/vr/ - Retro Games

[Anonymous No.3387571]

ITT we post content devs wouldn't dare put into modern games. (webm related)

[Anonymous No.3387575]

>>3387571
>tfw feminists have ruined modern vidya

[Anonymous No.3387582]

Good gameplay

[Anonymous No.3387893]

[Anonymous No.3387907]

>>3387893
That... is not how I pictured abobo in my head, I always thought he looked cartoonish? The regular sprites when you fight him do.

[Anonymous No.3387952]

>>3387571
Curse modern games for never allowing anything lewd anymore!

[Anonymous No.3388093]

[Anonymous No.3388098]

[Anonymous No.3388629]

[Anonymous No.3388638]

They're all white and normal kids.

[Anonymous No.3388648]

>>3387952
I really need to play the Shantae games.

[Anonymous No.3388668]

>>3387952
>lewd
I think his point was you can't have violence against womyn anymore.

[Anonymous No.3388691]

>>3388638
DISGUSTING PATRIARCHY REEEEEEEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.3388720]

>>3388668
What is GTA?

[Anonymous No.3388761]

>>3388720

a constant media and controversy circus

[Anonymous No.3388789]

>>3388093
The REAL answer here. The word "Isis" has been completely expunged from modern media for anything not terrorists

[Anonymous No.3388798]

Trying again after your last thread got deleted, OP?

Keep getting upset over nothing. In the newest GTA you can still fuck hookers then beat them to death to get your money back. But by all means, keep thinking men are oppressed and marginalized.

[Anonymous No.3388974]

>>3388638
George's a reverse trap, gotta count for something

[Anonymous No.3388992]

>>3388720
Name all the women you HAVE to kill in the entirety of Grand Theft Auto.

The number is actually very small.

[Anonymous No.3389008]

>>3388992
Catalina, that one woman in GTA5 (though she gets sucked into a plane engine so you didn't exactly kill her), and that's all I can think of.

[Anonymous No.3389019]

>>3387571

[Anonymous No.3389023]

>>3388992
Everyone of them on the street that's laughing. I know they're laughing at me, even though I have a suit and a 4 million dollar car.

[Anonymous No.3389079]

>>3388789
>2014, ISIS starts referring to itself as such
>2013, Archer stops being about the spy agency ISIS and instead deals with the CIA and cocaine smuggling
THEY KNEW

[Anonymous No.3389083]

>>3387571
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JySGRUFKlk0
???

[Anonymous No.3389087]

>>3387571
So who made this game? Was it Technos, Rare, or Tradewest?

[Anonymous No.3389102]

>>3389087
Rare developed it, which is why it plays more like a Battletoads game than a Double Dragon game.

[Anonymous No.3389131]

>>3389087
Tradewest is a publisher.

[Anonymous No.3389147]

>>3388798
I thought they took the money pickups out in IV

actually I don't think you're serious

[Anonymous No.3389151]

>>3389147
Super serious, you fags should return to /r9k/

[Anonymous No.3389346]

>>3387952
>No feet

Fuck

[Anonymous No.3389490]

[Anonymous No.3389680]

>>3389346
Why are you foot fetishists so fucking obnoxious about it? I've never seen anyone being so fucking open about their disgusting fetishes but you people.

You are the reason I stopped drawing people barefoot or with sandals or anything, there's always one of you coming in to be gross about it.

You think it's not gross because it's not boobs or vagina but we know you fap to it.

[Anonymous No.3389695]

>>3389680
I'm not sure how feet could be more gross than anal

and there's nothing wrong with anal

aside from that, how are you such a shitty artist that you can't appreciate every kind of anatomy? your work is probably shit

[Anonymous No.3389698]

>it's the hourly "abloobloo my bigotry isn't indulged by vidya anymore i'm being oppressed abloobloo" thread
ffs didn't you guys get exiled to 8gag where you belong

and modern games are shit anyway i think even you reactionaries can admit that having this kind of content wouldn't actually make any game better

[Anonymous No.3389712]

>>3387952
i like how the devs caught on to how shit shantae's gameplay was so instead of making it better they just pandered to neckbeards and turned it into a passive-aggressive porn game

[Anonymous No.3389795]

>>3389695
Try having a bunch of assholes demanding "sexy soles", every single time, on completely worksafe artwork and see how fast your patience grows thin. Specially gross if the character is a kid.
You wouldn't ask for loli anal publicly outside of 4chan, would you? Not without causing people to label you as a pedo, for sure.

