/vr/ - Retro Games

[Anonymous No.5103025]

most detailed textures in a vr game?

[Anonymous No.5103035]

[Anonymous No.5103037]

Deu sex, Concrete Wall Texture

[Anonymous No.5103064]

>>5103037
>he doesn't know about Unreal Engine's detail textures

[Anonymous No.5103079]

>>5103064
Of course I do, I watched that DF reteo ep too, thats why I posted Deu Sex as the most detailed texture, because it is, Df said so

[Anonymous No.5103090]

>>5103025
>1920x1080
That's retro?

[Anonymous No.5103096]

>>5103090

[Anonymous No.5103102]

>>5103096
>widescreen as /vr/
lame and bluepilled

[Anonymous No.5103105]

>>5103102
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA1H6dw6Fxo

[Anonymous No.5103109]

>>5103105
>le 1% is the 100%
not even pilled

[Anonymous No.5103114]

>>5103109

[Anonymous No.5103126]

>>5103114
That SSAA out the ass is not retro and not even supported natively by the game.

[Anonymous No.5103184]

is ps2 retro yet?
because i want to say silent hill 3

[Anonymous No.5103187]

>>5103184
>yet
Not unless you can travel back in time and pressure Sony to release it before January 1st 2000.

[Anonymous No.5103189]

>>5103184
Ps2?
/v/ sounds like
the right place for you

[Anonymous No.5103264]

>>5103114
>oval flak

[Anonymous No.5103360]

sonic adventure has many nice areas but quake 2 on ps1 is also detailed for older hardware, gran turismo 1 also has a pretty detailed non blocky road textures

[Anonymous No.5103617]

I wonder why the hell nobody does this these days.
Fractal layering detail textures were introduced to UE in '99, yet to this day we see games with textures that turn into a blurry mess up close.
Is it really that hard to implement?

[Anonymous No.5103623]

>>5103102
>>5103090
Both Unreal and Quake 3 engines supported any AR/Resolution combo out of the box, and were incredibly optimised for what they could do.

[Anonymous No.5103671]

>>5103617

[Anonymous No.5103679]

>>5103617
Croteam still does

[Anonymous No.5103817]

>>5103090
huhuhuhu nut retruo, nuh tis nut retruo too huhuh

[Anonymous No.5103832]

>>5103617
This is done in Mercenaries: Playground of Destruction, too, even in the PS2 port.

[Anonymous No.5104058]

>>5103817
de perr is not retro, big pitchher? is not retro

[Anonymous No.5104069]

>>5103617
I always kinda thought detail textures looked like shit. It just looks like artificial grain all over everything.

[Anonymous No.5104094]

bitch

[Anonymous No.5104103]

>>5104069
Except it's down entirely to the texture artist. There's nothing stopping you from making detail textures with less grain.

[Anonymous No.5104105]

>>5104103
Still looks like someone plastered a repeating 4x4 tile all over the walls.

[Anonymous No.5104117]

detail textures just look ugly.

[Anonymous No.5104168]

>>5104103
I'm all eyes if you've got any examples of that.

like this >>5104094 is what I'm talking about. It's not got the polycount to match that ultra fine texture detail, so it just looks inconsistent and doesn't sell that well. Unreal does generally look good but it's not the textures doing it.

[Anonymous No.5104227]

>>5104168
A lot of the examples here are using the HD texture packs, the vanilla game doesn't look like that.

[Anonymous No.5104253]

>>5104227
ut came with compressed textures on disc. I bought a s3 savage 2000 just for that and yes they look like that.

[Anonymous No.5104263]

>>5104253
But that's for Unreal Tournament. Unreal 1 didn't come with them.

[Anonymous No.5104282]

>>5104253
>>5104263
The UT HD textures were also optionable since not every GPU could use them at the time.

[Anonymous No.5104289]

>>5104282
so? It came out in 99 and I used them just fine when it came out. Tons of pc games had optional shit you couldn't use if you didn't have the correct hardware.

[Anonymous No.5104298]

>>5104289
Don't see what you're trying to say? The point of this thread is detailed textures. Which obviously look different depending on which textures pack you're using..

[Anonymous No.5104315]

>>5104298
the point is detailed textures so I posted a game using the highest quality version of those textures.

[Anonymous No.5104320]

>>5104315
while this guy
>>5104094
posted textures using unofficial fan made HD textures for unreal 1 which look horrible.

[Anonymous No.5104328]

>>5103360
Pretty sure that's just mipmapping and/or bump mapping.

[Anonymous No.5105791]

>>5103679
Croteam uses simple detail textures that are like >>5104069 said is just grain, and uses a single layer, so if still looks blurry if you stand next to a wall.
Upon zooming in or getting closer, Unreal shrinks the detail texture down, maintaining the density of detail on the same level, so that even at the closest distance, the relative-to-screen texture fidelity remains the same.
Also, Unreal uses lots of different detail texture variants for different materials like wood, plants, metal, stone, temple walls, concretes and such - the example pic is not very good as it shows stone detail textures which are grainier than the rest.

Original Unreal DTs were subtle enough to look good in low-poly levels.
This >>5104094 UHD shit looks bloody awful. The ultra high fidelity clashes against low-fi environment, and on top of that it removes the detail textures which in turn makes it look worse up-close than the original.
Picrelated is how original looked

[Anonymous No.5105797]

>>5105791
And here's an Unreal detail texture for wood extremely up close

[Anonymous No.5105868]

>>5105791
Here's a video of the level with original textures.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BA5ZyGv2Dw

[Anonymous No.5105882]

>>5103035
Where's this from?

[Anonymous No.5105914]

>>5103105
Can we have a list of retro games with widescreen support? Probably making a thread later in case I dont get responses here

[Anonymous No.5105920]

>>5105882
The quoted post or your pic? The quoted post is Xenogears.

[Anonymous No.5105939]

>>5105882
That`s a fat schnoz