings of modern systems (eg. online required, DLC, HD resolutions) should be considered retro if it's old enough. The GBA is the same age as the Genesis and SNES were back in the mid-00s and they were considered retro then. unfortunately mods are dingbats who seem to think the forum is going to be flooded with fucking Halo posts or whatever if they include the rest of the 6th gen as if anybody who regularly posts on this forum gives a single shit about some mediocre console FPS. when was the last time Kuru Kuru Kururin got discussed on /v/, huh?

[Anonymous No.6712275]

>>6711839
>>6711886
It isn't funny. It's never been funny. It's never gonna be funny.

[Anonymous No.6712280]

>>6712275
it's not supposed to be funny, it's just so other posters know what you're all about.

[Anonymous No.6712362]

>>6712251
wut? are you confused or something? I 100% support what you're saying, my dude.
the rules are fucking stupid.

I'd take another board at this point, so long as they rename this one to "vintage games" or something.

[Anonymous No.6712371]

>>6712362
>responding to some random in a deleted thread
well, someone is seething

I’m not even a Sony fanboy but to me it looks like someone chapped your ass real good, you are coming off as one of those stereotypical nintentoddlers

also PS2 has an amazing library, what are you even talking about?

[Anonymous No.6712392]

>>6712371
uhhh m8? wrong guy?

[Anonymous No.6712395]

This is obvious bait. No bandwagoner would want to know what it was like. I'll tell you anyway and when you can no longer read through your seething tears just tell me to stop.
A few years into the 00's everything "retro" was largely considered obsolete. There were a handful of freaks who were interested in it but the rest of the world considered it junk. It was common to find a box of random shit at a yard sale or flea market for a few bucks. I have about 200 systems and can't think of a single "retro" one I paid more than a few bucks for unless it was CIB. That likely included controllers, games, and some other random shit. It was common to find boxes of games for a few bucks. I bought a shoebox full of GB carts for $12. PS1 games were 3 for a buck at my local flea market. Same for Saturn, which were fairly common. There was usually some NGCD, SCD, PCE and other random shit mixed in and all the same price. A "CIB" System Card or Arcade Card looks like a CD game so I found a few of those as well. Again, same price. Flea markets in Japan were littered with WS/WSCs selling for less than a buck. I have a whole drawer full of them. Old PCs were literally considered garbage. People would pay you to hall them away. Especially those nasty heavy CRT monitors.
Ok i'll stop.

[Anonymous No.6712507]

>>6712395
You might actually have a disorder. Please get help and stop posting.

[Anonymous No.6712516]

Partys over boys time to pack it up

[Anonymous No.6712521]

[Anonymous No.6712526]

The GBA port was illegitimate. Let's not even acknowledge it's existence from now on.

[Anonymous No.6712534]

[Anonymous No.6712540]

[Anonymous No.6712549]

[Anonymous No.6712554]

[Anonymous No.6712561]

[Anonymous No.6712563]

>13 posts away from bump limit
AHHHHH ZOOMBROS!!! Even when they don't get deleted, our troll threads get trashed within a day. I'm shaking and crying... Going to go replace the batteries on my Gameboy Advance, put on my trench coat and fedora, and walk around outside playing Mario. Maybe a female human will see me playing and want to talk to me about my portable Mario?

[Anonymous No.6712564]

>>6712280
1) not even him
2) calling someone pedo as a baseless instinct is the dumbest attempt at a meme I have ever seen

[Anonymous No.6712567]

[Anonymous No.6712572]

>>6712564
*insult not instinct

Not even on a keyboard. Pure brainfart due to being exposed to such ridiculousness.

[Anonymous No.6712574]

[Anonymous No.6712584]

>>6712572
*not even on a cellphone

FUCK

[Anonymous No.6712587]

[Anonymous No.6712596]

[Anonymous No.6712607]

[Anonymous No.6712615]

[Anonymous No.6712623]

[Anonymous No.6712629]

>>6712564
>not even him
okay
>calling someone a pedo as a baseless insult
Oh it's not baseless at all, don't you see?

[Anonymous No.6712653]

>>6712623
Gayenesis
>>6712623
dumb movie games?

[Anonymous No.6713085]

>>6712653
>Gayenesis
t.Seething Nincel

[Anonymous No.6713945]

>>6712653
>>6713085
Faggots, both of you

[Anonymous No.6713949]

>thread made it to bumplimit
sad!

[Anonymous No.6714135]

>>6713085
>>6713945
More than you.

[Anonymous No.6714148]

>>6713085
T. Shitter

[Anonymous No.6714534]

>>6712203
>>6712248
>murr zoomer general
We gamer don’t give a damn