/vr/ - Retro Games

[Anonymous No.3263424]

What retro games do you think Trump would like?

I'm thinking Sim City on account of building things.

[Anonymous No.3263434]

Sunset Riders, you get to shoot mexicans.

[Anonymous No.3263441]

>>3263434
you play as a mexican, you don't shoot 'em. you shoot cowboys, women, and indians.

Kuso thread. Do not encourage OP.

[Anonymous No.3263445]

>>3263424
Wario because he likes hoarding coins and he's a WASP honorary Jew. And he's vaguely villainous but still sort of likeable in some weird way.

[Anonymous No.3263449]

>>3263441
Yeah, don't encourage OP. The million "overrated games"/e-Celeb/arguing over scanline threads are much, much better.

[Anonymous No.3263457]

>>3263424
For some reason, I can see him enjoying Alpha Centuri or Jagged Alliance 2. He seems like a turn-based kinda guy.

[Anonymous No.3263458]

>>3263449
Fuck off Australia Kun we're just trying to have a good time.

[Anonymous No.3263467]

>>3263424

[Anonymous No.3263469]

>>3263458
When do we get the auto replace for "troll" = "Australia-kun"?

Anyways. I think he'd be all about any of the tycoon games.

[Anonymous No.3263470]

>>3263458
>Australia Kun

I'm American

[Anonymous No.3263481]

>>3263441
>Kuso thread

[Anonymous No.3263504]

Postal 1&2

[Anonymous No.3263514]

Metal Gear Solid 1

>>3263445
>villainous
>not the hero we need

[Sage No.3263529]

Why do you Trump half tards keep coming here to make threads? Fuck off back to your containment board.

[Anonymous No.3263531]

>>3263514
Well, antihero if you want to look at it that way.

[Anonymous No.3263538]

>>3263467
Was going to post this, but I was unsure of its Retro Status.

[Anonymous No.3263556]

He's basically Solidus IRL, but I don't think MGS2 counts as retro.

[Anonymous No.3263572]

>>3263441
El Greco calls Cormano a "gringo" in the arcade. Clearly there's some deeper lore.

Was Cormano a chicano?

[Anonymous No.3263679]

>>3263529
Omg, right? Like I just can't. I can't even. Omg such misogynistic racist pigs, like how can you even like a non progressive?

[Anonymous No.3263748]

>>3263679
Trump gets support from lots of people because he's nothing but a demagogue. He just regurgitates popular opinions regardless of how unrealistic or stupid they are.

[Anonymous No.3263756]

>>3263748

Name something unrealistic he has said.

[Anonymous No.3263757]

>>3263748
And yet, he's still the least shit candidate out of Hilly "I'm so incompetent I let people die in Bengazi and leak my emails" Clinton and Bernie "Because I'm poor, everyone else should be as well" Sanders.

[Anonymous No.3263795]

I enjoy watching you proles squabble over which out of touch psychopath will swoop in and save you from your shit lives. Better than television really.

[Sage No.3263802]

>>3263679
>gets triggered without any mention of political views

[Anonymous No.3263804]

>>3263802
hey, it IS election year you know, fights could break out at the drop of a hart

[Anonymous No.3263807]

>>3263795
europoor libcuck, FUCK OF

[Anonymous No.3263835]

>>3263538
It's borderline retro, in the same way that Windows XP is

[Anonymous No.3263848]

>>3263802
>lash out at a person due to their political choice
>be surprised when someone lashes back

Leftists, everyone

[Anonymous No.3263860]

>shitposting thread
>they are always started in early morning US, evening EU
I'm pretty sure the majority of the shitposters on this board are europoors, the evidence points their way.

[Anonymous No.3263868]

I want american /pol/tards and their shitty candidates to leave /vr/ forever.

sage

[Anonymous No.3263873]

>>3263860
>trump thread
>started by europoor

Doubt it.

Actually, If this board is anything like /sp/ was back in the good days of that board (years and years ago), it's probably Aussies pretending to be Americans and Aussies pretending to be euros.

