/vr/ - Retro Games

[Anonymous No.3252974]

ITT: Stuff in retro games that they could get away with at the time they couldn't get away with today.

[Anonymous No.3252986]

Releasing a complete game.

[Anonymous No.3252993]

>>3252974

I never understood why they couldn't have just made that intro random, and you never know who's going down.

Couldn't have been a rom space issue, there's a ton of unused crap in there so they could have easily fit in a sprite of the white guy going down.

[Anonymous No.3252994]

>FF6
>scene in the original where the guard is beating up Celes
>cut from all rereleases

[Anonymous No.3252997]

>>3252994
Even the wii virtual console rerelease?

[Anonymous No.3252998]

[Anonymous No.3253003]

>>3252998
Anon, rapelay isn't retro.

[Anonymous No.3253005]

>>3252974
whats wrong with fist to the face equality? too many pussies these days.

[Anonymous No.3253006]

[Anonymous No.3253007]

>>3252993
>there's a ton of unused crap in there
In Street Fighter 2? Not really. If you want to look for lots of unused stuff in a Capcom fighter, look at Darkstakers and Jojo.

[Anonymous No.3253012]

>>3253005
In todays hyper politically correct world, a blonde hair blue eye'd white guy punching a black guy in the face just wouldn't fly.

[Anonymous No.3253020]

>>3252998
they didn't get away with that then

[Anonymous No.3253023]

>>3253006
If orchid got pregnant, could she still fight in the game?

[Anonymous No.3253027]

>>3252974
Capcom can always get away with it. Resident Evil 5 happened.

[Anonymous No.3253028]

>>3252986
>Releasing a complete game.
kek
in the case of SF2 it may have been complete but it was re-released several times to remove bugs and balance it. not bad if you only played it in the arcades but kinda sucked for the console releases

[Anonymous No.3253030]

>>3253007

Well okay Mr Connery I lied a little, but there are some unused sprites and obscured background elements.
they could have easily trimmed the game and just added one sprite of the white guy going down.

And I'm not even an SJW, would have just made the intro more exciting.

>Who's going down? who's going down?

[Anonymous No.3253037]

Oy vey!

[Anonymous No.3253038]

>>3253030
>>3252993
what i still don't get is why those 2 guys aren't in the game but are featured in the intro

[Anonymous No.3253054]

>>3253012
what about a black hair black face nba rapper cucking me while my wife plays the retron5 ?

[Anonymous No.3253060]

oh yay this fucking thread again

[Anonymous No.3253061]

>>3253054
very progressive.

[Anonymous No.3253069]

>>3252974
>could get away
You do know they replaced the black guy with another white guy in Genesis version?

>>3253028
World Warrior was a complete as it was in its original state. Bug fixes aside, which were fixed in actual revisions (by that, I meant later prints of the same PCB, not the obvious Dash/Turbo/Super/X editions). The so-called upgraded versions were mostly made due to fan-demand (making the bosses playable and added in mirror matches in Dash), as well as beating the bootleggers at their own game (as was the case with the faster gameplay and extra moves in Dash Turbo).

[Anonymous No.3253079]

>>3253060
What are you talking about

[Anonymous No.3253093]

Brown-skinned humanoid monsters.

[Anonymous No.3253125]

>>3253079
not him but, basically this thread is an excuse for /pol/fags to whine instead of talking about games.

[Anonymous No.3253135]

>>3253125
>muh /pol/ boogeyman
This thread is clearly talking about games and how things have changed over the past 20 years, you're the only one who's whining.

[Anonymous No.3253140]

>>3253125

I havent posted in this thread yet, I am not a polfag or American, but it is true that nowadays you cant make a game like pic related without a big media controversy, and that sucks. To me it is a kind of censorship.

[Anonymous No.3253141]

>>3252974

[Anonymous No.3253142]

>>3253125
>muh pol boogieman

[Anonymous No.3253150]

>>3253140
>nowadays you cant make a game like pic related without a big media controversy, and that sucks. To me it is a kind of censorship.
true, but how many threads do we need about it?

[Anonymous No.3253162]

>>3253150
It's one single thread and it doesn't come often. You can easily hide it if you don't like it.

[Anonymous No.3253165]

>>3253162
>It's one single thread and it doesn't come often.
define 'often'

[Anonymous No.3253168]

>>3252974
You do realize the 90s Clinton Years was a time of extreme political correctness right? Do you think political correctness was invented in 2015?

[Anonymous No.3253180]

>>3253168
not nearly as bad as it is now

[Anonymous No.3253182]

>>3253168
What this guy >>3253180 said.

Political Correctness in the past 6 years is far worse than its ever been.

[Anonymous No.3253192]

>>3253180
>>3253182
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nD-Afpg4P2U

Not really. I dont see any court cases going on right now.

[Anonymous No.3253194]

>>3253192
Video Games were the big new scary thing that few understood at the time. There are no court cases today because there is an effective system for rating games and everyone has gotten sick and tired of Jack Thompson demonizing video games. That's not political correctness, nobody was demanding there be more women, gays, or blacks in vidya at the time.

[Anonymous No.3253201]

>>3253192
i was speaking about the general culture not vidya(maybe I shouldn't have here but I did).

>>3253194
>that few understood at the time.
some still don't understand video games, but yes there is always something that people need to blame their problems on. comic books, rock and roll, dungeons and dragons, video games; I wonder what will be next.

[Anonymous No.3253208]

>>3253201
>I wonder what will be next.

Social media. It's already started.

[Anonymous No.3253212]

>>3253208
>Social media. It's already started.
oh, never got on social media, what will be next after that then?

[Anonymous No.3253216]

>>3253194
The Night Trap case was all about misogyny towards women. Same shit happening with todays games.

[Anonymous No.3253218]

>>3253037
Underrated post

[Anonymous No.3253227]

>>3253216
>The Night Trap case was all about misogyny towards women.
white knights were around long before aggressive feminists

[Anonymous No.3253235]

>>3253216
the game was still made, and that was more about protecting children from 'degeneracy' than feminism.

[Anonymous No.3253236]

>>3253216
Yeah, but they were nowhere near as aggressive or powerful back in the 90s as they are today. Companies are today going out of their way to make games more politically correct not to offend these harpies that don't even play video games, even if it harms the game.

[Anonymous No.3253239]

>>3253236
Oh please. It's not the harpies their trying to appease, it's the radical reftist Tumblr users who scream misogyny at the slightest idea of sexism.

[Anonymous No.3253248]

>>3252974
>That Compressed image


Disgusting. I still don't understand why people don't save these.

[Anonymous No.3253256]

>>3253239
what do you think he means by harpies?

[Anonymous No.3253263]

>>3252974
>>3253248
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGbBl6yRYvc&t=1m58s

[Anonymous No.3253268]

>>3253012
>In todays hyper politically correct world, a blonde hair blue eye'd white guy punching a black guy in the face just wouldn't fly.

But a black guy that looks like Django or some shit punching a white guy is A-OK!

[Anonymous No.3253272]

>>3253125
>excuse for /pol/fags to whine

Looks like you're whining right now faggot

[Anonymous No.3253273]

>>3253216
Ha, no it wasn't. Back in the 90s popular American consciousness believed that videogames were a children's medium. Yes, "misogyny," or as it was more appropriately termed back then "sexism," was an aspect of night trap's criticism, but the large share was that the content was called pornographic (which we know it pretty much wasn't) and thus was not fit to be in the hands of minors. The criticisms were levied at Mortal Kombat and Doom and that's why the resolution of that business was mostly the creation of a standard system for rating games.

Saying Night Trap "was all about misogyny towards women" is revisionism just because you want to contend that what's happening today is comparable to what happened in the 90s.

>>3253239
Aren't you agreeing with that guy or is harpy supposed to be something specific in your mind when it's a catch-all term for any woman who is screeching?

[Anonymous No.3253274]

>>3253165
Once a month

Now shut the fuck up and go away

[Anonymous No.3253275]

>>3253268
Exactly, it's insanity.

[Anonymous No.3253278]

>>3253268
white privilage

[Anonymous No.3253279]

>>3253212
straight white men

[Anonymous No.3253280]

>>3253268
>>3253275

>But a black guy that looks like Django or some shit punching a white guy is A-OK!
And a black man raping a white man in the snow?

[Anonymous No.3253302]

>>3253280
which retro game does that happen in?

[Anonymous No.3253306]

>>3253302
He's talking about that Samuel Jackson movie The Hateful Eight that came out last year, look it up.

[Anonymous No.3253307]

>>3253302
I digressed (Django name, tarantino film, political correctness, etc)...

>inb4 go to /pol/

[Anonymous No.3253315]

>>3253302
Snow Bros

you have to get the bad ending

[Anonymous No.3253331]

>>3253182
Why do conservatives bawl about political correctness, all the time? No one is stopping you from saying what you think. Just consider how you say it.

Unless you are actually saying something demeaning, bigoted, or plain wrong. Are people complaining about not being allowed to be assholes? Who wants to be an asshole? And who wants to defend assholes?

[Anonymous No.3253341]

>>3253006
I had this poster on the back of my door as a kid

[Anonymous No.3253345]

>>3252993
man, as a kid, I'd rewatched the opening so many times hoping it'd be random since that'd be cool as fuck

>>3253038
this bugged me a bunch too

[Anonymous No.3253362]

>>3253331
I hope no one responds to this comment seriously. Leftards cucks cant be reasoned with.

[Anonymous No.3253373]

>>3253362
I was almost going to respond to him seriously, but said fuck it because it wasn't worth arguing with. It honestly feels like bait.

[Anonymous No.3253376]

>>3253331
Who gets to decide who is an asshole? If I think you're an asshole first posting this does that mean you shouldn't be allowed to post it?

[Anonymous No.3253398]

>>3253331
you seem like an asshole yourself. Why do you need to attack people for no reason?

[Anonymous No.3253440]

>>3253331
Because many times in these conversations certain facts come out that are uncomfortable, sensitive, and many times racist. Unfortunately emperical evidence is apparently nothing compared to emotions, and as such actual civilized progress stagnates by actual discussions being ignored and censored.

[Anonymous No.3253443]

>>3253038
The white guy is Cody.

[Anonymous No.3253452]

>>3253440
Its the entitled mentality that gets me. Someone is butthurt and they have to demand that something is done to 'fix' it or they have to go insulting people because they're triggered instead of just disagreeing and ignoring it or participating in the debate without whining and using buzzwords

[Anonymous No.3253457]

>>3253452
What bothers me is that this trend is prevalent on both sides, predominantly on the Left, but it's sickening that no one seems to want to learn from anything they disagree with.

[Anonymous No.3253473]

>>3253443
His name is Scott. Black guy's name is Max.

http://game.capcom.com/cfn/sfv/column-100906.html
http://game.capcom.com/cfn/sfv/column-100887.html

[Anonymous No.3253496]

>>3253168
That's not political correctness though. If you were to say that all drug users are losers, that's politically incorrect.

[Anonymous No.3253502]

Everything I don't like is political correctness

[Anonymous No.3253534]

>>3253168
The difference was that no one paid attention to that shit. Games were still full of violence and titties and no one cared but old bible bashers.

[Anonymous No.3253537]

>>3253331
Fun fact; more people are being arrested for writing or saying something in Britain today then they were in the 18th century thanks to newly introduced hate speech laws.

[Anonymous No.3253541]

>>3253331
Me. I'll defend an asshole's right to be an asshole to the death.

Don't like what he or she says? Counter it rationally or ignore it.

[Anonymous No.3253548]

>>3253541

You "I can be mean if I want!" retards are all the same. You're an asshole, then people tell you to shut the fuck up and you start crying about your freedom of speech. Literally kill yourself my dude.

[Anonymous No.3253571]

>>3253548
Nope. You kill yourself. Feelings never trump the right to free speech. I'll defend assholes, people who write smut about little children, Islamists, Communists, Scotsmen, Priests, Fascists, Racists, Trade Unionists, Pervets, Jehovah's Witnesses, Anti-gunners and your right to free speech. Because I have principles and you're just a whiny little bitch who can't stand people being nasty and so wants to surrender your right to free speech and take away everyone else's.

[Anonymous No.3253573]

>>3253548
>>3253571
And tell me to shut up all you want. Scream it at me if it makes you feel better. Just don't push for laws to lock me up for hurting your feelings because that shit is obscene. I'll defend your right to say we shouldn't have free speech, but you're a cunt for doing so.

[Anonymous No.3253582]

>>3253069

>White guy punches white guy.
HORRIBLE! RACISM! PRETENDING BLACK PEOPLE DONT EXIST!

>White guy punches a black guy.
HORRIBLE RACISM I AM OFFENDED BY THIS!!

>Black guy punches a black guy.
BLACK ON BLACK VIOLENCE, ITS ALL THE WHITE MANS DOING! STOP FIGHTING EACH OTHER!

>Black guy punches a white man.
Haha, take that whitey! ur a cuck fear the bbc!

[Anonymous No.3253584]

>>3253571
>>3253573

>call an asshole an asshole
>immediately starts putting words in my mouth and screaming MUH FREEDOM OF SPEECH

Like fucking clockwork. Don't worry, a few years from now you'll be able to look back on your current opinions and get embarrassed a little and move on.

>too retarded to understand the very real negative effects of pushing negative stereotypes

I bet you think child porn should be okay too, because it's free speech.

[Anonymous No.3253590]

>>3253584
Not gonna lie, you're a decent troll.

I didn't get it until your last sentence when he beat you with a solid argument and you just kept talking shit.

Maybe next time tone it back a bit with the instant "you're a pedophile if you disagree with me" rhetoric.

[Anonymous No.3253597]

>>3253584
>I bet you think child porn should be okay too, because it's free speech.

You're fucked in the head if you're advocating that child abuse is a form of self-expression. You can't make analogies like that - you may as well say "I bet you think it should be illegal to murder people because it's not part of the tax code!"

[Anonymous No.3253598]

>>3253590

Considering his fucking post literally says "I'll defend assholes, people who write smut about little children" in it, no, I'm pretty sure he's just a piece of shit.

[Anonymous No.3253647]

>>3253598
I'd that's the first thing you thought of when he said that, that says a lot about you.

I thought he meant talking shit about kids. "That kids a faggot" "what an ugly child" "that girl is retarded"


Etc., but if your first thought is fucking kids, well....

[Anonymous No.3253658]

>>3253647

>too retarded to even know what the word "smut" means
>"y-you're the REAL sicko!"

Underageb&?

[Anonymous No.3253691]

Great thread, guys.

[Anonymous No.3253702]

>>3253691

It was a le epic /pol/ thread from the first post, report hide and move on.

[Anonymous No.3253723]

>>3253702
> pol boogyman

I can tell you are insufferable

[Anonymous No.3253743]

>>3253723

Oh, was this a very genuine thread for racism circlejerking created by /vr/ regulars and not crossboarding shitposters?

[Anonymous No.3253753]

>>3252974
Tengai Makyou games didnt really give two shits about copyright. Although really copyright law is different in japan. Not sure how this kind of stuff would age today now that games are so far into the mainstream. A lot of other politically incorrect stuff in the series likely wouldnt fly either.