Also I draw whatever the fuck I want, so cry me a river.

[Anonymous No.3389815]

these threads are retarded and made by underage kids with no understanding of censorship in a larger context. games and other media are less censored now than they've ever been. "sjws" have just replaced soccer moms and ultra conservatives. most cases of perceived racism or sexism came from japanese games anyway.

the OP gif, what are you trying to say with it? you can't beat up women in modern games? then why can you shoot women in Overwatch? how is that any different? there are tons of examples.

>>3388629

take this post for instance. what about Fat Princess? it generated a bit of controversy but it was still made.

[Anonymous No.3390390]

>>3389815
Yeah, a Japanese game having a character with big boobs is an outrage, an American game having a sex minigame is funny.
A Japanese game having lesbians is "pandering to mouth-breathing permavirgins", a Western game having lesbians is "game-changing and progressive".
I get weebs suck, but anti-weebs are just as obnoxious. Seems like they are still sore about Pearl Harbor.

[Anonymous No.3390407]

>>3389815
Yeah, feels like these threads are made by people who either are underage or haven't played new game in decade or two.

[Anonymous No.3390413]

>>3388668
MRA needs to update its list of "stuff to constantly bitch about". doesn't Fallout 4 have female enemies? I know Dragon Age Inquisition has a lot. I kill them constantly, in the Hissing Wastes. There are also the nurses from Silent Hill. And Feminist Frequency just put out a video complaining about the lack of female enemies, in games.

it makes sense, really. if you assume that men and women are mostly equal, with mostly the same motivations and will, then you would expect to find women in combat. the only reason there aren't female zombies in Resident Evil, or female bandits in Borderlands is because the designers don't want players shooting girls.

i know its not Retro, but here is a group of ninja sluts from Afro Samurai, whom you fight as part of the story. yes, you can chop them in half, just like the guys.

[Anonymous No.3390414]

>>3388761
that's "constant BILLION DOLLAR media and controversy circus", to you.

[Anonymous No.3390419]

>>3389680
feet are cute! and they are almost as sensitive as hands, and are right next to the genitals, in the brain's arrangement of sensory reception. and, until recently, they were rare as unicorns in media, making finding a barefoot sprite or piece of art like spotting Mew in Pokemon

[Anonymous No.3390423]

>>3389712
looking at their character designs, I think they just like curvy girls with round asses.

[Anonymous No.3390432]

>>3389079
>2014, ISIS starts referring to itself as such
~ACKSHUALLY~ ISIS name given by westerners, and not a very accurate one. That's why Obabo was trying to push "ISIL" for a while until he gave up because ISIS is a way cooler name for a terrorist organization (although they're really more like an army) so people would use it anyway.

They call themselves ad-Dawlah (al-Islamiyah) and other Tusken Raiders who don't like them call them Daesh.

[Anonymous No.3390462]

>>3388798

Nobody in this thread has said anything to the effect of men being oppressed. You're right that GTA still lets you be violent against women, because it lets you be violent against EVERYONE. Still didn't stop certain feminists from throwing a little tantrum over it in GTA V. As if, what? They expect Rockstar to make the women unkillable like the quest givers in Bethesda games?

We all know GTA is kinda like South Park in that they've both been around for so long and they're so popular that they never really get in trouble for living up to their 'offensive' reputations. It's the video game series that don't enjoy that protection we need to worry about. And we're certainly not going to see any video game any time soon where it's possible to drag a woman around by the hair and kick the shit out of her. Even if you can do the same to men, or even worse.

[Anonymous No.3390470]

>>3389795
why are you frequently drawing children?

[Anonymous No.3390478]

>>3390419
>feet are cute
I came here to give you your reward.

[Anonymous No.3390556]

>>3390470
I illustrate books for children, asshole, the writer is who decides how old the characters are. I am not going to put up with pedo scum just because you can't admit your fetish is creepy.

[Anonymous No.3390560]

>>3390462

[Anonymous No.3390561]

>>3390419
You can't be serious. Go fap to a Tarantino movie or something.

[Anonymous No.3390568]

>>3388668
Well that's a pretty silly point then. /vr/ does get a lot of people who are that stupid though.

[Anonymous No.3390584]

>>3387907
I thought he was Mexican. Which also wouldn't be allowed in a game these days.