[Anonymous No.3263876]

>>3263467
Do you get to fire people in that game.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75SEy1qu71I

[Anonymous No.3263894]

>>3263679
He's asking what this bullshit has to do with /vr/. It probably wouldn't be so bad if you faggots weren't so sensitive and defensive, for example with posts like this.

[Anonymous No.3263896]

>>3263756
Trying to ban a religion from entering the country is literally the single most anti-American ideal put forth by a presidential candidate. Building the wall is unrealistic, deregulating wall street is unrealistic (unless you want to see the majority of Americans suffer financially), and his tax plan is unrealistic because it shifts tax burden onto individuals and families under 91K, while reducing the burden on those earning less than 25k and more than 150k. Basically it's designed to further damage the middle class and force more people into the lower brackets while protecting those in the upper brackets.

[Anonymous No.3263908]

>>3263896
cry some more you libcuck nigger, I can't WAIT until you get sent to the wall building labor camps.

[Anonymous No.3263921]

>>3263896
>Trying to ban a religion from entering the country is literally the single most anti-American ideal put forth by a presidential candidate

They shouldn't have crashed planes into our buildings then.

[Anonymous No.3263924]

>>3263921
You shouldn't have trained them and given the means to in the first place.

[Anonymous No.3263927]

Age of Empires

[Anonymous No.3263932]

Ok guys, it's time FOR YOU /POL/ MOTHERFUCKERS TO FUCK OFF BACK TO YOUR CONTAINMENT BOARD

[Anonymous No.3263936]

this thread is shit
fuck off etc
sage

[Anonymous No.3263948]

>>3263924
In hindsight maybe, but we needed non-American soldiers dealing with Russians trying to take our resources in the middle east.

[Anonymous No.3263958]

>>3263932
>there's no such thing as cross-posters...
>there's no such thing as cross-posters...
>THERES NO SUCH THING AS CROSS-POSTERS

[Anonymous No.3263961]

Posting an obvious one, also this is now /biz/ game general.

>>3263679
>Republican-head supporting Trump
>implying the GOP doesn't hate him even more than any Democrat could

[Anonymous No.3263970]

>>3263896
I'm mostly surprised that even /pol/ types don't realize Muslims can just lie about their religion and get in that way, regardless of your views on Islam it's gonna be really hard to enforce.

[Anonymous No.3263974]

>>3263970
Most of /pol/ does realize that.

What we (hope) Trump means is that he'll put a temporary ban on certain countries. Believe me, we talk about Taqiya on /pol/ all the time, we know they'll just lie about their religion.

[Sage No.3263981]

>>3263848
>assumes someone is a leftist because they think Trump supporters are morons
Trump supporters, everyone. How's your first election going?

[Anonymous No.3263986]

>>3263981
Neocons may as well be leftists too, friend

[Anonymous No.3263991]

>>3263981
>assumes someone is underage because they support Trump
How's your first shitpost going?

[Anonymous No.3264001]

>>3263991
That's a pretty good point. It's been proven Bernie is the choice of high schoolers.

Hillary and Trump have far more support among the various age groups, though obviously from different people. They appeal more to people who have been through life and have experience under their belt, not NEETs and underage dreamers like Bernie

[Sage No.3264002]

>>3263986
Trump supports single payer and has seemingly supported raising taxes on the wealthy. That's not conservative fiscal policy.

[Anonymous No.3264005]

Trump is running a high school popularity contest.

The man's a demagogue. A Rorschach. He'll say anything to get attention, and people see in him whatever they want to see.

Which makes him the perfect candidate. And it doesn't matter, because as Douglas Adams pointed out:

"The president's job is not to wield power but to draw attention away from it."

[Anonymous No.3264008]

>>3264005
All that is true, but it's better than having yet another Soros puppet in Hillary

[Anonymous No.3264016]

>>3264005
Trump is less wishy-washy than most politicians, though. If he really did just say stuff that people wanted to hear, why is he so consistent on his promises?

[Anonymous No.3264149]

I hope Trump supporters don't mind that Trump will usher us into World War III.

[Anonymous No.3264154]

>>3263572
He speaks english for one

[Anonymous No.3264160]

>>3264149
You know Trump and Putin are good friends, right? There won't be a WWIII.