Tengai Makyou fuun kabuki den in case anyone is asking.

[Anonymous No.3253760]

>>3252974
I never had even the slightest sense that this was racist until SJW's started pointing it out, the game has Black characters already, how is it racist to show them fighting a white guy?

[Anonymous No.3253767]

>>3253760

You fags sure are good at recognizing every manner of false flagging except for "sjw racism bullshit."

[Anonymous No.3253780]

>>3253753
Another example in TM Apocalypse IV that I grabbed in my current playthrough:

Loose tl: "If I donate money here, the Dark Cult will give me a surgery to turn me into a white boy. But i don't have any money..."

In this town in the game, all of the residents are runaway children and all of the Native American kids highly consider getting the surgery "so boys will like me" or "so I can marry my idol Candy" or such and such.

[Anonymous No.3253795]

This thread reeks of underage. The game industry was under so much more scrutiny in the retro era than it is now. The recent (and fringe) SJW trend is nothing compared to the political/religious/media frenzy of the 90s over "explicit" content, which was mostly violence-related, but extended much further, as reflected by Nintendo's ridiculous censorship policies at the time.

[Anonymous No.3253797]

>>3253760
calling something racist makes people pay attention to you. Just look at this thread.

[Anonymous No.3253798]

>>3253795

Fucking thank you.

[Anonymous No.3253802]

>>3253795
A lot of research has to go into it. Nintendo doesnt get away with too much shit because it's fucking Nintendo. They cause an outrage over "spastic" and in the meantime small time publishers like WD can use "retarded" with zero publicity issues. Certain games hit certain niches. Those niches are pretty much exposed thanks to the Internet's insane word of mouth range.

[Anonymous No.3253804]

>>3253020
*outside of japan

[Anonymous No.3253806]

>>3253795
Sorry if I poorly translated this so take it with a grain of salt, but I remember reading a couple months ago on Shoji Masuda's twitter that they considered bringing Linda Cubed Again stateside, but ultimately didnt because they wanted to avoid controversy because people dressed up as Santa Claus stab the shit out of people.

Truly a strange time.

[Anonymous No.3253810]

>>3253804

Really? I thought the game has been banned in Japan since then.

[Anonymous No.3253813]

>>3253248
>upscaled, massive PNG
you dumb motherfucker

[mightkek No.3253892]

>>3252974
triptest

[mightkek !!fu8I1Pusw4B No.3253894]

>>3252974

[Anonymous No.3254132]

>>3253331
>plain wrong.
Right and wrong are subjective

[Anonymous No.3254264]

>>3253235
how many games in modern days have been kept from being made due to feminism?

[Anonymous No.3254268]

>>3253780
参ったな、爆笑しちゃった。

[Anonymous No.3254287]

>>3253093
To be fair, every human or humanoid besides the rogue has a dark skin.

[Anonymous No.3254329]

>>3253702
>>3253743
>Anyone who doesn't agree with my views is /pol/
You must be a delightful person

>>3253795
>Haha, just accept the fact feminists and SJWs who don't even play video games having a lot of control over the industry, just accept more politically correct and shitty artsy games.

[Anonymous No.3254332]

>>3253341
you pig

[Anonymous No.3254335]

>>3254264
DOA Extreme 3 says hello.

[Anonymous No.3254337]

>>3254329
>>Haha, just accept the fact feminists and SJWs who don't even play video games having a lot of control over the industry, just accept more politically correct and shitty artsy games.
Burden of proof is yours

[Anonymous No.3254343]

>>3254337
>More politically correct
Are you blind? Have you not noticed how feminists and SJWs keep demanding more minorities in games because feelings and how easily offended they get? Take a look at all the drama from dead or alive extreme 3 for example, it didn't get a US release because of all the screaming feminists. To these SJWs, anyone who isn't pandering to the left is a racist transphobic homophobic misogynistic neo nazi. Everyone nailed the AVGN to the cross because he refused to review the new Ghostbusters movie.

>Shitty artsy games
Gone home is a great example. It's just a walking simulator only some liberal arts major would like because it features lesbians, but game reviewers gave it 10/10 like it was something amazing.

[Anonymous No.3254359]

>>3253541
>>3253548
>>3253571
>>3253573
>>3253584
>>3253597
what

[Anonymous No.3254368]

>>3253795
There' a huge difference, back in the 80s and early 90s it was mainly about "what content should our kids be viewing, is it right that children play games that..." etc. And as you said it was more about the violence and/or sexual content. When games with adult content started to come out, they censored accordingly and nobody with fuck them over since only adults could buy them and have access to them and play them, theoretically at least, yes of course there were exceptions...

Today gaming is a different phenomenon, regardless of your political view you have to accept that everywhere in the media, gaming included (which is now a global phenomenon that includes adults as a target audience, openly, and moreven has blurred the lines between kids and adults as it's target audience) is full of motherfuckers pushing their shit opinionated views on you in a creepy and stealthy way which would make anyone with a normal level of criterion want to cringe... btw, gaming is dull and soulless nowadays, and that is a personal opinion, regardless of it's content and how self righteous faggots push their agenda with it.

[Anonymous No.3254406]

>>3253248
OP was posting the CRT version. That's the way it's supposed to be enjoyed, right?

[Anonymous No.3254425]

>>3253027
not without half of the enemies becoming random white people pulled out of a shopping mall.

[Anonymous No.3254432]

>>3253315
>implying that's the bad ending

[Anonymous No.3254442]

>>3254343
You're not really proving anything about things being "more" politically correct. You're just pointing out the obvious, that it's still an issue that comes up. But it's on a smaller (and different scale) than what it used to be, when devs had to scrub their games clean of any content that could even be distantly "questionable" (i.e. nude statues or crosses on coffins) because companies like Nintendo were terrified of backlash.

[Anonymous No.3254553]

>>3254335
It wasn't released in the west, but it was still made. And I really can't think of any other modern examples. If people complain about misogyny enough then games get altered, sometimes only in certain regions, but rarely cancelled.

[Anonymous No.3254608]

>>3253573
Politically correct types who get all offended and indignant when you say things they don't like and try to tell you not to say those things are not trying to force you to stop saying those things, though. They aren't opposing or infringing on your right to free speech.
They're trying to make you stop saying certain things, of course, but not trying to FORCE you.

No doubt there are a lot of politically correct types who want to outright ban certain speech, but that's not just anyone who has a PC attitude and tells you to shut up.

[Anonymous No.3254609]

>>3253331
>No one is stopping you from saying what you think.

I think you're a nigger. Defend that. Oh wait

>Unless you are actually saying something demeaning, bigoted, or plain wrong

[Anonymous No.3254618]

>>3254608
>They're trying to make you stop saying certain things, of course, but not trying to FORCE you.

Stop lying you fucking disingenuous faggot.

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/08/27/canadian-hate-speech-proposal-threatens-free-speech/
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/23/justin-trudeau-canadian-prime-minister-seeks-feder/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_against_Holocaust_denial#Overview_and_commentary

[Anonymous No.3254632]

>>3254618
>www.breitbart.com

[Anonymous No.3255005]

>>3254632
Milo is a faggot, but you shouldn't disregard the website because of him.

[Anonymous No.3255140]

>>3254406
>16:9
>1280x720
>"CRT Version"
Are you retarded?

[Anonymous No.3255147]

>>3253331
Back to >>>/tumblr/ you degenerate landwhale
Kill yourself

[Anonymous No.3255153]

>>3253006
I know they couldn't get away with her boob flash move today.

[Anonymous No.3255173]

>>3254553
It seems like its a slow process where it is being infiltrated from the inside. Isn't there certain series where feminists became employees at development studios? I know Duke Nukem is one such example

At least in the early 90s it was clueless out of touch politicians and not dumb fuck 20 year old college aged idiots that feel morally superior

[Anonymous No.3255175]

>>3253795
Bullshit
Not only is the SJW bullshit affecting vidya nowadays it's affecting politics too

[Anonymous No.3255180]

>>3253006
Tacky and mysognist.

[Anonymous No.3255181]

>>3255173
The slow infiltration of the feminist agenda might as well be the title of a book about the history of Bioware.

[Anonymous No.3255185]

>>3254442
That was before the rating system idiot. Once the rating system came about, no one gave a fuck anymore. Feminists won't ever be happy until their agenda is projected in every game tho.

Nintendo is a different story. they have been scared to offend people since the 80s and they decided not to stop the whole time. Nothing has changed with Nintendo and that's their decision. Has nothing to do with what we're talking about here.

[Anonymous No.3255189]

>>3254368
Fucking this

And I also echo your sentiment about today's gaming being shit
Gaming was better when it was a "kid's toy" when devs really had to try and impress kids with their creativity rather than just constantly making your run of the mill First-Person Shooter

[Anonymous No.3255193]

>>3255189
Also now people are obsessed with the story and "canon" of games more than the gameplay, creative level design or whatever. They've become movies now and with movies along come pretentious agendas to try to push onto people

[Anonymous No.3255195]

>>3255193
Mgs was a mistake

[Anonymous No.3255207]

>>3254608
People are just tired of this extreme leftist SJW type crap that is being force-fed to everyone everywhere on the internet. I really don't blame them honestly. It's gotten tiring, especially with people like you who justify that cancerous behavior.

How about if you don't like something fuck off? Not only isnt there a point to someone saying shut up to someone you disagree with but that is really self righteous to think that their opinion is valid just because they want you to stop "saying certain things".

[Anonymous No.3255389]

>>3253341
Nice
>>3254332
Faggot

[Anonymous No.3255412]

>>3253810
Nope, Japan gave zero fucks about the game. Only thing that did change is the outrage ensured Japan was less likely to localize it outside of Japan.

[Anonymous No.3255413]

>>3255185
The creation of a rating system only proves my point that things were much more scrutinized back then. The industry wasn't just being nice by creating rating boards, they were forced into that position by politicians and consumers.

Go ahead and keep picturing this grand puppetmaster feminist agenda ruining everything you like, but really the "misogyny in games" discussion only thrives because people like you perpetuate it. The media and average joes don't give a fuck about it and it'd be dead in the water if you guys stopped getting butthurt over it.

[Anonymous No.3255415]

>>3255412
*localize it and their other games

[Anonymous No.3255446]

>>3255413
Whiny conservatives shut the fuck up for the most part once the ESRB was created. Feminists and SJWs will never shut the fuck up, It's a huge difference between the two.

[Anonymous No.3255489]

>>3255180
Yeah, whore! Put som clothes on, whore!

>>3255413
Check out Overwatch on Wikipedia...

[Anonymous No.3255504]

>>3255446
>Whiny conservatives shut the fuck up for the most part once the ESRB was created.
Except they didn't. Like I already said, games are brought up at EVERY mass shooting, and the PS2 GTAs are at least on the same level as any pre-ESRB game in terms of notoriety and media attention. But it seems like that was before your time.
>Feminists and SJWs will never shut the fuck up, It's a huge difference between the two.
Okay, but their audience really doesn't extend further than the people who read their tumblrs and the angry gamers that think this is a major issue. You really need to get out more if you think SJWs have a prominent voice in any kind of public discussion.

[Anonymous No.3255517]

>>3255413
I'm not sure why you think far left progressive movement is non-existent or that it is not having an impact on Western culture. The recent rise of SJW and feminist attacking video games in greater frequency is simply a side effect of this phenomena. And it is not going away, it is going to get worse.

>You really need to get out more if you think SJWs have a prominent voice in any kind of public discussion.

You really think that? Have you seen what's happening in universities? All I can say about the far left progressives is that they are the biggest source of acceptable anti-scientific rhetoric in academia.

[Anonymous No.3255526]

>>3255504
>Okay, but their audience really doesn't extend further than the people who read their tumblrs and the angry gamers that think this is a major issue. You really need to get out more if you think SJWs have a prominent voice in any kind of public discussion.
But then there's the alpha men who gets power by ruin everything else for other men...

[Anonymous No.3255527]

>>3255413
I'm not sure why you think far left progressive movement is non-existent or that it is not having an impact on Western culture. The recent rise of SJW and feminist attacking video games in greater frequency is simply a side effect of this phenomena. And it is not going away, it is going to get worse.

>>3255504
>You really need to get out more if you think SJWs have a prominent voice in any kind of public discussion.

You really think that? Have you seen what's happening in universities? All I can say about the far left progressives is that they are the biggest source of acceptable anti-scientific rhetoric in academia.

[Anonymous No.3255560]

>>3255504
>You really need to get out more if you think SJWs have a prominent voice in any kind of public discussion.
Not him, but dude, what are you even talking about? The president has repeated misinformation or outright lies that originated from feminists and SJWs. They just gave talks at the UN under a year ago. They make a dedicated effort to shape public discourse, successfully changing the policies of sites as large as Google, Twitter and GitHub as well as having notable presence and control in universities as high up as Harvard and Yale, to even scientific communities where information that goes against the ideology is shut down in fear of the "harmful effects" even if said information may be true.

I didn't want to get involved in the conversation but people on this site for some reason will not accept the blatant elephant in the room that even the most mainstream of sites have accepted. You might be tired of the backlash, fine, but don't deny that they're there when we live in a time of phones that can take pictures and video.

[Anonymous No.3255584]

>>3255560
>They just gave talks at the UN under a year ago

Wrong. Go look up where they actually held a speech. Stop spreading misinformation.

[Anonymous No.3255592]

>>3255560
dont start posting these two chucklefucks on /vr/ please.

[Anonymous No.3255596]

>>3255560
That wasn't about video games, it was about harassment, you retard.

And speaking of things that aren't about video games, what is this thread doing here?

[Anonymous No.3255615]

>>3255584
I can't find what you're talking about. I'm finding them talking at the UN. However, the UN did retract the report later to look into it which is great and a big step forward.

>>3255596
>That wasn't about video games, it was about harassment, you retard.
That's the point, "you retard". It isn't just something in games, though "these two chucklefucks" >>3255592 have been notorious for trying to control games, too.
>And speaking of things that aren't about video games, what is this thread doing here?
It's about games. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean you can silence it.

[Anonymous No.3255621]

>>3255615
If it's not video games, it has no business on this board. Fuck off, shitposters.

[Anonymous No.3255625]

>>3255621
>I can't read

[Anonymous No.3255627]

>>3255621
This thread was originally about stuff in retro games that wouldn't be allowed in more hypersensitive 2016. So yeah, it's allowed here. This thread was going fine till one faggot started complaining about muh /pol/ boogeyman.

[Anonymous No.3255632]

>>3255625
I stopped reading when you admitted it wasn't video games. If it doesn't meet this simple requirement, it's not for this board.

[Anonymous No.3255634]

>>3255632
It is about video games.

[Anonymous No.3255635]

>2016, current year
>being a misogynist
I seriously hope you guys don't do this.

[Anonymous No.3255637]

>>3255627
It's not a boogeyman if a retard is in here talking politics.

and secondly, this thread is repost troll bait, along with that overrated games thread that always starts with the same MGS image. OP knows the thread will veer off course and it wouldn't surprise me if he's one of the shitposters here.