[Anonymous No.3390608]

>>3390413
MRA has a point though. Games are now giving a seriously distorted view of sex equality. Even in games we didn't used to think we had to worry about it. I mean look at this bullshit. 40$ for a blowjob from a bitch that ugly is practically highway robbery.

[Anonymous No.3390727]

>>3390560
funny example cos they've been removing nipple textures on Cammy, we don't get to see Mika slap her ass anymore for the Super move and her default outfit is too revealing for ESPN covering EVO finals

[Anonymous No.3390741]

>>3390608
40 dollars is an acceptable price fo a blowjob
you don't pay to enjoy the contours of her cheekbones and jawline
you enjoy the dick suck

[Anonymous No.3390756]

>>3390727
this outfit is still in the game, right? fair trade.

anyway, the point is equality. if we have sexy guys, we can get sexy girls. if the guys take a punch to the face, so can the girls. in fact, so SHOULD the girls.

Feminism is not some codified organization with leaders and a uniform platform of policies and objectives. it is a general philosophy, and anyone who thinks they have feminist ideals gets to call themselves a feminist. this includes useless cheerleaders, like Taylor Swift, all the way to nutjob bloggers who think every instance of hetersexual sex is rape. just because "a feminist" says something doesn't mean shit. that's like saying, "a person with hair", or "I know a guy..."

the more women are allowed to play, the better the games get. if Ryu baring his nipples means that Laura's shirts get smaller, let the fujoshis fap!

[Anonymous No.3390787]

>>3390727
>her default outfit is too revealing for ESPN covering EVO finals

What? didn't the guy chose the alt costume himself? Or is that the latest conspiracy theory?

[Anonymous No.3390803]

>>3390568
>>3390413
It's especially stupid because censorship about things like that was worse back in the day

Poor Poison had to grow a dick and become a tranny and still couldn't even make it to the SNES

[Anonymous No.3390809]

>>3390787
>Or is that the latest conspiracy theory?
lol?

>Fun fact: Fuudo was required to use the "Story 1" costume after his first match because the default was deemed too revealing by ESPN.
>I was the Japanese interpreter for SFV and had to explain it to Fuudo.

http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2016/jul/19/mika-too-sexy-espn-fuudo-forced-change-character-costume-evo-finals/
http://www.gamezone.com/news/street-fighter-5-r-mika-s-costume-was-too-sexy-for-espn-to-handle-during-evo-3441527

[Anonymous No.3390843]

>>3390756
companies shouldn't fucking pander to feminazis that don't even play the games, nothing is being traded here

there's nothing wrong with striving for equality but these movements get co-opted all the time by organizations with exactly all that, don't be so naive

[Anonymous No.3390848]

>>3387571

[Anonymous No.3390852]

>>3390462
>They expect Rockstar to make the women unkillable like the quest givers in Bethesda games?
I have nothing invested in this thread so far but I would like to interject, that yes that is EXACTLY what they want. They think women are treated so poorly daily that it is only fair.

[Anonymous No.3390882]

>>3390848
well hell

[Anonymous No.3390889]

>muh sjw boogeyman
fuck off /v/

[Anonymous No.3390904]

>>3390889
>wanting censorship
fuck off reddit

[Anonymous No.3390913]

>>3390904
>thinking there's censorship
>not understanding what censorship really is

You are such a tool....

[Anonymous No.3390936]

>>3388789
My wife and I named our cat Isis back in 2010. I hate that it feels awkward when I say her name now.

[Anonymous No.3390947]

>>3390936
If you're American, you shouldn't be bothered by it. ISIS are working directly under USA's and Israel's orders.

[Anonymous No.3390950]

>>3389019
Hey had to axe the slot machine mini games due to some EU regulation. Shockingly, compared to most of the other shit in this thread, this one's actually true.

[Anonymous No.3390959]

>>3390843
>all that projecting

Democrats.

[Anonymous No.3390975]

>>3390848
fffffffff

[Anonymous No.3390981]

>>3387952
>No ass uncovered unspandex unbodysuits ass shots
>No dancing in that fucking game
>Lewd

Nice try asshat

[Anonymous No.3390989]

>>3390936
My wife's son named our cat Deshawn

[Anonymous No.3391026]

>>3388098
>digging
>not diddling

[Anonymous No.3391029]

>>3388098
Is this game good or just edgy?