[Anonymous No.3264185]

>>3264149
>this meme

Thank you for making it very obvious that you get spoonfed by Facebook memes and John oliver

[Anonymous No.3264318]

Why are we getting invaded by /pol/?

[Anonymous No.3264334]

>>3264002
>Trump supports single payer
I read that as "single player" and was confused what the fuck it had to do with taxes.

[Anonymous No.3264359]

>>3263424
>>>/pol/

[Anonymous No.3264404]

Backtopol.jpg

[Anonymous No.3264413]

>>3264318

/pol/ can't help spewing their shit everywhere because they think it's the MOST IMPORTANT THING IN THE WORLD that their tupee-wearing champion becomes president

And then they think anything short of screaming support for their shit off topic threads could only be from THOSE DIRTY LIBERALS, GRRRRR

[Anonymous No.3264473]

>>3264334
I mean, that seems to be what he thinks running a government is going to be.

[Anonymous No.3264687]

as a foreigner who doesnt live in the USA Trump worries me for economic reasons.
I dont think it is possible to force Apple to build their shit in the USA and not in China, unless the USA stops being a free economy, which will make it a less attractive country for investment.
I think he could hurt the dollar, which would hurt the countries that have a shitload of dollars or American debt, but long term would hurt the USA too.

If he puts a 35% I guess that means the USA will be leaving the NAFTA treaty. And I am not sure it is possible to deport 11 million people in 2 years without something like a police state.

You cant make America great again like decades ago, because decades ago Europe was recovering from WW2, China was a maoist country with no industry, and the Soviet Block still existed. There is much more international competition nowadays.

I also think Americans have never had a right wing demagogue like Berlusconi or Putin in power, so they wont realize how damaging it is until it is too late.

[Anonymous No.3264690]

>>3264687
>I also think Americans have never had a right wing demagogue like Berlusconi or Putin in power, so they wont realize how damaging it is until it is too late.

Can't be any worse of a fuck-up than Obama's been the last 8 years.

[Anonymous No.3264706]

Yet another /pol/ thread that the mods won't delete.

[Anonymous No.3264725]

>>3264005
>A Rorschach.
I'm no Trump defender, but that's kinda the nature of presidential candidates. 7 years into Obama and I'm still hearing deluded fantasies about how he's actually gonna legalize weed and end all wars, or he would if the political establishment would let him. As a leftist, it's fuckin' depressing since Obama is Bush 3 at best.

Pic included to be relevant to thread.

[Anonymous No.3264727]

>>3264690
Honestly, what do people think he's done that's so terrible? Please explain to me.

[Anonymous No.3264731]

>>3264185
Rand Paul and Mike Huckabee (!) come off as the most reasonable in these quotes imo.

[Anonymous No.3264745]

>>3264727
racial tensions are the highest they've been in years, partly due to the way he handled some high profile incidents

[Anonymous No.3264758]

>>3264745
Chicken or egg. The right certainly fanned the flames.

[Anonymous No.3264760]

>>3264745
I don't get why that would get pinned Obama when there's been a string of police shootings of black folks that have gotten a lot of media attention. I also don't buy that protesting against getting killed by cops means you're contributing to "racial tensions."

[Anonymous No.3264775]

>>3264760
only 30% of police shootings are of black people, whereas black people commit ~50% of violent crime, so no there's not really a problem with police shooting black people. You're right that there is a larger cultural problem with the media inciting division, but the president should be a leader and a uniter, not someone who tacitly endorses that same agenda.

[Anonymous No.3264780]

Hell yeah!
Trump's going to make vidya great again!
Definitely vr related.

[Anonymous No.3264783]

>>3264775
Saying they commit 50% of violent crime and they're convicted for 50% of violent crime is two different things. You can bet public defenders aren't getting anyone off the hook.

[Anonymous No.3264826]

>>3264783
crime surveys corroborate the 50% number though.

[Anonymous No.3264858]

>>3264760
That game is fucking great.

