/vr/ - Retro Games

[Anonymous No.3323914]

What's the most graphically impressive retro game?

[Anonymous No.3323918]

A lot of them given that 4chan's idea of "retro" is actually fucking Dreamcast games. Jesus fuck. Lumping in anything 1995 or later with retro is bad enough, lumping in DC with retro is goddamn insanity.

[Anonymous No.3323919]

Ultima 9 or Quake 3

[Anonymous No.3323924]

>>3323918
That's completely arbitrary.

[Anonymous No.3323932]

>>3323914
Vagrant Story.

[Anonymous No.3323934]

Myst

[Anonymous No.3323937]

gun nac

[Anonymous No.3323938]

>>3323932
Seconded, very impressive

[Anonymous No.3323961]

If you like pre-rendered stuff, Riven still holds up, as does The Forgotten: It begins

As for rendered in real time, Scud Race/SEGA Super GT is one of the most graphically intense games of 1996. Also Sonic Adventure still looks decent.

[Anonymous No.3323963]

>>3323914
>teehee they're all gonna praise my lovely DC
>the only 6th gen console allowed on /vr/
>i'm so smart!
>praise her, praise her!
>FAP FAP FAP

[Anonymous No.3323965]

>>3323963
Do you want us to praise you for figuring out the obvious?

[Anonymous No.3323971]

>>3323965
Praise me, praise me!
FAP FAP FAP

[Anonymous No.3323982]

>>3323932
>>3323938
>3D PSX games
>visually appealing

You high, my niggas?

[Anonymous No.3323984]

>>3323914
Unreal blew some minds back in the day.

[Anonymous No.3323990]

>>3323982
Appealing for a 3D PSX game for the era, goober

[Anonymous No.3323991]

>>3323914
No contest.

[Anonymous No.3323992]

>>3323982
>what is style?
I bet you're a PCuck

[Anonymous No.3323993]

>>3323992
>>what is style?
Something that Vagrant Story lacks? lel

[Anonymous No.3323994]

Let's just get to the Metal Slug posting.

[Anonymous No.3324070]

>>3323918
>Lumping in anything 1995 or later with retro is bad enough, lumping in DC with retro is goddamn insanity.
What metric are you basing this on?

Someone as smart as you surely realizes that the word "retro" is almost entirely subjective in this context.

[Anonymous No.3324073]

>>3323914
Book of Watermarks on PS1 looks impressive.
Wizardry Dimguil got great visuals too and so does Fromsoft's Echo Night 1 and 2.

[Anonymous No.3324080]

>>3323982
Probably has only ever played PSX games on emulator and never saw what the games actually looked like on the system

[Anonymous No.3324091]

>>3323982
You are new buddy.
I hate Steam summer sales since it brings so much shit from /v/ its not even funny.

[Anonymous No.3324097]

>>3324073
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUQICnnUxvo

book of watermarks intro.

[Anonymous No.3324098]

>>3324091
Can't be new, he called it PSX, which only oldfags do.

[Anonymous No.3324129]

>>3323963
Generations are completely arbitrary. The games on DC have a lot more in common with fifth gen and came out during the fifth gen. It's only considered sixth gen because Sega already had the Saturn.

[Anonymous No.3324151]

Console would be Dead or Alive 2, Soul Calibur, Shenmue 2, or Ecco, all on Dreamcast.

PC would probably be Outcast. Freespace 2 and Quake 3 are up there too.

Arcade had that SCUD race game. Really impressive for 1996.

[Anonymous No.3324157]

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb4WtUp7hDw
dat draw distance
dose reflections

[Anonymous No.3324165]

>>3324129
It is 6th gen because it is a closer release date to 6th gen.

It also uses a similar 128bits marketing that ps2 used. (previous generation of consoles people referred to 64 bits)

The console featured consistencies with 6th gen for networking and 480p output among many other things.

DC was slightly weaker than the ps2. In comparison to how weak the ps2 was to the gamecube and how weak they all were to Xbox, it was barely worth noting.

[Anonymous No.3324186]

For this to be remotely fair we would need different categories. For example >>3323991
looks amazing for 5th gen but can't compete with the best looking Dreamcast games.

[Anonymous No.3324193]

>>3323919
Ultima 9 did have a relatively enjoyable world despite everything else and the railroaded areas

[Anonymous No.3324197]

>>3323914
Quake 3 no doubt. It still looks great at 1080p 144fps.

