[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vr/ - Retro Games


View post   

File: 448 KB, 1992x1084, PlayStation-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2849064 No.2849064 [Reply] [Original]

How long until the undisputed GOAT becomes /vr/?

>> No.2849065

Never.

>> No.2849067

Never and it's a trash system by any reasonable standard.

Blurry and flickery mess that was a DVD player first and console second.

>> No.2849070

>>2849067
>being this much of a tryhard

>> No.2849072

>>2849070
Nostalgia blinders can be hard to take off for some people.

>> No.2849073

>>2849067
*tips fedora*

>> No.2849074

>>2849070
How about the fact that most multi-plats looked better on other systems?

>> No.2849076

>>2849072
Do you realize what board we're on?

>> No.2849081

>>2849074
No argument there. Good thing, then, that playing every worthwhile PS2 exclusive would take years of dedicated playtime.

>> No.2849084

>>2849076
Outside of the CRT and emulation stuff most the time it's sound reasoning.

The PS2 had blur filters on nearly every game. Nearly every game ran at 480i and was a flickery mess as a result. That's the facts.

>>2849074
And what this anon said too.


The PS2 is objectively trash. But it has some really nice games. Only a handful though.

>> No.2849090

>>2849074
The difference between RE4 for the Gamecube and RE4 for the PS2 graphically was pretty staggering.

>> No.2849092

PS2 games are just modern games with worse graphics. PS1/N64 games are not.

>> No.2849098

>>2849092
>PS2 games are just modern games with worse graphics.
Nice wording.

>> No.2849103

>>2849092
What about early titles like Maximo?

>> No.2849106

>>2849090

The PS2 version is still better due to the fact that it has way more content and also lives on a system that has a controller that isn't retarded.

The PS2 version does use recorded clips of in-engine Gamecube footage as FMVs though, which is kinda hilarious.

>> No.2849109
File: 246 KB, 852x754, 1446133544604.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2849109

Hopefully never, and this image is the reason why.

>> No.2849117

>>2849106
The 2 extra costumes and extra mini game don't make up for the the bad graphics and sound.

>> No.2849120

>>2849092
>PS1 games are not
Wrong.

>> No.2849124

>>2849120
Completely different resolutions among other obvious differences.

Unlike PS2 and later.

>> No.2849127

The PS2 is retro if you want it to be. The console debuted March 4 of 2000, I consider all the early PS2 titles to be retro.

>> No.2849132

>>2849106
The extra content really isn't enough to cover up the fact that it looks and sounds worse.

Personally, I think the Gamecube's controller is perfectly fine. I personally found it more comfortable than the PS2 controller.

>> No.2849137

>>2849124
Except it is a well-known fact the PS1 was the first modern console.

Compare games like Final Fantasy VII that are all flashy but no substance, trashy 3D platformers like Crash for ADHD children and the rest of the PS1 library to the libraries of the Genesis and SNES. Plus the fact 90% of it's library is blatant shovelware.

All you need to do with PS1 games is replace their old dated graphics with modern ones, add some achievemnts for filler and you have a modern vidya. You can't do the same to SNES or Genesis games.

>> No.2849141

>>2849137
Good shitpost.

And no PS1 graphics can't just be replaced. They need to be completely redone.

You have control differences too.

>> No.2849147

>>2849141
>Good shitpost.
Epic.

>And no PS1 graphics can't just be replaced
>They need to be completely redone.
No shit sherlock.

The various PS1 game remakes already speak for themselves.

>> No.2849149

>>2849147
And the PS2 remakes are just upscales.

>> No.2849154

>>2849137
You forgot about changing everything about how the games control. Unless you really think modern gamers would be able to stomach something like, say, the tank controls of the original Resident Evil.

But at that point, the comparison to modern games doesn't really work anymore.

>> No.2849156

>>2849064
can't believe i bought that fucking blue wedge. and i thought microsoft were kikes with 360 faceplates

>> No.2849161

I hear the Slim models are more reliable. Is this true?