I'm not even a huge fan of sim/strategy games, but I find international affairs and public policy really fascinating, and this game is amazing.

A long time ago I modified the Super Iraq scenario on the disk into one based on the then-current US invasion of Iraq.

Great underrated title for DOS. Cyberjudas sucked though.

Somebody post that gif/webm of this game where the player launches 5000 nuclear warheads at Israel

[Anonymous No.3264872]

>>3263424
He endorsed a PC game called Donald Trump's Real Estate Tycoon.

He also said he never plays video games and considers them a waste of time. The current prez said the exact same thing.

[Anonymous No.3264910]

>>3264858
>A long time ago I modified the Super Iraq scenario on the disk into one based on the then-current US invasion of Iraq.
That's cool as hell. What was the best strategy for that scenario, you think? In the game, I mean.

[Anonymous No.3264919]

>>3264725
I understand what you mean, and sometimes feel it myself, but don't short-change the Obama administration.

-repealed "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"
-reversed Bush torture policies
-opened relations with Cuba
-enacted (half-assed) health care
-got us (mostly) out of Iraq

..and other notables, all while the majority of congress wouldn't piss on him if the man was on fire.

>Que someone saying "Nixon opened relations with China and founded the EPA."

[Anonymous No.3264939]

>>3264687
lucid post

[Anonymous No.3264994]

>>3263908
Oh, did I trigger you?

>>3263921
>Actually believing the official 9/11 story

And I thought Hillary supporters were dense.

[Anonymous No.3265004]

>>3264745
Oh wow, racial tensions are high because you don't like a black guy in office. Poor babies.

Obama has been 8 years of straight economic recovery, whether you agree with his stances on social issues or not (I think he's made a lot of mistakes, but he's a hell of an improvement on Bush).

[Anonymous No.3265007]

>>3264994
>le jews did it!
And you're calling others dense?

[Anonymous No.3265020]

>you will never go back to pre-/pol/ 4chan
>"it's /vr/-related because I said video games in the OP!"

FUCK OFF

[Anonymous No.3265030]

>>3264919
I get what you're saying, and I agree with you. As a leftist it is incredibly gratifying to have a president acknowledge the rights of lgbt people to such an extent. And I can also acknowledge the obstructionism in congress is, perhaps, unprecedented.

>enacted (half-assed) health care
Obamacare had some good ideas in it and some potentially very bad ideas, but reducing the number of people without any kind of health insurance is probably a net benefit. I'm still waiting for more data to be honest. It's no single-payer, you know.

>reversed Bush torture policies
>got us (mostly) out of Iraq
These I'm not convinced of. In the case of torture, his DOJ prosecuted John Keriakou, who blew the whistle on CIA waterboarding of suspected Al-Qaeda detainees, but has not prosecuted a single designer or implementer of our torture programs.

And he isn't interested in really closing Guantanamo, just moving it. Indefinite detention has certainly become part of the Obama administration's playbook, as has global extrajudicial drone assassination.

And are we really out of Iraq? Americans are supposedly in "support roles" but one recently died in Iraq in combat and those kind of statements exclude special forces and covert ops. I have no doubt special forces have "boots on the ground" taking out targets in Iraq and Afghanistan, regardless of what the Obama administration claims.

But like you say with Nixon, it's about acknowledging that presidents aren't usually black and white. So to speak.

[Anonymous No.3265031]

>>3265007
Protip: the Jews didn't do it either.

[Anonymous No.3265041]

>>3264994
Eh. I can buy "Bush administration-era intelligence organizations did not sufficiently gauge the urgency of an imminent terrorist threat", or even "the Bush administration knew 9/11 was going to happen and did nothing because they needed a pretense to bomb shit", but claiming Bush and his cronies, or really any representatives of the US government, planned and executed 9/11 is borderline lunacy.

[Anonymous No.3265382]

>>3265031
Yes they did. There's even a photo of israelis setting up the explosives inside the tower.

[Anonymous No.3265387]

>>3265041
No it's not. The idea that liberals can call Bush "worse than Hitler" for 8 years and then say "oh but he'd never lie" is lunacy. Don't be such a rube and learn to think logically, you literal faggot.

