[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vr/ - Retro Games


View post   

File: 287 KB, 1782x1124, 8b5c3814f84a9f587f062564ef614a962b1ff8089660e002be74aa3c7f4d9a99.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5431598 No.5431598 [Reply] [Original]

Hi guys,
I remember in the early 2000 I used emulators a lot more, especially N64 emulators. I remember them being accurate and functioning well.
Now I see a lot of problems with emulators. I wonder if something changed or if it's just bad memory, and emulators used to be shit and I just didn't notice being a young teen and all.

Thanks

>> No.5431607

>>5431598
The later. They are a lot better now and with more features than before. I used to remember Nesticle being "fine" until I revisited it later and it's a fucking abomination.

>> No.5431630

Yeah no, emulators got so much better since then. You were probably just using lower latency peripherals back then, like a crt screen and wired mouse/keyboard or controller. Not to mention the crt probably made the graphics look a lot better.

>> No.5431645

>>5431630
>>5431607
I remember playing mostly on a laptop, so in the end it must be a matter of perspective. Thanks for answering my question.

>> No.5431669

>>5431630
>Yeah no, emulators got so much better since then.
Gonna play devil's advocate here: The underlying platforms have gotten better, certain emulators have improved a lot, but the majority were just abandoned, replaced by worse shit, and/or no longer function properly on modern platforms.
Actually I even take back what I said about "platforms" "getting better." That's not entirely true. Android is a garbage fire worse than any other trash OS that ever existed.

>> No.5431728

OP is a ZSNES shill

>> No.5431764

>>5431598
I had the same impression. I used emulators a lot back in high school (early 2000s) and remember them playing just fine. These days I can feel every millisecond of latency when emulating SMW. Fortunately, run-ahead has fixed that for machines with the processing power to do it.

>> No.5431765

>>5431728
But didn't they take netplay away from znes in newer versions?

>> No.5431769

>>5431598
>N64 emulators

Ok the graphics cards, particularly the voodoo models can do N64 better than anything even right now.

>> No.5432098

>>5431598
You're just remembering wrong. Probably because you were a baby.

>> No.5432105

>>5432098
t. Nintendo

>> No.5432160

>>5431607
I remember Nesticle being relatively shitty back in the day too. I had a sprite comic in the early 2000s and I only ever used it because it was capable of turning off layers for sprite & background capture. For actual play I used FCE Ultra.

>> No.5432192

>>5432160
I don't think FCEU existed back then. Or, at least, it wasn't widely known. I didn't know what I was doing to be honest, I just checked Zophar's Domain or something and got that out of there.
I do remember a few games were kinda glitchy but I used to think it was a "bad ROM" or something.

>> No.5432243

>>5431598
N64... who gives a shit. But other systems that have games with actual replay value have emulators that are very good now. But i think it also depends on the OS. My mame cab is running winXP and my snespc is running Win7. Each of those OSs have good emulators. And im sure good linux counterparts exist as well

>> No.5432257

>>5432192
>I don't think FCEU existed back then.
I know it existed in 2005. Wtf is all this FCEUX shit...2008 wtf? That cannot be right.

>> No.5432261

>>5432257
Ah I'm talking a bit before that, like 1999 or so.

>> No.5432276 [DELETED] 

>>5432261
Ok, but for some reason the Internet says an emulator that I had used since late 2004 didn't exist until August of 2008. I still have FCEU downloaded to an old computer and the file proves I added that one in 2006. WTF?

>> No.5432283

>>5432276
The internet can often have inaccurate information.

>> No.5432284

OK n/m tracked it down. Confused it with a fork. Thanks for making me review it, though. Been emulating since 2004, heh.

>> No.5432285

>>5432276
Maybe you used plain FCE instead? FCEU and then FCEUX are forks of it.

>> No.5432287

>>5431598
There's a moderate mixture
On the one hand, emulators of the past were hacky, buggy shit.
On the other hand, although accuracy has improved I would say the user experience of modern emulation is worse. If I want to play a SNES game on Snes9X, I'm up and away in 15 seconds. If I want to play one on Retroarch, first I've got to go through the rigmarole of setting that up, using their generally dire user interface with more menus than the average restaurant. If you're a power-user that does add more features, and in terms of accuracy to the original system and game compatibility the retroarch cores are much better, but the out of the box experience is garbage.