>> No.2849163

Sony consoles didn't get good until 7th gen now that you think about it.

>> No.2849165

>>2849163
I know this is shitposting but a laughed anyway.

>> No.2849169

>>2849161
Yes, unless you want to play games off an HDD.

>> No.2849170

>>2849169

Yay. :D

I've always wanted to explore the PS2 library.

>> No.2849172

>>2849137
>>2849154
>worse than modern games for featuring dated graphics and controls
>worse than actual retro video games for introducing the shticks which define modern gaming
Truly no game library is more overrated than the PS1 library.

>> No.2849174
File: 3.84 MB, 5576x6912, 1438128970201.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2849174

I dont have a problem with the PS2 being on /v/ but the fact many people shitpost this thread just because they dont like the PS2 is just sad, considering this console is probably the best one ever created. So stop acting like retards and just report and hide the thread if its bothers so much.

>> No.2849176

>>2849170
You're in for a great time, I started quite recently myself. I can see why some people prefer fats, though. Blank DVDs are cheap, but they pile up quickly if you have a backlog as huge as mine.

>> No.2849179

>>2849174
This. If you think the PS2 was a bad system, you don't enjoy video games. Just look at that fucking RPG section.

>> No.2849180

>>2849172
>shticks which define modern gaming
Ya Arcades and Atari don't exist.

>> No.2849182

>>2849172
>no game library is more overrated than the PS1 library
what is n64

>> No.2849183

Its been over a decade and a half since the 6th gen began and roughly a decade since it ended, why aren't all the consoles invovlee considered retro yet

>> No.2849185

>>2849174
>>2849179
Not everyone likes are wants to play 480i trash.

Add that most the games on that list are mediocre at best.

>> No.2849186

>>2849174
>North American ICO cover
Absolutely disgusting.jpg

>Downhill Domination
All is forgiven.

>> No.2849187

>>2849185

*tips fedora*

>> No.2849189

>>2849185
>>>/v/

>> No.2849192

>>2849187
>>2849189
Back to /v/ please. You posted the link there already which should be convenient for you kids.

>> No.2849202

>>2849192
Yet you're the one who's bothered by 480i. Don't you have a mustard race thread to post in?

>> No.2849204

>>2849202
I could care less about resolution with in reason.

You thinking I'm talking about resolution confirms you need to get your ass back to /v/.

>> No.2849208

>>2849204

*couldn't

You couldn't care less, Anon.

>> No.2849210

>>2849208
Thanks nerd.

>> No.2849212

>>2849210

'Welcome.

>> No.2849217

I love the PS2 but I hope the sticky never gets updated except maybe including the GBA for similar reasons to the Dreamcast

>> No.2849223

>>2849185
>judging a game by its resolution

you're trash. 480i isn't even bad, it was the dang standard for twenty somethin years, we just have better stuff now that it's the future. In 10 years you'll think 4K looks like shit, everything is relative

>> No.2849224

>>2849064
We need to petition Jackie 4chan to make the rule for /vr/ "any game for a system [X#] of generations old" instead of being any arbitrary year.

If we can't discuss gen 6 by the start of gen 9 then that's just straight up bullshit.

>> No.2849226
File: 220 KB, 480x360, 1443634638125.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2849226

>>2849185

>> No.2849227

>>2849217
Not it really wasn’t underageb&. And I’m not talking about the resolution. You’re too ignorant to understand that UI guess or something since everything is progressive now and you were like 5 when PS2 came out.

240p was the standard for over 20 years.
480i was only ever forced on PS2. It is the only console to have the majority of games force 480i.
>>2849226
I really don't get you PS2 fanboys. You just ignore facts and say everyone is a shitposter.

>> No.2849231

>>2849217
I think that once the system turns twenty and /vr/ is still around, it should be added.

>> No.2849239
File: 126 KB, 480x360, 1443634819987.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2849239

>>2849227

>> No.2849241

>>2849227
480i was the standard res of tvs and video signals from '82 onwards. the reason 240p exists is because it's half of 480i. every show you watched or movie you saw on tv was displayed at 480i

>> No.2849246

>>2849241
We aren't talking about TV or movies.