[Anonymous No.3265390]

>>3265004
>Obama has been 8 years of straight economic recovery

The current administration STARTED the depression, which has been the worst in US history BY FAR, and erased 80% of all wealth in the nation.

If America were judged against itself 10 years ago it would currently be considered a third world nation by comparison.

[Anonymous No.3265392]

>>3265004
>he's a hell of an improvement on Bush

This is objectively false and is like saying "stalin was an improvement over the czars". No he wasn't and it's not even open to debate.

[Anonymous No.3265396]

>>3264919
>-repealed "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"
>-opened relations with Cuba
>-enacted (half-assed) health care

These are objectively bad things.

>-reversed Bush torture policies

This never happened.

>-got us (mostly) out of Iraq

This caused ISIS, which makes him directly responsible for millions of deaths. He's literally exactly the same as Hitler and has killed as many people or more.

[Anonymous No.3265457]

>>3265390
>The current administration STARTED the depresson

I find this statement mind-bogglingly narrow minded.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_the_Great_Recession

>>3265396
Objectively:
not influenced by personal feelings, interpretations, or prejudice; based on facts; unbiased: an objective opinion.

>literally exactly the same as Hitler
dropped

[Anonymous No.3265531]

>there are people unironically defending Obama

this is why /vr/ shouldn't discuss politics

[Anonymous No.3265538]

>>3264002

>Trump supports Single Player

I sure hope he does. I'm sick of everything these days needing esports and multiplayer and online connectivity. Just give me a good SP.

[Anonymous No.3265776]

>>3263424
>Trump

[Anonymous No.3265807]

>>3265531
Go back to your right-wing hugbox.

[Anonymous No.3265813]

Did 6 million jews die in the Holocaust?

[Anonymous No.3265817]

>>3265030
All it did for most people I know was force them to pay for insurance rather than correct the problem of them not having insurance. So now they pay way too high of rates for the cheapest of insurance which puts a critical strain on their budgets.

[Anonymous No.3265823]

>>3265392
>this is what Republashits actually believe

[Anonymous No.3265827]

Reminder: Report, filter and hide.

[Anonymous No.3265886]

>>3265041
>>3265387

the thing Bush son is often accused of with reason is lying about the weapons of mass destruction in order to invade Iraq.

The world supported the USA when they invaded Afghanistan, but things were very different when they invaded Iraq.

[Anonymous No.3265918]

Quick reminder for everyone:

The vast majority of /pol/fags out there will constantly claim, to the ends of the earth, that 4chan has always been this bad and that every thread on every board has always been chock-full of far-right retards posting dank conservative memes.

These people are trying to gaslight you. Yes, there have always been dipshits posting "NIGGERS NIGGERS XD XD XD JEWS DID 9/11" in random threads, but that's basically all that happened, and 4chan was relatively apolitical on the whole. That's not what's happening now. The recent trend of /pol/fags taking every opportunity to hijack threads with their stupid shit has only been going on for a few years. But they act like it's been going on since the beginning of 4chan, because they want to proliferate the narrative that YOU'RE the one invading THEIR super secret clubhouse, because that allows them to feel even more victimized than they already think they are.

[Anonymous No.3265932]

>>3265918
>4chan has always been this bad

Before it was good, yeah. The people posting

>NIGGERS NIGGERS XD XD XD JEWS DID 9/11

Are just edgy kids wanting to fit in without having to put any thought into their comments. In turn, people thought mindlessly posting like that was acceptable, and eventually became the norm.

Remember when you'd be verbally berated for using emoticons? Seems like forever ago. Point is, there's more nuance to his situation that you're letting on, and your polarizing view does nothing but hurt the general community.

Let them have their shitty memes, they'll let you have yours. Just expect to be harassed about it, as they're equally harrassed, because that's considered acceptable now.

grrrreeaeeeeat.