[Anonymous No.3255639]

>>3255635
Am I a misogynist if I hate women but I don't do anything TO them. Don't talk to, date, interact etc.

I go so far as to refuse to have a woman check me out at the store?

[Anonymous No.3255641]

>>3255639
No, it makes you a virgin neckbeard piece of fucking shit tho.

[Anonymous No.3255643]

>>3255639

Yes, in the same way you can be a pedophile without being a child molester.

[Anonymous No.3255649]

>>3255639
>Am I a misogynist if I hate women
That would be the only requirement needed, yes.

[Anonymous No.3255650]

>>3255632
The report in question was generally more about harassment. That's true. That's because someone on the other side of the argument disputed that SJWs and feminists had any real input on anything. It was a response. Complain to them if you don't want them being ridiculous. However, you conveniently ignored the actual subject matter: the thread. Is it about video games? Yes. As stated in my post. Honestly, even the UN thing was partially about video games although it didn't have to be because it was a response to something in the thread.

>The September 24 report, issued by the International Telecommunication Union, was published on the same day that the United Nations hosted a symposium at its New York headquarters that gathered women from across the world to talk about the Internet's potential as a platform for harassment and abuse. The accompanying report touched on those issues, but its accusations about video games as a broader inspiration for violence included messy citations that failed to back up such assertions.

>One lengthy takedown, posted by Jaime King, was able to discredit over 30 percent of the citations in the report. They ranged from circular (the UN citing itself) to dubious (citing Wikipedia) to baffling (just straight-up blank entries).

[Anonymous No.3255651]

>>3255639
holy shit die you autistic fuck

[Anonymous No.3255652]

>>3255637
It was going great till fags started complaining over nothing. People were having fun till you showed up.

[Anonymous No.3255657]

>>3255652
Over nothing, while retards are in here right now not talking vidya.

[Anonymous No.3255658]

>>3255639
This is why we have to bring back euthanasia, seriously.

[Anonymous No.3255660]

>>3255639
>Am I a misogynist if I hate women
lol

[Anonymous No.3255665]

>>3255639
Kill yourself man. I'm not even being ironic here, PLEASE kill yourself.

[Anonymous No.3255669]

>>3255639

Go blow yourself up for ISIS already Ahmed.

[Anonymous No.3255674]

>>3255639
Back to >>>/r9k/ with you

[Anonymous No.3255676]

>>3255639
Dont worry anon I also hate woman they are annoying as fuck.

[Anonymous No.3255678]

>>3255641
>>3255643
>>3255649
>>3255651
>>3255658
>>3255660
>>3255665
>>3255669
There is nothing wrong with being MGTOW.

[Anonymous No.3255679]

>>3255641
>>3255651
>>3255658
>>3255665
>>3255669
>>3255674
Triggered SJW leftist faggots.

Remember kids, never bother with a woman unless you're fucking.

Period.

[Anonymous No.3255685]

>>3255679
>>>/r9k/ you autistic MRA faggot

[Anonymous No.3255690]

>>3255678
Hey, he's entitled to his own opinion but opening with that line is as hilarious as saying "I don't hate black people but I kinda want to kill them." It got a bunch of people and I'm not convinced it was more than fun on the internet.

[Anonymous No.3255695]

>>3255690
He's still a faggot though

[Anonymous No.3255703]

>>3255695
>I'm a simp who's entire world is centered around and dominated by women. Please kill me.

[Anonymous No.3255706]

>>3255703
>still caring about 3DPD
>2016
This is why you will always be a faggot

[Anonymous No.3255708]

>>3255706
You'll never breed, and that's a good thing.

You're most likely some form of nigger anyway.

[Anonymous No.3255712]

>>3255685
>you

[Anonymous No.3255715]

>>3255712
>I can't get laid so I hate women, wahh wahhh!

[Anonymous No.3255730]

>>3255690
>"I don't hate black people but I kinda want to kill them."
The fuck? That and what he said aren't comparable. He just doesn't want to deal with women, not kill them.

[Anonymous No.3255738]

>>3255730
Funny in the sense that he asked if he was a woman hater because he just hated women. Not meant to be a literal 1:1 comparison.

[Anonymous No.3255757]

>>3255730
Simps who are condition by our gynocentric society believe any slight towards women, even disliking a woman, is eual to murder.

[Anonymous No.3255764]

>>3255757
And people who still complain about females are fucking faggots. If you don't care about females, why are you bitching about them? Clearly you must care greatly about them.

[Anonymous No.3255772]

>>3255764
Because I care about my fellow MAN and the things that bother him, which women are pretty high on that list. Plus ignoring a problem won't make it go away, that line of thinking is stupid.

[Anonymous No.3255794]

>>3255772
Females are like Internet trolls: they thrive off attention you give them be it positive or negative attention. If you don't give a flying fuck about them, they'll go away. Encouraging other men to strive for glorious 2D females is much more productive than bitching about 3D females all day.

[Anonymous No.3256002]

>>3255712
Is that a man?

[Anonymous No.3256010]

>>3256002
It is now. That, or they won't take either gender.

[Anonymous No.3256016]

>>3255794
Dope gender roles senpai! Makes me feel fucking great to have a penis!!!

[Anonymous No.3256396]

I meant to say Nuke this thread pls.

[Anonymous No.3256539]

>>3253306
DINGUS

[Anonymous No.3256545]

>>3256016
At least womyn aren't like men who are all rapists.

[Anonymous No.3256578]

>>3256545
0/10. Put some effort into it next time please.

[Anonymous No.3256580]

>>3256578
Deal with it misogynist.

[Anonymous No.3256582]

>>3256580
Anon-kun, please put some effort into your baiting. I know you can do better than this.

[Anonymous No.3256960]

>>3255715
Liberal faggot

[Anonymous No.3257004]

>>3255715
Cut the bullshit you white knight

[Anonymous No.3257145]

>>3256002
It's Pat!

[Anonymous No.3257226]

>>3253012
And yet, Capcom has announced Scott and Max have canonical names and they have updated artwork with the SFV logo. Hrm...

[Anonymous No.3257240]

>>3252974
Naturally, these days it would be a black guy punching out a white guy, and nobody would give two shits or a fuck.

[Anonymous No.3257246]

>>3252986
/thread

[Anonymous No.3258589]

>>3253168
>You do realize
>>3253069
You do know

CLEARLY THEY DON'T, STOP WRITING THIS LIKE A SMUG SPASTIC

[Anonymous No.3258676]

>>3255639

So this is why the white race is dying

[Anonymous No.3258734]

>>3258676
Why would you want a beta autist retard like him to breed? Is this how desperate you guys are that you'd fuck up the gene pool just to stay the majority?

Master race!

[Anonymous No.3258976]

Bump for.more of the two fags fighting.

[Anonymous No.3259771]

[Anonymous No.3259778]

This thread's still here?

[Anonymous No.3259786]

>Instead of you telling me to shut up, I'm going to tell you to shut up

[Anonymous No.3262313]

>>3258976

this. in for more fedora on fedora shitposting. it's gotta ramp up, they didn't even start memeing at each other yet.

[Anonymous No.3262527]

If this image were released on a new game today, it would be called racist and people would also be saying that Mario is a cuck

[Anonymous No.3262652]

what the fuck is going on here?

[Anonymous No.3262976]

>>3259778
Yeah, it's not breaking any rules.

[Anonymous No.3263018]

>>3262527
Racist? no, sexist? Anita Sarkesian seems to think so.

[Anonymous No.3263115]

>>3262527

more like Sweden, 2016

[Anonymous No.3263118]

>>3252993
What unused crap is in there? Anything interesting?

[Anonymous No.3263132]

>>3253795
There were news crews and PROTESTERS the day I bought my copy of Mortal Kombat. Even got interviewed for the local news.

[Anonymous No.3263429]

>>3252974
Requiring the player to git gud.

[Anonymous No.3263446]

>>3263132
did you also happen to win a contest and got interviewed for that, chris?

[Anonymous No.3263464]

>>3253180
Are you kidding? Music was banned. Now is a cakewalk compared to then.

[Anonymous No.3263476]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAqu0JM8TAo

Seems like it would be triggering to kids and their safe spaces.

Also pic.

[Anonymous No.3263486]

>>3263429
Literally every game NOT by Ubisoft called.

[Anonymous No.3263492]

>>3263486
Have you ever heard of Dwarf Fortress?

Anyway Ubisoft fell off the wagon, I was a hard core R6 / Rogue Spear player in the day.

Kids these days and their "tactical" games.

[Anonymous No.3263562]

[Anonymous No.3264847]

The First Funky Fighter. Animal cruelty to the maximum. As an obscure arcade it got away with it but if they decided to release same game for smartphones today (its gameplay would be ideal for touchscreen), they would instantly ban it.

I don't know if they would label it as sexist since they only have sexualized anthropomorphic animals. And SJWs are furries.

[Anonymous No.3264861]

It's just a short line but you know how paranoid SJWs are.

[Anonymous No.3264874]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UM82PgC1VVU
Pretty much all fighting games with bikini girls and stereotype characters like native americans. HG101 made few months ago an article about Kasumi Ninja, whining about the native american character. Strangely enough, they didn't whined for being sexist.

[Anonymous No.3264902]

>>3264861
I think they would take more issue with the fact that she's getting kidnapped and/or killed all the time.

[Anonymous No.3264950]

>>3264847
It involves a strong masculine guy saving a hot damsel in distress. It's sexist by default according to SJWs.

[Anonymous No.3264972]

[Anonymous No.3264976]

>>3264972

[Anonymous No.3265158]

>>3264874
>SHOW NO MERCY

[Anonymous No.3265168]

>>3264874
racism is fucking hilarious to me. what was that sjw fighting game on DOS?

[Anonymous No.3266145]

>>3264874
>HG101 made few months ago an article about Kasumi Ninja, whining about the native american character. Strangely enough, they didn't whined for being sexist.
Why?

[Anonymous No.3266158]

>>3256002
I'm not sure about birth gender, but no. not in any sense of the word.

[Anonymous No.3266425]

>>3255712

Hey its that Negasonic girl from that Deadpool movie!

[Anonymous No.3266434]

>first 5 seconds of the game
>let's just straight up murder the damsel from the previous game

[Anonymous No.3266727]

>>3264972
Ηοw would that trigger tumblrinas?

[Anonymous No.3266731]

>>3266727
They hate any macho masculinity

[Anonymous No.3266737]

>>3265168
>DOS game
>SJW game
How is that working?

[Anonymous No.3266740]

>>3266731
Then they should hate almost all '80s games and movies.

>>3264950
Yeah. That too.

[Anonymous No.3266749]

>>3266740
They do. I think they even hate the alien franchise which has a strong female lead.

[Anonymous No.3266757]

>>3266749
Aren't they supposed to like strong female leads that kick ass? Or they hate it because most alpha males loves this movie? You know, like in Metroid's case...

[Anonymous No.3266765]

>>3253248
>the building in the background is one half-sprite mirrored to look bigger
>the buildings behind it just had their heights modified to look different

Lazy and disgusting, just how I would expect from Capcom.

[Anonymous No.3266801]

>>3264976
But is he really?
What IS freedom? Is any of us truly free?

[Anonymous No.3266816]

Games are way more violent and politically incorrect now than they were in /vr/ times.

[Anonymous No.3266820]

>>3266816
Delusion.

[Anonymous No.3266824]

>>3266816
>Making new games of old franchises less sexualized
>Political incorrect
Pick one

[Anonymous No.3266832]

>>3266816
more violence

less sex

less butthurt about religious symbols

more butthurt about sex/gender/race/ethnicity

less "pokemon is the work of satan"

more "pokemon is racist because goldeen represents trans mongolian christian hindi women being oppressed"

its a trade off i guess

[Anonymous No.3266836]

In Leisure Suit Larry 1, you have to get a girl horny by giving her Spanish fly.

Of course, this is done in the least creepiest way. The girl is fully aware that it's Spanish fly and snatches it from you and she doesn't even hook up with you.

But, the SJWs would cry and moan if they saw something like this today.

[Anonymous No.3266842]

>>3266832
>more "pokemon is racist because goldeen represents trans mongolian christian hindi women being oppressed"
Please tell me they never said anything like that.

[Anonymous No.3266846]

>>3266842

[Anonymous No.3266847]

237 replies for a thread that could be solved with one answer: "Everything."

[Anonymous No.3266848]

>>3266832
>less sex
what

[Anonymous No.3266849]

>>3253069
I think it was only changed because of the limit of colours the Genesis could have on screen at one time.

[Anonymous No.3266851]

>>3266847
Fuck of faggot

[Anonymous No.3266852]

>>3266847
That's no fun though.

[Anonymous No.3266853]

>>3266846
That's not Goldeen

[Anonymous No.3266859]

>>3266853
Still a nigger though.

[Anonymous No.3266860]

>>3266847
suck my dick you fucking SJW piece of shit faggot

[Anonymous No.3266862]

>>3266860
>suck my dick
>you faggot

what did he mean by this?

[Anonymous No.3266863]

>>3266847
McFucking Killyourself you multi-culti libcuck.

[Anonymous No.3266868]

>>3266847
eat a chode you fucking nigger

>>>/reddit/

[Anonymous No.3266870]

>>3266847
Catch AIDS and die you faggot retarded cuckold.

[Anonymous No.3266872]

>>3266847
Shit dude, nice catch!

>>3266851
>>3266860
>>3266863
>>3266868

[Anonymous No.3266876]

>>3266860
>>3266863
>>3266868
>>3266870

[Anonymous No.3267185]

>>3266876
I don't get it, why is everyone calling him a faggot?

[Anonymous No.3267232]

>>3267185
It's just Australia-kun samefaging.

[Anonymous No.3268571]

>>3266846
>Don't talk to me or my husband's daughter ever again

[Anonymous No.3268681]

>>3266832

>less sex

No fucking way.

The rest of your post isn't about the games themselves, but about blog websites on the internet that you are forcing yourself to read.

[Anonymous No.3268805]

>>3255140
i think street fighter used some wierd 12:7 aspect ratio
384x224 correct me if im wrong

[Anonymous No.3268996]

>>3268805
It is being displayed on 4:3 screen mate. So both screenshots are wrong.

[Anonymous No.3269003]

>>3268996
This is why the characters oddly wide in CPS II games, especially in SFIII.

[Anonymous No.3271336]

>>3268996
Interesting

[Anonymous No.3272437]

>>3266757
She's a man with boobs according to Sarkeesian.

[Anonymous No.3272452]

>>3272437
Is there even one strong female character from an old game/movie that Anita approves? I bet the answer is "No".

[Anonymous No.3272457]

Not /vr/ but God Hand for PS2 would trigger lots of tumbrlinas if it was made today with the male lead character spanking female sexualized enemies.

[Anonymous No.3272465]

>>3272457
God help them if they found out about Rance.

[Anonymous No.3272927]

>>3272465
If it won't get a western release at Steam, I doubt if they will even bother. It's not like Rapelay (Japan only game) where you actually play as a rapist.

[Anonymous No.3272948]

>>3255639
>2016
>being this closeted

[Anonymous No.3272961]

>>3255635
>2016
>abusing the word "misogynist"
This is not NeoGAF, faggot

[Anonymous No.3273089]

>>3272927
Well you do play as a rapist.