Games since pong were 240p with few exceptions till 6th gen came along.
6th gen brought 480i/p as the standard. PS2 forcing 480i unlike any console before or since.

You can like the PS2 all you want but objectively it is the worse console graphically.

>> No.2849276

>>2849246
It really rustles me when people pretend that resolution is the BE ALL AND END ALL.

Like if a game with N64 graphics running at 720p is objectively superior to PS4 graphics running at 480p.

Resolution is only a single piece of the image quality puzzle. An important piece of sure, but it's not decisive dammit.

PS2 was pushing polygons and lighting well in advanced of Dreamcast but all people can spout is (not VGA 640x480 so INTO THE TRASH).

>> No.2849281
File: 174 KB, 555x250, PS2-Header.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2849281

Relive the magic of the waiting in line for the PS2, cruising for gangbangs, selling it to kids for 3 times its worth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgiIczF-Q2A

>> No.2849282

>>2849276
Why do you idiots think I'm hating the PS2 for the resolution? I never said that.

I assume you're another anon anyway.

>> No.2849284

>>2849217
Changing the sticky isn't going to change the rules or the users. People would still resist the GBA like they do with the DC.

>> No.2849286

>>2849246
the ps2 didn't force 480i. if you put a 240p game in a ps2 it'll output 240p.

the ps3 does force 480i though, not recommended for ps1 discs

>> No.2849290

>>2849286
There's exceptions but I was making the point that the majority of games are forced 480i.

>> No.2849297

>>2849290
yeah and 480i isn't bad, i've played maybe a hundred ps2 games and I never thought its video output looked worse than older consoles, you're crazy

>> No.2849306

>>2849297
You're a casual then. I sold my PS2 for that very reason.
480i like any interlaced resolution is trash.

>> No.2849310

>>2849306
GS Mode Selector, son.

The fact that you don't know about it means you are a casual.

>> No.2849315

>>2849310
A buggy fucking mess from what I've seen.

And that wouldn't had help me since it came out way after the PS2 was relevant.

>> No.2849334

ps2 is definitely better than nes,snes ,n64 and ps1...al that low res pixel trash shit with just a handful of good games.

>> No.2849340

>>2849109
That argument might as well be "PEOPLE WILL DISCUSS HALO!!!1!!!!!1 WWWHAHAAAAAHHHHH MKDS MODS MOMDS OMDS"

Listen here, newfag, every single board on 4chan has a "hide" button which is placed prominently and can be accessed with a single click. Hide shit you don't like instead of jumping at shadows and crying about bogeymen.

>> No.2849349

Dreamcast was allowed 5474 days after its Japan release.

PS2 is still now allowed after 5011 days.

For those of you bad at math, that's almost 13 years and 9 months. We can't discuss games that are nearly a decade and a half old.

>> No.2849351

>>2849349
Dreamcast isn't actually allowed, don't let the sticky confuse you.
We aren't allowed to discuss Windows games from 2000 either.

>> No.2849352

>>2849306
If you can't fit this entire map on your screen you are a DIRTY CASUAL

http://orig01.deviantart.net/080d/f/2015/112/9/0/shards_of_war_preview_by_elfray-d8qo5v7.png

>> No.2849356

>>2849067
I bet you're the kind of guy who defends ET and claims no one hated it until e-celebs started talking about it.

>> No.2849357

>>2849351
>Dreamcast isn't actually allowed
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>> No.2849361

>>2849306
you do realise ps2 can do 720p. LOL
i would prefer 240i ps2 ovwe 720p snes any day.

>> No.2849364

>>2849361
>>2849356
>>2849352
Guess the underaggeb&s first console.

>> No.2849367

>>2849364
Anything other than "Sega Master System" is wrong.

You honest-to-god think that having a high resolution is "hardcore". Go ahead and define "hardcore" and "casual" for us so we can laugh at you.