>> No.5432293

>>5432283
That's the truth regardless.
/ I still remember when I realized in mid to late 2004 that I could play *any* Nintendo game, or arcade game (within reason). It blew my mind.

>> No.5432295

>>5432285
>>5432293
Crap I read your post wrong. Yeah FCEU already existed at that time.

>> No.5432296

>>5432285
That is exactly what happened. Will try to delete the old post.

>> No.5432298

>>5432295
>Crap I read your post wrong.

You were still right. The Internet is full of crap as well having a lot of truth.

>> No.5432303

>>5432298
Yeah you gotta sift through a lot of shit to get to the accurate stuff.
Man, years from now, when people like us that were around at the time are gone, people is gonna have a hard time finding hard facts, despite all the information around.
"The internet never forgets", my ass.

>> No.5432306

>>5432303
>people is gonna have a hard time finding hard facts, despite all the information around.
>"The internet never forgets", my ass.
>is gonna

Indeed. ;)

>> No.5432310

>>5431598

youre not running on windows xp anymore, buddy.

>> No.5432313

>>5432303
>Man, years from now, when people like us that were around at the time are gone, people is gonna have a hard time finding hard facts, despite all the information around.
>"The internet never forgets", my ass.

Seriously, though, this is a huge problem. If we can't keep video game history straight, are we sure we know the history of the world all that well?

>> No.5432319

>>5432306
I can't English very well, but I thought that was an acceptable contraction. Oh well.

>>5432313
Yeah if something relatively trivial like videogames is so full of inaccuracies I can't imagine how many facts we take for granted are just wrong, specially the further back we go.

>> No.5432329

>>5432319
Oh, well I was being jovial about it anyway, take no offense, please.

>>5432319
>Yeah if something relatively trivial like videogames is so full of inaccuracies I can't imagine how many facts we take for granted are just wrong, specially the further back we go.

Anyone who would try to deny as much is a fool.

>> No.5432335

>>5432329
Wait is "people" meant to be used with plural pronouns? I thought it was singular because it's a collective. Like "flock" or so. Ah well no offense taken, I want to improve my English so I'm curious.

And yeah a lot of people says "preservation is just wanting to play games for free lol :^)" but I find the whole history of videogames as interesting as any other topic.

>> No.5432341

>>5432335
>Wait is "people" meant to be used with plural pronouns?

It can be in special written situations*, but normally and mostly use "are people". Glad to help in a small way.

*that are not coming to my mind.

>>5432335
>And yeah a lot of people says "preservation is just wanting to play games for free lol :^)" but I find the whole history of videogames as interesting as any other topic.

Oh definitely, anon. Like how it's not even possible to emulate arcade games until 1975 because they were all solid state. A lot of those games will probably be lost and the greater video game community, as it were, needs to act to save that era.

>> No.5432346
File: 66 KB, 719x1000, a pioneering arcade game.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5432346

>>5432341
*people are

>> No.5432353

>>5432287
Exactly. We need more emulators not designed for hyperautists. I mean now that I put in the effort to get RetroArch in working order it's my go-to setup for pretty much everything but NES and GameCube/Wii, but compared to SNES9X's ease of use it's a headache. Even Project 64 was less of a tussle, and you had to configure plugins with that.

>> No.5432357

>>5432341
>It can be in special written situations*, but normally and mostly use "are people". Glad to help in a small way.

Ah that's good to know, thank you.

>Oh definitely, anon. Like how it's not even possible to emulate arcade games until 1975 because they were all solid state. A lot of those games will probably be lost and the greater video game community, as it were, needs to act to save that era.
Yeah I completely agree. Some might argue they "aren't fun" or "why would you want to play that", but they still were precursors that don't quite deserve to just disappear. Even the shittiest games served some purpose, or were part of someone's career, or inspired something else, etc. A bunch of them make their way into museums or so, but even those will give in eventually (specially with how delicate those older ones can get, replace enough components to keep it going and it might be altered in subtle or not-so-subtle ways).

>> No.5432371

>>5432357
>but they still were precursors that don't quite deserve to just disappear.

Yeah, like Atari's 2600 "Adventure" is not engaging today beyond nostalgia if one is honest, but it's still the great-grandfather of Zelda, which spawned others..you can't just for them. As for arcade games purely, I bet almost no one is playing "Pong" or "Computer Space" for real anymore and that's interesting if anything. Even Funspot's Pong game doesn't work last I heard. How many could possibly be working and in operation?