[Anonymous No.3391031]

>>3390419
>feet are right next to the genitals

wat

[Anonymous No.3391050]

>>3388648
don't bother

[Anonymous No.3391173]

>>3391029
Good for a laugh but really bad otherwise

[Anonymous No.3391287]

>>3390423
no, they just know their playerbase; people who buy boring games to jack off to animu 14 year olds.

[Anonymous No.3391321]

>>3390413
he's just mad he can't take out his misogynist buttpain in literally every game like that was ever standard
>Feminist Frequency just put out a video complaining about the lack of female enemies, in games.
reactionaries bitch about femuhnists when they cant murder enough women in games and they bitch about femuhnists when they can. reactionaries gonna react i guess

[Anonymous No.3391337]

>>3391050
Why not?

[Anonymous No.3391339]

>>3390975
>>3390882
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4ma40q

[Anonymous No.3391346]

>>3391321
Learn a new word today there, sport?

[Anonymous No.3391349]

>>3391337
Not that guy but they're really bad. Movement is rigid and stiff, there's no sense of momentum. It feels like someone made them in a game making program with no real idea what they're doing. The character designs are good - and by good I mean fappable - but even then, in the earlier games, they were drawn pretty amateurishly. That word sums up the whole series.

If I had to describe it with an analogy, I'd say it feels like when you buy a game in a franchise you like but this one isn't made by the same people , it's just a licensed thing. Like how the "platforming" feels in Sonic Spinball when you're expecting something like normal Sonic. It feels like somewhere there are good "real" Shantae games and these ones are like that, like Sonic Spinball or Mario Is Missing.

[Owl No.3391361]

>>3390803
USA censorship always due to religion or chivalry.

[Anonymous No.3391370]

>>3391346
it's perfectly descriptive. not even a communist but commie lingo is pretty helpful sometimes

[Anonymous No.3391375]

>>3390848
i can't imagine that being allowed ever. kinda hot though desu

[Anonymous No.3391392]

>>3390913

>Censorship is the suppression of free speech, public communication or other information which may be considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, politically incorrect or inconvenient as determined by governments, media outlets, authorities or other groups or institutions.

There you go, just for you. Censorship isn't always some totalitarian regime burning books in the streets. It's broader than that. You've learned something today. Maybe you can learn to google this shit yourself next time before you mouth off.

>>3390560

That's not exactly 'dragging a woman around by her hair and kicking the shit out of her', is it? The exact same animation would happen regardless of if you're fighting a man or a woman, and it's a fighting game so that makes perfect sense. If you were playing a hack n' slash like God of War and there were human female enemies you could manhandle and pull their hair like that (in a quicktime animation or something), I can guarantee the SJWs would be on their Twitters begging for it to be removed. And then it probably would be.

[Anonymous No.3391397]

>>3390981
ok? nude ass shots were never vidya standard especially in the shantae games

>implying the dancing was lewder than those outfits
>implying it was primarily meant to be lewd and not cute

this some /trash/-tier thirst

[Anonymous No.3391426]

>>3391392
wtf no external force is making devs do anything. if a group of consumers are uncomfortable with certain content than producers have every right to take it out or just not care and leave it in and the producer has every right to do either. this is just the free market
inb4
>b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-but these women who obviously play these games and care enough to complain at all actually don't play games and are just fucking around in game media to oppress me ; ;
or maybe some girls play games and have some things to say about them? is that just too far-out for reactionaries to accept? wasn't a supposed tenet of gamergate to help support these female devs and gamers that apparently don't exist? ffs you donated to that female dev charity that subsequently made vivian. was that really just for argument points? whatever

if you all are so thirsty for the Domestic Abuse Simulators you're so nostalgic for (lolwhat) then why don't you stick it to the sjews and make it yourself? ohwait that would involve doing something other than bitching

[Anonymous No.3391441]

>>3391392
The exact same animation would happen regardless of if you're fighting a man or a woman
wow just like the example in op you dense fuck. I like how MRAs just make up their agenda on the fly to suit whatever Internet Argument they're trying to win

[Anonymous No.3391446]

>>3391392
>The exact same animation would happen regardless of if you're fighting a man or a woman
wow just like the example in op you dense fuck. I like how MRAs just make up their agenda on the fly to suit whatever Internet Argument they're trying to win

[Anonymous No.3391475]

>>3391339
>they added fuckin schlicking sounds
holy fuck that's lewd

[Anonymous No.3391583]

>>3391426
>so thirsty for the Domestic Abuse Simulator

Holy shit, this. Why is it every time MRAs try to argue for what equality is it always comes back to "I should be able to beat up women"?