[Anonymous No.3274196]

>>3272457
Are there any /vr/ games that let you do that?

[Anonymous No.3274239]

>>3255504
>Okay, but their audience really doesn't extend further than the people who read their tumblrs and the angry gamers that think this is a major issue. You really need to get out more if you think SJWs have a prominent voice in any kind of public discussion.
This is a shill. SJW shills always try to deny the existence or importance of SJWs.

[Anonymous No.3274840]

>>3274239
That and white knights who mistakenly think they'll get laid if they're a good male feminist.

[Anonymous No.3274964]

>>3273089
>2016
>not accepting someone's sexual preference

bigot!

[Anonymous No.3275024]

>jewish style theme music
>Monetary racial benefits

[Anonymous No.3275456]

>>3275024
No! The goyim know! Consult the protocols!

[Anonymous No.3276205]

>>3259771
To be fair, all but the Genesis game were shit so Winston got lucky he wasn't in them.

[Anonymous No.3277425]

>>3275024
Good game, love it.

[Anonymous No.3277438]

>>3274964
who knew pat robertson posts on /vr/?

[Anonymous No.3277446]

Dont see anything wrong here.

[Anonymous No.3277478]

>>3265168
>>3266737
Its Tough Guy for DOS. Its Taiwanese and you fight black homosexuals as hitler over a SF golden gate stage.

[Anonymous No.3277491]

>>3264861
>how paranoid SJWs are.
This whole thread is hilarious

[Anonymous No.3277494]

>>3277446
He actually got the job because he could dance tho.

Or is it the lips? Damn I just noticed that.

[Anonymous No.3277528]

>>3277494
The lips fo sho

[Anonymous No.3277590]

>>3274239
Oh yes, I forgot there is a vast SJW conspiracy, funded by the Jews, for the purpose of White Genocide.

>this is what reactionaries actually believe.

[Anonymous No.3277626]

[Anonymous No.3277631]

>>3277626
If that was made today, I don't think the Japanese would have given a single fuck if some westerner was offended.

[Anonymous No.3277638]

Remember when Agumon was a Fuhrer? Also all the Agumon in the background are Jews, they even have numbers on their forehead. You have to save them from being holocausted with Digimon Card Battling.

>>3277631

Yes they would. They censored Jynx from Poogeymon in the 90's and in modern times they changed things like Takara's logo which is a kawaii ugu~~~ black baby.

[Anonymous No.3277639]

>>3277590
retard

[Anonymous No.3277640]

>>3277638
This?

[Anonymous No.3277641]

To be fair they removed his entire stage in Veitnam.

[Anonymous No.3277643]

>>3277638

[Anonymous No.3277646]

>>3277640
>>3277643

Yeah it was based on a toy so Takara changed its logo and removed the big red lips on the toy. Plus they made it x100 cuter by turning it into different colours and also a bear.

[Anonymous No.3277647]

>>3277638
What the fuck? DCB is one of my favorite games and I never knew this. Need to play that version.

[Anonymous No.3277652]

>>3277647
It's the Japanese version. The one we got was actually the sequel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kU2cgX_JMhg

[Anonymous No.3277658]

>>3277652
Oh, that's the Japanese exclusive one? I see. I wonder if anyone ever bothered to translate it. There's a team out there fixing and translating some Digimon games right now. They did that PSP game and worked on fixing the bugs in DW1.

[Anonymous No.3277660]

[Anonymous No.3277696]

Why wouldn't this be acceptable

[Anonymous No.3277707]

>>3277660
>He doesn't know about the Punch Out on Wii

[Anonymous No.3277713]

>>3277590
Its subtle, something a dumb fuck like you would never pick up

[Anonymous No.3277716]

>>3277631
The Chinese sure don't give a fuck to this day how racist they are

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eeWLryzvZ2c

[Anonymous No.3277723]

>>3277707
It was released before GG. Also it was less offensive with all characters speaking their native language instead of gobbledygook.

[Anonymous No.3277802]

>>3277478
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQkPaPqAgfA
Is Taiwan the most weeb country?

[Anonymous No.3277824]

>>3277802
>LEE is all caps
>no other names are
The animations are actually amazing compared to what you'd expect.

[Anonymous No.3277828]

>>3277802
Holy shit that volume spike at 2:07. And just as I was praising the animations, too.

[Anonymous No.3278896]

>>3277723
That's not what was considered offensive about Punch-Out, guy who just had to Google it.

[Anonymous No.3278910]

>>3277802

Damn the plane level over SF is a fucking awesome background for a fighter.

[Anonymous No.3278960]

>>3277446
Doomguy over there in the back is like "wtf is this? this ain't phobos. where da cyberdemon at?"

[Anonymous No.3279103]

>>3277824
True.

[Anonymous No.3279730]

>>3278896
And what was racist about Wii's Punch Out, guy that implies that I didn't knew about Punch Out and yet I am on /vr/?

[Anonymous No.3280003]

>>3255180
> misogynist

That word doesn't mean what you think it means.

As an aside, why do people flip out about video game portrayals of women with idealized forms but nobody bats an eye for the converse? Men in games are also idealized and depicted in ways that most men in real life are incapable of ever achieving.

Why is Orchid bad but Zangief is alright? Why is Zero Suit Samus bad but Solid Snake is alright?

People are too damn uptight about things, nowadays. I think people want to enjoy controversy more than they want to enjoy games.

[Anonymous No.3280013]

>>3280003
Feminists in the first world have ran out of things to complain about sometime in the late '80s and have slowly begun to loose their minds.

[Anonymous No.3280085]

>>3280003
>Men in games are also idealized and depicted in ways that most men in real life are incapable of ever achieving.
If you bring that up, they usually give you some bullshit excuse about idealized men male power fantasy. In reality, it's just an excuse for fat women and their beta orbiters to idealize another type of women.

[Anonymous No.3280095]

>>3280085
>Male power fantasy
>Implying that franchises like Game of Throne isn't full of handsome, muscular men which often go naked or half-naked with female fans drooling over them

[Anonymous No.3280102]

>>3280085
>Men getting uncomfortable over male character designs like that
>Implying that this shit happens in real life
I doubt if she ever watched anime like One Piece where even non-macho, gay-looking characters are very popular among male fans

[Anonymous No.3280148]

>>3277723
Gamer gate didn't do shit, most overblown series of events I've ever seen.

[Anonymous No.3280167]

>>3280003

Zangief is sexy, but he doesn't cup his hands on his bulge, give us a boobs and butt pose, leap at the enemy ass first, or have lewd dialogue. I'd love it if he did, though.

Orchid herself isn't bad, but advertising your game with a sexy picture of her washing a car is, as it's got nothing to do with the game or her character and reduces her to nothing but her sex appeal. Am I getting through at all?

[Anonymous No.3280169]

>>3280085
You can tell the author is a woman. A male power fantasy is having power as a ruler, be it politics or corporate, or tons of money.

[Anonymous No.3280172]

>>3280102
Or any issue of Jojo's Bizarre Adventure for that matter.

[Anonymous No.3280178]

>>3280169
Nah. The author is just some random cuck trying to get fangirl pussy by espousing feminist bullshit he doesn't really believe in.

[Anonymous No.3280202]

>>3280172
>The irony when this edit is more accurate than the original

[Anonymous No.3280232]

>>3280003
>As an aside, why do people flip out about video game portrayals of women with idealized forms but nobody bats an eye for the converse?
Because feminism was founded on the insecurities of some women. Do you see how hard they try to pull down anyone more attractive than them and limit and discourage men from interacting with them, especially sexually? This has been going on forever and was a big deal with porn in the 90s. Before then, it happened with prostitution as well. They don't care if they tear apart economic opportunities for women as long as it gives them more perceived chances with men. It's absolutely nothing more than the female equivalent of men who complain women always go with the "jocks" except extra embarrassing because they actually, unironically somehow feel threatened by video game characters and pillows. I can't believe people take this shit nearly as seriously as they do and let me tell you, it's going to get an awful lot worse for them because you can't run from biology and reality forever. As the world continues to globalize and come together, they're going to be forced to face the music as they already have been.

People who hate people generally don't want to fuck them.

As for my opinion on Zangief and the others, I think they're excellent. Same with the girls.

[Anonymous No.3280357]

>>3253141
When I see people getting offended by cultural things such as this it makes me laugh but
also angry at the same time that they themselves
do not see the irony in how ignorant they themselves are being.

[Anonymous No.3280367]

>>3280167
>but he doesn't cup his hands on his bulge
In SFV his V-Reversal is bulge thrust and he flexes instead all the time, which is same depiction of sexuality, just adjusted for his bara looks

[Anonymous No.3280378]

>>3255413
I think when it pertains to the 90's about politically correct bs It was mainly the allustrious cunt
that is Tipper Gore, The WBC and crazy conservative christian mothers along with a few cases of feminists back then.
We didn't take as much notice because it wasn't spotlighted as much as it is today thanks to ease of access to the internet as well as the creation and wide spread popularity of
social media.Now it's in your face 24/7 and everyone is talking about it.

[Anonymous No.3280404]

>>3277631
They definitely and unfortunately do and did so back then that's why Capcom censored
Final Fight for the western release because they
stated they were afraid it would have outraged feminist and they didn't want to deal with that.

[Anonymous No.3280781]

>>3277713
>i-it's subtle and totally exists despite lack of evidence

lol k

[Anonymous No.3280873]

>>3252974
i always wished they'd make a mod of wolfenstein wherein you were a SS guard and you had to shoot your way out of a kike camp wherein the steinbergs were holding u hostage and the last boss would be the stereotypical jewish carachture with the big nose that would be so cool lmao :D

[Anonymous No.3281038]

>>3277478
I don't think SJW means what you think it means. That's, like, the opposite of SJW.

[Anonymous No.3281110]

>>3280873
try the moonman mod for doom 2

[Anonymous No.3281152]

>>3266765
It's funny how you didn't mention how the crowd is duplicated 3 times. But tiles take up space and that scene is only a few seconds long, so who can blame capcom?

[Anonymous No.3281628]

>>3281110
That mod is a hell of a lot of fun, downloaded it just for the moonman.

[Anonymous No.3282229]

>>3253315

lul

[Anonymous No.3282230]

>>3280003
If it makes you feel better I had a childhood crush on Zangief and masturbate to rule 34 of him to this day.


>>3280167
I wish there were more cock bulges in videogames. Throw us a bone.

But to answer your question modern feminism takes its political views from Marxism. So in their minds men are the oppressing class which is why there are mostly men in politics and women are the oppressed cast and victims to everything. They're also racist and sexist.

[Anonymous No.3282232]

>>3280781
Stay delusional champ

[Anonymous No.3282236]

>>3252974
The Hiker in Pokemon Red/Blue got high as a kite on mushrooms.

Wait no in Black and White a pedophile Hiker wants to fuck you...

I love Japan.

[Anonymous No.3282240]

Okay, so Male video game characters wearing thongs and speedos isn't necessarily a power fantasy....but it's like humor, you know? "Hey! look at his butt all tight like that!" When a woman character has spandex on, it's for the sake of male lust. Zangief and Solid Snake are for something to chuckle at, or perhaps it's just a neutral depiction of near-nudity for sheer novelty which is quite tame and non-objectifying. Unlike Tracer from Overwatch which is clearly for the purpose of basement ejaculation.

[Anonymous No.3282289]

Who knew there were so many leftist bitches on /vr/?

[Anonymous No.3282303]

>>3268805
>>3269003

Pixel aspect ratio

[Anonymous No.3282317]

>>3280178
It's ok, the story of David Willis is a sad one

- He really liked a girl name Trixter in the Transformers fandom
- She ended up dating another guy cause he had money.
- Ends up a Lesbian later. Like super dyke
- David settles for plan B, man looking chick that comes from money
- Both of them have rich parents so don't need to work
- David Willis to this day still posts his shit on /co/ to keep himself in the public eye

[Anonymous No.3282359]

>>3282230

>blahblah

That's great, are you going to address anything that I said in my post?

[Anonymous No.3282364]

>>3282240
How about we laugh at female butt too then? Would that satisfy you?

[Anonymous No.3282380]

>>3253571
I'd buy you a beer and a gun.

[Anonymous No.3282448]

>>3282359
No.Go to Sargon of Akkad on youtube he explains shit better.

[Anonymous No.3282625]

>>3282317
Just when I thought /co/mblr couldn't get worse. Does /co/ like him?

[Anonymous No.3282630]

>>3282240
And naked Raiden is something to chuckle about, huh? Bishounen characters in jrpg are something to chuckle about, huh?

[Anonymous No.3284000]

>>3282289
And thankfully we have plenty of right wingers to counter them

[Anonymous No.3285392]

>>3253571
My nigga

[Anonymous No.3285398]

>>3253038
It's Joe and MIke from Street Fighter 1. Mike was recently confirmed to be the same character as Balrog (Mike Bison JP), but that's bullshit... No one from back in SF2's production is at Capcom anymore anyway.

[Anonymous No.3285424]

>>3255596
>That wasn't about video games, it was about harassment, you retard.

>Wikipedia says so, so it's gotta be true

I feel sorry for you, anon.

[Anonymous No.3285430]

>>3255596
>it was about harassment, you retard.
Prove it.

[Anonymous No.3285457]

>>3285398
Capcom actually redesigned Mike and Joe for SFV, even though they're not in the game at all
http://game.capcom.com/cfn/sfv/column-100879.html
http://game.capcom.com/cfn/sfv/column-100880.html

As said earlier, the guys on the SF2 intro are entirely different people named Max and Scott and have new redesigns too

http://game.capcom.com/cfn/sfv/column-100887.html
http://game.capcom.com/cfn/sfv/column-100906.html

[Anonymous No.3285471]

>>3285430
How dare you, sir? Asking a man to do research and risk being triggered by facts in the current year. Tsk, tsk.

[Anonymous No.3286173]

Quick reminder for everyone:

The vast majority of /pol/fags out there will constantly claim, to the ends of the earth, that 4chan has always been this bad and that every thread on every board has always been chock-full of far-right retards posting dank conservative memes.

These people are trying to gaslight you. Yes, there have always been dipshits posting "NIGGERS NIGGERS XD XD XD JEWS DID 9/11" in random threads, but that's basically all that happened, and 4chan was relatively apolitical on the whole. That's not what's happening now. The recent trend of /pol/fags taking every opportunity to hijack threads with their stupid shit has only been going on for a few years. But they act like it's been going on since the beginning of 4chan, because they want to proliferate the narrative that YOU'RE the one invading THEIR super secret clubhouse, because that allows them to feel even more victimized than they already think they are.

[Anonymous No.3286179]

>>3286173
Stale pasta is stale.

[Anonymous No.3286332]

>>3286173
Youre on a nonexistent crusades my friend. KYS plz.

[Anonymous No.3287160]

>>3255596
Oh please, all the harassment against anita was fabricated.