>> No.5432373

>>5432371
*can't just forget them.

>mfy anon's English is better than mine
/Your English is good btw

>> No.5432385

>>5432373
Hah, no worries.
But yeah, on the bright side there seems to be more people getting some interest in the stuff, so maybe (big maybe) things will improve before the trail gets cold. Documentation, emulation, ways to keep hardware going without altering its operation, every little bit counts.

>> No.5432386

>>5432357
>A bunch of them make their way into museums or so, but even those will give in eventually

(Give out) Just helping again since you said it's ok. Not being a jerk. :)

And yeah, even in those museums, how many get to play them? I've seen some shows where they let people line up and play, but it can't be more than a couple minutes for each person. In a sense those games are already lost as originally intended. :|

>> No.5432390

>>5432385
>Documentation, emulation, ways to keep hardware going without altering its operation, every little bit counts.

I truly believe that emulation is the best long term preservation method,(if not just for costs) but the computers that run those emulators will need backing up, so it's imperfect.

I hear that some people are making new Pole Position boards to replace the breakdown-prone original PCBs, but that's another thing unto itself, but I suspect that's where all games are headed. Replacement via emulation or other
"fakery."

>> No.5432402

So sick and tired of this fucking n64 emulators suck meme.

https://m64p.github.io/

(looks like it's behind a paywall now, the last free version is here

http://www.emutalk.net/threads/57250-m64p-download-(2019-01-26)

Doesn't even require an install.

Setup the controller, and then play.

I'll give 1 x 4chan gold to any kind sir that can find a game that won't run perfectly on it.
Pokemon snap, gauntlet legends, mario tennis/golf, star wars rogue+naboo, kirby 64, go your hardest.

Like, seriously, shut the fuck up if you don't know what your talking about.

>> No.5432408

>>5432402
>(looks like it's behind a paywall now

They're making people pay now? LOL fuck them.

>> No.5432409

>>5432386
>Give out
Noted!

>>5432390
Fortunately, current computers are fairly well-documented in terms of architecture, and a lot of emulators are open-source, so we should be able to get them going in the future like we are able to run actual code for a C64. There's stuff like QEMU and such that can help in a few decades.
There are no warranties but should be doable, specially if they keep being updated or forked over time.
It IS going to be a problem for stuff like online games that require closed servers and such, though, since those die as soon as their servers die. I can almost smell the gap forming (and some games are, indeed, already lost. Until someone reverse-engineers the servers or something.)

>> No.5432412

>>5432409
>Noted!

Yeah, things "give out", people "give in", unless you're being funny or creepy and then people do "give out". ;)

>> No.5432414

>>5432402
What the shit? This paid thing is just a "pretty package" on top of mupen64 and glide64? Talk about scummy.

>> No.5432419
File: 28 KB, 425x250, most satisfying zombie game ever.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5432419

>>5432409
>It IS going to be a problem for stuff like online games that require closed servers and such, though,

:(

>> No.5432421

>>5432414
The thread is about easy to use emulators that work.

The last free version of m64p, is easy to use and just 'works'.

No chasing up additional plugins, no configuring, nothing.

Do i agree it's scummy to put behind a paywall? Yeah, but that's not what the topic is about.

>> No.5432425

>>5432421
>The last free version of m64p, is easy to use and just 'works'.

Does it run Star Wars Episode I: Battle for Naboo?

>> No.5432437

Learn to read nigga, i said specifically it does here.

>>5432402

Granted, the games i tested, i only tested for 10 mins or so, but in that ten mins, not a single problem. Gauntlet legends had a very minor graphical glitch on the hud, but that's it. A complete non issue.

>> No.5432445

>>5432425
>>5432425
>Does it run Star Wars Episode I: Battle for Naboo?


Well?

>> No.5432467

>>5432425
>>5432445

Fuck me, read this

>>5432437

Or, you know, check it yourself kiddo.

SPOILER ALERT< YES IT FUCKING RUNS NABOO.

IT RUNS EVERYTHING.

>> No.5432470

>>5432467
OK, link, linear anon?

