/vr/ - Retro Games

Final Fantasy X

spiritual warfare

Also why was NOA so obsessed with eradicating Christian references from games back in the day when America is a majority Christian country?

>>6923747
old people cant understand technology and think everything is mockery.

>>6923739
This game was amazing.
You actually lose your progression items if you enter the bar.
Brilliant.

Noah’s Ark for the SNES

Devil World

Halo and Doom

>>6923734
Phantasy Stars and EVO

you know churches were the only thing missing from the sims 1 for it to be complete

>>6923734

>>6923734
Diablo 2, play as a Paladin.
Your primary objective?
Kill Satan (Diablo)

>>6923734
>I know you, Raziel. You are worthy.
What madness is this? What pitiful form is this that I have come to inhabit? Death would be a release, next to this travesty.
>You did not survive the abyss, Raziel. I have only spared you from total dissolution.
I would choose oblivion over this existence!
>The choice is not yours.
I am destroyed!
>You are reborn.


The birth of one of Kain’s abominations traps the essence of life. It is this soul that animates the corpse you ‘lived’ in. And that Raziel, is the demise of Nosgoth. There is no balance. The souls of the dead remain trapped. I can not spin them in the wheel of fate. They can not complete their destinies.

Redeem yourself. Or if you prefer, avenge yourself. Settle your dispute with Kain. Destroy Him and your brethren. Free their souls and let the wheel of fate churn again. Use your hatred to reave their souls... I can make it possible. Become my soul reaver, my angel of death...

>>6923884
Christians 100% dropped the ball by not saying DOOM is pro-christrian

>>6923734
Leged of Zelda.

>>6923734
there is no Pro-Christcuck games made by Japanese developers
all of the Jap games are mocking Christcucks but they are too retarded to realize this

>>6926203
I remember making the exact argument to my parents. All they saw was pentagrams and gore but I was like
"but the main guy hates evil and hates demons and is hunting them down where they live..."

>>6923734
E.V.O.: Search for Eden is basically intelligent design: the game. Take that as you wish.

>>6926714
Did it work?

>>6923734
It's not exactly Christian, but Earthbound.
The final boss cannot be defeated by brute force, technology, or even psychic powers. In the end, your only hope is prayer.

>>6926693
what about dragon quest

doom obv

>>6926851
Ok

>>6927684
He's got you there

>>6925623
oh good Lord above in heaven the voice acting in this series

Rest In Peace, Mr. Tony Jay

There aren’t many of those

>>6926693
Kys redditor

>>6926693
Extreme BRAINLET & LERPing

>>6930314
Based

>>6930314
dangerously based

>>6923734
>pro-christan
>magic is used by good guys
pick one

>>6931621
Both

>>6931621
>magic used by good guys
based miracles.

>>6923734
Megami Tensei Last Bible Special
gotta save Jerusalem from faggot demons

Is OP just baiting or do people really think this is 'pro christian' and not just the use of the religion's magic and symbols for artistic means?

>>6926693
seething

>>6933228
doesn't matter, Japs think Christianity looks and sounds cool

>>6933230
I think if you were to tell a Christian that a pixel man throwing crosses at Frankenstein was a glorification of their religion they'd be a little offended.

I like the Castlevania aesthetic myself, but doesn't mean I think the religion is 'cool'.
- - -
There are no "Christian" games because the religion's themes really aren't fit for gaming. The only fighting that ever happens in the bible is in the old testament where Moses and the Jewish Warrior kings lead the Jews on campaigns to subjugate rival tribes. But New Testament is about a Rabbi giving a sermon on a hill and then being persecuted.

Something like the Greek religion lends itself more easily to gaming since the characters are constantly fighting or going on adventures. The very concept of a 'hero' going on an 'odyssey' comes from them.

So the most you can do with Christianity is something superficial where stick a bunch of crosses on the pixel warriors.

>>6933263
>I like the Castlevania aesthetic myself, but doesn't mean I think the religion is 'cool'.
what you think doesn't matter, the developers thought it looked cool and appealing so they went with it and it worked.

>There are no "Christian" games because the religion's themes really aren't fit for gaming
Wherever there are good and beautiful themes there will be an overlap with Christianity. i.e conforming to objective moral truths, martyrs out of love, fighting for what is right, protecting the weak, destroying evil, being honest, being generous, overcoming temptations, being free from lust and pettiness, following a higher order and not just your subjective feelings, good vs evil is a timeless theme, pursuit of wisdom and having faith in the unseen, power of prophecy, etc, all these are noble christian themes and heroic games with heroic characters will promote them.

