/vr/ - Retro Games

[Anonymous No.5913280]

s o o n™

[Anonymous No.5913287]

>>5913280
>input and audio lag, wrong resolution, and no analogue output™

[Anonymous No.5913315]

Mark my words, nintendo will never do it because they don't want to have to engineer a better analog stick for it. They will instead release the games on switch to some capacity.

[Anonymous No.5913318]

>>5913280
>and more
no, that's about it

[Anonymous No.5913319]

>>5913280
They wouldn’t be able to include 20 games like all the other mini consoles since there aren’t even 20 good games on the console but the nincels will buy it anyways lmfao

[Anonymous No.5913323]

>>5913319
still more than the psclassic ayy

[Anonymous No.5913329]

>>5913280

[Anonymous No.5913352]

>Zelda, Mario... all your favorites!

[Anonymous No.5913368]

>>5913315
They’ll never do it because Rare made the N64 what it was and without those games they’ve got Mario 64, Starfox and OOT to appeal to normies and nothing else.

[Anonymous No.5913385]

>>5913368
So you're acting like Microsoft's current business relationship with Nintendo doesn't mean anything to you?

GTFO with that bullshit.

[Anonymous No.5913397]

>>5913315
>nintendo will never do it because they don't want to have to engineer a better analog stick for it.
Even if they do, people will complain endlessly that the sticks don't feel right compared to the originals (and with how shit the build quality the analog sticks are on the Switch, I hope Nintendo never makes a N64 mini because they will make the sticks as cheap as possible).

[Anonymous No.5913427]

>>5913397
They rereleased Gamecube controllers when Smash 4 and Ultimate came out.

[Anonymous No.5913440]

>>5913280
Not going to happen.

Nintendo will want to use the cheapest system on a chip as they did with the NES and SNES Classics and N64 games would require too much power and thus better and more expensive emulating hardware. So they won't bother.

[Anonymous No.5913447]

>>5913280
There is no real market for it anymore, the mini console craze is over and I would argue that le epic retro gamer phase is slowly passing with normalfags.

Also purely from the product standpoint the controller is harder to replicate than NES/SNES and the hardware requirements would be higher too. Then there is the problem of the games, there aren't that many to pick from in the first place and 80% have aged horribly and are barely playable by today's standards.

[Anonymous No.5913503]

omg another mini console to put under my tv yess!!!!

[Anonymous No.5913508]

>>5913280

[Anonymous No.5913512]

>I have nothing to say so I spam images
for what purpose?

[Anonymous No.5913520]

>>5913427
Yeah and they are identical to original gamecube controllers, not redesigned or re-engineered. Considering the inherent flaws of the n64 controller stick and how much longer ago they were produced, I highly doubt they would put out exact replicas of the originals.

[Anonymous No.5913540]

>>5913280
If Nintendo actually did one of these I think N64 games would really drop in value. Same thing happened to NES and SNES carts after their classic consoles came out. For N64 people literally only want the same 20 or so games when it comes to physical carts, and most of those games would likely be on the mini

[Anonymous No.5913563]

>>5913440
This. The absolute biggest reason this won't happen is there is no 'system on a chip' powerful enough to do it. You can emulate the NES and SNES on anything, but you can barely find 20 N64 games that run perfectly on a full-fledged gaming PC. ARM-cpu stuff like the memeberry's compatibility is just an absolute shitshow without a hope. Nintendo would have to pool so many resources together to pull it off it'll never be worth it.

[Anonymous No.5913571]

>>5913508
God damn do I hate youtubers

[Anonymous No.5913587]

>>5913440
>>5913563
I'm pretty sure whatever SOAC Nintendo is using has to be several times more powerful than the Wii was and that thing has near perfect N64 emulation on the VC.

[Anonymous No.5913594]

>>5913385
It doesn’t. The Nintendo 64 was shit.

[Anonymous No.5913598]

>>5913563
If they still have the source codes to those old games they could probably do it with "minimal" effort. Its kinda like how the Xbox360 was just emulating those old Xbox games. If you have professional programmers who actually know what they're doing its possible. But chances are its all lost, from the era where nobody kept source codes for shit.

[Anonymous No.5913613]

>>5913323
Ps classic wasn't released correctly at all. It could have had over 20 titles on it. Not shivelware titles, but legit titles.

[Anonymous No.5913638]

Excited to see N64 emulation fucked up even more than normal.