>> No.5432483

>>5431669
>majority were abandoned, replaced by worse shit
this is objectively false though - the "major" ones from like ~2006 either got improved on, ceased all advancements, ceased and released code which others improved on OR others came into the fray and created much better ones

>n64
Project64 was the bigger one, last updated in 2017 but the much better Mupen had a last update late Feb
>psx
epsxe was the major player but Mednafen has absolutely blown it out of the water with it's higher compat and overall functionality
>ps2
one of the hardest consoles to emulated, last updated 2017 but the plugins get updated pretty often, perhaps another big update soon? last one was giant though with MTVU
>GC
GOAT status
>wii/wii u
bretty good

anyways, i could go on but emulation is in an absolutely fantastic state right now

>> No.5432485

>>5432483
>emulation is in an absolutely fantastic state right now
^this Heck, Raiden II arcade was made playable years ago and many said the encryption would never be cracked.

>> No.5432651

>>5432483
>Dolphin
>GOAT
That's not mGBA though

>> No.5433817

>>5432408
cemu did it, others followed.
it's the future people chose.

>> No.5433840

>>5432402
I guess running like SHIT with constant crashes beats not running at all.

>> No.5433870

>>5433840
>I guess running like SHIT with constant crashes beats not running at all.

Which game, Battle For Naboo? I want to properly emulate that, damnit! And yes I do own a real cartridge too.

>> No.5433882

>>5432402
>I'll give 1 x 4chan gold to any kind sir that can find a game that won't run perfectly on it.
Put your helmet back on retard, no N64 game runs anywhere near perfectly, they don't even try to emluate them correctly, they use HLE instead. Even if you don't notice a difference they're still lagging, the physics and timing is off.
>Like, seriously, shut the fuck up if you don't know what your talking about.
Good joke.

>> No.5433919

>>5432257
The first NES emulator I used was JNES(?)
Snes was ZSNES
Genesis was Gens+
N64 was PJ64

>> No.5433949

>>5433882
Eh idk dude, BK besides from the opening jam they do which is a little wonky, works absolutely perfectly. Loaded up Tooie last night and I don't think I can't think of a single issue I had and I finished the whole thing.

There are lots of games that have minor issues (which is the case for nearly any somewhat recent consoles) but you're painting them out to be fucking horrible lmao

>> No.5434908

>>5433882
Like i said, shut the fuck up, you don't know what your talking about.
>muh hle
>muh physics
>muh timings
>muh minor things that absolutely cannot be noticed in a real world scenario

Like i said, shut the fuck up, or find a game that won't launch.I'm waiting.

>> No.5434929

>>5434908
>>muh hle

I agree. What does that even mean in terms of playing the game? Yeah, it's high level emulation-HLE. So? How is that a bad thing?

>> No.5434938

>>5434908
>find a game that won't launch.

what an absolute fag. just changed your own criteria from "any game that won't run perfectly on it"

>> No.5434989

>>5431598
compatibly was always a huge problem back then, but emulators did use hacks to makes games run better because there wasn't a real call for accuracy yet.
the problem now is that current emulators need much higher specs in comparison and there less choices for emulators overall.

>> No.5435050

>>5434989
>current emulators need much higher specs
huh? no they don't, unless you're talking about new console emulators

current emulators, even while getting upgraded, still require the same specs they did years ago. there's *optional* things in the game that let you run the game at higher resolutions, but you still need a basic CPU to play the game natively

>> No.5435068

>>5434938
Oh fuck me, this is the game is, semantics?

My definition of 'perfectly' is play game from start to finish with barely any glitches or issues. Considering even retail release copies of games rarely meet this standard i think it's a fair bar to set.

So again, i'm not moving the goalposts, find a game that won't launch AND play perfectly as per the above criteria.

>inb4 that's not perfect

inb4 fuck you, like i said retail copies are shipped with bugs all the time, mostly minor in nature. I've not found a single issue with any game (besides the very minor one with gauntlet legends i mentioned earlier).

All you faggots talk a big game, but aren't willing to d/l the emulator and prove me wrong. You all shut the fuck up about saturn emulation being bad, but after getting btfo now n64 emulation is the new whipping boy.

>> No.5435272

>>5431598
N64 emulators were borderline unusable in the early 2000s.

Though I do agree that SOME emulators actually got worse over time. Some of them will add too many features and become a chore to use. Simplicity + accuracy is the ideal formula.

>> No.5435278

>>5431598
Emulators used to be faster but less accurate.
That never bothered me, personally, but better is a subjective term.
Just go download some older emulators. They still work most of the time.