>So the most you can do with Christianity is something superficial where stick a bunch of crosses on the pixel warriors.
This is the pleb reading of Christianity that thinks Christ was a pacifist hippie who just preached tolerance and love lmao, so cringe.

>>6923734
Don't you mean pseudo-christian? The Japanese use it as a crutch to get westerner's attention while not really being religious. Like with vampires having crosses on them in anime, it's mostly aesthetic.

To be fair, actual christfaggots do something similar with ghost films.

t. agnostic

But now that I got that out of the way, other than vampire games, >>6923884 wait there's more cringe I just can't do it, sorry OP.

>>6926230
It's pagan faggot.

>but the cross
The first nes game never counts or megaman is robot-cop.

>>6926851
No. You people >>6927730

fuck this thread I'm out I can't even check the thread before making a suggestion without being infected by aids no ability to concentrate

too gay in here by default as christfaggots are faggots

>>6933335
Those 9 hour days you use to shitpost could be done by doing something more constructive. Maybe try reading the bible?

>>6925615
based

>>6926714
problem with Doom was that it was really gross and gorey and opened to the door to other gorey FPS games, kids shouldn't be ''going to virtual hell to kill demons'' anyway. But for adults no problem.

>>6933343
kid icarus

I'd rather burn it.

How about you newfaggots actually be 'legit' next time?

>>6933335
>t. agnostic
>I really just don't know guys, it's all a mystery ;)
>self-righteous anti-christ God-hating brainlet
kek, every time

>>6933343
Also I post longer than 9 hours. Some of the time I'm in my bed on my phone without the trip on, phone hanging from the face with magnetic book reader thing in front of it so my eyes don't feel crossed, bluetooth keyboard, posting away for hours and hours.

Also, our our overly competitive society I'd have to be best at something to 'contribute', so I literally can't be productive, and productive usually means wasteful otherwise. Even if not, I hate society.

>>6933354

>>6933356
You don't know what agnostic means idiot.

It means that you can't know even if someone were to tell you. It's about not having faith. It's about seeing faith as a synonym for delusion. It's about being open minded though to such delusions simultaneously without dedication in any direction, theism nor atheism, though grammatically atheism covers agnostic, that's just a flaw in the English language, not logic.

>>6933360
>Also, our our overly competitive society I'd have to be best at something to 'contribute', so I literally can't be productive, and productive usually means wasteful otherwise.
Yes, we all know you're a loser who doesn't even try at anything and have resigned yourself to failure. Now maybe you can accomplish something like leaving the thread when you said you were.

pagans (aka homosexuals) seething. lmao

>>6933369

>>6933370
Okay, I'll go farm to make America die of diabetes even faster. Ages 40-70ish are only 40 percent pre-diabetic, it needs to be even higher.

Or maybe I should go build a house that will be torn down to be rebuilt in the next 60 years? That's totally my property and not someone else's that wants it to be looking superficial over efficient.

>>6933372
pagans aren't real they're a very old spook

>>6933369
>It means that you can't know even
agnostic? it means you have no knowledge either for or against a position. Yet you are clearly against God and christianity.

the idea that it's impossible to know is a form of radical skepticism going beyond agnosticism, dumbfaggot.

> It's about not having faith. It's about seeing faith as a synonym for delusion.
You can't operate in the world without faith and presuppositions that can't be proven.
Your radical skepticism about God (being totally unknowable) is a form of faith, which would be a delusion according to you.

>that's just a flaw in the English language, not logic.
it's a flaw in your thinking since you misinterpret what agnosticism means, and you took a radical position that has no basis in any logic or evidence.

>>6933378
Nice retro meme.

>>6933385
>pagans aren't real they're a very old spook
anyone who isn't Christian is a pagan

>>6933385
Just get a skill you lazy nigger and stay off of 4chan. If you're that content with doing nothing but yelling at anonymous strangers then you really unironically should kill yourself. And if you can't do that, then you're the biggest pussy on the planet.

You can't even leave the thread like you said, you're literally a waste of flesh who can't commit to anything.

>>6933386
It means no faith.

People try to use the English to confuse people beyond this.

>but how do you know you don't know? XD

And such doesn't work on every agnostic.

