/vr/ - Retro Games

[Anonymous No.6296662]

is the GBA retro yet? dont want to get banned over dicussing it since other stuff like PS2 is considered retro everywhere else but not here

[Anonymous No.6296663]

>>6296662
ps2 has been retro for a while now. 360 was announced as the new cutoff last november when that console turned 15(!).

[Anonymous No.6296665]

>>6296662
NO, NOT RETRO!

[Anonymous No.6296668]

>>6296665
saying so doesnt make it so.

[Anonymous No.6296670]

>>6296668
Read the sticky, fucking newfag.

[Anonymous No.6296672]

>>6296662
>>6296668
Did it come out before the year 2000? No? Then fuck off back to /v/

[Anonymous No.6296673]

>>6296672
a few years back i remember reading here that GBA was acceptable even tho PS2 wasnt

[Anonymous No.6296675]

>>6296662
GBA is 32bit and plays shitty snes ports with muffled music. It should be considered retro.

[Anonymous No.6296678]

let me get this straight
>PS2: not retro
>Gameboy Advance: not retro
>Dreamcast: retro
how hard does a console have to flop to be considered retro? will ouya be considered retro soon?

[Anonymous No.6296680]

>>6296663
All my PS2 threads get deleted for being off-topic.

[Anonymous No.6296681]

Not retro, enjoy your ban

[Anonymous No.6296682]

>>6296678
>>6296675
Typical 18 year old shitheads that don't know what "retro" means. It's not stuff from when YOU were a kid, the world literally does not revolve around your perspectiveless shitty short lives

[Anonymous No.6296683]

>>6296682
nigga most people that played PS2 and GBA are well in their 30's by now, just because you are a bitter 60 year old stuck in a time capsule doesnt mean time stops moving

[Anonymous No.6296684]

>>6296678
Dreamcast came out in 1998, it's retro.
PS2 and GBA came out after Dec 31, 1999, they missed the cutoff for retro.

[Anonymous No.6296687]

>>6296683
Retro is a time period here, not an age

[Anonymous No.6296689]

>>6296684
>console released in december 31 1999: totally retro
>console released in january 1st 2000: zoomer not retro at all

[Anonymous No.6296690]

>>6296683
>BAAAWWWWW OLD MAN TIME STOPS FOR NO ONE
>is literally crybabying on /vr/ about not being able to post about 20 year old games
the irony is fucking palpable

[Anonymous No.6296694]

>>6296689
Yeah, that's how cutoffs work. Life isn't fair.

[Anonymous No.6296698]

>>6296690
>waaaah waaah why does everyone consider 6 gen retro? 2001 feel like yesterday for me and my facebook friends
>>6296694
who says the rules of a board shouldnt change over time? will this board still consider 6th gen retro in 2030? seems super retarded

[Anonymous No.6296702]

>>6296689
That's what the sticky says, stupid.

[Anonymous No.6296704]

>>6296702
>why yes, i have no opinion of my own and mindlessly agree with whatever rules are imposed
thought so

[Anonymous No.6296706]

>>6296698
>who says the rules of a board shouldnt change over time
Until they do, go fuck off.

[Anonymous No.6296710]

>>6296704
>too stupid to read the sticky
>too stupid to realize that /v/ exists
Wanna talk about non retro crap then go to >>>/v/. Fucking faggot.

[Anonymous No.6296712]

>>6296698
Age isn't the issue, pre 2000 is retro. Get over it dude, you're shitting yourself over nothing.
>who says the rules of a board shouldnt change over time?
Who says the board needs to cater to your retarded opinions and ideas? Suck a dick already fag
>will this board still consider 6th gen retro in 2030?
They should, because games made before the year 2000 will still be made before the year 2000 in the year 3000
>seems super retarded
Reason and logic seems like super retardation to the super retarded

[Anonymous No.6296713]

>>6296710
/v/ is too fast to discuss old games nobody has played in 20 years
/vr/ is literally meant for that niche
>but muh rules
should be changed, simple as

[Anonymous No.6296714]

>>6296662
>don't wanna get banned
>does bannable offense by bringing up a dead beaten horse that has nothing to do with the discussion of retro games themselves
And no, talking about consoles themselves and their relation to eachother doesn't count. Talk about retro games or fuck off.