[Anonymous No.3324241]

>>3323914
For me it's a toss up between SaGa Frontier 2 and SF: Third Strike.

[Anonymous No.3324273]

Ultima Underworld still blows my mind what they were able to do in 1992.

>>3324157
also this

[Anonymous No.3324330]

>>3324165
>128bits marketing that ps2 used
Not trying to meme you but I have never seen the term "128-bit" used in any context in any media promoting the PS2. Can you provide a source?

[Anonymous No.3324668]

Unreal blew my mind the first time I played it. Seeing the waterfall and hearing the soundtrack was awesome.
I have a thing for self-contained alien worlds in shooters; Quake, Q2 and Unreal still make me giddy.

[Anonymous No.3324796]

Darius Gaiden has some fuckin sexy 2D sprites.

[Anonymous No.3324834]

>>3324796
And some fuckin sexy music. Darius Gaiden fucking rocks.

[Anonymous No.3324837]

>>3324241
>SaGa Frontier 2
Mah neegler

[Anonymous No.3324839]

>>3324241

her face is unsettling

[Anonymous No.3324865]

>>3324837
I dream of that game getting an HD release some day, even though I know it'll never happen because they would have to re-scan most of the art.

>>3324839
Probably because most of the body is carefully animated while the head remains static except for a bit of eye movement. In context in the full game with everything moving though I still think it all looks incredible.

Also special mention for Legend of Oasis.

[Anonymous No.3324889]

>>3324241
Rotoscoping is cheating.

[Anonymous No.3324895]

>>3324889
Whatever leads to a good looking end product is all that matters in my opinion. One could call Vermeer or Rockwell cheaters, but the end product of their work is still excellent.

[Anonymous No.3325032]

>>3324186
Yeah, I guess Shenmue would probably be the best, but that's like RIGHT on the edge of being "retro"

[Anonymous No.3325056]

>yfw Dreamcast has a more powerful GPU than the PS2 yet DC gets to be retro while PS2 doesn't

[Anonymous No.3325087]

>>3325056
Wasn't the PS2 a little bit stronger compared to the DC?

[Anonymous No.3325093]

>>3325087
I think the performance was pretty much equal in the hands of the right people. Xbox was the only player on a different league.

[Anonymous No.3325101]

>>3324889

Rotoscoping is the best result one can get in animation.

[Anonymous No.3325104]

OP, what the fuck? Why are you posting Shenmue 2 emulated with that shitty size? It looks way worse than the original version

3D, PC they are too many. Soul Calibur was the most impressive specially on a Crt
2D .... Dynamite Headdy, Rocket Knight Adventures, Yoshi's Island, BoF3 or some of the rpgs on snes.

[Anonymous No.3325115]

>>3325087
PS2 processor and RAM were better, yeah. But Dreamcast beat it in terms of texture quality and pushing raw polygons. Also hardware AA.

[Anonymous No.3325139]

>>3325104
1080p hack in NullDC. Try it out sometime.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xs2RJygIi0Q

[Anonymous No.3325160]

>>3323919
I would say Turok, if you take into account console limitations.

[Anonymous No.3325186]

>>3323914
Invasion from Beyond/B-Movie (PS1) had a very impressive framerate for its detailed 3D missions. And it had varied missions. Also one of the few games optimitised for PAL because sweed devs?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-h8DLe2TC4

Game does get bloody hard if you didn't rescue enough scientists to research better weapons and ships though.

[Anonymous No.3325197]

>>3325186
Wrong cover art.

[Anonymous No.3325205]

>>3323992
>PCuck
Cucks belong here >>>/pol/

[Anonymous No.3325209]

Crazy Taxi

[Anonymous No.3325226]

Hard mode: 'only 80s games.

[Anonymous No.3325241]

>>3323914
Outcast

[Anonymous No.3325249]

>>3325226
>80's
Alternate Reality for the Atari 8-bit?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YvYBlyzphs

[Anonymous No.3325269]

Check this out, 1988.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ti2J_GK-oa4

[Anonymous No.3325273]

>>3325269
Why not moobs?
>Hokuto no Ken: Violence Gekiga Adventure

[Anonymous No.3325305]

>>3325249
Insane graphics.
Wonder if someone sang that song.