>>the idea that it's impossible to know is a form of radical skepticism going beyond agnosticism, dumbfaggot.
That's another English trick. It is literally radical skepticism. That's what agnosticism is. You're just trying to make mental traps with word games that make false conceptions about things. Another one christfaggots try is defense o their ways, "I know jesus loves me" and whatnot when they literally cannot. Unless delusional of course.

>maybe he just hasn't talked to you then
Then he's a cunt and not benevolent, illogical facefuck.

Anyway, now back to something you actually said.

>operation without faith
Animals do it all the time, and we are animals.

Creatures of habit like a mouse.

>flaw in logic
It's about not trusting a logic while having more than one type.

Open mindedness because they current logic you have isn't satisfying.

>>6933392
that's why it's a spook

>>6933396
No.

>>6933396
I came back to obviously post kid icarus but then I saw people @'d me so i went and posted on and on.

Keyboard go brrrrrrrr

>>6933407
>nigger who literally can't do anything besides shitposting on a Bangladeshi flip book forum is a big brain on religion
lmao admit it, you too chickenshit to kill yourself because you're a full on failure and too scarred to try accomplish something

>>6933407
>>but how do you know you don't know?
>>You're just trying to make mental traps with word games
no one is making traps for you, your position has internal contradictions and you're ignoring them. That's all.

If you're ''agnostic'' i.e [without knowledge and neutral about God], don't go around making universal negative claims about what exists or what humans can and can't know. If you don't know, just stfu and to some searching until you arrive at a coherent position.

>>operation without faith
>>Animals do it all the time
well you're operating on contradictions so that makes you dumber than an animal right now

>>6933426
>well you're operating on contradictions so that makes you dumber than an animal right now
namefag atheist btfo

>>6933434
>>6933426
He's a literal bag of flesh who admits to posting on 4chan for like half a day and refuses to do anything else and thinks he can argue religion and philosophy, says he'll fuck off, then whimpers back to the thread like a dog returning to its vomit just to keep arguing.. He's lower than most animals.

>>6933407
>>but how do you know you don't know? XD
strawman, the question would be ''how do you know humans can't know X or Y?"'

and the answer is, you don't, it's just empty speculation on your part, just because you don't know X or Y, doesn't mean it's impossible to know in principle.

>>6923734
>hot oppai lolis
You can't have that in a Christian video game!

>>6933420
It's not about being big brained you zoomer-memer.

Just don't be deluded. It's not hard at all.

>>6933426
I'd rather be as stupid as an animal than an intelligent human being that's been driven insane by slave religions invented by the jewish.

>>6933434
>>6933445
not an argument

>>6933449
Indeed you don't, because you can't, thanks for agreeing.

About principles, humans have a very hard time with those even with religion so I'd argue it's not related to spirituality.

>>6923734
La Abadia del Crimen for the Speccy

>>6933317
You have no idea what I'm talking about. You sound like you learned about Christianity from warhammer and video games.

I brought up the Sermon on the Mount, the single longest, most studied, and most respected passage by Jesus and not only did you not seem to get the reference (meaning you don't even know your own religion) but it's 'cringe' to you. It's 'for plebs'. The plebs were the one's Jesus was giving the sermon retard.

From point of ignorance and anti-Christianism, you're trying to lecture us on the religion in pixel-platformers.

>>6933528
>>sermon on the mount
>taking christfaggotry this seriously

Don't you know using imageboards is a SIN?

>>6933528
>I brought up the Sermon on the Mount
dude i know what you were trying to do, stop being disingenuous. Any time there was violence or heroism in the Bible you want to ignore it or twist it into something negative. Anytime there is passivity and love you want to exaggerate it. Cherry picking until your fingers turn red. Either you don't understand the scope of Christianity, it's themes and values, or you do understand it and are being deceptive.
>From point of ignorance and anti-Christianism, you're trying to lecture us on the religion in pixel-platformers.
wtf does this even mean?
My response showed how Christian themes can appear in gaming just fine, a catastrophe that creates a fallen world/apocalypse, martyrdom out of love, fighting for the weak, enduring suffering, forgiving an enemy and giving them a second chance, good triumphing over evil, etc....

>>6933543
I'm not a Christian. I'm just aware of the religion enough to understand the importaince of the Sermon. I also had some Christian friends that I could discuss the religion with sensiable. First centuary Christianity is a great topic of study.