[Anonymous No.3287183]

>>3253037
kek

[Anonymous No.3288421]

>>3253037
Funny

[Anonymous No.3288760]

[Anonymous No.3288770]

>>3253813
>guy who's always complaining about PNG files
Found dial-up-kun.

[Anonymous No.3289778]

>>3288760
lel

[Anonymous No.3291074]

>>3285398
This

[Anonymous No.3291131]

i think this thread has been invaded by tumblr.

[Anonymous No.3291213]

>>3288760
I can't believe this is real

[Anonymous No.3291214]

>>3291131
People stopped bitching about the thread being offensive days ago

[Anonymous No.3291226]

>>3253795
People like you seem to phase out mid to late 90s from your memory.

[Anonymous No.3291317]

>>3266847
Wait, is this post supposed to demean "back then"? Cause it does the opposite.

[Anonymous No.3291325]

>>3277641
Only to be back in 6 haha.

[Anonymous No.3291349]

>>3291226
What particular games are you talking about? DOOM, Diablo, Build shooters? The graphic violence of these games wouldn't make anyone today flinch. They were controversial (DOOM was even blamed for Columbine) and the only reason they weren't censored out of the ass was because PC was pretty much "indie" and under less scrutiny than consoles. Mortal Kombat and Pokemon came out in the same timespan and were centers of major controversies. In general, games today can get away with much more than what games in the 90s could.

[Anonymous No.3291350]

This isn't a very good thread. I don't see why it had to survive for so long.

[Anonymous No.3291359]

There was never any actual controversy over some of the regional censorship changes developers decided to apply to their games of their own retarded volition. I doubt anyone would have cared about SF2's title screen involving a white-on-black brawl. If anything, they game would be praised for its inclusiveness today.

On the other hand, good luck having any LGBT themes or characters in retro games. The Christian right would have staged a boycott, and since most gamers were likely underage, that probably would have put a serious dent in sales.

>Stuff in retro games that they could get away with at the time they couldn't get away with today.

If GG is any indication, developers aren't allowed to have liberal themes or LGBT characters in their games anymore because something something SJW boogeyman pandering.

Curiously, this is something that Nintendo refuses to permit on its platforms even today. The Sims for GBA and DS had same-sex character romances nuked, but the corresponding PSP versions did not. Then there was the whole Tomodachi Life controversy. Nintendo eventually loosened up its character romance policies with Fire Emblem, but only in the form of DLC I believe.

[Anonymous No.3291362]

>>3291349
What's wrong with pokemon? Also it's a natural progression for violence and shit getting more severe, autistic cunts reverse such progress.

[Anonymous No.3291375]

>>3291349
PC and PlayStation were pretty much central to gaming in the late 90s, and one of the defining elements of video games were dark aesthetics and gruesome violence. The culture itself had an anti-authoritarian spirit reflected in media like the aforementioned games and mainstream 18+ programming. Saying it was "censored" is beyond asininem but that not the heart of the problem.

The shocking games your talking about (Mortal Kombat, Doom) belong to the early 90s zeitgeist which is different to the one I'm talking about. They paved the way for it, sure, and that's why they were so shocking, because it later became the norm. So yeah, again I'm asking you again, why are you phasing out an entire period of time?

[Anonymous No.3291386]

>>3252986
Top Kek

[Anonymous No.3291395]

>>3291362
There was a ton of controversy about Pokemon a couple decades ago because it allegedly caused epilepsy, made kids kill themselves like Tamagotchi, and converted them to Satanism. I remember my aunt strictly banning her kids from owning any Pokemon merch and even trying to steal my Pokemon carts because it was a wicked Japanese plot to make kids into jaded murderers.

Basically it was popular.

>>3291375
I'm not arguing the state of industry is better now. I'm arguing that censorship and moralfaggotry were much more entrenched back then.

[Anonymous No.3291404]

>>3291395
> because it allegedly caused epilepsy
But that's just one moment from anime.
> made kids kill themselves like Tamagotchi
Tamagotchi made kids kill themselves?

[Anonymous No.3291408]

>>3291395
Neither am I. I just gave you the lowdown on how lenient it became near the end of the decade. The moralfaggotry and censorship was prominent from the beginning to about the middle.

[Anonymous No.3291415]

>"Violence in the media is wrong!"
>"Sometimes, children just deserve a good beating!"
>"Indoctrinating my child into the Lord's Army or shipping them off to some overseas oil war is my duty as a United States citizen!"

'90s parenting in a nutshell. No wonder so many kids ended up batshit crazy and went on shooting sprees. Of course, the dumbshit parents tried to scapegoat the media instead of examining their own poor choices.

[Anonymous No.3291807]

>>3291359
>gender politics and libtard agendas are so cool in games you guys

[Anonymous No.3292185]

>>3291325

They even updated him for .exe but at least this time he didn't have literally Vietnam for a stage.

[Anonymous No.3292512]

>>3277641
I thought that was just a rumor.

[Anonymous No.3292561]

>>3291213
Yep this was considered "humor" 20 years ago. Something todays society doesn't understand

[Anonymous No.3292592]

>>3288760

i had a magazine with that in
there was another one for C&C which was the famous photo of Hitler looking out over all his troops and it said something like "It's a great feeling, isn't it?"

[Anonymous No.3292603]

>>3292561
It's sad that initially I thought you're one of those tumblr cucks.

[Anonymous No.3293202]

>>3288760
Tragedy + time = comedy. If it's not worth joking about, then it doesn't worth jack.

Political correctness used to be a minor annoyance. The news would tell you Pikachu is the son of Satan and you'd just brush it off and move on to the next gym. Nowadays you can't even start a quest without the NPC asking you if you have a problem with them being trans. You see AAA companies being bullied into changing/removing stuff left and right, by oversensitive retards who don't even buy their products in the first place. The SJW plague is spreading like wildfire with no end in sight. It started with vidya and moved on to comics and movies. It's fascism of the highest order, it's dangerous and it's killing fun for everyone. All in the name of hurt feelings. Fuck this gay earth.

[Anonymous No.3293297]

>>3293202
Good thing anime is immune to SJWs.

[Anonymous No.3294240]

>>3292185
Lame

[Anonymous No.3294251]

>>3293297
Guess who's next?

[Anonymous No.3294264]

>>3276205
People think the genesis game is shit? First I've heard this

[Anonymous No.3294265]

>>3294251
Japan doesn't give a shit about exports, and will not give up the steady stream of otaku money for bitter harpies on the other side of the world who will watch it on Netflix (zero ad revenue) and buy zero merchandise.

[Anonymous No.3294269]

>>3294264
Fuck, nm

[Anonymous No.3294271]

>>3293202

>Political correctness used to be a minor annoyance.

The days of early Nintendo censorship policy infringed all over a number of developers' creative visions in ways you can't begin to imagine, and all of this was borne from far-right politics, not your SJW boogeyman.

>The news would tell you Pikachu is the son of Satan and you'd just brush it off and move on to the next gym.

Overly-religious soccer moms were whining about violence and Satanism in the media to such a degree that Nintendo wouldn't even permit religious references or any explicit mention of death in any game published on a Nintendo platform. I'd hardly call that minor.

>Nowadays you can't even start a quest without the NPC asking you if you have a problem with them being trans

BioWare has always had shitty writers. And speaking of BioWare, let's be clear that Baldur's Gate II did *not* feature any LGBT characters despite constant fan requests for them, and the game did not allow the protagonist to have relationships with NPCs of the same gender even though opposite-sex relationships were possible with a variety of characters. The only way to enable such a feature was through a fan patch that simply toggled all character states to bisexual - something that posed no technical challenge to BioWare.

(continued; fucking character limit)

[Anonymous No.3294273]

>>3293202
>You see AAA companies being bullied into changing/removing stuff left and right

No, they just hire retarded writers who shoehorn politics into the storyboard of their own volition. Since when did developers give a shit what gamers think? We're talking about the same people who rush bugged out, non-functional software onto the shelves to meet deadlines and take advantage of holiday shoppers.

>The SJW plague ... It started with vidya and moved on to comics and movies

"Social justice" has appeared in comics since comic ratings boards stopped being so retarded about their censorship policies. Back in the day, comics weren't allowed to touch down on "mature" subjects like LGBT characters - at least not without being published independently, which meant no major retailers would stock them.

Creative outlets have wanted to explore civil rights issues for decades, but have been too hampered by ratings boards and censorship policies to do so.

>Fuck this gay earth.

No, fuck you for being selectively retarded.

I want back the IQ points I lost. Your entire post is one massively hypocritical rant about how "Wahh! This offends me, so it shouldn't be allowed to exist!" Stop buying games you don't like, idiot.

[Anonymous No.3294287]

>>3294271
>>3294273
All that shit you spewed is completely different than what the other anon is talking about regarding modern PC shit. You sound like you're a little offended by the fact that people are sick and tired of your morally superior agenda that you like forcing onto people. No one cares how it was 20 years ago. It's still a lot worse now whether you like it or not

[Anonymous No.3294318]

>>3294287
>All that shit you spewed is completely different than what the other anon is talking about regarding modern PC shit.

You have no idea what you're talking about.

>You sound like you're a little offended by the fact that people are sick and tired of your morally superior agenda that you like forcing onto people.
>agenda

What agenda? Developers having more creative control over their content? Go back and re-read my post, particularly this part:
"Creative outlets have wanted to explore civil rights issues for decades, but have been too hampered by ratings boards and censorship policies to do so."

This has shit-all to do with anybody "forcing their agenda" on you or anybody else. The video game industry isn't completely enslaved by ratings and sales figures. Some companies just *want* to explore themes such as civil rights, and this has been the case for fucking decades. This sudden influx of LGBT characters and similar phenomena is SOMETHING PEOPLE HAVE WANTED TO DO FOR DECADES.

No one said you have to agree with the existence of "social justice" in the media. Be a responsible consumer and stop giving your money to these people if it bothers you so much. Just don't presume you have any authority to bully developers or writers from being able to publish these works in the first place.

>No one cares how it was 20 years ago.

You should, because you're proposing that history should repeat itself.

>It's still a lot worse now whether you like it or not

You're an idiot.

[Anonymous No.3294335]

>>3294318
Are you a shill for some developer? The damage control in this post and the smug self assured attitude makes me think you are being paid to make these posts. Why do you even care what people do? Why do you care about lgbt characters? Those people probably don't even play video games so who cares what they want for decades. Not our problem

[Anonymous No.3294342]

>>3291349
Doom was blamed for the Columbine school shooting cause the kid who did it was an avid Doom player and also built his own maps. That was all just the media attention whoring though, they called Doom as a training software for pipebomb murdering, despite Doom not having pipebombs.

I'm sure if the kid was playing Pokémon or Sim City, they would've came up with some creative way of blaming those for his violent tendencies.

[Anonymous No.3294353]

Mostly PCE/CD games?

[Anonymous No.3294531]

>>3294353
I need to start getting into those kinds of games more.

[Anonymous No.3294764]

>>3294335
>muh shill meme
not him but i love you pretend neutrals being unable to go a single post without parroting internet neonazi memes and then pretend it's not what you're getting at here
>i-i just want free expression in my vidya as long as it panders to my racist/sexist power fantasies alone. it's not like the market has been oversaturated with these tropes for decades, gimme moreeeee. fuck new ideas! heil hitler! muh kikes! muh cucks! muh sjw! reeeee etc.

and lgbt people don't play games now? then who are these people pressuring devs to be more inclusive in their games then? pick one /pol/-oops i mean gamergate.

[Anonymous No.3294802]

>>3294318
You've been conditioned to accept the PC/SJW takeover of gaming, television, movies, etc

[Anonymous No.3294810]

>>3294764
Wow.. you strawmanned yourself into a frenzy didn't you?

[Anonymous No.3294860]

>>3294318
>>3294764
>>3291359
Tumblrs calling nigger, you have to go back.

[Anonymous No.3294959]

>>3294271
>>3294273
>>3294318
>>3294764

[Anonymous No.3295296]

>>3280003
There are males in gaming designed for a female audience but largely the only people who would get turned on by Zangief are gay men into bara. Yes he's wearing barely anything but the truth that both guys like you and gamer feminists are missing is that men and women are treated very different by the majority of society.

The buff dude in the new Final Fantasy whatever his name is is a better example of a character that's designed to be both masculine and attractive to a female audience. He's not a kawaii desu bishonen like the rest of the characters but still has a clear increased focus on prettiness and handsomeness compared to Zangief who is not going to be seen as a sexual character at all by most men OR women. Even though he wears far less clothes that doesn't make him more of an idealized "sexy guy" character.

The examples on the right in this pic >>3280085 are also different from Zangief in that regard. Even just the way Zangief is posed makes it obvious he's not meant to be seen as attractive to the great majority of the gaming audience.

[Anonymous No.3295307]

>>3294335
>seriously implying every single non-straight person on earth is a turboSJW
That's what the agenda-pushing retards want you to believe. You can have gay characters or options without blatant agenda-pushing bullshit; there's a huge difference between a game like Read Only Memories which creates an autistic Tumblr land where everyone is some kind of broke-brained Tumblr loon's idea of "diverse" and say The Sims which has offered same-sex relationship options since its inception. Or, say, some Japanese bara dating sim which is just wank material for gay men and doesn't concern itself with shitting blood about straight white male privilege or whatever.

[Anonymous No.3295354]

>>3294271
>>3253795
> as reflected by Nintendo's ridiculous censorship policies at the time.
And what the fuck else?

Other marketers took advantage of Nintendo's baby-friendly image by being as controversial as possible. Games like Mortal Kombat on every non-Nintendo system showing plenty of gore and games like Duke Nukem and Shadow Warrior on the PC were full of objectionable material. Nintendo themselves got more lenient over time too by allowing and promoting things like Conker's Bad Fur Day.

>BUTBUT SJWS ARE NOTHING COMPARED TO SOCCER MOMS AND KKKONSERVATIVES

Except that the left has completely replaced the right as far as "soccer mom" complaints go, both in terms of violence and sexualization. This time it's even more of a threat than it was the last time because what is basically social conservatism is being successfully pushed on youth. The last time it was just a matter of waiting for for old people to die off. Now promoting beliefs about as prudish as those of a hardcore fundie Christian is the cool rebellious teenager thing to do and that is what makes it so fucking dangerous.

[Anonymous No.3295380]

>>3295354
>This time it's even more of a threat than it was the last time because what is basically social conservatism is being successfully pushed on youth. The last time it was just a matter of waiting for for old people to die off.
Not to mention many SJWs themselves are actually part of the gaming industry, rather than being limited to just congress and political activists.

[Anonymous No.3295381]

>>3291359
>If GG is any indication, developers aren't allowed to have liberal themes or LGBT characters in their games anymore because something something SJW boogeyman pandering.
Have you ever asked yourself why the group you strawman as "GG" never complains about lesbian or gay VNs or The Sims allowing same sex relationships & marriage since forever or anything of the sort?

Are you being willfully dense to push an agenda, or are you actually too fucking stupid to realize the difference between creating gay characters and in-your-face politics?