[Anonymous No.3325352]

>>3323914
Depends on what do you consider graphically impressive. What do you mean by that. Like as in games that were technical feats for the hardware they were being made for or games that still look gorgeous to this very day despite the hardware.

[Anonymous No.3325448]

>>3325352
Good graphics are good graphics. Ugly ass polygon blocks aren't impressive to look at no matter how ill suited the system is to rendering them.

[Anonymous No.3325541]

>>3324889
>Rotoscoping is cheating.
Said nobody playing Prince of Persia, Another World or Flashback
Those games still look great, never mind the HD remakes

[Anonymous No.3325830]

>>3325101

Said no one who has studied animation.

https://youtu.be/mS3PGKUiSco?t=289

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXiemb_MWjY

Animation should have exaggerate movements and imply more motion per frame than a live-action film is capable of.

Rotoscoping a shit.

[Anonymous No.3325909]

Raiden II. Yeah, it does look sorta bland when you see just screenshots of it, but in motion there is an almost absurd amount of detail put into animation. Every single enemy in the game either explodes into tiny pieces of flying shrapnel or drops to the ground as a burning husk, creating a smouldering crater on impact. Or better yet, killing another enemy on the way down. Hell, your bombs will even cause collateral damage if you use them in rural areas!

The only other STGs I can think of that come close to this level of detail is Fire Shark and Gun Frontier.

[Anonymous No.3325943]

>>3325830
Rotoscoping is much better for dramas and facial expressions., because it can capture realistic human inconsistency and microexpressions.

[Anonymous No.3325946]

>>3323914
it's weird, it's so lowpoly and dated but there's a richness to it that makes it look really good still. can't beat solid art direction

[Anonymous No.3325960]

>>3325943
If that's its sole merit, why not just keep it at live action, where the micro-expressions can be seen in their full glory?

[Anonymous No.3325961]

>>3325087
Well, the processor and ram were not as good, so something like GTA which needs to stream a lot of data wouldn't have worked. It would have always been able to keep up with the ps2 with 3d fighting games though. I'd imagine if the system had continued it would have gotten a lot of games that had great graphics but were camera locked, like God of war.

[Anonymous No.3325965]

>>3325943
Rotoscoping is pointless today, it was useful for animating a panning shot of a city or other landscape with miniatures, but now we have computer animation, even for people you are better off using motion capture and then animating over that.

[Anonymous No.3325974]

>>3325943
You mean the microexpressions that are lost due to the 'artist's' human inconsistency?

[Anonymous No.3326202]

>>3325830
>Animation should have exaggerate movements


Kek, even comical animations like Betty Booop make use of rotoscoping. But what would you know? Another day where another "specialist" weaboo posts some another shit (and asian) example of rotoscoping.

Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs captivating people since eons. That furukushu inna shell, only the "special ones".

[Anonymous No.3326260]

Resident Evil (2002)

[Anonymous No.3326265]

I remember being blown away the first time I pulled a loop-de-loop in this when it came to the arcades.

[Anonymous No.3326284]

>>3324151
>Dead or Alive 2
I agree. I was blown away by DOA 2, still looks great today. 60 fps (?) cloth, boob, hair physics, big arenas, bump maping, fog etc. hell it still looks better than some games coming out today and is more fun too.

[Anonymous No.3326292]

>>3326284
>bump mapping
That was in DOA3 faggot

[Anonymous No.3326295]

>>3326292
Oh my bad

[Anonymous No.3326296]

What do you think of this list?

http://www.imdb.com/list/ls009056347/

I thought it was pretty strong.

[Anonymous No.3326304]

>>3326296
Eh, sides too much with 3d games as opposed to graphically beautiful games. I don't want to live in the world where Virtua Cop 2 is considered better looking than Cyberbots.

[Anonymous No.3326305]

>>3323934
you mean Riven

[Anonymous No.3326310]

>>3326295
fuck off you fucking faggot

[Anonymous No.3326320]

>>3326310
You think you're trolling, but it's so ad hominem that I doubt even the most sensitive poster would take you seriously

[Anonymous No.3326335]

>>3326320
>sensitive
>>>/lgbt/ you leftist faggot. same for the rest of you liberal freaks shitting up /vr/

[Anonymous No.3326338]

all those colors

[Anonymous No.3326345]

>>3326335
You ok man?

