/vr/ - Retro Games

>>6735618
It’s an enhanced portmake of the, dare I say it, quintessential classic retro scotformer "Mario Madness" on the Nintendo NES.

>>6735618
Genuinely yes
Shame some autists are gonna come into this theead screeching about not retro for a 19 year old game, that is about as old as the Dreamcast which apparently IS retro

JUST WHAT I NEEDED

C'mon man

I think it's not retro, anon.
Didn't you learn your lesson by now?
>>6735634
Games on 20XX consoles go to /v/.
I mean you're 19 too but you're not retro, are you?

>>6735653
You seriously think they're doing this for any reason other than being a troublemaker? When somebody knows they can get a negative reaction, they'll keep doing it.

Gba isn't retro

>>6735618
Ports of retro games are allowed.

>>6735653
We’ve discussed this already, but the classic retro handheld GBA absolutely should be permitted. It is considered by most to be a continuation of the classic retro console SNES and its game library consists almost entirely of classic retro 2D style games. It has a strong retro vibe and soul for days. It really makes sense to be able to discuss classic 2D side scrolling action platformers such as Ninja Five-o, Astro Boy: Omega Factor and Lilo & Stitch, to name but a few titles in its vast library of retro classic 2D gems. Not to mention retro classics like the Castlevania, Fire Emblem, Densetsu no Starfy and Golden Sun series, as well as all of the undeniably retro classics that got left in Japan such as Tomato Adventure and Magical Vacation. Intelligent discussion of these 2D retro classic GBA titles will be an overall boon to the discourse on /vr/ and enhance board culture in general.

>>6735668
Based and, dare I say it, quintessentially retropilled.

>>6735664
I don't know, GBAutist could be a real autist and not just a shitposter. Either way, he'll get 404'd.

>>6735668
Haha shit, I should really save your pasta.

>>6735668
You can discuss rule changes you want on >>>/qa/
Not by spamming here.

>>6735675
Wow... what's the point in spamming us that much? We're not even a big board...

>>6735668
>GBA gets allowed
>WHY IS PS2 NOT ALLOWED? IT CAME BEFORE THE GBA1111!!
>PS2 gets allowed
>WHY IS THERE NO XBOX???? IT'S THE SAME GENERATION AS PS2
And this can go on, and on.

>>6735680
>what's the point in spamming us that much
If you only knew anon... this month has been a shitpost fest.

>>6735668
thanks for the suggestions bro, the gba is easily my favourite non retro system

>>6735684
Woah. This guy needs help.

>>6735691
And/or a permaban.

>it’s only one guy

>>6735684
I’m in here a few times, and I’m not the GBA guy.

>>6735697
It's kind of mindblowing.

>>6735705
Which of those zero-quality threads were you responsible for?

>>6735713
Pepe whispering "GameCube", and the one about games that would probably have been on a longer-lived Dreamcast.

>>6735684
aww my dreamcast shitposts didn't make it into the screencap, now i feel sad

>>6735634
you called it anon. just waiting for the schizo nonce who posted loli porn of roll from mega man to come in and start spamming mary kate and ashley carts

>>6735684
Majority of threads there are legit discussion about retro ports.

>>6735713
Anon, you’re on /vr/. Most of us are old enough to remember the PMRC ladies you seem to be trying to channel here, and let me tell you, acting like a finger-wagging schoolmarm is not a particularly effective way to discourage misbehavior, particularly on le 4chinz. In fact, it usually accomplishes just the opposite.

>>6735639
THIS IS AS FAR AS YOU GO

>>6735668
>classic retro 2D style games
I guess "classic retro 2D style" indie games should be allowed here too, right? I for one would love to see threads about Celeste here on /vr/!