>>6933565
If you're not that branch of kikery then at least remember that judiasm predates christfaggotry.

Why care about any branch even if you want to bring up how long something was there?

I know I know, thread topic. You need jesus for vampires for some reason rather than just a cursed crucifix.

>>6933564
> Any time there was violence or heroism in the Bible you want to ignore it or twist it into something negative.

I already talked about violence. There is PLENTY of violence in the old testament. The Jews are always at war. But there is almost none in the new testament. You sound like you are not familiar with the your own religion.

>My response showed how Christian themes can appear in gaming just fine
No it doesn't, it should have been obvious. You could replace the Belmont's cross with a Muslim Crescent, or a boomerang, and it would be exactly the same. You could change it's theme to another religion or strip out all religious elements and it would be the same game. The themes you are talking about are things you imagined onto it. You could imagine them just as well if the character was non-religious. Because the Christian elements are superficial and not relevent. In fact they are so trivial in some versions of casltevania games they even remove the religious elements and the game still hold up fine.

>>6923734
Completely forgot about this game.
Kid Iccarus made me remember.

>>6933601

>>6933584
>There is PLENTY of violence in the old testament.
So why discount the OT in favor of the NT? and act as if the sermon on the mount negates any of the old testament?
We don't view one scripture as superior or more authentic than the other. So when you said: ""There are no "Christian" games because the religion's themes really aren't fit for gaming. The only fighting that ever happens in the bible is in the Old Testament.... But New Testament is about a Rabbi giving a sermon on a hill and then being persecuted."" you reveal your ignorance about the status of the OT and the NT and who God is in the Christian worldview. Jesus didn't negate any righteous violence that God commanded in the OT. And the NT has plenty of violence if you actually read it. The most violent book of the bible is Revelation/Apocalypse of John, where Jesus comes back and kills millions.

> You could replace the Belmont's cross with a Muslim Crescent, or a boomerang, and it would be exactly the same. You could change it's theme to another religion or strip out all religious elements and it would be the same game.
>because the Christian elements are superficial and not relevent.
their superficial yet strong enough to make you and that atheistfag seethe lol

>>6933603
Actually quite based for a christian game

>>6933619

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1Vr3DZSpfg
Prayer Warriors has some great music

>>6931621
God-induced magic is good, though.

>>6933565
>uhhh, I'm not a Christian....but let me tell you about your religion...you see....
lmao everytime this happens they say bullshit

>>6933606
>So why discount the OT in favor of the NT? and act as if the sermon on the mount negates any of the old testament?
Have you read the sermon? Everything gets turned upside in the New Testament. Most of the old testament is an artifact with irreconcilable philosophical differences. They also have irreconcilable ideas about the afterlife. There's none in the old testament. The Old Testament is a different religion entirely. Sort of like how the New Testament is part of Islam, even though Islam is an entirely different religion with irreconcilable differences to the Old and New Testament.

>The most violent book of the bible is Revelation/Apocalypse of John, where Jesus comes back and kills millions.
True enough. It's a very different book.

Come to think I take it back. You can get Christian action game stuff provided you lean heavily towards Revelation.

>their superficial yet strong enough to make you and that atheistfag seethe lol
And there we have it. This is what Christianity means to you. Making people 'seethe' and feeling morally superior.

>>6933659
>Everything gets turned upside in the New Testament. Most of the old testament is an artifact with irreconcilable philosophical differences. They also have irreconcilable ideas about the afterlife. There's none in the old testament. The Old Testament is a different religion entirely.
you've been confused by gnostics and new age interpretations, lmao
hilarious but it happens to plebs who don't bother to read the bible themselves, but just digest second-hand hearsay.

>>6933683
This is what the Muslims would say if you told them that the bible is NOT irreonciable with the Quaran.

You do know that many early Christians do not even want the Old Testament to be cannon? Amoung them was Paul of Tarsus.

They they solved it is that whenever there is a contradiction between the old and the new testament the new testament takes prescidence. Old Testament has no after-life, New Testament does, so there is an after-life. Old Testament says the Jews are the only human. New Testament says God loves all races, so god loves all races.

The Muslims do another thing. If the New testament says something agains the Quoran, the Quoran is always right.