[Anonymous No.3295406]

"You really need to get out more if you think SJWs have a prominent voice in any kind of public discussion"
>every single mainstream, vaguely left-leaning media source uncritically approving of Anita Sarkeesian, a woman who thinks porn is inherently harmful and "feminist porn" is a patriarchal ploy to market misogyny as female empowerment
>mainstream news sources like Huffington Post, The Guardian and Vox pushing ideas like "white fragility is racial violence" and literally saying that jailing a few innocent men and even women for rape is a "necessary evil", framing incidents like the Cologne rapes and the Orlando shooting as the fault of toxic white male culture
>the UN giving a platform to said woman along with a scumbag who sexually harassed a dude and then had her indie friends bully him into silence
>academia, just fucking academia
>>3295380
Also this. It used to be outsiders vs. people who actually care about games. These days popular influential figures like Tim Schafer and Josh Sawyer become mindless ideologues.

[Anonymous No.3295410]

>old games were turbo-censored and entirely ruled by soccer moms
>because Nintendo
you fuckers are delusional

[Anonymous No.3295419]

>>3295410
Tomb Raider blatantly went from being hugely marketed on sex appeal to completely dropping that aspect because ~current year~

[Anonymous No.3295420]

>>3295419
And if you think this is unfair to female players, why do you retards want the women covered up instead of encouraging games to appeal to women with their male characters more?

Here's a primarily female-targeted JRPG with shoujo-esque art where the male character wears less clothes than the women.

[Anonymous No.3295423]

>>3295420
DMC3 Dante is obviously designed to be sexually attractive to women. He also had a huge male following.
>BUT THERE ARE MEN WHO TOOK ISSUE AND SAID HE LOOKED LIKE A DEGENERATE FAGGOT AND DIDN'T PLAY THE GAME BECAUSE OF IT
Yeah, and they're the male equivalent of Anita.

[Anonymous No.3295430]

>>3255180
>Orchid herself isn't bad, but advertising your game with a sexy picture of her washing a car is, as it's got nothing to do with the game or her character and reduces her to nothing but her sex appeal. Am I getting through at all?
How do you feel about this obviously pin-uppy fangirl pandering illustration of a male FF character

Is it ~misandry~?

[Anonymous No.3295434]

ITT: Desperate /pol/tards make shit up and perform complex mental gymnastics to push their retarded anti-liberal biases and revisionist views.

Not even /vr/ is safe from the cancer that is Stormfaggotry.

[Anonymous No.3295441]

>>3295434
>Anyone that doesn't agree with me is an evil neo nazi!
>Implying hardcore libs/SJWs aren't revisionsts
>"It's okay when we do it!"

I'm certainly not /pol/ but fucking hell Anon, I always thought being liberal meant being open minded.

[Anonymous No.3295442]

>>3295434
>SJW in full damage control mode

[Anonymous No.3295449]

>OH WOW GET THE FUCK OUT /pol/ STOP POLLUTING OUR BOARD WITH YOUR BIGOTRY
>WOW LOOK AT ALL THESE FAR-RIGHT LUNATICS
>IF YOU THINK THE INFLUENCE OF SEX-NEGATIVE FEMINISM ON THE GAMES INDUSTRY IS A PROBLEM YOU ARE LITERALLY DYLANN ROOF

Most anti-SJWs on the internet are not the alt-right or /pol/ crowd. You're the one making up a paranoid "boogeyman" if you think everyone taking issue with the gaming industry's modern hyper-senstivity on a site as popular as 4chan is the kind of faggot who reads American Reneissance and watches Ramzpaul vlogs.

By Youtube standards, every single alt-right "celeb" is a fucking nobody. Compare their subscribers to those of "I'm a liberal and I support gay marriage and hate racists but SJWs are still faggots" channels and you'll realize how utterly fucking delusional you are.

[Anonymous No.3295473]

>>3295449
Even fucking Alison Rapp spoke out against Anita Sarkeesian's influence on the industry and how she's been convincing male devs that women are all complete fucking prudes and sees the general trend towards "woman-friendly = desexualized" to be an industry problem.

How does it feel to be more indoctrinated than fucking Alison Rapp, someone who defends pedophiles as an oppressed group and thinks she was fired from Nintendo because of misogyny?

[Anonymous No.3295481]

>>3282317
>>3280178
Willis is a deeply broken person with a deeply broken view on sexuality and all it took to find out was pretending to be a SJW offended by his work: http://itswalky.tumblr.com/post/77236614719/im-kind-of-torn-about-your-nsfw-comics-on-one

>I am a wreck. I seriously did not ever grasp my dick until I was nineteen because I was afraid my dead grandmother was watching me.

This is the man trying to tell us what healthy sexuality is.

[Anonymous No.3295515]

>>3291395
Except Pokemon actually does have an evolutionary line based on Baphomet and has had it since the first gen. The fundies who complained were just ignorant retards who had no idea what they were talking about so they didn't notice.

Of course this doesn't mean Pokemon has a "satanic agenda"; Japan isn't America and to them it's just another cultural thing to reference for variety's sake. But they'd actually have had a point if they brought it up.

[Anonymous No.3295519]

>>3295515
Kadabra even has a freaking staf shape on its forehead.

[Anonymous No.3295525]

>>3295519
*star shape
god dammit

And yeah they also have the pentagram goat head shape.

[Anonymous No.3295551]

[Anonymous No.3295565]

>>3295434
>/pol/tards
So, anybody who fights against the narrative is a stormfag, right? It can't possibly be a disgruntled gamer who hates seeing their community crash and burn, right?

>make shit up
So, the "Gamers are dead" articles never happened, right? The vast majority of game journos aren't corrupt SJWs colluding against the community, right? Literally who indie devs don't suck dicks for good reviews and competition prizes, right? There's no wannabe writers trying to push their gender politics agendas through games set in medieval fantasy worlds, right?

>Not even /vr/ is safe
/vr/ does not exist in a vacuum, anon. I understand the need to defend your hugbox -it's my hugbox, too- but facts will always bleed through. Either accept that or stay in denial. Remember all those crazy goobergaber conspiracy theories? Funny how they all turned out to be true, huh?

The SJW invasion is something that concerns all of us still proud to call ourselves gamers. And guess what, that means you too. Maybe none of your favorite titles or franchises have been violated yet. Maybe that provides you with a false sense of security for the time being. Or maybe you're under the impression that by staying neutral and doing your best to fend off the hordes of meanie /pol/tards you'll hold on to your supposed moral high ground. But the truth is you're chasing windmills, because the people ITT, no matter their political leanings, are one thing and one thing only: Gamers fed up with this modern incarnation of fascism that the dragon of political correctness has evolved to.

These conversations need to happen. You should be thankful that we're still allowed to have them here.

[Anonymous No.3295606]

>>3295565

Jesus. I play games, but people who call themselves gamers, and are incredibly proud of that label, have a massive fucking cultural problem, full of 30 year old man-children, children, and just in general social spastics. I'm not saying you're one of those, but listen to yourself. Who gives a shit? Why do you people care so fucking much that people find certain games to treat women as sexual objects instead of as actual characters (they do, its very widespread.)

Notice how no women gamers ever weigh in on these discussions? Its because the overwhelming majority of women actually DO feel like they're not catered for in culture, and that women aren't usually positively depicted in games. They're just too fuck scared to argue on the internet about it because psychopaths get way too into it, find out their IP addresses and potentially make their life a living hell.

Take that fucking Zoe Quinn shit, what kind of no life douche's would spend so much of their time being obsessed over something that should just be a trivial thing to be forgotten in 2 minutes?

Anita Sarkeesian? I've seen a couple of her videos, and I agreed with a few things she said, some of it sounded unreasonable. Yet there are people who spend inordinate amounts of time making Youtube channels that are almost COMPLETELY dedicated to saying she's a worthless piece of shit, like wtf.

A lot of gamers might be against racism (though there's certainly still a lot who aren't), and support gays and whatnot, but you have to admit, there is a massive segment of misogynist gamers who are just obsessive psychopaths if anything outside themselves challenges the way they think the world is/should be like.

>SJW invasion
Bullshit. Games haven't changed for the worse. No one's forcing anything on anyone. You're precious game industry isn't under threat from some moralistic boogeyman. People are just changing what they think is acceptable, and they're requesting that their media responds .

[Anonymous No.3295615]

>>3295565

> Political correctness ... fascism

That's facetious. What people are saying when they complain about political correctness is that they think they should be allowed to say whatever they want, but people shouldn't be allowed to react negatively to it. There is no censorship. No one's censoring you if you're complaining about PC. You're just complaining that people don't like your shitty opinion, and that your in the minority with your shitty opinion. Companies aren't becoming PC either, they're just responding to their customers changing values, which has happened all throughout history.

Anti-PCers are the fascist ones. You want your opinion heard without criticism, to say outdated, oppressive and offensive things.

Just like how people eventually decided we should get rid of minstrel shows, and elephants in circuses. And to stop using the N word. People definitely made similar arguments about people becoming PC.

[Anonymous No.3295628]

>>3295606
>Anita Sarkeesian? I've seen a couple of her videos, and I agreed with a few things she said, some of it sounded unreasonable. Yet there are people who spend inordinate amounts of time making Youtube channels that are almost COMPLETELY dedicated to saying she's a worthless piece of shit, like wtf.
Even other SJWs are taking issue with her and realizing she's a fucking loon >>3295473

If you don't see anything objectionable with this
>a woman who thinks porn is inherently harmful and "feminist porn" is a patriarchal ploy to market misogyny as female empowerment
you're just as much of a far-gone ideologue as her.
>Why do you people care so fucking much that people find certain games to treat women as sexual objects instead of as actual characters (they do, its very widespread.)
By Anita logic, the moment a character is drawn to look sexually attractive to the audience she ceases to be a character and becomes an object.
>Notice how no women gamers ever weigh in on these discussions? Its because the overwhelming majority of women actually DO feel like they're not catered for in culture, and that women aren't usually positively depicted in games. They're just too fuck scared to argue on the internet about it because psychopaths get way too into it, find out their IP addresses and potentially make their life a living hell.
Except there are tons of women that dislike Anita-brand feminism you delusional mental midget.
>make their life a living hell.
Name a single woman whose life is now a "living hell" because of internet shitposters.

[Anonymous No.3295635]

>>3295615
>>3295615
>Companies aren't becoming PC either, they're just responding to their customers changing values, which has happened all throughout history.
Yeah man, what the media tries to push as "changing values" absolutely represents the beliefs of the average consumer. That's why the media was talking about the "Washington Redskins controversy" as if it were the most important fucking thing in the world, and yet surveys on general audiences AND EVEN ON NATIVE AMERICANS showed that the great majority did not give a flying fuck.

GG have become a hivemindey and obnoxious as fuck group of contrarians but I can't help but see people like you as even more delusional.

If you're just fakeposting I'll have to congratulate you because you're extremely good at it and sound exactly like a GamerGhazi/ShitRedditSays/whatever moron.

[Anonymous No.3295648]

>>3295565
>The SJW invasion is something that concerns all of us still proud to call ourselves gamers.
This is one of the reasons I see GG as reality-deying contrarians. "Gamer" was a term that was constantly mocked on 4chan but as soon as SJWs started shitting their pants about "gamers" suddenly everyone started using it. I'm not saying you're necessarily one of those people but fuck if I can't notice a general trend.

For the record, I don't think "gamer" was ever a bad word. Just as there is a difference between a film viewer and a movie buff there is a difference between someone who plays video games and a "gamer"; it's a matter of dedication. But once again, this used to be an unpopular opinon on 4chan that suddenly changed out of the blue when people realized that using the word would piss off their ideological opponents.

[Anonymous No.3295653]

>>3295615
>People who want free speech, free thinking and no damper of creative freedom are facists.

[Anonymous No.3295661]

>>3295653
>>3295615
A question worth asking is, how is modern game devs self-censoring to not offend a loud minority of leftists different from Nintendo of America removing any mention of alcohol, religion or sex or any trace of blood from games to not offend a loud minority of conservative fundies?

Why was one evil and wrong and worth fighting but the other is just "natural evolution of culture"?

[Anonymous No.3295667]

>>3295606
Not trying to be a cunt here, but it's pretty obvious from your post that what you think you know, you got from mainstream media outlets, so I won't go further into this with you. Presenting people with facts they deny to acknowledge is a very thankless job. If you're genuinely interested, you'll do the research yourself at some point.

Just to make a few things clear, though, no one is pro sexism, no one is pro racism. That's like saying you're pro murder. It's when politically correct hashtagtivists try to spin this as if there's nothing BUT sexists and racists and what have you in the gaming community that people fight back. And why wouldn't they? Okay, we get it, discrimination of any kind is wrong. Can we please have our vidya back free from gender politics and assorted agendas now?

The funny thing is that the SJWs bitching about all this shit and crying harassment over valid criticism are talentless hacks. Wanna make a difference and change the world through your holy ideology? How about creating some original content and groundbreaking new IPs instead of trying to shit up the already established work of people who love the industry and have dedicated their life to it?

>>3295615
You don't get how free speech works, I think. It goes like this: Speak your mind, deal with the consequences. Anti-PCers aren't the ones disabling comments and likes/dislikes in their videos, friend. It's the other way around. It's the SJWs who are trying to force their agendas down our throats. If you can't see that, then I don't know, man.

>their customers
SJWs are not their customers. You know that, and I know that. Stop lying to yourself. We built his industry and now it's shunning us for fear of offending SJW sensibilities.

>>3295648
I don't know. I've been a gamer my entire life. No one on here ever gave me shit for using the word on the odd occasion I did so.

[Anonymous No.3295681]

>>3295661
Conservative fundies don't mail you knives or syringes filled with unidentified liquids, nor do they dedicate their lives to destroying your career through character assassination just because they heard you make a joke they didn't like during lunch break.

Also, see >>3294959

[Anonymous No.3295684]

>>3295667
>Just to make a few things clear, though, no one is pro sexism, no one is pro racism.
The alt-right are, openly.

However, the alt-right are an extremely small group that left wing journos are trying to portray as huge and influential. Ramzpaul, a guy that pretty much everyone involved in the alt-right follow (aside from people so extreme that they find even him to not be racist enough) has 34 thousand Youtube subscribers. The SPLC act like he is a huge threat that is somehow converting young people en masse to the far-right cause, going as far as to use an out-of-context image of him dressing like a thug and holding using a (fake) gun ironically to make it look like he's some kind of violent terrorist and not just an old man with nothing else going on in his life getting mad about liberals and cuckservatives on Youtube.

Meanwhile Shoe0nHead, another anti-SJW youtuber who dislikes the alt-right, is pro-LGBT (yes including the T part) and generally socially-liberal has 308,635. And she's not even close to being the most popular.

[Anonymous No.3295690]

>>3295681
I was saying both are bad, dude.

[Anonymous No.3295691]

>>3295661
What's there to say Anon? They're both as dellusional as each other and people like us get fucked as a consequence. Earlier post pic related.

[Anonymous No.3295698]

>>3295690
I wholeheartedly agree. It's just that, with the social media boom the SJW invasion is much more invasive/loud than the 90s fundie one could ever hope to be. And that's the reason they get shit done. That's the reason the actually bully people out of a job and companies into catering to them. Meanwhile, they don't buy jack 'cause that doesn't get them any moral points to show off to their friends and the ones who end up suffering are the actual gamers and the industry itself.