[Anonymous No.6296715]

>>6296713
You should be shot against a wall, simple as.

[Anonymous No.6296716]

>>6296713
Kill yourself, simple as.

[Anonymous No.6296717]

>>6296712
>arbitrary cutoff date
>Reason and logic
reason and logic are not your thing my man

[Anonymous No.6296719]

>>6296713
And until the rules are changed GBA will not be considered retro on this board. Don't like it? Too bad.

[Anonymous No.6296720]

>>6296717
It's not arbitrary, the year 2000 is commonly accepted as the start of the 21st century

[Anonymous No.6296724]

>>6296720
It's also when the jews went into overdrive with their NWO plan. Everything after the turn of the century is pure shit.

[Anonymous No.6296727]

>>6296720
you subjectivelly decide that 21st century is the cutoff, wich is arbitrary

[Anonymous No.6296729]

>>6296727
How about I arbitrarily cut your head off, and rape your mother and sister?

[Anonymous No.6296730]

>>6296682
>It's not stuff from when YOU were a kid
that is literally the definition of retro. it does not refer to any specific time period, just a "recent past"

[Anonymous No.6296732]

>>6296730
Did you know that your recent past was pure jewish crap?

[Anonymous No.6296735]

>>6296727
Ovjectively actually. The whole world accepts that Jan 1, 2000 was the start of the new millenium, except for you.

[Anonymous No.6296736]

>>6296720
if anything it was really 2001, culture doesn't instantly change at the start of a decade, it can take 2-3 years. In this case it was 1, and it was triggered by 9/11. culture has been irreversibly changed since then

[Anonymous No.6296738]

>>6296736
Right, the jews claimed this century. Now they need to die.

[Anonymous No.6296739]

>>6296732
the fuck are you on about? forget to take your abilify this morning?

[Anonymous No.6296740]

>>6296727
This board as a whole, decided that 2000 be considered the cutoff. Don't like it? Then go somewhere else. You can bitch and moan till you're blue in the face but, on this board, GBA will not be considered retro.

[Anonymous No.6296741]

>>6296735
>reading comprehension
>moving the goalpost
yes, the 21st century starts in the year 2000
where does the definition of retro say that it ends there tho?

[Anonymous No.6296742]

>>6296739
>take your meds, goy

[Anonymous No.6296743]

>>6296724
>>6296732
desu it's been nothing but Hebrews since WWII

[Anonymous No.6296746]

>>6296742
>no, of course i have not taken my anti-psychotic today
say no more senpai

[Anonymous No.6296747]

>>6296746
Kill yourself, jew.

[Anonymous No.6296749]

/vr/ is extremely unintelligent besides their extremely autistic understanding of soldering computer parts. I will defend them from the jews.

[Anonymous No.6296751]

>>6296747
white as fuck. you can't tell me how jews have anything to do with the definition of "retro" because you are a loony bin

[Anonymous No.6296753]

>ITT: Bitter oldfags showing their schizo /pol/tard side and coping with the fact that its not the year 2004 anymore and they no longer have any friends

[Anonymous No.6296757]

>>6296741
On the sticky, you fucking idiot. On this board retro games are defined as anything pre 2000. Do some online communities considere GBA retro? Perhaps, but not here. So kindly fuck off.

[Anonymous No.6296759]

>>6296751
>white as fuck
You're damn right, faggot.

[Anonymous No.6296760]

>>6296753
more like zoomers shitting their diapers out of desperation to join our secret club

[Anonymous No.6296762]

>>6296757
>On this board retro games are defined as anything pre 2000.
yeah for now
nobody without brain damage considers dreamcast to be any more retro than PS2 or gamecube

[Anonymous No.6296765]

>>6296762
>yeah for now
Do you think you're making inroads, commie?