[Anonymous No.5913687]

>>5913368
>and nothing else
Mario Party
Mario Tennis
Mario Golf
Wave Race
1080 Snowboarding
Cruis'n USA
Dr.Mario 64
Pokemon Puzzle League
Pokemon Snap
PokeStadium 1 or 2 (lack of gb connection might hurt but normalfags only care for the minigames)
Smash 64
Those are normalfag-favorites and could easily be on the classic.

[Anonymous No.5913697]

>>5913280
Rather see a GB/GBC classic

[Anonymous No.5913715]

>>5913598
>>5913563
>If they still have the source codes to those old games they could probably do it with "minimal" effort. Its kinda like how the Xbox360 was just
Wii VC proves you wrong. It's good but not perfect.
And Wii U is even worse for some reason.

[Anonymous No.5913725]

>>5913508
This is truly terrifying

[Anonymous No.5913786]

>>5913280
nintendo is going to greatly underestimate the demand for this.

[Anonymous No.5913830]

>>5913440
>>5913563
Nintendo could use remade N64 chips or a custom MIPS+RCP+RAM SoC but that would need R&D which costs money. That's what's so disappointing about all these retro consoles. They should work more like real hardware with a special "built-in" flash cart. As far as I know, only the Atari Flashback 2 and 2+ work that way. You could actually add a cartridge slot to those. If it was up to me, these mini consoles would be more like updated versions of the real thing, complete with cartridge slot or CD drive, at least for a "deluxe" version. "Deluxe" PlayStation mini would be more like a PSOne with the original PlayStation shell style and a collection of games. I get that they're marketed for people who don't know how to emulate and who don't have any retro consoles, or for people buying something cool for their kids/grandkids, but it sucks that they don't put any effort into them. They could still be something cool for kids without being disappointing for adults who grew up with the originals.

[Anonymous No.5913834]

>>5913287
Why the fuck would they put analogue out? The whole point is for people to plug them into their modern TV's with HDMI. Are you some kind of rabble rouser? What's your endgame here? Is this a troll? Are you the hacker known as 4chan, and am I being rused in some way here?

[Anonymous No.5913836]

>>5913447
>There is no real market for it anymore, the mini console craze is over and I would argue that le epic retro gamer phase is slowly passing with normalfags.
Wrong. The post.

[Anonymous No.5913838]

If Sega came out with a console that would play every single game from the Master System to 32X to the Dreamcast I would buy the shit out of it.

[Anonymous No.5913847]

>>5913687
>1080 Snowboarding
They'd have to re-license, or remove the Burton and Tommy Hilfiger branding. Was Ride in there too? Never played it on VC, so maybe this already happened, or Nintendo will just put it out anyway.

[Anonymous No.5913849]

>>5913830
>CD drive
No company is going to pay to put actual optical media into a mini console without it being over $100 out the gate. These things are made to manufactured as cheaply as possible.

[Anonymous No.5913851]

>>5913838
You're more likely than not posting from a device that already can my dude.

[Anonymous No.5913952]

>>5913280
It won't happen.

[Anonymous No.5914102]

>>5913280
Nintendo will never do it because it would cost too much and they don't have the ability to emulate N64 titles correctly.

[Anonymous No.5914109]

>>5913319
They'd drop the game count to 15, maybe even 10

[Anonymous No.5914408]

Nah. Everyone will just keep rereleasing SNES and Genesis emulators

[Anonymous No.5914747]

>>5913715
Nintendo putting out whatever spare Wii hardware in N64 shells PSTV-style is an idea I've heard come up in these threads before, they'd be able to re-use their old emulator that worked decently and at least cover the VC library. It's just very doubtful they could meet demand with that kind of set up.

[Anonymous No.5914753]

>>5913563
Can you name a good N64 game can't I run on my Raspberry Pi?

[Anonymous No.5916426]

>>5913368
>microsoft is literally putting their exclusives on switch now
>banjo is in Smash
You can't possibly be this stupid.