You wont. You'll just avoid the question.

>> No.2849369

>>2849367
Another idiot thinking I'm talking about resolution. So dumb and young.

>> No.2849372

>>2849246
This shows how retarded you are. Have you heard of composite? With certain software, you can even play your PS2 games on a PS2 at 720p/1080p albeit with lag or tons of slowdown. Yup you're definitely a shitposter.

>> No.2849373

>>2849372
oops meant Component

>> No.2849378

>>2849372
You mean component, champ?

What about the 99% of the rest of the library that's stuck at 480i? Just ignore that shit I guess.

>> No.2849379

>>2849369
Alright, he's avoiding the question. Just report him, he's only using this thread as screencap bait because he got upset over MGS2 and still hasn't let go 15 years later.

>> No.2849384

>>2849379
What is the question? The meta shit about hardcore vs casual? Sorry strawman somewhere else kid. Maybe /v/.

You seem to be really set on that. Still probably think I'm talking about resolution.

>> No.2849385

>>2849378
Remember, 480i is just a resolution and not the actual graphics. With the software I speak of, you can force games to play on progressive.

>> No.2849390

>>2849385
The "software" isn't magic. It's either single field or both deinterlacing to get a fake progressive image.
Actually according to the wiki it’s using both fields and doubling them for 60 frames when it can. Pretty shit for games.

>> No.2849392

whats the most demanding pc game from 2002? is that retro enough? i think when people under 20 don't know the games on that year it should be considered retro

>> No.2849395

PS2 is not now and never will be considered retro.

>> No.2849402

>>2849392
PC games from 2000 and later aren't considered retro unless there's also a port to retro hardware.

>> No.2849403

>>2849392
>whats the most demanding pc game from 2002?
UT2003 probably

>> No.2849408

But there are PS2 threads on /vr/.
This is one.

It's fucking awful.

>> No.2849415

>>2849408
Because of you shitting it up, mate. This board is stagnating into filter wars, and Donkey Kong games are the whipping boy of the week. Having a limited amount of subjects to discuss is not what a board is for, it has to adapt and evolve.

>> No.2849427

>>2849415
But... I need my #safespace, I couldn't afford a PS2 because of having to buy black market hormone blockers because my shitlord cis male doctor wouldn't prescribe me them and polygons trigger me.

>> No.2849428

>>2849415

>it has to adapt and evolve

But as you're not the admin or a mod and don't set the rules, fuck you

>> No.2849431

>>2849415
There's more retro games than anyone could ever possibly play.
As long as people keep playing different things there's no need to open the PS2 floodgates.

>> No.2849432
File: 226 KB, 842x595, H 001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2849432

I was a kid when the Atari (CE 1975) was still in stores and I personal think that the PS2 is the last of the "retro" series (CE 2000 - 15 years ago from present). I think its these people (picture related) that just don't want to concede there notions of retro just might be more than the Pac-Man of their "before-I-was-born" fantasies (picture related).

>> No.2849435

>>2849179
Why would anyone want to play an RPG? That's the most entry level genre there is, that's why only women and children play them. The best console of all time is either the Mega Drive or the Neo Geo AES.

>> No.2849451
File: 95 KB, 625x626, 1449377671549.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2849451

>> No.2849463
File: 18 KB, 927x885, 1435575344669.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2849463

>>2849435

look at this b8 even though I agree as I prefer arcade games over rpgs

>> No.2849482

>>2849064
I remember having constant laser problems with it when I was a kid
so disappointing, because the PS1 was resilient as fuck

>> No.2849519

>>2849415
Haha, no. You have to have ages, eras, you don't change definitions and group the modern age with medieval times just because too much time has passed since then.

The game design, mechanics, everything is totally different, so one day PS2 might be "modern", "pre-contemporary", but never retro. A 70's movie isn't part of "classic cinema", two hundred years from now, a movie from the 50s still won't be part of the "early cinema" (start of the 20th century).