[Anonymous No.3326347]

>>3326338
Only looks good in pictures. Shit in motion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0JzpjINeE0

[Anonymous No.3326348]

>>3325269
holy fuck

[Anonymous No.3326353]

>>3326310
looks like someone needs a diaper change

:^)

[Anonymous No.3326354]

>>3326353
He just wants attention, better to leave him alone.

[Anonymous No.3326376]

>>3324889
I'm not sure SF3 was rotoscoped, that was just a well animated part

most of the animations are not anywhere near that fluid

also, SF3 is retro? Isn't that late 90s? How fucking young are you people

[Anonymous No.3326383]

Terranigma. It's just so beautiful in every way.

[Anonymous No.3326395]

>>3326376
It is definitely retro by the standards set in the sticky, it was also on the dreamcast which makes it eligible regardless of year.

[Anonymous No.3326568]

>>3326376
>I'm not sure SF3 was rotoscoped

I can confirm that it was. Animated 3D models then hand drawn overlay was how they did the sprites.

[Anonymous No.3326576]

>>3325087
Yes. Far more powerful. Gamecube was more powerful than ps2 and xbox was more powerful than that.

Anyone that disagrees has serious mental issues. Even wikipedia has the numbers as plain as day. Dreamcast was behind in all fronts.

[Anonymous No.3326578]

Donkey Kong Country

no doubt

[Anonymous No.3326579]

>>3325056
It didn't, you try hard attempt at trolling.

[Anonymous No.3326612]

>>3323982
Well, then everything that came before it can't be visually appealing either. SNES is just a bunch of squares and dots. It looks like something my grandma would knit in a sweater.

[Anonymous No.3326626]

>>3326612
>Well, then everything that came before it can't be visually appealing either
how do you come to that conclusion from the comment you referred to? A lot of people consider the PS visually a downgrade, from high quality 2D graphics to fairly basic 3D graphics

[Anonymous No.3326670]

>>3326347
>Australia cup
>upside down

[Anonymous No.3326674]

>>3326670
fake. No GPU back then had latitude support

[Anonymous No.3326690]

>>3324834
This

[Anonymous No.3326704]

>>3326284
It's the main reason why I got a VGA box.

[Anonymous No.3326710]

>>3326704
which version of the game do you play, and on what platform?

[Anonymous No.3326713]

>>3326202

They used rotoscoping to make animation easier, just because it's found in notable animation that doesn't make it a good animation technique. Older Disney films used to retrace previous Disney works all the time, are you going to tell me that makes it a good animation technique too?

[Anonymous No.3326727]

>>3325056
>Dreamcast has a more powerful GPU

lmao

>Dreamcast fill rate: 100 MPixel/s

>PS2 fill rate: 2352 MPixel/s (half for textures)

[Anonymous No.3326747]

>>3326727
wow are you retarded or something

>4mb vram (Ps2) vs. 8mb vram (Dc)
>most Ps2 games are interlaced while most Dc games are progressive scan

[Anonymous No.3326749]

>>3326568
Really? I tought that was the case for Art of Fighting 3?

[Anonymous No.3326791]

>>3326747
>4mb vram (Ps2) vs. 8mb vram (Dc)

You missed the devil in the detail my friend :^)

8 MB VRAM (DC) - 0.8 GB/s

4 MB eDRAM (PS2) - 48 GB/s

PS2 having progressive scan less often is only a matter of less "VRAM", not a matter of speed or power.

[Anonymous No.3326796]

>>3326747
Your autism is showing.

Next you will reply with ps2 reported as 0.0 gflops when DC was 0.2.

>PS2 36 megabytes of Vram+main
>DC 24 megabytes of Vram+main

I wish I could see the dumbass look on your face when you realize PS2 was using similar internal technology as previous consoles( no need to elaborate if you understand). Even the 360 only had 10mb of eDRAM. Unlike the DC, using that as it's only GPU memory, for the ps2 and 360 it wasn't used for much.

[Anonymous No.3326801]

>>3326727
You have to force "most" DC games into 480p. Something that can be done as well on ps2 with GSM as well as other resolutions much higher than 480p.

DC was weak compared to PS2, PS2 was weak compared to Gamecube, Gamecube was weak compared to Xbox. Get used to it, those are the facts..