[Anonymous No.5916432]

>>5914109
Probably 5
>Mario 64, f zero, star fox, Zelda OOT, Zelda MM

[Anonymous No.5917086]

>>5913687
Cruisn usa and Mario Tennis

>ok

[Anonymous No.5917192]

Listen here funboi's, there will be n64 mini.
Everyone has touched on the games list, it's a bit weak, moreso if agreements can't bemade with rare.
But the real kicker is the controller!!
There is a reason ps one didn't include dualshocks-the rumble and analogue stick tech costs a shit load of money.
Some games can't be played fully without a rumble pack (oot and lylat wars) as some neat features depend on it.
To top it off, you need 4 of the cunts to play some top tier n64 games like goldeneye and mario parties.
Hell, even the controller ports are extra money, and again, you need 4 on the front of the console.
They'd have to, at the bare minimum, include 2 controllers with analogue sticks with rumble packs(or built in rumble packs) with the base console.
Lastly, pixel art and 2d graphics are 'so hot right now', shovel knight and undertale and other faggy shit like that.
You show me one game (and no not minecraft) that looks like above that was released recently to critical acclaim.
And double lastly, modern gamers can't play old shooters anymore, the turok style fps controls would make zoomies heads explode.

[Anonymous No.5917195]

>>5917192
will be no* n64 mini fuckit

[Anonymous No.5917213]

>>5913834
>Why the fuck would they put analogue out?
they wouldn't, because they're making a piece of garbage for people with no taste

[Anonymous No.5917254]

>>5913687
*minigames and rental trash

[Anonymous No.5918615]

>>5917192
>Some games can't be played fully without a rumble pack (oot and lylat wars) as some neat features depend on it.
oot stone of agony is almost useless

[Anonymous No.5918643]

>>5913587
>snes mini
>more powerful than Wii
are you retarded?

[Anonymous No.5919091]

i've got a really stupid theory as to why this is actually happening
banjo and k rool in smash for starters, simple enough
but they really didn't have to record new palutena's guidance for sheik, referring to the character as "he" instead of reusing the old dialogue

[Anonymous No.5919108]

>>5913687
Wave Race and 1080 need to rebrand licenses. God knows who owns the rights to Cruisin.

[Anonymous No.5919112]

>>5913287
People who put the tm in their posts are unfunny losers.

[Anonymous No.5919160]

>>5918643
You might be retarded to think a 2001 level hardware is comparable to 2013 ARM. Wii was essentially using a 2001 cpu and a slightly more updated 2004-2005 gpu.

2018 tablets have more processing power than ps4/x1.

[Anonymous No.5919168]

>>5919112
>People who put the tm in their posts are Unfunny Losers™
fixed that for you

[Anonymous No.5919171]

>>5913587
>the Wii
>has near perfect N64 emulation on the VC.
HA HA NO.
Tons of games have various graphical issues that don't happen on real hardware.
>>5914747
>they'd be able to re-use their old emulator that worked decently
It didn't.

[Anonymous No.5919214]

>>5919108
wr64 on vc removed all the brands, they could do that for 1080 too.
Cruis'n is owned by Nintendo.

[Anonymous No.5919245]

>>5919214
>Cruis'n is owned by Nintendo.
Nope
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruis%27n
All other games after Crusin 1 were published by Midway. It's most likely a Rare issue where Nintendo the 64 port but Midway kept the rights.

[Anonymous No.5919285]

>>5919245
>Raw Thrills
It has a lot of Midway's old staff, but it's not Midway. Raw Thrills had to partner with Nintendo again to release the two most recent games in the series, likely because Nintendo owns the Cruis'n brand.

[Anonymous No.5919446]

>>5913368
You're acting like that Rare shit has aged well. As long as it got SM64 and OOT its fine. Those games are still widely regarded as some of the best games ever made. Especially OOT, so many still to this day say its the best game made.

[Anonymous No.5919534]

>>5919171
You must be retarded.

[Anonymous No.5919673]

>>5913697

This is actually a great idea. They could release a tiny handheld with a rechargeable battery and a super long battery life.

Or they could do a Gameboy home console you plug into your television.

[Anonymous No.5919701]

>>5913280
It literally CANNOT happen because they can't use Rare, licensed games, or M-rated games, which leaves nothing but first party Nintendo stuff. It would end up with like 10 games, literally half of which would have Mario in them.

[Anonymous No.5919943]

>>5919534
>thinks VC emulation is accurate
>calls others retarded
Nice argument retard.
>>5919701
>M-rated games,
PS1 assic has M rated games, can't see why Nintendo wouldn't.