[Anonymous No.3295705]

>>3295691
That's my point. I highly doubt the "ANTI SJWS ARE THE REAL FASCISTS" samefagging guy whose posts ITT are really easy to pinpoint would describe the influence of right-wing moral guardians on 90s Nintendo games as the company "just responding to their customers values".

Honestly the only reason I'm even addressing him is because the way he's typing seems way too accurate to be a troll. If it is then it's gotta be an insanely good one who's very familiar with SJW communities instead of simply basing his idea of what they're like on 4chan strawmen like the typical fakeposter. His posts are fucking spot on what a brainwashed Neogaf user would write.

[Anonymous No.3295709]

>>3295684
That's what the liberal media does.
>FEAR THE NOBODY WHO'S GONNA TURN YOUR CHILDREN INTO TURBONAZIS THROUGH HIS NONEXISTENT MASS APPEAL but pls no look at smart girl videos cuz she not on our side and make us look bad lol

[Anonymous No.3295731]

>>3295709
The thing is, I don't think most people are dumb enough to be manipulated by that stuff; see my earlier Washington Redskins example.

Really I think those that buy everything the media says are a special kind of stupid. Not even Tumblr SJWs were brainwashed enough to get behind dumb shit like "shirtgate" or "bernie bros"; I've seen only a couple of ~Twitter elite~ morons living in a bubble completely separate from the normal world unironically parrot that stuff.

[Anonymous No.3295869]

>ctrl+f "retard"
>22 results, but none of them are this

You just know this is going to be removed in the remake.

[Anonymous No.3295992]

>>3295434
Is that all you know how to do? Use buzzwords and kick and scream like a child when you don't like something? Jesus the amount of buzzwords and liberal rhetoric in this post when we're having a perfectly fine discussion is fucking embarrassing. This right here shows what is wrong with these sjw people right here, in addiction to the other guy who wants everyone to say "everything is fine!" And if you don't you MUST be literally hitler. It's getting to be self parody forms of ridiculous at this point

[Anonymous No.3296873]

>>3295869
Who'd have thought a country bumkin that has joined a terrorist cell would have non pc language? I am shocked and appaled.

[Anonymous No.3297628]

>>3296873
Yeah, what a shocker there

[Anonymous No.3297638]

>>3296873
https://youtu.be/bbszy1l83Qc?t=52s

Nah, black people say it all the time.

[Anonymous No.3297656]

>>3297638
It's sad that that makes it okay

[Anonymous No.3297963]

>>3253496
Not really. Political correctness was never about protecting drug users.

also weed is not a drug

[Anonymous No.3297969]

>>3253192
Lieberman you little cunt, two decades later and Postal 2 gets an expansion, suck a blurry texture polygon dick. Hah hah.

[Anonymous No.3297993]

>>3266851
>>3266860
>>3266863
>>3266868
>>3266870

>some guy obviously makes fun of political correctness

>is immediately berated for being politically correct, for no logical reason

YOU people should all kill yourselves. Learn to read simple sentences. What a bunch of autistic retarded manchild shitbags.

How do you fucking work in everyday life? How can you fuck up one sentence? Just read it and understand it with your toddler brain.

[Anonymous No.3298065]

>>3255690
>ignoring women
>kinda want to kill women

THE EXACT SAME THING

[Anonymous No.3298503]

>>3297993
All those posts are all by the same guy. It's just australia-kun shitposting hard.

[Anonymous No.3299579]

>>3297963
Yeah it is.

[Anonymous No.3299862]

>>3295661
They're both dumb.

[Anonymous No.3299912]

>"Like, everything is a conspiracy, man!"
>"Better kill them before they kill us!"

This is exactly why I have no faith in humanity. Centuries later, we're still sectarian shitheads, so evidently the core of human nature does not evolve alongside social paradigms. it just gets repressed until it explodes into another retarded genocide war.

I'm ready for the nuclear holocaust. Just end this species' misery quickly.

[Anonymous No.3300790]

>>3299912
You're overreacting anon.

[Anonymous No.3300809]

>>3295354
>"Games industry is glorifying killing people"
>The guy in the picture of an E3 conference is wearing an Orlando ribbon
I thought we were done with the whole "Games cause violence" bullshit that has been proven wrong every single time

[Anonymous No.3301781]

[Anonymous No.3301862]

>>3292592
post it

[Anonymous No.3302003]

>>3301781
>2008
I don't know whether to say NOT RETRO or "They quite obviously did"

[Anonymous No.3302246]

>>3301781
>2008
Anon, not retro.

[Anonymous No.3302418]

Wonder Boy jigaboos

[Anonymous No.3302434]

Also this

[Anonymous No.3302472]

>>3252974
"TAKE THAT NIGGER"

[Anonymous No.3303516]

>>3292592
>>3301862
I'm interested also, please post it.

[Anonymous No.3304312]

>>3302418
>>3302434
I'm pretty sure that could still get away with that in Japan.

[Anonymous No.3304340]

>>3282232
>t-the conspiracy is real! i-i'm not crazy, everyone else is!

[Anonymous No.3304352]

>>3295515
>>3295519
>>3295525

I'm surprised that Game Freak went with biblical inspired monsters for Ruby and Sapphire considering what happened in the states. Also Houndoom in Gold/Silver was pretty demonic, and I'm surprised they made Smoochum (A baby Jynx) too. Although, they did make Bellosum green in that game to make it look less Polynesian. I guess the religious people fucked off after Red/Blue?

[Anonymous No.3304353]

>>3304352
Can you imagine how racist this thing would look in Jynx's colors? And by racist I mean fucking adorable. I'm sorry but Japan made me love tiny kawaii black babies.


>>3302434
>>3302418

Why is it so fucking cute? It's like if your grandma was racist but on the opposite end of the spectrum, because they're babies instead of seniors, and it's all based on ignorance and naivety so it becomes so fucking kawaii.

Niggas are kawaii I'm not afraid to say it.


Has anyone ever seen one of the first hentais where a super blackface looking kid like, sucked the soul essence out of that girl? Did I just imagine it?

[Anonymous No.3304427]

>>3253473
>>3253443

WRONG
its geese howard

[Anonymous No.3304549]

>>3295354
>wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH SOMEONE HAS AN OPINION!!! WAAAH
guess what none of those tweets you posted in the image fucking matter worth shit. Those games are all still going to sell millions of copies. It doesn't fucking matter. You're making it matter by dedicating your life to getting upset over it.

[Anonymous No.3304605]

>>3304549

Just like Doom and Mortal Kombat sold like crazy too after the 90's soccer moms started moaning about it. So you're just proving his point. These people are every bit as irrational, every bit as fascist and every bit as bad as eachother. Make no mistake about it, if you gave any one of these SJW whiners the option, they would censor and ban every single game (and piece of art in general) that they feel to be 'offensive'. And they'd absolutely believe they were doing the right thing ultimately.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

[Anonymous No.3304614]

>>3284000

And thankfully there's some reasonable people to counter the both of you.

[Anonymous No.3304629]

>>3295705

Every so often a thread about censorship will show up on /vr/ and I swear, this fucker shows up every time. I can't be sure it's the same person, but like you said, it's very easy to pinpoint. They make the exact same arguments every time, focusing around this idea that censorship is "a natural evolution of our culture" or whatever. But of course, this only applies to censorship based on their SJW style dogma of what is 'acceptable' and what's not. I've come to expect this cunt in every thread like this. I'm not going to bother arguing with them again though, you can't use logic on someone who doesn't use it themselves, even if they try really hard to make it look like they do.

[Anonymous No.3304653]

>>3295354
>after mass shooting on queer brown people

Wasn't the Orlando shooter a muslim closet homosexual? Can't be just white people, then.

[Anonymous No.3304662]

>>3304605
I don't think it's about 'good intentions'. I think that's what these people tell themselves. They want to feel good about themselves by 'solving' problems that weren't there until they decided they were problems. They probably also like the rush of power they get from achieving something - it's thanks to them that this content was removed, that this game was not released. These are people who accomplish nothing in their life and strive for things like this instead.

[Anonymous No.3304970]

>>3304340
Keep telling yourself that

[Anonymous No.3305323]

>>3304662
The most dangerous villains are the ones who think they're doing the right thing. SJWs would paint their babies blue and toss them into the sea in order to protect narrative. We're talking about people who have openly defended pedos here.

[Anonymous No.3305483]

>>3280232
That's a mighty large delusion you got there
Can't face the fact that women's lives don't revolve around rejecting and accepting men
At least not in the times we're living in

[Anonymous No.3305493]

>>3280232
Easy there sperglord

[Anonymous No.3305534]

>>3305483
It is absolutely nothing but jealousy that other women are prettier and more desired. Complaining about objectification is nothing but an attempt to level the playing field. They're actually upset that people find people attractive.

>Can't face the fact that women's lives don't revolve around rejecting and accepting men
Then why do they go out of their way to interfere with what other people do in their free time? Do you think models are offended by their own bodies? For these women, their world does revolve around it enough that they develop these controlling behaviors.

>>3305493
I'm not apologizing for telling the truth.

What they don't realize is even if they got there way, it still wouldn't make people want them. They're just as bad on the inside as they are on the outside.

[Anonymous No.3305575]

>>3305534
Never met a female feminist I could get a hard on for. Never met a male feminist who I couldn't kill using only my pinkie finger.

If feminists really cared about "women's issue" where are the femminist campaigns and charities for female genital mutilation? The mass rape of poor girls in West Africa? Forced marriages?

It's just a bunch of spoiled rotten middle and upper middle class western bitches trying to get attention. Girl from a well off family in the richest country in the world attending one of the top 10 Universities in the world with more than half the students being women going on the professional careers, acting like a whiny cry baby, while in rural China a newly born baby girl is smothered to death just for being a girl. Subhuman pieces of narcissistic trash.

[Anonymous No.3305619]

>>3305575
>Never met a male feminist who I couldn't kill using only my pinkie finger.

[Anonymous No.3305623]

>>3305619
>Projecting

[Anonymous No.3305628]

>>3253140
what about that conquistador game they made recently?

[Anonymous No.3305630]

>>3305623
>forgot to mention I'm a Navy SEAL with 90 confirmed kills in multiple combat zones across the globe, kiddo.

On /vr/ no less, top kek.

[Anonymous No.3305634]

>>3305619
Found the male feminist.

[Anonymous No.3305646]

>>3305634
>someone called me out for being a tool on the internet, waaaaaaaaaah waaaaaaaaah you're obviously a feminist! mods!!

[Anonymous No.3305658]

lol the internet tough guy got so butt-blasted that I called him out so he reported my posts. fucking top kek m8, way to go.

[Anonymous No.3306891]

>>3305628
What about it?

[Anonymous No.3306912]

wew lotta triggered polcucks in this thread

[Anonymous No.3307636]

>>3305534
God damn dude
You really hate women

[Anonymous No.3309104]

>>3306912
More like a lot of triggered tumblrites

[Anonymous No.3309394]

>>3299579
It's a leaf

[Anonymous No.3309402]

>>3295635
it's funny how americans gasp about how 'offensive' obvious mexican characters are when they're actually popular in mexico.

[Anonymous No.3309423]

>>3309402
Like Speedy Gonzalez, he's actually very popular with Mexicans.

[Anonymous No.3309440]

>>3309402
>it's funny how americans gasp about how 'offensive' obvious mexican characters are when they're actually popular in mexico.

Except we don't. Political correctness (in the context you're referring to) isn't pushed by even a sizable minority of people. It's mostly just tumblr shit, and you're most certainly not going to encounter it anywhere but online.

Europeans have a really warped view of American politics. You guys seem to base these views on whatever sensationalized bullshit you might see coming from American media. American media is far removed from reality. It's just a consequence of freedom of press. The media is going to parade around the most dumbshit views it can because drama and sensationalism mean higher ratings.

I bet if you watched enough Jerry Springer or Maury Povich, you'd also think all Americans were trailer trash and welfare mamas.

[Anonymous No.3309620]

>>3309402
Anything the least bit stereotypical will be cried about by a bunch of tumblr idiots. Yet they will be totally fine spamming depictions of redneck white men or something like that.

I hope these idiots realize how hypocritical they are and that no one but buzzfeed takes them seriously.

[Anonymous No.3309685]

>>3309394
>It's a leaf

Look at this retarded ass stoner. You don't smoke the leaves, burnout. You smoke the flowers.

[Anonymous No.3309697]

How could noone mention this guy yet?

[Anonymous No.3309731]

>>3309697

Because it's usually alt-right babbies who whine about political correctness. These are the same individuals who revive the Confederacy, reinstate slavery and put gay men to death.

As much as they claim to be concerned with institutions encroaching on freedom of expression, I didn't see any of these groups fighting against the censorship of LGBT people all throughout the media in the '80s and '90s. Homosexuality was even criminalized up until 2003, and it took decades of violence and systematic persecution against gay men before the courts finally considered repealing sodomy laws and recognizing sexual orientation in hate crime statutes. (And hate crime legislation varies from state to state - some states refuse to punish offenders who target people specifically because they're LGBT.)

[Anonymous No.3310013]

>>3309731
Here we go with another neurotic tumblr-ite with "muh alt right boogieman" again. Don't you have anything better to do then shitpost your bullshit here? Who the fuck likes political correctness anyway? You can be anti-PC and still be pro-gay, pro minority etc.

[Anonymous No.3310020]

>>3309731
But anon, homosexuality is nothing more than a degenerate fetish. They should not have their rights just as much as a serial killer shouldn't be allowed to go around murdering, or a pedo allowed to touch the childrens.

[Anonymous No.3310021]

>>3310013
>Boogieman
>Strawman
>Tumblr/Reddit

Jesus. Fucking. Christ. I can't abbreviate "to be honest" but people like you can use the above mentioned words in 90% of your posts. I'd rather have "nigger speak" than constant bitching about a group of people who isn't even fucking here.

[Anonymous No.3310030]

>>3310021
That post (>>3309731) has plenty of bitching in it. What makes your leftist bullshit any less annoying? That's my whole point dipshit

[Anonymous No.3310224]

>>3309731
>Alt-right
>Wanting to put gay men to death
That would mean killing themselves you know

[Anonymous No.3310279]

>>3309685
He was talking about canada

[Anonymous No.3310527]

>>3309731
Why do you keep posting this irrelevant off topic crap no one cares about?

[Anonymous No.3310583]

>>3310030
Where in my post did I show affinity towards any side?

[Anonymous No.3310616]

>>3275024
What game?

[Anonymous No.3310662]

>>3309402
>obvious mexican characters
Nigga, T. Hawk is mexican in name only, our natives never adopted that style of clothing and his name is in english for fucks sake.

The thing about stereotypes or caricatures, is that context doesn't carry over from country to country, we have no reason to find them offensive. The negro caricature for example, has no negative connotations here in Mexico, the character in my pic is almost universally beloved in here, but foreigners see it and immediately assume the worst.

[Anonymous No.3310818]

>>3252986
DLC on suicide watch

[Anonymous No.3310837]

>>3253037
GOLDMAN!