>Old Testament says the Jews are the only human.
this is true though

>>6933659
>Have you read the sermon? Everything gets turned upside in the New Testament. Most of the old testament is an artifact with irreconcilable philosophical differences.
1. the Sermon on the Mount doesn't turn the violence of the OT "upside down" and doesn't abrogate it. So this doesn't help your case at all. The OT agrees with everything in the Sermon on the Mount, it's not a new invention. God always preferred peacemakers, the humble, the lowly, the faithful, the meek, and he preferred forgiveness.
2. The only thing that the NT ''abrogates'' from the Old Testament is the dietary, ceremonial, & sacrificial laws the jews did to become ''clean''. When Christ became our substantive sacrifice those laws became fulfilled and their purpose complete. That's why Christians don't worry about doing animal sacrifices or abstaining from pig. But, all the moral laws are still intact and obligatory to Christians, the 10 commandments, punishing murderers, the sanctity of marriage, etc. And all the instances of righteous violence (ordered by God) in the OT are justified and 100% Christian approved.
3. If you read the NT you'll realize Christ tightened the screws on morality and made things even stricter, it's harder to divorce (he even said Moses made it easier for hebrews back then because they were weak), it's harder to be righteous, simply having hateful thoughts towards a brother is like murder, having lustful thoughts about a woman is adultery, regarding children he said: "but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea."

>>6933659
>This is what Christianity means to you. Making people 'seethe' and feeling morally superior.

Yup that's Christians to a tee. It would be funny if they weren't so obnoxious that they literally deify a guy and then ignore just about every lesson he tried to teach. It's a power cult, not a morality system like they want you to believe. They're some of the worst people on earth.

>>6933683
>Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets. I have not come to abolish them, but to fulfill them. For I tell you truly, until heaven and earth pass away, not a single jot, not a stroke of a pen, will disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.…
Okay, so the Law of Moses still appl-
>But Jesus went to the Mount of Olives. Early in the morning He went back into the temple courts. All the people came to Him, and He sat down to teach them. The scribes and Pharisees, however, brought to Him a woman caught in adultery. They made her stand before them and said, “Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery. In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such a woman. So what do You say? They said this to test Him, in order to have a basis for accusing Him. But Jesus bent down and began to write on the ground with His finger. When they continued to question Him, He straightened up and said to them, “Let him who is without sin among you be the first to cast a stone at her. And again He bent down and wrote on the ground.
...WHAT.

So, yes, logically irreconcilable. Either OT applies and the poor girl snuffs it, or it does not in which case Jesus cannot actually be claiming to fulfill the laws of the Prophets in good faith.

>>6933691
>You do know that many early Christians do not even want the Old Testament to be cannon? Amoung them was Paul of Tarsus.
wtf? You mean Marcione? Paul was 100% in favor of the OT and often quoted from it.

Marcione was the gnostic faggot who wanted to cherry pick the NT apart, only quoting what suited him, while also gutting the OT. lmao, you are so confused dude.

>This is what the Muslims would say if you told them that the bible is NOT irreonciable with the Quaran.
You're believe the bible and quran are totally reconcilable? I don't know what you mean or what this has to do with anything. If you said the bible and quran are ''reconcilable completely'' both Christians and muslims would disagree...

>They they solved it is that whenever there is a contradiction between the old and the new testament the new testament takes prescidence. Old Testament has no after-life, New Testament does, so there is an after-life. Old Testament says the Jews are the only human. New Testament says God loves all races, so god loves all races.
gibberish
the OT says all humans (jew and gentile) come from Adam and Eve, and it has prophecies about gentiles joining the covenant and becoming at peace with God. And the NT says gentiles will be the majority who take up faith, while the jews get dispersed for lack of faith, and that's what is happening etc.

>>6933726
That's not the sermon on the mount.
A trial would require not just the woman, but also the man she committed adultery with and the witnesses who saw it. The accusers remained silent when asked about their own sins and didn't offer any evidence besides hearsay. And when Jesus asked them to ''throw the first stone'' they all refused, knowing their accusations were disingenuous. That doesn't mean the punishment for adultery changed, it means that situation didn't meet the measure of the law.

>>6933726
> I have not come to abolish them, but to fulfill them.
Right I already said he fulfilled them on the cross and even said ''it is finished''.
>so the Law of Moses still appl-
the moral law is timeless and doesn't change, the ceremonial/sacrificial laws were fulfilled. Go research covenant theology. You don't know what Christians believe.