Here's a list of about a dizen games Nintendo could get access to, Rare stuff not included:
Mario 64
Ocarina of Time
Majora's Mask
F-zero X
Mario Kart
Wave Race 64*
1080*
Ogre Battle 64
Smash Bros
Pokemon Stadium 1 or 2
Rayman 2
Mischief Makers
Sin & Punishment
Yoshi's Story
Mario Golf
Mario Tennis
Snowboard Kids 1 or 2
Crusin' USA 1

*needs licenses rebranded, which Wave Race got on VC
These are games that Nintendo either owns wholesale or could get access to via 3rd party request. I would also include Body Harvest and Space Station Silicon valley, but considering Nintendos strained development with DMA (aka Rockstar North), it's possible there's still bad blood between them (as there hasn't been a GTA ever released on home consoles, even now). These also could be emulated decently provided Nintendo puts actual effort into it this time.

[Anonymous No.5919964]

>>5913427
I bought both, Smash 4 controller is perfect, but the ultimate one has stick drift

[Anonymous No.5919969]

>>5913447
Retro gaming isnt a phase tho, every time i wear my n64 shirt i get mad love from everybody

[Anonymous No.5919973]

N64 mini is basically pointless because all the games that they'd put on it are going to be the same ones we've seen rereleased a million times over like mario and ocarina. It'd be more interesting if they're able to get Rare on board (which now could actually happen), if they're able to jump through the licensing nightmare to get Goldeneye, and if they're able to get other 3rd party games like Mischief Makers and Turok. Both in terms of permission as well as getting the emulation decent enough, which was previously a problem on Wii's VC for presumably a lot of games that didn't show.

Also, I think they'd need to go all-out and have the thing packed-in with FOUR controllers and a lot of the games have a multiplayer focus. N64's strength was as a party console, and so there'd be much more appeal if OUT OF THE BOX it was just this thing you could unpack and it'd be all set up from the start for four-player partying. That way it'd also have appeal beyond "retards who don't know how to set up an emulator on their computer"

[Anonymous No.5919974]

>>5917192
Goldeneye has alternate control schemes more palatable to zoomers

[Anonymous No.5920038]

>>5919973
>interesting if they're able to get Rare on board (which now could actually happen), if they're able to jump through the licensing nightmare to get Goldeneye
Or they could bypass that and port the superior Perfect Dark, a game they actually own.

[Anonymous No.5920059]

>>5920038
are they going to ensure the emulation runs at silky smooth 8.0 frames per second, as the developers intended?

[Anonymous No.5920428]

>>5919160
>2018 tablets have more processing power than ps4/x1.
wew

[Anonymous No.5920459]

>>5920428
It’s true, but only because the current gen consoles have dogshit netbook CPUs

[Anonymous No.5920505]

>>5913315
The old Nintendo would never do it, but the old Nintendo started dying about 20 years ago. A company is not a person, they have a continued flux of people. Nintendo became prone to gimmicks, giving up technical superiority to other companies, releasing nonsensical items like the SNES and NES Classic. If the old Nintendo has been on life support for a while the N64 Classic would mark the final death of it for me.

[Anonymous No.5920512]

>>5920505
>SNES and NES Classic
I obviously mean SNES class and NES classic. And some of their modern stuff is very good. But it's not old Nintendo good.

[Anonymous No.5920583]

>>5919160
Yep, guess you're retarded, sorry for asking.

[Anonymous No.5920945]

>>5920505
They started during with the GameCube ? Why?

[Anonymous No.5920969]

>>5919446
>muh aged poorly
only idiots say that shit

[Anonymous No.5921638]

>Pokemon Stadium 1 & 2
>without access to the core games to use your Pokemon

What's the fucking point?

[Anonymous No.5922781]

>>5920505
>giving up technical superiority to other companies
they had technical superiority when?

[Anonymous No.5923185]

>>5920583
He explained why you're wrong and you have no valid comeback.

[Anonymous No.5923263]

>>5920505
N64 was the last of "cool Nintendo" but the Wii was fun.

[Anonymous No.5923925]

>>5919673
that Samsung logo in the upper left is triggering me

[Anonymous No.5924013]

>>5923925
>upper left

[Anonymous No.5924047]

>>5913315
The second part is the real reason. They know the games are huge nostalgia sellers. They can drip feed them as selling points into the Switch instead.
...
Remember Earthbound on Wii U? There's a reason it was never on Wii.

[Anonymous No.5924514]

>>5919943
>Rare stuff not included:

Nintendo has a pretty good relationship with Microsoft right now. Banjo and Kazooie are in the new Smash. I can see games like B&K, Perfect Dark, Blast Corpse, Get Force Gemini or Diddy Kong Racing make it to the system.