>> No.5435373

>>5435068
There's a name for what you're describing anon, that's a game being 'playable'. 'Perfect' means 'this game ran as it did on original hardware', which it objectively isn't if there's any glitches or issues, no matter how minor. Stop trying to change what words mean because you're a fag that's backpedaling.

>> No.5435450
File: 254 KB, 1282x772, jThueKq.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5435450

>>5435373
'playabe' conjurs up images of managing to, on a technical level, reach the end of the game, regardless of the amount of minor glitches and visual artifacts, audio distortions and other oddities encountered along the way.

By your definition pic related would be classed as 'playable', by my definition, no, it's not perfect as to the naked eye, without using fraps, or some bs debug mode, or consulting some autistic website that catalogs every minor pixel out of place. Any retard can see that this ain't right, the emulator is clearly fucking out.

Find a similar 'type' of issue with any n64 game using m64p.

Btw can we move past the point of 'that's not the definition of perfect'? It's the /vr/ equivalent of a grammer nazi, pulling someone up on using 'there' instead of 'their'. You know what i meant, i know what i meant, let's get to the meat of the issue.

So you have a choice, either keep fagging on about 'muh perfect' or d/l the emu, try some games and see for yourself.

>> No.5435457

>>5435450
So in other words you're complaining that you're misusing the term and other people are taking issue with it. Maybe go with 'highly playable' or something else that doesn't generally mean near or completely cycle-accurate emulation.

>> No.5435484 [DELETED] 

>>5435457
>>5435373

Every fucking emulator compatibility list uses >>5435450
definition of "playable".
In absolute most cases "Playable" (or "working") means simply "Games can be played all the way through" - direct quote
One step below is simply "Starts" - game goes past the main menu and you can experience at least some gameplay before it crashes/hangs/bugs out and becomes incompletable.
Check the compatibility lists for Dolphin/Citra/Desmume
Some emulators don't even have "perfect" score, opting out for something like "fullspeed" completely omitting accuracy to the hardware. Many emulators consider "no major glitches" as "perfect" even if there are minor (usually graphical) glitches

It is you who are misusing the term.

>> No.5435486

>>5435457
Please direct me to this speadsheet you keep consulting, on how to grade emulator accuracy?

First you said 'playable', then 'highly playable'. What about 'extremely highly playble'? What's in between those two?

You see, it's fucking annoying when some asshole grinds a conversation/debate down to halt by playing 'gotcha' with arbitrary terms like 'perfect'. Really, if you want to get all Zen like up in here, nothing on earth would meet the true dictionary definition of 'perfect', it's unattainable by it's very definition.

So, what do you want? I said 'perfect', and now your saying i misused the term and now u say i should use some other term you just plucked out of your arse? Fucking cmon.

Like i said, you KNOW what i meant, and i KNOW what i meant.

Let's move past it, ffs, and get to the core of the issue.

I'm genuinely interested if anyone can find an problem with any game, besides the minor one with gauntlet legends. An older version had some minor issues with extreme-g and kirby 64, which have been fixed in the last free version i linked to.

You will honestly be impressed. I just wished people would be open to the idea of being impressed with something and happily surprised, rather then just outright shitting on something sight unseen. It's a shitty way to go in life.

>> No.5435496

>>5435457
>>5435373
>>5435450

In absolute most cases "Playable" (or "working") means simply "Games can be played all the way through" - direct quote
This does not account for any ammount of glitches or inaccuracies the player might experience while playing, unless they are totally gamebraking and prevent the player from reaching the ending.
One step below is simply "Starts" - game goes past the main menu and you can experience at least some gameplay before it crashes/hangs/bugs out and becomes incompletable.
Check the compatibility lists for Dolphin/Citra/Desmume
Some emulators don't even have "perfect" score, opting out for something like "fullspeed" completely omitting accuracy to the hardware. Some emulators consider "no major glitches" as "perfect" even if there are minor (usually graphical) glitches

For example:
https://pandorawiki.org/PPSSPP_Compatibility_List
https://en.dolphin-emu.org/compat/
But look up literally any emulation compat list

>> No.5435705

>>5435068
No, I am not willing to pay some idiot patreonbux for it. Bad precedent. It better not be violating any licenses like GPL, too.

>> No.5435753

>>5435705

I already linked to the last free version here

>>5432402

Again....it is here. It's the version i am using.

http://www.emutalk.net/threads/57250-m64p-download-(2019-01-26)


I'm holding your hand here. I mean, unless you give me remote access to your computer, i can't do anything more for you.

