>>4722012
>unless you worked for these companies, held sony stock, manufactured their system components or are miyamoto's personal sub who gives a shit? literally who? all that greentext doesn't change the reality, that to a rational consumer, n64 was basically a gaming sahara with the occasional dogshit collectathon platformer to "break" the quarterly drought
Ah, so finally a pony admits that sales aren't indicative of success? Okay then, glad we've established that.
>only ninfags in burgerland. nobody gave a fuck about the system in EU or JP. didn't you see that in your precious sales figures?
And yet, the N64 has the highest rated game of all time across all regions... hmm... now that sounds like success.
>the more companies profit, the better for us consumers!
>you are part of the problem, bucko
Are you legitimately retarded? OP made a post about business, I simply posted some facts countering his assertion that the PS1 was a more economically successful machine than the N64.
Look, the fact is, the N64 made more money, it was a better designed system that didn't need to be played upside down just to work, it had more revolutionary games, and it had better games. The N64 was the better system. It's time to get over it and accept reality.