>>6933734
>>You do know that many early Christians do not even want the Old Testament to be cannon? Amoung them was Paul of Tarsus.
>Amoung them was Paul of Tarsus.
>Paul against the OT

>>6933691
>>You do know that many early Christians do not even want the Old Testament to be cannon? Amoung them was Paul of Tarsus.
>Amoung them was Paul of Tarsus.
>Paul was against the OT
false. stop lying.

>>6933659
>>6933723
>hurrr Christians are mean to me!
if you're lying and talking shit about the religion expect to be proven wrong and laughed at. If you were a genuine questioner you'd be treated better, but you showed yourself to be dishonest.

>>6933317
None of the themes you mention are specifically Christian. Numerous religions from that region introduce and evelop these themes.

>>6933749
>That's not the sermon on the mount.
I never said it was.
>A trial would require not just the woman, but also the man she committed adultery with and the witnesses who saw it.
I would say that, since we are talking about scribes and Pharisees, the trial is already assumed to have taken place. If you were reading a transcript of a jury deliberation in a secular, modern-day trial, your first reaction would *not* be "WAITWAITWAIT NOW WHO SAYS THERE'S BEEN A TRIAL YET!?". That's already assumed by any sane person.
>The accusers remained silent when asked about their own sins and didn't offer any evidence besides hearsay.
They remained silent because their own sins are (sadly) irrelevant: the woman is on trial, they are not. Try doing any of that "But who are you to judge me?!" bullshit next time you're in court. Go ahead. See if the bailiff doesn't jail you for contempt of court.
>And when Jesus asked them to ''throw the first stone'' they all refused, knowing their accusations were disingenuous.
The only objective fact is that they refused.The Bible claims this was all due to it being a test. Assuming any of this ever actually occurred, I'm pretty sure the gentlemen in question would vigorously dispute this conclusion.
>That doesn't mean the punishment for adultery changed, it means that situation didn't meet the measure of the law.
If the law says a woman judged guilty of adultery should have stones cast at her until being bludgeoned to death, and this is not done, then it has absolutely been changed.

>>6933752
>the moral law is timeless and doesn't change, the ceremonial/sacrificial laws were fulfilled. Go research covenant theology. You don't know what Christians believe.
More elaborate layers of bullshit on an already specious conclusion do not magically make it correct. Either a law was written, understood, and applied, or it was not. The reasons, be they good or bad, are irrelevant. You cannot profess to uphold laws you then disregard a short time later and maintain internally consistent logic. You would have to resort to some sort of Messianic handwaving. Which is what occurred.

>>6933691
sounds like a simplistic take you you cooked up in and around your asshole

>>6933847
>I assume it happened, so the trial happened
>That's already assumed by any sane person.
No, you want to assume things that aren't in the text to fit your preconceived notion. It's possible there was some sort of jewish trial, maybe, or a mob justice type of event? We don't know for sure, the details aren't in the text. The fact that they went to Jesus for adjudication suggests something was unresolved or their intentions were not genuine and they wanted to trap Jesus in some legal scheme.
Don't forget Israel was under roman rule at the time, jews couldn't just execute a woman for adultery based on their laws alone, it's much more complicated than that, they also needed approval of the Roman law, which allowed execution of women for adultery, but on condition that they have a roman trial and the man she conspired with was also executed, the woman could not be executed alone, historians and roman lawyers like Quintillian and Seneca have repeated this roman ruling in writing.

>>6933335
>tripfag is a giant sperg
Like pottery...

>>6933858
> Either a law was written, understood, and applied, or it was not.
Some laws are universal, others are limited to a certain time and people. The ''law'' of circumcision or animal sacrifice didn't apply to gentiles, for example, while the law against theft or murder applied universally to all peoples.
I'm telling you what we believe and how you misrepresented Christianity in this thread. You can disagree with our views but at least represent them accurately...

>>6933335
Japan might not identify as christian but they are
>The majority of Japanese couples, typically 60-70%, are wed in Christian ceremonies

>>6933351
The guy who headed nu-doom said that the games are made to be edgy but essentially all-ages because "my kid isn't gonna try to glory kill you irl". The ESRB was a mistake.

>>6933780
>if you're lying and talking shit about the religion expect to be proven wrong and laughed at.

But you've just proven me right twice. You can have read your book but you're not following Jesus' teachings. You're twisting his words with the intention of upsetting people. You're a hypocrite and he's probably spinning in his grave over how you assholes have mangled his legacy. Go to another Trump rally.