[Anonymous No.3310849]

>>3310837
>GOLDMAN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ftc_Pbhb3IE

[Anonymous No.3310857]

>>3295473
I don't have anything to add aside from saying I'm so fucking glad she was fired

[Anonymous No.3311314]

>>3252974
One thing I'm glad they don't get away with anymore are hidden pathways, especially those which involve falling down a pit you otherwise wouldn't think to fall down.

[Anonymous No.3311462]

>>3253141
They could still do this because the racist here is the enemy.

>>3253037
I don't get the problem here.

[Anonymous No.3311557]

>>3309731
>As much as they claim to be concerned with institutions encroaching on freedom of expression, I didn't see any of these groups fighting against the censorship of LGBT people all throughout the media in the '80s and '90s.
I'm one of the biggest "anti-SJWs" as far as video games get and I'm one of the biggest pro gay rights people you'll see. Before arguing with internet SJWs I was consistently arguing with my own country's batshit far-right nationalists.

You're a fucking piece of shit for trying to paint all your ideological opponents as the alt-right.
>>3310021
Say what you will but I've used both Tumblr and Reddit enough to know that they're full of 4channers and 4chan has plenty of actual Tumblr-type SJWs. /co/ and /u/ is where you will easily find them.

I just like to spend time on every online community and see what they're all about. 4chan has been my main one since 2005 but I think the whole "internet war" shit is really gay so I like to make up my own mind. For example, I decided Reddit is by design an inherently bad website, but Tumblr is capable of intelligent dissent from the majority opinion and said dissent is not censored as often as it is on Twitter.

[Anonymous No.3311567]

>>3253537
Thought Crimes

Yesterday's science-fiction is today's frightening reality.

[Anonymous No.3311572]

>>3311557
>I'm one of the biggest "anti-SJWs" as far as video games get and I'm one of the biggest pro gay rights people you'll see.

Then you're approximately 1% of the individuals who are opposed to "social justice," as the rest of your allies unanimously equate homosexuality with being a tumblrtard and go out of their way to promote anti-gay censorship and legislation.

>You're a fucking piece of shit for trying to paint all your ideological opponents as the alt-right.

Because they are?

You can fuck right off with your golden mean fallacy.

[Anonymous No.3311578]

To add to my earlier tl;dr:

the idea of Tumblr as the "evil SJW central" is wrong. I used to be wary of saying this because of the Charlie Hebdo controversy sparking some really terrifying Tumblr posts but the Orlando shooting made a lot of people on Tumblr, even teenage girl SJWs (http://trqncywhore.tumblr.com/post/146036893625/ithelpstodream-muslim-community-this-wasnt-an proof), realize that the SJW narrative of "brown people good, white people are the villains, always" is garbage.

Meanwhile Twitter is the place where the absolute craziest shit will be posted AND justified by actually-influential figures, in either the mainstream media or "nerd culture". Twitter, not Tumblr, turned games industry people like Josh Sawyer, Tim Schafer and Anthony Burch into mindless ideologues. Twitter turned Lauren Faust into what she once satirized in Powerpuff Girls (she got behind the "shirtgate' fiasco; most of Tumblr did not). Twitter is where I saw animation industry celebs unironically buy the fucking "bernie bros" meme' not Tumblr. Twitter is why Platinum employee JP Kellams never shuts the fuck up about how Bayonetta is a feminist game and is fighting the cishet patriarchy with its mere existence.

Twitter is the most cancerous social media and "Twitter culture" is a huge part of why so many game devs ended up this way.

[Anonymous No.3311580]

>>3311572
>as the rest of your allies unanimously equate homosexuality with being a tumblrtard and go out of their way to promote anti-gay censorship and legislation.
Prove it.

[Anonymous No.3311596]

>>3311580
>Prove it.

>>>/v/
>>>/pol/
>>>/r9k/
>>>/lgbt/
Crtl+F "SJW" / "liberal" / "leftist" / "libcuck" / "mental illness" / "degenerate"

Pretty sure any anti-SJW thread is going to bash trannies and gay people just the same, because /pol/ perceives them to by byproducts of a "leftist brainwashed civilization."

Where you even here when all that GamerGate shit started? I was, and it subsequently caused me to migrate from /v/ to /vr/ to get away from it. I read one iteration of GG general after the other. Between doxxing and harassing figure industries, /v/ was outright calling for the abolition of LGBT characters in the media because that would "stick it to the left."

No rational person should condone censorship, be it from the left or the right. But the point is that all this fuss over "leftism" invading the media or pushing political correctness on everyone is completely asinine conspiracy shit and has no basis in reality. And if that's what you subscribe to, then yes, you're a delusional alt-right jackass.

While you're whining about your SJW boogeyman, the conservative majority in my state (and other Southern states) is pushing anti-gay and anti-trans legislation as we speak. Because these are the individuals who have actual legislative power in my country, and thus pose the greatest threat to our civil liberties.

[Anonymous No.3311609]

Thread successfully derailed.

[Anonymous No.3311639]

Ever notice how Code of Princess, a game whose designs are literally done by a "queer woman of color" (christ I feel dumb even saying that), is a game that constantly gets accused of misogyny?

If the current clique of culture-policing retards had their way (see the UN begging Japan to ban any comic book or cartooon with rape in it) a ton of women who make "problematic" works would be harmed by it. I'm not just saying this because it sounds nice but directly quoting a woman working for the Japanese government who was responding to the UN crybaby shit.

And yes the goddamn UN are treating video game "objectification" like a serious problem. If you seriously think there's not more pressure to censor sexual shit today compared to the old days just because Nintendo pandered to soccer moms you're delusional.
>>3311596
I was there from the earliest days when it wasn't even called that and wasn't a cancerous Reddit upboat circlejerk and I've never seen a single fucking post saying gay characters should be censored. If they existed they must have been a tiny, tiny minority.

I did see some /pol/fags try to push their Youtube celebs like Ramzpaul in the early days of that other chan but it did not work. Figures like Shoe0nhead who are liberal as fuck and even have actual transsexual people as guests in their videos became far, far more popular with that audience. Internet Aristocrat & some retard who went by "King of /pol/" became butt monkeys for trying to push holocaust denial and other shit instead of talking about video games and the former toned down his rhetoric significantly as a result; once again he even had some non-insane trans people on his podcast whose pronouns he respected. Which, to be honest, is a fucking huge change from his early edgelord days.

The actual decent people gave up on the "movement" eventually and now it's just a bunch of cancerous circlejerking retards, but even then it's not an alt-right circlejerk.

[Anonymous No.3311646]

>>3311639
Shit like this used to be seen as a middle finger to those very soccer moms that Nintendo of America pandered to and you didn't have people like Tim Schafer shitting blood over it.

[Anonymous No.3311651]

>>3311572
> Then you're approximately 1% of the individuals who are opposed to "social justice," as the rest of your allies unanimously equate homosexuality with being a tumblrtard and go out of their way to promote anti-gay censorship and legislation.

wow, you're retarded.

I am not that guy but i'm also anti sjw/feminism and totally pro equality, i think most people are like me nowadays.

[Anonymous No.3311730]

>>3311651
The funny thing is that I've actually argued with the /pol/ types constantly on THAT OTHER CHAN when they were trying to promote their idiot celebs. I've watched Ramzpaul's videos for the same reason that I read far-left articles and even that guy, who I think is a hateful piece of shit with many horrifying opinions, has never pushed for the censorship of gay people and said that he's totally okay with men fucking each other in the ass. I'm talking a borderline David Duke-tier guy who's unironically said that he's "happy" that "we took America from the Indians" because might makes right; not even THAT fucker fits anon's strawman.

[Anonymous No.3311742]

>>3311730
Dude you're fully autistic. Stop fighting a manufactured rat race.

[Anonymous No.3311809]

>>3311609
You mean it hit bump limit, I enjoyed the butthurt from leftists and SJWs.

[Anonymous No.3313097]

>>3311578
I agree with you. I never went on Tumblr much at all but I'm sure you have a point, especially judging with all the fucking insane screenshots of Tweets i've seen over the years. I've always hated that place the most and agree its the most cancerous site out there besides those other shitty leftist sites like Huffpo, Buzzfeed, Salon or what ever other shitty sites are out there.

[Anonymous No.3313497]

>>3310527

Because as much as SJWs claim "/pol/" is ruining 4chan, they're the ones who want a soapbox to complain about "anti-SJWs", "alt-right" and "/pol/" on 4chan and do it at every opportunity. Everything they "blame" /pol/ for, they're guilty of.

[Anonymous No.3313509]

>>3311596
>cries about muh phobias on fucking 4chan
>muh doxxing and harrashmunt!
>he thinks the idea that political interests push certain ideologies and political correctness in media is outlandish and a "conspiracy"
>SJW is a "boogeyman"
>he keeps deflecting from people who literally control academia and most the media, pushing hate speech laws and other authoritarian legislation every day, as if not letting certain people go into certain bathrooms was the great threat to humankind

Please kill yourself or go back to tumblr.

[Anonymous No.3313517]

So when will SJW apologists finally leave 4chan for good? This thread was painful to read.

[Anonymous No.3313521]

>>3313517
U delusional or something? 4ch hit the point of no return fucking years ago thanks to greedy moot wanting more people on the site. There's gonna be more and more of them, and less and less of intelligent or at least adequate people. Our shitty best hope is that Trump's gonna change the mentality of these sheep and we're gonna have equal rights AND equal rights for majorities.

[Anonymous No.3313681]

>>3313521
Equal rights would inherently be equal rights for majorities.

There's absolutely nothing wrong with social justice. It's just that it's completely stolen by people who are ironically super authoritarian and hateful. If the word lived up to its definition, it would mean not censoring people just because you disagree with them or preferring one to another based on race, background, gender, etc.

Somehow crazy people have hijacked the trademark to decency and now it can never mean anything except what they want it to mean. Of course, true equality would not make the people in SJW groups happy because equality never produces equality in outcome and guess who would get hit hardest by that. There's a reason no one talks about Asians as a minority except in the context of sexuality.

I'd like to see them explain this picture because this wasn't that long ago.

[Anonymous No.3313702]

>>3313681
> Equal rights would inherently be equal rights for majorities.
I expected some intelligence on the part of the reader, I should've said equal rights for minorities and equal rights for majorities. The point here is that "equal rights" now means "some equal rights, but mostly privileges".

> There's absolutely nothing wrong with social justice
But as you say this term evolved and now it's like saying there's nothing wrong with feminism.
> it would mean not censoring people just because you disagree with them or preferring one to another based on race, background, gender, etc.
> or preferring one to another based on race, background, gender, etc.
So if a woman prefers to fuck white males it should be corrected by SJEnforcement?
> crazy people have hijacked the trademark to decency
It's natural to be antagonistic to other social groups and minorities.

As for misogyny, women deserve most of it, if we're honest. Not like blacks do have lower IQ and do commit more crimes, but it's not necessarily race-inherit and it's not proportional to the hate they get - no, I mean women are dumb bitches who ruin everything due to their primitive nature. Conservatism is literally hard-wired in them, what do you expect?

[Anonymous No.3313715]

>>3313702
Either you missed the point of what I was saying or you deliberately interpreted everything in the worst way possible to make a counterargument to things we mostly agree with.

[Anonymous No.3313734]

>>3313715
I just responded to parts I disagree with or that sound ambiguous.

[Anonymous No.3313753]

>>3313734
Well, I'll go through them then.

>I expected some intelligence on the part of the reader, I should've said equal rights for minorities and equal rights for majorities. The point here is that "equal rights" now means "some equal rights, but mostly privileges".
We both meant the same thing here. It's not even an argument. What you said is what I meant. That's why I brought up the next parts about how it would mean that if people didn't merely shift the definition.
>But as you say this term evolved and now it's like saying there's nothing wrong with feminism.
Above.
>So if a woman prefers to fuck white males it should be corrected by SJEnforcement?
Dating/fucking has nothing to do with justice at all.
>It's natural to be antagonistic to other social groups and minorities.
Sure, I mean it's natural to do a lot of things but that isn't saying anything. The main place my point differs in the rest of yours is that I was saying we generally don't mind people who do well, whereas we dislike people who don't and cause problems. That's probably the only partial disagreement we have and it's not even really a disagreement. From there it derails a bit.

[Anonymous No.3313774]

>>3313753
> Dating/fucking has nothing to do with justice at all.
See but I had to ask cause so many crazy cucks.
> The main place my point differs in the rest of yours is that I was saying we generally don't mind people who do well, whereas we dislike people who don't and cause problems.
Who's "we"? People? In that case, there's lots of nuances that fuck shit up. What usually happens is you have this natural tendency to antagonize, let's say, other races. Stemming from there it becomes an instilled part of societal culture and ideology - still not too strong and aggressive though. But then something happens to your Joe, that corresponds with the bad stereotype and he now hates every member of that race for being <insert_sin>. This can lead to active confrontation. Even if it doesn't, now media starts to force equality of cuck variety (which if it's the only way, I'm fine with that unless it's literally insane), which converts most people, but then the circle of racists becomes small, but very proactive or at least much more hateful on the inside - which leads to steady increase in racist followers all over again and shootouts.

[Anonymous No.3313804]

>>3313774
>People?
Yeah, I meant "we" as people collectively in that case, not as a racial thing.

Antagonistic feelings shouldn't run the country, of course. If they did, we'd end up back here again because it works for both "sides". But I think there's nothing wrong with having opinions.

I'll agree with you that trying to suppress and demonize people only creates super hateful mass shooter types, particularly when you're making them out to be someone they're not. That's definitely a problem but people care more about looking good on social media than solving problems, so they'll start a fire even if it makes things worse. It's very selfish and dishonest.

[Anonymous No.3313924]

>>3313804
They're hypocrites, thats why. When I think of it in that perspective, then it is just plain old stupidity that doesn't anger me as much as make me sad for people that ignorant. It's funny how they act tolerant and promote anti-hate and equality, yet they turn into a lunatic if someone disagrees with them.

I don't think SJWs really care about any issues either. They just get triggered by certain buzzwords and ideologies from the alt-right and instead of ignoring it, they go full autist about it. Its fucked up how the mainstream media really fuels the fire by being biased and alienating certain people.

[Anonymous No.3314153]

mortal kombat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.3314948]

>>3252974
This is the best thread we've ever had.

[Anonymous No.3314952]

>>3313924
sjws are literally intell operatives working for the federal reserve bank

look this shit up and stop being gullible

[Anonymous No.3314953]

>>3314948
Aside from the sjw propaganda shills from reddit/jidf/tumblr of course.

[Anonymous No.3314956]

>>3313804
>mass shooter types

youre an idiot if you think those aren't false flags

[Anonymous No.3314957]

>>3313681
youre subhuman

[Anonymous No.3314958]

>>3311596
literally nothing in your post ever happened

[Anonymous No.3314962]

>>3309731
literally nothing in your post ever happened

[Anonymous No.3314964]

>all the sjws in this thread

[Anonymous No.3314967]

>all the sjw apologists in this thread

[Anonymous No.3315047]

Fin.