[Anonymous No.3392335]

>>3391392
We've been through this exact thing before and you're as wrong now as you were then. Nothing is being suppressed. Deciding to make your game as marketable as possible for the market and demographic you are releasing it into isn't censorship, it's good business. You are a complete moron.

[Anonymous No.3392739]

>>3389019
>filename
???
But seriously I got addicted to the gambling in Pokamin, it basically taught me that my parents had always been right about Vegas.

[Anonymous No.3392894]

>>3391031
Supposedly, in neuroscience, foot fetishism is explained as something developed due to the proximity of the part of the brain that recognizes feet to the part that recognizes genitals. At least, that's what was said in college, and I didn't care to research it further because I was only there for my IT degree.

[Anonymous No.3392901]

>>3391426
If someone is uncomfortable about a work of fiction then that's clearly the entire point. You think the torture scene in GTA5 was meant to be amusing? Fuck no, it was meant to be horrifying.

If it's not meant to be, then congratulations you're a pussy.

[Anonymous No.3392907]

>>3390852
>Womyn need powerups and bonuses to compete with men
#TRIGGERED

[Anonymous No.3392917]

>>3387571

[Anonymous No.3392953]

>>3391029
I had some fun with it, definitely eerie, laughed quite a bit while playing it and it's like 2 dollars on steam.

[Anonymous No.3392958]

Violence is accepted more than ever in recent games, but the casual racism would cause a fucking outrage today.

[Anonymous No.3393063]

>>3392901
I don't know the bit you're referring to but were you the torturer or the victim? One thing I do think is genuinely fucked up - and a legit difference between the same subject matter in games vs other media - is when you torture people in Splinter Cell. I mean this is a mainstream as hell game with a fucking torturing minigame, just widely accepted by the average Murcan who would be reviled by nipples in a game, let alone an erection or something.

[Anonymous No.3393069]

>>3392894
I personally think it's down to 2 things.

1. It's a part of the body you don't often see in other people. Generally you'll see people's legs and arms, hands, faces etc, but not feet. They'll have socks on if not shoes. If a girl is barefoot around you, it usually implies a sense of closeness to some degree - you wouldn't have people barefoot in an office or on a train, for example.

2. It's a senstitive part of the body, feet are often ticklish so it seems more meaningful if you touch someone's feet than, say, their shoulder

As a sidenote, another fetishised body part are the armpits and those two points apply there as well.

[Anonymous No.3393302]

>>3390803
Was it, though? I always heard that Capcom was AFRAID of feminists complaining, but I don't actually remember any mention of any ACTUAL action, or threat of one, by any feminist org at the time.

[Anonymous No.3393304]

>>3390809
>>3390787
ESPN is a sports channel, they are supposed to be all-ages by nature.

[Anonymous No.3394638]

>>3393069
I don't think so. Foot pervs cum all over the place when they see someone, or even a drawing, with sandals or something, and that's extremely common in summer. Similarly, it's common to see people barefoot on a beach or a pool.
Likewise, I've seen go full perv on character types like goddesses or fairies, where the "implied sense of closeness" is not even a part of the equation.

Anyway, that's not the fucking point. The fucking point is foot fetishists being extremely open and perverted about it in public avenues or with completely inappropriate material. Like "I might have my dick in my hand but at least I am not perving over vagina or boobs!" which doesn't make even a bit of sense. Every fetish requires self-filtering or you will be seen as a fucking perverted weirdo, even if it's something innocuous like long hair or glasses.

[Anonymous No.3395176]

>>3387893
>>3387907
He doesn't look that far off from how he was depicted in the manual art for the first game. Neither design have the horseshoe mustache that he clearly sported in the arcade version though.

[Anonymous No.3395187]

>>3393304
I suuuure see a lot of kids at the football field.

[Anonymous No.3395191]

>>3390568
/v/ strawman was the point, no surprise there.

>>3390803
This was needed though, she needed bigger pants to keep her dick in.

[Anonymous No.3395195]

Remember when /vr/ wasn't /pol/?

[Anonymous No.3395205]

>>3395195
This shit was around before we started being mad about the invasions. It goes with the "kids these days" threads.

[Anonymous No.3395441]

>>3387571

[Anonymous No.3395451]

I do things like that in modern games all the time, OP.