[Anonymous No.5924587]

>>5922781
zoomer in the radar

[Anonymous No.5924595]

>>5924514
Still no Goldeneye though. God damn it, this is why licensed games will always be cursed. It's been the same shit with Turtles in Time on the SNES as well.

[Anonymous No.5924601]

>>5913368
There's so much more!
Kirby 64
Smash bros
Castlevania 64 or LoD
Majora's mask
Yoshi's story
Mario party
Doom 64
Paper Mario
Hydro Thunder
Mario Kart 64
F-zero X

[Anonymous No.5924604]

>>5924514
Just because Banjo is in Smash doesn't mean they won't be renegotiations for other shit Rare owns like PD and Conker. That's why I didn't list them.

[Anonymous No.5924836]

>>5924604
>Just because Banjo is in Smash doesn't mean they won't be renegotiations for other shit Rare owns like PD and Conker. That's why I didn't list them.

I don't expect Conker, because of the M rating. I think Nintendo could negotiate PD, Microsoft already has a superior port that runs at 60fps and 4K on the Xbox One X. Donkey Kong 64 could be a likely candidate, since Nintendo owns that one anyway. I bet Nintendo could get an un-edited version of Diddy Kong Racing, since they own the DK characters.

[Anonymous No.5924859]

>>5924595
>Still no Goldeneye though. God damn it, this is why licensed games will always be cursed. It's been the same shit with Turtles in Time on the SNES as well.

Yeah, I think Eon Productions is the problem with this one. It might have something to do with Pierce Brosman's licensed image in the game. When they made tat GoldenEye remake, they replaced Brosman with Daniel Craig.

[Anonymous No.5924862]

>buying emulators

[Anonymous No.5924978]

>>5913838
They already released a mini, and have done tons of "Sega Collection" releases. Plus yeah emulation exists.

>>5913563
I emulated N64 with Intel integrated graphics with a laptop from the mid 2000's. I couldn't play Counter Strike, but I could play Nintendo 64 games without a problem.

>>5917192
Rumble pack isn't a deal breaker and N64 really wasn't known for it's FPSs other than what you posted. The important thing is marketing which the name gives. Other anons have posted two lists of well known games without license issues.

>>5920505
Nintendo has been the "family" console sense the beginning. It's also often been the pack leader pushing forward new concepts. I don't really see anything wrong with the "gimmics", as opposed to just being a gloryfied PC that Playstation and X-Box are.Touch Controls and the dual screen of the DS ended up being a huge success, but it'd never happen if everyone always played it safe and never innovated. It's not like it stops them from putting out good traditional games either.

[Anonymous No.5925204]

Mario 64
Mario Kart 64
Smash Bros.
Mario Party #1, #2, #3
Paper Mario
Mario Golf
Mario Tennis
Pokémon Stadium
Pokémon Stadium 2
Pokémon Snap
Dr. Mario
Kirby Shards of Dream Land
Star Fox 64
F-Zero
Yoshi's Story
Mega man 64
Castlevania 64
Castlevania eternal darkness
Bomberman (all three games)
Harvest Moon 64
Animal Crossing (Localized)
Banjo Kazooie
Banjo Tooie
Conker's Bad Fur Day
Perfect Dark
Jet Force Gemeni
Golden Eye 007
That other James Bond Game
Worms Armageddon
Earthworm Jim 3D

[Anonymous No.5926640]

>>5913697
>>5919673
What games would a Game Boy Classic have?

Mario Land/Wario Land
Metroid 2
Link's Awakening
Kirby
Mega Man
Pokemon
Tetris
Donkey Kong
FFA
Picross?

[Anonymous No.5926728]

>>5925204
>Bomberman (all three games)
Why not all four?

[Anonymous No.5926869]

>>5913287
>Arguing that real hardware is the best way to experience n64 games

8 F P S

F

P

S

[Anonymous No.5926873]

>>5913287
I hope people wouldn't really bitch like this.

First two are on real hardware too. Same amount as emulation now. Last bit is a choice if people want to do it or not, most would not want to downgrade and would take digital.

[Anonymous No.5926874]

>>5925204
More than half those games wouldn’t be in there because of licensing. Take a look at the games on the SNES and nes classic and I think it’ll be pretty clear why they’re there

[Anonymous No.5926886]

What games would a Virtual Boy Classic have?
>trick question*

[Anonymous No.5926935]

>>5913280
If you want this, you probably want AIDS too.

