[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vr/ - Retro Games

View post   
File: 812 KB, 769x771, 1498481539403.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4331121 No.4331121[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Is it time to allow GBA games already? It's long overdue. Not only is it barely-not retro in terms of year (if we accept /vr/'s current incorrect arbitrary definition of retro), but given the type of system it is and the type of games that are on it, I see literally zero (0) actual valid reasons why we shouldn't be allowed to discuss GBA games on /vr/. The only actual counter-argument I have ever seen is "b-but where will it end? soon you'll be asking for PS3 and Xbox 360 games in /vr/!" which is a non-argument. Nor is anyone suggesting modern pixel-art games from 2017 should be allowed on /vr/ either. The point is the GBA is the real thing, released before 9/11, with actual hardware limitations producing limited 2D sprite-based graphics, just like any other retro console.

But let's see what the rest of you think.

http://www.strawpoll.me/14163091

>> No.4331125

>>4331121
>Is it time to allow GBA games already?
nope
never will be
cry more

>> No.4331126

Nah.

>> No.4331130
File: 127 KB, 601x508, you.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4331130

>>4331125
I can see you're absolutely seething and intensely anxious through that post structure anon.

>> No.4331131

>>4331121
Yes. Also Ps2 when

>> No.4331134

Good luck with that, this board has a hard enough time accepting Dreamcast as it is.

>> No.4331136

>Not only is it barely-not retro in terms of year (if we accept /vr/'s current incorrect arbitrary definition of retro)
You've got a point. We should raise the bar to stop encroachment.

>> No.4331139

>>4331130
keep posting tired memes like the /v/irgin you are, all you're doing is showing why the board should stay the way it is