[Anonymous No.3265942]

ctrl+f rampart
no results

[Anonymous No.3265957]

>>3265932
>telling the truth about how 4chan used to be is now a "polarizing view"

[Anonymous No.3266015]

>>3263927
I fucking hate playing against my dad in AoE2, he spams walls like a mother fucker and most of his walls are 5 walls thick

[Anonymous No.3266048]

>>3265918
It seems to me that most of the /pol/ shitposters are newfags who thought that the humor here was not just idiotic trolling. There were always shitposts similar to what they do now, but it was obviously a joke.

[Anonymous No.3266173]

>>3265918

>"not muh 4chan"

Delicious lib tears. Your impotent rage fuels us.

[Anonymous No.3266224]

>Board about old videogames
>lots of old fucks reminiscing about their childhoods
>fags and retarded children surprised when there's a lot of support for trump

Mildly entertaining. Shows how popular Trump is, too. Spilling over everywhere.

[Anonymous No.3266398]

>>3266173
It's like they think their bitching and whining proves us wrong?

[Anonymous No.3266436]

I don't fucking care anymore, man. I don't fucking care about the wall, I don't care if the Jews did it, I don't care if he dindu nuffin, I don't care about liberals, I don't care about Trump. Why does everything have to have a political agenda?
I just want to play and talk about some fucking video games.

[Anonymous No.3266446]

>that one pathetic fag ITT spamming back to pol

[Anonymous No.3266454]

>ITT leftwingers get triggered

[Anonymous No.3266468]

>>3263961
does anyone actually play biz sims here?

[Anonymous No.3266470]

>>3266224
Youngfags are the cancer killing /vr/.

[Anonymous No.3266543]

>>3264687
Making Apple and other electronics companies manufacture domestically would basically upend their supply chains, electronics are made by bringing in components from various (mostly Asian) sources, who in turn usually do a fair bit of sourcing themselves.

There is an essay called I Pencil about how the parts to make pencils come from all over the US. Now, keep in mind that the US is a large country with ample natural resources and relatively few legal barriers to internal travel. Basically cutting off the supply chain and saying "do everything here" for the production of something as multifaceted and complex as modern electronics would be a logistical nightmare, and not just because Apple couldn't use suicidal Foxconn labor.

Unless Trump's plan is to get a huge automated factory infrastructure up and running as fast as possible, in which case bravo.

[Anonymous No.3266567]

>>3265918
To expound on this, 4chan always called people niggers or cunts for a laugh, but there really was an increase in right-wing sentiment here over the years. Things like pic related used to be the default (there's plenty of Fox hate now, of course, but it's from the opposite direction), and GENUINE racists/sexists were universally considered lolcows.

That said, we're hardly unique in this regard, there's been a shift going on in general since around 2010. I have some personal theories, but I'm already stepping too far into /pol/ territory.

[Anonymous No.3266586]

>>3266543

Automated production of electronics will become a thing. Just because Chinese and Pajeets are cheaper than robots now, does not mean it will remain so in the future.

Plus there's also the fact that Koreans and Chinese basically streal all IP and technology developed in the US, because they do all the manufacturing.

[Anonymous No.3266607]

>The mods will never do their jobs

Shake my head to be honest pham

[Anonymous No.3266610]

>>3266567
As someone who came here a lot in the before times (pre-late 2006/2007), I will say that a lot of the early culture was centered around having fun and trying to be amusing. Whether it came from laughing at how long it took mods to take down illegal images or racist things like bix nood or around blacks never relax, it didn't really matter. I doubt many were really obsessing over a hatred of blacks or anything, just an enjoyment of racist humor and a lack of fear of poking fun at anyone or anything. 4chan really started to change for the worse when people tried to unite the user base for purposes other than idly fucking with live jasmine (or whatever the sites were) cam whores by getting them to put shoe on head. See: Project Chanology, WE DO NOT FORGIVE WE DO NOT FORGET video for examples of cancer.

[Anonymous No.3266639]

YOU SEE GUYS 4CHAN WASN'T ACTUALLY RACIST IT WAS JUST *IRONICALLY* PRETENDING TO BE RACIST

[Anonymous No.3266657]

>>3266610
The particular shift I'm referring to is fairly far removed from Chanology, but perhaps that did foster a general mindset that's more conducive to what's happening now. A "serious business" rally from one side will also cause it in the other; without going into details, that's basically what's been happening with nerdshit this past 5 years. At any rate it's readily obvious there was a certain levity in 2006 that just doesn't exist anymore (though /b/ was much better at fucking your shit up then, ironically).