>>6933363
>>6933378

What a bunch of retards derayling this thread

>>6934353
I'm sorry, Anon.

>>6933513
>invented by the jewish.
Plato invented it. Read The Republic.

>>6934045
you just said Paul was against the OT, that's about as retarded as saying Muhammad was against the Quran. Get lost kid, you goofed up and got exposed.

>>6923734
>pro-christian
>posts Rondo of Blood
gonna be honest with you chief, Castlevania if actually seen by christians would hate it as much as they hated D&D back in the day

>b-b-b-but I'm killing demons and bringing holyness into the world
no one cares, try the doom ripoff that was Super Noah's ARK 3D
https://youtu.be/bDcP4IRbg_4?t=11

>>6937116
Well duh, Christians are mostly hypocrites who haven't even read their book let alone follow it.

>>6933642
>>6933216
>>6933182
It's witchcraft, not miracles. Are you guys stupid or have you not played the game in question?

>>6923734
saints of virtue

>>6937142
lol semantics

>>6937130
fucking this

>>6933216
based
take back the holy Land from the jews

>>6933619
There was an uproar, rage and an actual attempt to ban this game in my country since it was offensive to catholics kek

>>6923734
Classicvania.

how they pussed out in Civ 4 and made all religions neutral

>>6938072
I are confused, anon. Different sources say it's set in a world based on the ancient middle-east, and also a mediaeval fantasy world (presumably one mased on the middle east?). So which is it? From your comment i thought it was going to be set in the C20, and you were on some weird pogrom. But hey, we all have our foibles. You've only been here for three weeks.

>over half the comments are deleted

Hellow reddit.

Kid icarus is the only one also. Ironic it's delet.

>>6940695
Atheists got triggered by based Christianvania.

>>6926807

E.V.O. sets up Gaia and the sun as two gods though, and drags in influence from aliens as well. It's Christian-aligned in some ways but it's not Christian.

>Christian Imagery
>Pro Christian
lol. As dumb as Doom larpers.

>>6923734
painkiller

>>6940695
>>6940887
It was offtopic /pol/faggotry

nice to see Christian imagery in a positive light. If this game was made in 2020 by western devs the hero would be a trans-demon killing christian kids.

>>6940887
lol no. It was cultists feverishly pasting bible passages.

>>6942073
>killing christians
And that's a good thing

>>6942374
Just shut up and say some shit about Castlevania, you fucking retard-nigger.

>>6940887
>Atheists got triggered by based Christianvania.
good

>>6923739
Might be the only good Wisdom Tree game, still have that 8bit hymnal music stuck in my head 25+ years later

>>6942376
Kys commie faggot.

>>6942573
Neener Neener

>>6942380
Castlevania isn't for cultists. There.

>>6942376
Tranny Leftist Commie Pedophile Cuck Confirmed

>>6942692
Ready for your party to lose again in november?

>>6942752
Did you watch the debate last night? Trump was shouting and arguing before the topic was even said, Biden has this in the bag

>>6942771
Biden's answers were shit tho.

>>6923734
Best Christvania moment

>>6942771
It's obvious you didn't watch the debate. Trump mop the floor against Biden and the moderator.

videogames are, by definition, anti christian and if you're a practicing christian you should avoid them, you should also avoid the internet, and especially avoid a child porn website like this one

>>6937142
>It's witchcraft

Go on.

>>6923734
I dunno. Which one promotes molesting 3D children in Vatican City?

>>6942752
I'm a SEA monkee. My Worker's Socialist Party hardly won anything since the 60s. >>>/pol/

>>6942771
What delights me about Trump is how his support by fundamentalist Christians in particular highlights that they're all hypocrites who probably haven't actually read the teachings of Jesus and certainly don't follow them. They mostly want wealth and power and to insist that women shouldn't be allowed to have abortions because fetuses are people even though Moses' laws laid out in Exodus explicitly contradict that. But of course that would mean paying attention to what their book actually says which they have zero interest in.

They're all charlatans who don't actually believe the bible, but on the off chance it was true they're all going to burn in their own Hell. Good times!

>>6943346
>Moses said it's ok to have abortions
[Citation Needed]

>>6943346
The Talmud, which is pretty much the most evil thing ever created, is pro-abortion, so I think the Christans are right in being opposed to it.