[Anonymous No.3326802]

>>3326576
I don't think Xbox had that much more raw power than the GC. It did however have other advantages such as playing music CDs.

[Anonymous No.3326821]

>>3326802
>I don't think Xbox had that much more raw power than the GC

It did. Shitloads more. Xbox had two fucking vertex pipelines for fucksakes (and each vertex pipeline was individually more powerful than Gamecube's one vertex pipeline) and like three times the fill rate. Gamecube actually had extremely small amount of raw power. Less than PS2, in fact.

What Gamecube had going for it was an unambitious fixed vertex pipeline that was very fast at transforms (albeit useless at anything else), a very efficient texture unit and bundled texture memory, and no obvious bottlenecks overall.

[Anonymous No.3326848]

>>3326821
I seem to remember that people said back in the days, the XBox has considerably more raw power than the GCN, choked harshly by various bottlenecks; while the GCN has weaker but more balanced components and fewer bottlenecks. The result was hardware performing very similarly. Knowing no technical details about either system I kind of considered GCN's approach more elegant, XBox'es kind of hamfisted

[Anonymous No.3326860]

>6th gen console wars in disguise
>>>/v/

[Anonymous No.3326861]

>>3326791

>48 GB/s
>in 2001 where the best you could hope for was 8 GB/s

With speeds like that you could literally get away with using the VRAM as a cache and pull you textures from the main RAM.

[Anonymous No.3326867]

Best-looking 5th gen game.

[Anonymous No.3326881]

>>3323914
Super Mario 64

[Anonymous No.3326916]

>>3326860
All the more reason sixth gen should be allowed here, so we can have proper technical discussion about more consoles than just the DC.

[Anonymous No.3326920]

>>3323919
Damn Ultima 9 still looks amazing

[Anonymous No.3327047]

>>3326916
No.

[Anonymous No.3327052]

>>3327047
Then DC should be banned, since it's part of a non-retro generation of consoles.

[Anonymous No.3327062]

>>3325269
Looks pretty sexy for a 1988 game.

Also what do you anons think about this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHkwdvfXHJc

Came out in 1983. Eat yo heart out Starfox.

[Anonymous No.3327071]

Nothing is even close to resident evil remake on GameCube

[Anonymous No.3327080]

>>3327052
Dreamcast is gen 5.5, dumbass.

[Anonymous No.3327175]

>>3327080
>gen 5.5
lol

[Anonymous No.3327207]

>>3327062
That looks amazing, but what the hell does it have to do with Asimov's story?

[Anonymous No.3327224]

>>3326821
>Gamecube actually had extremely small amount of raw power. Less than PS2, in fact.

I'm wouldn't be certain on that, but comparing anything with the PS2 is really difficult because the PS2 architecture is so unusual. The Gamecube's 450 MHz PPC processor is both faster and a much better architecture than the PS2's MIPS CPU.

The Gamecube does have a straight-forward graphics pipeline, like a PC, thus very easy to program. The GC favoured special effects (like shaders) over raw polygon numbers. The PS2's GPU is a bizarre beast that focuses on raw speed over anything else. PS2 games suffered from far less special effects as these had to be done manually with multi-texturing and the like and it took a year for the middleware to catch up to the architecture.

>>3326796
Oh man, how embarrassing for you. The PS2 has a small amount of extremely fast VRAM because its intended use was to stream textures. All other architectures worked on the principle of loading all the resources you needed into VRAM and not changing them per-frame. That's easy to code, but it does limit you to the given VRAM capacity. The PS2 could swap the VRAM several times a frame. No, the PS2 was not using 'similar internal technology as previous consoles' -- in fact you couldn't choose a worse example, the PS2's entire architecture was upside down and back-to-front compared to _anything_ that came before or after it.

[Anonymous No.3327228]

>>3327224
>I'm wouldn't be certain on that
He's got a point, you know. Gamecube couldn't handle Burnout 3, whereas the Playstation 2 could.

[Anonymous No.3327274]

>>3326710
"vga box" so dreamcast newb.
>>3327052
>>3327080
>>3326916

I agree dc isn't retro I used to play online via wideband at my friends house. love the console and own 2 but it doesn't feel old my psone with a screen doesn't have that look and feel to it either but the games do.