[Anonymous No.3266667]

More importantly why haven't you embraced feminism yet?

[Anonymous No.3266679]

>>3265932
>Remember when you'd be verbally berated for using emoticons?
You get verbally berated either way. Trying to fit in into online communities is a waste of time.

[Anonymous No.3266680]

>>3266667
Because it destroys females by asserting that women should be more masculine.

[Anonymous No.3266684]

>>3266680
Since gender is a social construct what's wrong with females becoming the new dominant alphas and males becoming the new nurturing gender? Aren't men better at everything anyways?

[Anonymous No.3266754]

>>3265918
4chan was always racist and edgy and shit, and that was okay. The real reason /pol/ is so intolerable today is because it's so humorless and preachy. Habbo raids and GNAA and shit are one thing, but /pol/ literally believes that it wages a culture war to the death so it goes around raiding boards with their propaganda and fiercely enforcing anti-PC as the new PC, without as much as a veneer of self-consciousness and irony. It comes off as very crusadery, the same sort of attitude that the extreme SJWs are hated for.

People just take internet way too seriously nowadays I guess.

[Anonymous No.3266774]

>>3265918
4chan is contrarian. When the left is in charge, it's right wing, when the right was in charge it was left wing.

[Anonymous No.3266779]

>>3266754
you know /pol/ wouldn't be so bad if the left wasn't also filled with crazy militant retards

[Anonymous No.3266787]

>>3266684
>Since gender is a social construct
It isn't. Sex=gender unless you're a deluded libcuck who thinks all bathrooms should be unisex.

[Anonymous No.3266791]

>>3266684

I don't see many alpha females in construction, transportation or any job that doesn't have heating, artificial lights and air conditioner.

Being the pampered sex does not equate dominant.

[Anonymous No.3266794]

>>3264005
That's funny. Because I could have sworn it was crooked Hillary who went on black radio and claimed she always has hot sauce in her purse. Because you know how they love hot sauce! He's more honest than that fucking tiwt.
>Game he'd play
Romance of the 3 Kingdoms
>The realm has fallen into chaos
>The people demand change
>The old regime's time has come to pass
>The people want a totally new regime and a great leader to impliment change
Holy Shit, he's Neo Cao Cao

[Anonymous No.3266796]

>>3266787
There is zero scientific evidence that girls prefer to play with dolls and wear pink dresses. Also why can't I be born into a third gender?

[Anonymous No.3266810]

>>3266796
>Also why can't I be born into a third gender?
Because there's no such thing as a third gender, you entitled millennial with a mental disorder.

[Anonymous No.3266815]

>>3264690
My sweet child, yes you can. Yes you can.

[Anonymous No.3266839]

2012 ronpaul forced everywhere
2016 trump forced everywhere
2020 ??????????????????

[Anonymous No.3267148]

>>3263424
ayy lmao all these butthurt libs

[Anonymous No.3267251]

>>3266454
no /pol/friend

you are the triggered

you are the perpetually, permanently triggered

[Anonymous No.3267259]

>>3266657
>alleged "/b/ collage"

>no Happy Negro

[Anonymous No.3267273]

>>3263424
Trump says video games cause violence.

So none. Stop shilling the meme candidate here.

[Anonymous No.3267279]

>>3267251
Funny how they say libs get triggered but you say one bad thing about trump and suddenly...

"ACTUALLY..."

[Anonymous No.3267292]

>>3266794
>That's funny. Because I could have sworn it was crooked Hillary who went on black radio and claimed she always has hot sauce in her purse. Because you know how they love hot sauce! He's more honest than that fucking tiwt.
She actually probably does though. It's pretty well-documented going back that she constantly eats spicy shit. I assumed it was pandering too.

[Anonymous No.3267295]

>>3265942
Damn, good call. You're right, it was a collective failure of everyone involved.