The sense of entitlement is bewildering. I'm trying to help you, lord how i am trying. You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink it seems. What's next, what me to show you where to d/l n64 roms as well?

If you a truly thirsty for n64 emulation that will genuinely surprise you at how good it is, with absolutely no tinkering involved, just drink. Drink you damn horse.

I honestly thought /vr/ was better then this. This is /v/ tier faggotry.

>> No.5435772

>>5435753
You are way too pushy.

>> No.5435894

>>5435496
>In absolute most cases "Playable" (or "working") means simply "Games can be played all the way through" - direct quote

That's not what "playable" means at all fool, that NEVER been what playable means in the context of emulation. Go screw your "direct quote" zoomer, why do you "direct quote" some tard who wrote something on a 3rd party wiki and yet don't believe people here.

We have seen what compatibility lists look like. You're not providing us with any new information here that we didn't know since at least 10+ years ago. Just stfu, you know nothing about emulation and have nothing to add.

Also, those lists are notorious for calling something "runs perfect" or "no problems" when they're running like absolute shit.

>> No.5435919 [DELETED] 

>>5435894
Meh, don't bother, he already switched to victim mode "b-but I was just trying to help why is the mean 4chan man not kissing the very wrong I stand onto", he'll never see why his attitude is obnoxious and will just try to report or lash at everyone who isn't sunshine and smiles about his valuable contribution.
It'd be hilarious if the guy was the maker of this thing trying to shill his patreon with "a free dose" like a vulgar drug seller, though. Not terribly likely because that'd be the stupidest way to get people to pay, but man it'd pay that dollar if that was the case.

Either way, programming a GUI is nothing compared to the work involved in making the emulator and plugins, but the one charging money is the one putting the least effort. Why is this always a thing.

>> No.5435921

>>5435894
Meh, don't bother, he already switched to victim mode "b-but I was just trying to help why is the mean 4chan man not kissing the very ground I stand onto", he'll never see why his attitude is obnoxious and will just try to report or lash at everyone who isn't sunshine and smiles about his valuable contribution.
It'd be hilarious if the guy was the maker of this thing trying to shill his patreon with "a free dose" like a vulgar drug seller, though. Not terribly likely because that'd be the stupidest way to get people to pay, but man it'd pay that dollar if that was the case just for the laugh.

Either way, programming a GUI is nothing compared to the work involved in making the emulator and plugins, but the one charging money is the one putting the least effort. Why is this always a thing.

>> No.5435924

>>5431598

I think it's windows' fault

>> No.5435929

>emulators too hard to use
>you can easily find a quick youtube video showing you how to set it up

that's what i did for mednafen and it was totally worth it

>> No.5435936

>>5435894
>that NEVER been what playable means in the context of emulation
except it alway was, you assmad buttfaggot

>> No.5435942

>two apes just arguing with each other about something that literally doesn't matter
must suck being you guys

>> No.5435945

>>5435894
>muh feels
>muh gamer cred
>FOM buzzwords
the cancer rears its ugly head

>> No.5435975

>>5432287
I still consider Snes9X modern since its maintained (i believe?) and a great UX.
Same as Mesen, its better then literally all other NES emulators - though this one is newer.
Everything ive seen about retroarch is a huge turn off, not sure why people talk about it so much.

>> No.5436145

>>5435975
Retroarch is concidered to be a collection of most accurate emulation cores, so one does not need to look them all up individually when he can just slap Retroarch on pretty much any system and be assured to have a reasonably accurate-to-original experience.

>> No.5438663 [DELETED] 

>>5431598
No they didn't.

>> No.5438680

>>5438663
fuck off, ghostbumpfaggot

>> No.5438834
File: 32 KB, 620x400, 819.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5438834

>>5435929
>you can easily find a quick youtube video
>some shitty stock music or weeb song starts playing
>HEY GUYS NASALLY MILQUETOAST AUTISTIC FAG HERE THIS IS MY SETUP FOR EMULATOR.EXE I DON'T KNOW WHAT THIS SETTING DOES BUT LETS TURN IT ON ANYWAY ALSO TURN ON HQ4X FILTERS FOR SICK GFX

>> No.5440289

>>5436145
I have mixed feelings about retroarch; the android version is easy enough to configure and use, had dq3 up and running in a couple of minutes using the fceu core. The pc version is the opposite, needlessly convoluted.