Also, that Exodus line isn't about whether abortion is allowed or not.

>>6943346
>Not posting best regional version of the scene

>>6943416
>>6942967
gj fgt

>>6943383

you guys are a talmud expansion pack desu

>>6943360
Exodus 21:22-25 states that the penalty of a man attacking a pregnant woman causing her to miscarry carries a penalty for the assault, but not the penalty of murder which would be applied if he killed an actual person. By definition it does not consider an unborn fetus to be a person in the sense that the religious right pretends it should.

>>6943383
That you dipshits pick and choose which parts of your supposedly infallible holy text to follow and which not to is comedy gold already. But even if you only took the New Testament as the "true" bits, most fundamentalist Christians act in a way that displays they don't actually care about anything Jesus said.

It's easier to push a camel through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter heaven, but no one actually likes to hear that because what they really want is wealth and power in this world.

Fundamentalist Christians are some of the funniest people on earth. Full of empty rage and vengeance, praying to a demi-god who would boot them out of Heaven himself if he saw their true thoughts. Which if you actually believe... He does. :)

>>6943430
talmud was written after christianity, retard

>>6943416
IDK, I don't like all the added rays.

>>6943416
IDK, I don't like all the rays in that one. Mine looks more protestant anyhow.

>>6943454
>Exodus 21:22-25 states that the penalty of a man attacking a pregnant woman causing her to miscarry carries a penalty for the assault

You miss the part where it is by accident. Intentionally killing an unborn infant was unheard of back then, not just because they lacked post modern morality, but getting a dead baby outside of you is more trouble more often than it isn't especially with bronze age medicine and tools.

>>6943553
No I recognize all that. You miss the point where intentional or not, killing an unborn fetus is not considered the same as killing a real person. And this is just one of so many examples where people who claim to be Christian do and say things polar opposite to the teachings they supposedly uphold lol

>>6943346
>>6943454
Kys babykilling liberal scum.

>>6943454
>>6943503
Kike cock sucker

>>6933498
Oppai/milk meme belong in the garbage.

>>6943963
>>6943970
How very Christian of you. What I wonder is your favorite teaching that Jesus Christ imparted and how does it help you to lead a better and more moral life?

>>6943416
Castlevania definitely has some tight scenes and set pieces.
Im liking Chronicles right now tb honest.


>>6944093
>What I wonder is your favorite teaching that Jesus Christ imparted and how does it help you to lead a better and more moral life?

“Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword." Matthew 10:34

"But if anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a large millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea." Matthew 18:6

>>6943454
Psalm 139:13 "For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother’s womb."
Jeremiah 1:5 ''“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart.''
everyone is made in the image of God, beginning at conception.

>>6943553
>Intentionally killing an unborn infant was unheard of back then
Abortion would be seen as a form of child sacrifice and rightfully condemned as demonic.

>>6940427
what was it before?

>>6923739
I remember seeing the AVGN play it back in the day and it looked pretty fun.

>>6943454
Why do you redd*tors pretend like they understand the bible after picking out some verses? This is why prots cringe up the discussion and theology at play. Without authority and tradition, this book can be taken however you want without regard for the genre, its themes or anything.

>>6942967
Really nice graphics. I'm still going through Rondo atm but will try the classicvanias after.

>>6944585
>without tradition and authority
all apostolic churches, catholic and Orthodox, agree with mainline Protestants that abortion is murder, the church fathers taught the same. And regarding the quotes about Christ they agree he wasn't a hippie pacifist and will come again with righteous justice to judge the wicked and degenerate. So I'm confused as to what you're referring to.

>>6944610
is this canonically his love interest? Or is it his daughter

>>6944647
let's go with both,.

>>6944656
guess I'm playing this one, beats playing as a gay vampire

>>6940530
Never touched Last Bible games, but from what I get, most of them are medieval fantasies with Special on the Gamegear being set in Jerusalem.

Play Nocturne, I'm sure you'll love it.

>>6926203
>Protestants 100% dropped the ball by not saying DOOM is pro-christrian
ftfy

>>6923734
Clearly Captain Bible.

>>6944585
>It doesn't mean what it actually says, it means what people told me it should mean!

That might be one of the worst comebacks ever and simply again proves how there are virtually no real Christians. They don't read their own book and don't even care what it says. Nice appeal to Reddit lol