[Anonymous No.3267303]

>>3266657
everyone who was been browsing for a while now has mentioned that 4chan changed back when anonymous became more of le edgy superhaxor neckbeard than the bored neckbeard who wanted a few laughs. I would like to have seent the old 4chan since I have a soft spot for the early to mid 00s.

[Anonymous No.3267401]

I don't go to /pol/ to talk about video games.
Don't come here to talk about politics.

[Anonymous No.3267473]

>>3264690
You must be at least 13 years old to post on 4chan.

[Anonymous No.3267496]

>>3266436
>coming to a videogames board to talk about videogames

Lel, kek, and jej.

[Anonymous No.3267517]

>>3267259
>no teh Rei

[Anonymous No.3267519]

>/vr/ - Retro Games

[Anonymous No.3267532]

>>3263896
Agree on tax plan, and somewhat about wall street.

But you can't be serious about the wall and Muslim ban. Both are realistic and American ideals bearing in mind the safety and well-being of American citizens. There's nothing remotely wrong or bad about them on any accord.

[Anonymous No.3267570]

>>3267517
zoomj fuck DONATE TO 4CHAN

[Anonymous No.3267604]

>>3267532
There already is fencing along large swaths of the Southern border. The desire to wall more of it, while bellicose, I'll let slide for now.

But explain to me how it's possible to ban Muslims. Do we keep out Islamic leadership? Do we allow them in temporarily, but give them special patches and ID cards identifying their theological bents? What if they lie? What if such a move emboldens the less sophisticated Americans to act further violently against Muslims in their own communities?

[Anonymous No.3267619]

>>3267532

>country is founded on religious freedom
>country was literally founded by people fleeing their country to escape religious persecution
>too fucking dumb to remember what happened last time a world leader forced anti-religious sentiments by forcing them to identify themselves with a garment
>this thread is still fucking open
>/vr/ will never be about video games again because le epic /pol/ threads don't get deleted

[Anonymous No.3267670]

>>3267619
>Islam
>Not inherently a religion of violence and domination

It should be banned from Earth

[Anonymous No.3267675]

>>3267670
this attitude/shitposting only furthers the cycle of violence

fucking sage

[Anonymous No.3267724]

>>3267619
>>country was literally founded by people fleeing their country to escape religious persecution

What? No, it was founded by people fed up with their government instituting taxes without input or consent of the public. Everyone who came over was some form of Christian or Catholic or Protestant, the least persecuted religions in history.

[Anonymous No.3267738]

>be me
>be OP
>start thread and stick around for first few replies then leave
>come back
>people still replying

How is the irony sonlost on you people?
You complain that this board isn't super serious business 100% of the time and yet this thread has the major replies over the last day~day and a half of any thread here other than the doom general.

Hell, my original post was even about games anyway. In the first few replies you have people who realized this and replied with game choices. Then you had people who saw a picture of Donald trump and thought "fuck, how can I be a professional victim today?". It is funny to see how truly unaware some people are. Then on the other hand, you had actual /pol/tards replying to the whiners, and they were equally annoying. You can't bitch about off topic if your own post is more off topic than the one you're crying about. If I had came in here and said "DUDE MAGA DUDE TRUMP 2016", that would be uncalled for. I merely used his image in a lighthearted fashion to open up some discussion about games. No wonder /vr/ has a reputation as the whiniest board, I guess I've been lucky to not see that side of the community in most of the threads I've been in.

Anyway, back on topic, I gave
>>3263961 a try, hadn't actually played that before. Do you have any other good /biz/ games?

[Anonymous No.3267928]

>>3267619
>country was literally founded by people fleeing their country to escape religious persecution
What a load of fucking bullshit. It was founded by people seeking economic freedom if anything.

[Anonymous No.3267938]

>>3267619
>only argument is you're a fugging nazi le jews sob story
every time

[Anonymous No.3267949]

>mods delete gba threads within minutes
>this thread has been up for two days now

I guess any thread goes as long as it says "video games" in the OP!

[Anonymous No.3267995]

>>3266567
I'd actually really like to hear more of your thoughts on this.