[Anonymous No.3395457]

>>3395195
People that bitch about le /pol/ boogeyman are still infinitely more obnoxious than /pol/

[Anonymous No.3395549]

>>3395457
Cool story /pol/

[Anonymous No.3395554]

>>3395549
Oh noes!! Teh /pol/ boogeyman strikes again!!

[Anonymous No.3395556]

Maybe you retards who are so obsessed with /pol/ should go back there -- FOREVER.

[Anonymous No.3395593]

>>3395549
He's right, you know. See >>3395556
No need to be such a faggot about it.
/pol/ is the only place keeping the spirit of 4chan alive.
/pol/ is a board of all of the oldfags of 4chan, and the only board that regularly generates lulz and tons upon tons of OC.

I don't shitpost here, I keep all /pol/ related shit off of here and most other /pol/acks do too, but as soon as some fucking white-knighting underage beta faggot rears his head we're going to call them out for it, that shit has no place on /vr/. Calling people out for their bullshit is not "omg /pol/ racist sexist boogeyman" shit, it's common sense. Think about the content of some of the games we still play today from back in the day, before heavy censorship, it was great wasn't it?

Since "Retro" has become Cool with the younger crowd, all kinds of different groups have been flocking to retro-related places, including /vr/, and it's easy to spot them based on their posts and the way they word things.
These faggots need to know their place or go the fuck back to their pathetic home sites. /vr/ is not your precious little politically correct safespace hugbox, if that's what you really want, then just fuck off somewhere else.

gif related, it's you faggots every time you make a pretentious post

[Anonymous No.3395595]

>>3395593
Forgot gif. My bad

[Anonymous No.3395598]

>>3391446

Yeah except, to my knowledge, that's a total fucking lie. The female enemy types in OPs webm are the only ones you can do this attack to due to the fact that they're the only ones with the long hair to hold onto. The male enemies don't trigger this animation, and obviously neither do the robots. And I'm not an MRA by the way. Nice try though anon, you gave it a shot.

>>3392335

Yeah, we have been through this before. And if you're he same guy I'm thinking of (butthurt SJW who pretends he's not an SJW and shows up in every thread about censorship), I basically forced you to admit that you're fine with censorship as long as enough people are begging for it. In case you don't remember though, there are two main kinds of censorship: there's hard censorship (which is direct, like making it illegal to produce certain types of art or finding it and burning it when it is made) and there's soft censorship (which is indirect, basically what SJWs are doing when they get on twitter and start demanding that certain things be changed, twisting the arms of the devs who don't want to trigger a PR shitstorm). Soft censorship is still censorship. And self censorship, on the part of the devs, is still censorship. This is what I was trying to get across in my post. Just because it's not the legal definiton of censorship doesn't mean it's not censorship. And even if it is good business (which is something I'm really not sure of), it also doesn't mean it's not censorship.

And let's not pretend for a fucking second that these people are just 'concerned customers' voicing reasonable complaints about the game. This isn't something like a bug, or a gameplay mechanic that doesn't quite work. It's blatantly politically motivated. And let's face it, feminists have a long and storied history of censorship, and it's only now that they've really been allowed to cut loose and flex their muscles.

[Anonymous No.3395617]

>>3395593
I hate /pol/ and I agree.

It's always been /v/ that's enen our problem anyway why are people blaming /pol/ on this one? We all know you guys ha e better things to do than shit up this slow board.

[Anonymous No.3395619]

>>3395598
Fuck when will summer end.

[Anonymous No.3395727]

>>3395619

Great counter argument there.

[Anonymous No.3395764]

>>3391446
stfu you regressive leftist cuck

this is my 1st time on VR and /pol was right again...tumblr fags really do infest this page

[Anonymous No.3395779]

KEK LIBERAL SJW TUMBLR TRIGGERED NUMALE BETA ORBITER WHITEKNIGHT REDPILL NIGGER DINDU FALSEFLAG TRUMP REDDIT DEGENERATE IT'S HAPPENING KIKE SHILL OY VEY GOOD GOY FEMINAZI FEDORA MY WIFE'S SON JIDF SHILLARY MAGA HITLER DID NOTHING WRONG

[Anonymous No.3396086]

>>3395441
Well, on the other hand you can make her the most badass fighter in the land or even become a ruler.

[Anonymous No.3396087]

>>3395779
You forgot Shut It Down.