Time to talk about this faggotry (dead fifth gen wars)

[Anonymous No.4582316]

Who's this idiot that keeps shitposting on /vr/ and dragging the board's content way down and every interesting thread into pointless name calling? Let's refute these points exactly so they can't claim I'm "dodging the argument"
>Never owned a console before the PS1
Sometimes they were older people who weren't in to consoles (which were marketed for babbies back then) or simply their family didn't have the money until it was released. Cartridges are expensive y'know.
>Values "cinematic experiences" and "story" over gameplay
The PSX had plenty of arcadey stuff just like the N64 did. It just had a ton more story-based titles than the N64 could support due to the cartridge limitation (which would have been fixed by the DD). Don't get mad just because there are games on a system that even if you owned, you'd never play anyway because you aren't personally interested.
>Says N64 graphics are blurry etc.
Each to their own. Personally I can't stand the completely overboard texture filter on the N64, but it was possible on the PSX to have good detail texture work without pixellation. If you set up your geometry right, affine texture warping is minimal. Both consoles have jaggies due to their low resolution output, and that's okay. Grab a CRT.
>Motion sickness faggot.
Never heard anyone say this about either console. It was always about Descent (DOS, 1995) or Doom or full 3d graphics in general. A shit game on the PSX with affine warping out the ass will give it more though,
>Attacks N64 for low framerate
Can't refuse this one. Both consoles got to shit framerates at the time. Just the limitations.
>Penis envy about Goldeneye
Can't personally relate to this but Goldeneye is definetly more fondly remembered than MoH, or PSX shooters in general. That's just the sort of library it had.
>David Hayter impressions
Come on, it's fun. Just not in public, keep in mind Twin Snakes did get released on the Gamecube in the end, so did Snake Eater 3D on 3DS.

[Anonymous No.4582319]

>Assumes Doom 64 is the PC version
Who the fuck thinks this? It's a new WAD in it's own right, treat it as such.
>PS1 won the fifth gen because it sold more units
Because that's exactly how you "win" a generation. You get economic success. If that means quantity over quality, well that's just how it happens. The rest is subjective to you.
>Claims the N64 has bad controls.
No, I never owned an N64 but I have held the controller and borrowed one for multiplayer some times. Until the Dualshock/Dual Analog came, the N64 controller was the better of the two soley because it had an analog stick and used it more of the time.
>Argues that CTR is better than MK64 or Diddy Kong
Diddy Kong is the one with the transformations right? It's just a different game, it's good alongside CTR. Mario Kart is the same old random unbalanced weapon party trash that's at least fun for multiplayer. Still has 2D sprites for kart "models" in the fifth gen though, that's pathetic. Driving a sprite kart/car never feels good.
>Calls any N64 platformer a collectathon.
But both consoles' platformers were like this. There's no difference?
>PS1 has better graphics because of the CD
No, but it has a lot more room for assets. Didn't have to cut corners as much for what you can release for your game. CD music sometimes can make or break a game.
>Never knew anyone who owned an N64
That's just personal circumstance. However again, the N64 was more expensive wasn't it? Kids with rich parents are always shitters.
>Makes fun of kiddy games
Then that faggot didn't look through BOTH libraries well enough then, now did he? It's just more of the library that was commonly available to purchase at the time was aimed at kids. It's just Nintendo's approach, and Sony's whole marketing shtick in the west was that the PSX wasn't like that.
>Probably wishes he was a woman
What's this got to do with it?
Fucking hell no wonder it's impossible to have meaningful conversation about PSX or N64 with this git around.
Discuss.

[Anonymous No.4582323]

>>4582316
If you know he's an idiot then why do you care? If you recognize it's bait, why the fuck do you bite it so hard? Come on man.

[Anonymous No.4582323,1]

>>4582316
>>4582319
It's also easy as hell to recognize the guy because of the same cringy filename.
This person is either a Gen Z that is trying to fit in or some sad individual that has nothing better to do other than spreading negativity because it's easier than communicating with people.