/vr/ - Retro Games

>>778317
Sure, I'd buy it. Anytime this is brought up people get hung up on where the buttons will be mapped to. How would we fix that issue?

do want.

I'd love some kind of HD remake. Not in the same manner they remade Gunstar Heroes, just some higher quality graphics really.

>>778375
I'd sincerely hope they keep Marina more or less looking like she does though. I don't like their recent fascination with more stereotypical animu.

>>778363
well the joystick can be the directional jets while double tapping the d-pad will be the running jets. and A will be jump and B will be to grab. the L and R buttons will be the action and speaking buttons.I sapose Y and X can be grab and jump too. What more do you need.

I would buy, I rented Mischief Maker once and it was fun

>>778378
She's pretty moe on her human form, I don't know what you are on about.

>>778378
The whole point of Mischief Makers was to be ridiculously animu, though.

>>778386
That would work.

>>778386
That sounds good

How would the 3DS implement the SHAKE SHAKE feature?

>>778484
Marina's art style is clearly not "stereotypical animu."

I felt that was obvious enough that I didn't need to specify.

>>778486
>>778492
You felt the need to post twice because?

>>778535
it definitely has an "anime from the 80s/90s" feel to it, I don't know what are you talking about.

>>778486
>>778492
You felt the need to post twice because?

>>778543
But 80's and 90's anime isn't what I would call MODERN stereotype anime. Had I specified 80's or 90's that would have been different.

>>778558
you didn't specify shit, that's the problem.

Maybe you should have said "please don't remake the character using modern standards because I hate new stuff and that's why I post on /vr/" and that conveys your point perfectly. Because she's pretty damn anime already.

>>778528
I wouldn't shake my 3DS; seems like that feature would be better for a Wii U port...

>>778567
I'm not sure why you're so pissy. Is that a reasonable response to this situation?

>>778582
No, completely unacceptable.

this could do with a redesign, actually. i don't think treasure had the best anime people in the business at the time.

>>778618
>i don't think treasure had the best anime people in the business at the time.
probably not, but they did at least have a recognizable art style which is more than you can say about a lot of modern anime

>>778624
you are definitely no the first or last person who thinks crappiness has a stylistic charm.

>>778618
I love their style of art. I hate to see them throw it aside for something more plain and forgettable.

>>778651
Is that official for real? If so, where did they get that from?

>>778570
Yeah, Wario Land did that and it could suit Mischief Makers also.

>>778665
I'm not entirely sure. But it is similar to their official box arts and such.

>>778694
Sega Ages 2500 was a rerelease of the games for PS2. So this might be official art.

>>778724
It sure has a charm, but the fact that it is pencil-colored raises my suspicions a bit.

>>778645
Enough effort behind an abstract artstyle can look pretty nice. Just look at Panty and Stocking. Which is pretty memorable. A lot more than if it looked like everything else out there.

OK, controversy time: MM is one of the weakest Treasure games. I'd almost consider it the start of their decline.

>>778831
Neither ZUN art or >>778618 styles stem from an effort, but from a lack of proficiency. It's mostly accidental.

>>778724
It is. Most of it is on the Japanese boxart.

>>778839
Accidents can turn out OK. I'm sure your parents would agree.

>>778845
that was lame, dude. I got more severe burns while stroking my hands against each other vigorously for 10 seconds.

>>778839
It's more that they've discovered a good art style and should stick with it than saying they were skilled in its creation. Pursue the stylization side instead of homogenize it.

>>778864
Again, I don't think crappiness really is a style you work towards.

>>778869
Gonna direct you back to >>778831

>>778873
I'm gonna redirect you back to >>778839

>>778875
Then I'll have to direct you to>>778864


Look, just because the original artists were unskilled doesn't mean they can't salvage it with some talent and direction.

>>778869
I'll take a memorable art style over advanced technical skill when it comes to goofy video games any day

>>778618
>>778645
>>778839
>>778854
>>778869
>>778875

You're not going to change the way anyone thinks acting like this and even if you were more subtle about it people still wouldn't give two shits.

Okay, so you hate the way they draw. Big deal, move along. I know you're going to tell me that you never said you hate it but I know that when people dislike something, they often complain near the people who enjoy it. That's so stupid.

Go troll an Adventure Time thread on /co/ or something

Mischief Makers should have gotten a sequel or remade on the Wii.

>>778894
I know, talk about missed opportunity.

Does wii-u still have those style remotes aside from the etch-a-sketch? Maybe it's not too late.

>>778898
it supports Wii controllers

>>778882
Adult Human Marina is not even consistent with the other art on the same game. Compare it to >>778567 and even >>778535 or any of the gunstar images posted in this thread.
It's just crappy, man. You probably won't see anything like that from Treasure ever again.

Maybe you can build a case around ZUN art, but then again, it "wasn't a pursuit towards stylization", but an attempt to recreate existing styles and not succeeding, leading to an unusual recognizable result, like art brut, and then ZUN just sticked to it, partly because of is recognizable, but party because that's the extent of his skills as an artist.

So yeah, Adult Marina can make do with a redesign.

>>778905
Well it's not on the cusp of the technology anymore but I'd still be all over that.

>>778907
At this point we're just going to have to agree to disagree, man.

>>778910
The Wii never was the cusp of technology though. Let's send letters to Nintendo and Treasure. If Sin and Punishment got a revival, why not Mischief Makers?

>>778917
Agree to disagree what? I'm not shunning you for liking it. Hell, I think it's charming, and my ZUN example was mostly tounge in cheek. But calling it a deliberate attempt at stylizing is just plain wrong.

>>778927
I never called it deliberate stylization. I'm saying piggybacking it and MAKING it a stylization would be fantastic. Your insistence it's just too crappy is where we hit an impasse.

>>778910
Like the other guy said, never was the "cusp of technology". Wiimote was an overglorified tilt detector. For Wii U theres also that Pro controller and hooking up classic controllers to the Wiimote. The Wiimote has a tiny d-pad, impossible to play platfomers on.

>>779040
Fine, "riding the wave of popularity" then.

I would totally be down for another MM, even if it would only find success in a niche. At the least it would expose the IP to people who have never even heard of it.

3DS is lower resolution than N64. You wouldn't be able to see anything.

>>778528
I'd rather they not have a shaking gimmick function. just continuously pushing the down direction is fine.

How is the emulation on this game nowadays?
I remember wanting to play it years ago and everyone talking about how Mischief Makers specifically was hard to emulate.

Obviously finding an actual cart would be ideal, but I haven't seen a copy yet.

>>779727
They're like ten bucks on ebay

>>779498
But OoT is on the 3DS and it looks much better than the N64 version.