[Anonymous No.3327346]

>>3327228

Compare gc RE4 to ps2 though

[Anonymous No.3327826]

>>3327224
>The Gamecube's 450 MHz PPC processor is both faster and a much better architecture than the PS2's MIPS CPU.

PS2's CPU has two vector units inside of it compared to Gamecube which has zero. Perhaps the Gamecube's CPU core is faster, but it absolutely cannot compete with the SIMD performance of two vector units. Not even close. Gamecube's GPU having a hardware T&L unit is supposed to make up for this, but it's a fixed pipeline that only works fast for transforms, meekly for vertex lighting and clipping, and doesn't work at all for anything else.

>S2 games suffered from far less special effects as these had to be done manually with multi-texturing

That's true, but it has shitloads more fillrate than the Gamecube to make up for that.

> it took a year for the middleware to catch up to the architecture.

Well, everybody knows the PS2 was a way more difficult platform than the Gamecube. That's without a doubt.

[Anonymous No.3327859]

>>3327826
Specs are all well and good, but at the end of the day gamecube games generally looked better than ps2 games, particularly the exclusives.

[Anonymous No.3327913]

>>3327274
>dreamcast
which game version?

[Anonymous No.3327932]

That HD version of Riven needs to get finished already.

[Anonymous No.3328248]

>people counting FMV shots
fucking morons

[Anonymous No.3328280]

>>3327913
US release

[Anonymous No.3328294]

I feel like Super FX games need to be brought up on those topics, always.

In particular StarFox and Yoshi's Island.

[Anonymous No.3328330]

>>3325830
>le aku no hana looked bad reeeeeeeee meme
Confirmed for child with complete shit taste who doesn't understand how art style influences emotion.

[Anonymous No.3328447]

>>3326202
>They used rotoscoping to make animation easier, just because it's found in notable animation ***that doesn't make it a good animation technique.***

Said the scholar in animation who posted a shit animu to make his point about rotoscoping.

So at least you can understand techniques are also used to facilitate things. But beyond that, rotoscoping is one of the most accurate techniques to achieve 100% correct perspectives. The results (good ones) are here already for a long time and how this is not a good technique is beyond my understanding. But since you post that two examples over there one can only imagine why.

>Older Disney films used to retrace previous Disney works all the time, are you going to tell me that makes it a good animation technique too?

Sorry? I don't see why not. Disney is big studio and if they wanted to retrace their classic moments in newer animations is because they wanted just that way. They could make it another way if they wanted.

The equivalent in your animus is a goku always running or talking the same shit way, like a gif, in some other background.

Hell, sometimes even in the same background.

[Anonymous No.3328463]

>>3324241
>>3324839
>>3324865

[Anonymous No.3328483]

>>3327859
Well that generally boils down to the Gamecube being easier to develop for. I think the Gamecube was great hardware. I just don't agree when people put Gamecube in a higher specs pecking order than PS2 when the reality is a bit more technically complicated (they have their technical strengths and weaknesses).

[Anonymous No.3328485]

>>3327826
I don't disagree with anything you're saying; you have successfully expanded upon the topic I was covering -- that comparing the Gamecube and PS2 is very difficult to do on a technical level.

The PS2 is a SIMD crazy machine, but then, not all problems are floating point -- the Gamecube's hardware Integer math was much better for certain tasks, something that PCs didn't get until around 2010.

The PS2's vector units are crazy fast, but then that had the downside that it made programming difficult -- keeping them busy was hard work. I think only Naughty Dog (Jak & Daxter) demonstrated the ability to master the PS2's specific architecture early on.

But above all, it's games that matter, and I respect the PS2 and the Gamecube equally for having good and interesting hardware, and excellent games.

[Anonymous No.3328503]

heroes 2

outcast, nolf (might not be retro, but damn, the best game ever), WC98/Fifa

[Anonymous No.3328526]

>>3324241

[Anonymous No.3328530]

>>3328463
i always thought the animations looked so funky on that game
pic related is JoJo Bizarre Adventure, another beautiful CPS3 game, although not as balanced, for sure

[Anonymous No.3329901]

>>3325139

[Anonymous No.3329905]

>>3325205
Hey buddy, how's your wife's son doing?

[Anonymous No.3329940]

>>3327274

dc is retro because no one owned one