[Anonymous No.5926963]

>>5913319
Found the gaystation faggot

[Anonymous No.5927104]

>>5924978
>N64 really wasn't known for it's FPSs other than what you posted.
N64 was a golden eye machine. You didn't sell it for a playstation only for playing golden eye with your friends, some Mario Kart 64 also, but the blueshell killed MK. There's only 4 games on N64, Mario 64, Mario Kart 64, Golden Eye, OOT. Everyone switched to the playstation.

[Anonymous No.5928242]

>>5913280
i doubt it

[Anonymous No.5928246]

>>5926886
Waterworld x20

[Anonymous No.5928269]

>>5926886

Nintendo should have just ported that Wario game to the 3DS and forgot the rest.

[Anonymous No.5928305]

>unpopular opinions that are true
The n64 was a good console with good games, but every single thing about it has aged like shit. Only 30 year old boomers blinded by nostalgia think an accurate replica would be good. Most of its 1st party exclusives iconic for the first to switch to 3D - Zelda, Mario, Smash, Paper Mario, Mario Kart, F-Zero, etc - all of them had way better games on the Gamecube alone. I can't think of much that wasn't done way better earlier or later other than the Rare games that might not even be available due to licensing. The only reason it would be cool to have an N64 mini would be because emulation for that console is finnicky as fuck even today.

[Anonymous No.5928353]

>>5924978
I disagree, rumble pack would be quite a blow not to have. Lylat Wars (or Starfox 64 for you burgers) had the rumble pack as a included accessory with the game, it just wouldn't be the same playing without it.
And in oot, the stone of agony. Again, the lack of rumble doesn't make it a lost cause, but it would sure be annoying being given that item and then having no way to utilise it in game.It
You remember the blowback the nes mini got, essentially perfect but the cord was a bit short.
Cue multiple youtubers and reviewers losing their collective shit for months over a cord being 2ft shorter then what they wanted.
Producing an n64 mini without rumble capability and putting games on it that utilise said feature is a recipe for e-celeb meltdowns.

[Anonymous No.5928369]

>>5928353
Further to my original point here, >>5917192, the cost of the controllers plus associated ports! The nes and snes controllers are shit easy to make, the n64 controller is complicated-id wager twice as much plastic as a snes controller, physically twice as big as well, plus an analogue stick, an underside z button and a accessory port on the rear.
AND YOU NEED 4 OF THEM!
Plus that other anon was right-no pokemon stadium without the gb connector.
Plus snes has pleasing mid-top tier 2d graphics, n64 had low tier early gen 3d.
I love it, but normies will think it looks like blurry, blocky trash.
How are they going to go from gears 5 to this and not throw up?
And the n64 had more fps's then goldeneye, turok was so good and beloved they actually remastered the first two (or three?) and perfect dark was genre defining also.
They are almost unplayable now as most normies are well accustomed to dual stick shooter controls.
It won't happen, it just won't. It's too expensive, you need 4 controllers with analogue sitkcs and rumble, it's too complicated to make, it's too complicated to sort out the myriad of licencing issues for wanted games, the library is pretty weak in hindsight and normies HATE early gen 3d.
It-(clap)-will-(clap)-not-(clap)-happen!

[Anonymous No.5928371]

>>5928369
>It-(clap)-will-(clap)-not-(clap)-happen!
Please felate a shotgun.

[Anonymous No.5928389]

>>5928371
>He's a whopper mate, how did you get him to bite so quick? What bait you use?
>I just ended my factual post with some black twitter bullshit, sends em into a frenzy! Works everytime!

[Anonymous No.5928390]

>>5913598
If it's anything like the 360 emulating the Hueg, they most certainly won't have professional coders creating flawless emulation. Beyond the Halos and some sports titles the 360 emulation would range from passable to awful.

[Anonymous No.5928407]

>>5919973
See, the Rare library isn't a selling point anymore either because Rare Rewind had all of the non DK games remastered years ago. And Nintendo can do whatever it wants with DK64 and DKR.

[Anonymous No.5928413]

>>5920038
Rare owns Perfect Dark.

[Anonymous No.5928571]

>>5920505
Twenty years ago the n64's lifespan was ending, of course nintendo wouldn't do it then