/vr/ - Retro Games

Try /v/

>>6449754
NOT
RETRO

>>6449754
Not retro.

>>6449759
why? /v/ doesn't even play older games.

>>6449764
>>6449765
PS2 released 20 years ago the fuck are you talking about?

>>6449759
>>6449764
>>6449765
you guys can just report instead of replying.

>>6449770
>PS2 released 20 years ago the fuck are you talking about?
It can be considered retro depending on the person, but /vr/'s rules aren't about "X amount of time has passed"; it's about "before the year 2000. As you said, PS2 is from the year 2000, so that's not /vr/ territory.
I know, you will find it unfair, but that's the rules. The general consensus is that a /v2k/ board would be needed for discussing non-current, post-2000 vidya.

>>6449754
God I loved this game so much as a kid

>>6449770
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO PS2RINO NOT RETRO!

>>6449775
You already got btfo here >>6448208 so you can stop. Hiro isn't making making new vidya boards.

>>6449754
Theres a free open source program you can get called something i dont even remembered that emulates an xbox controller using inputs from a playstation controller

it's basically a dumb petty proprietary software and hardware compatibility thing and you need to download an app to make your PC think your Sony controller is a Microsoft controller because microsoft refuses to support compatibility

>>6449775
They should update the rules then, it's well past time. Setting a arbitrary date instead of basing it on console releases or lifespan is silly. Also good to see you guys have all the insufferable wojak posters here too.

>>6449783
I replied to you, check it out. Stop begging and being an entitled fuck. If you don't like /vr/, you aren't being held hostage, you can leave.

>>6449754
I just reset my PC's drivers and my PS4 controller worked fine.
You can also try Joy2key for some applications. Have fun.

>>6449780
technically correct because the ps5 has not been released also that cop deserved it when I shot him.

>>6449787
>Also good to see you guys have all the insufferable wojak posters here too.
The wojak poster(s) ITT is an actual 6th gen beggar being sarcastic, in case you couldn't tell.

>>6449785
You're talking about xbox360ce likely, I've used that before years ago, usually goes in the program folder right of the game in question?

>>6449790
and you're using it wired or via bluetooth? I don't have a bluetooth connection with this PC and i'm worried that's how all the fuckers have been getting by.

>>6449792
oh we are well beyond the point of being 'ironic' with these fags.

>>6449794
I only use my PS4 controller wired. Try going to reset this PC.

>>6449794
>You're talking about xbox360ce likely, I've used that before years ago, usually goes in the program folder right of the game in question?
just reread the instructions everytime you need to play something on pc like i do lmao

I never learned pc master race shit because of gatekeeper transcucks and free mason gaslighting

>>6449789
>I replied to you, check it out. Stop begging and being an entitled fuck.
>NOOOOO PLEASE NOTICE BOOMER SEMPAI I SAID 6TH GEN ISNT RETRO
Stop being an entitled to fuck to what retro means. If you can't handle the increased demand for bumping up the cutoff year, you can leave.

The thing about the 6th gen begging is that it's now sort of a personal thing.
People being angry at /vr/'s rules and /vr/ regulars is more important to them than actually discussing 6th gen. Let's be honest, you want 6th gen discussion? Plenty of places you can do it.
Some people just became obsessed and made it their life mission to "win" this war and get /vr/ to accept post-2000 gaming, just to spit on "boomers" or whatever.

>>6449803
>increased demand
Samefagging and making off topic threads isn't an "increased demand".

>>6449808
>It's not too crazy to think about more vidya boards
You can stop lying anytime zoomer fag.

I can barely wait to talk about my favorite retro game. I mean, it's been 5 WHOLE YEARS, guys. Come on, it's current year. There were so many memes that didn't exist in 2015, its like totally ancient now.

>>6449814
>5 WHOLE YEARS
Nice strawman, wait another 15 years.

>>6449813
Lying about what?

>>6449824
There's hardly any place to discuss 6th gen.

>>6449826
https://www.google.com/search?q=ps2+forums&oq=ps2+forums

>>6449817
Get with the time, gramps. The world needs to change and bend to MY will, including this board. It needs to change because MY childhood is retro and I SAY so.

Yeah I can see you guys have your own problems here. This is why being organized and having some kind of board culture instead of just arguing all the time goes a mile. I'll just head to a traditional forum

>>6449829
>a bunch of vbulletin shitholes
Like I said, quit lying.
>>6449830
Nice screencaping your own strawman there.

>>6449835
Yes, fuck off you nigger. Your thread couldn't be a more obvious bait. Leave and never come back.

>>6449838
>guy asks question
>questions why 6thgen isn't retro
>NO IT ALLOW SHITPOSTING
>ok i leave
>THATS RIGHT LEAVE NIGGER DONT DESECRATE OUR SACRED BOARD

>>6449837
>im a zoom that learnt a new word today, and youll be damn sure ill use it as much as possible

>>6449830
honestly the person who wrote that is so based i'd buy him hot wings

cause i know he only needs fuel for his own destruction

>>6449837
>Like I said, quit lying.
What's wrong with vbulletin though? Also no there's more than that, you've got Reddit :^)

If you want a moving set year then go to Reddit since they have boards like that for you.

>>6449845
His Mass Destruction, you could say
https://youtu.be/6jFaoLrLzd4

>>6449847
>What's wrong with vbulletin though?
Outdated cluttered format for discussion
>you've got Reddit
Yeah, no. Keep trying

>>6449854
No, you keep trying. You're pushing your shit where it doesn't belong, seek out somewhere where it does belong.

>>6449838
wasn't bait at all, just wanted to solve an emulation problem but your board is full of fags who wanna whine about bullshit instead of appreciating old vidya, so that's on you. by the way, i'm not the other poster you think I am.

>>6449858
>nooooooo you can't post on my slow moving board!

>>6449858
I'm not leaving because I also enjoy enjoy discussing old vidya. Deal with it and fuck off to some thread about the N64 being shit or why Treasure games are shit for your high quality /vr/ discussion.

>>6449863
Nothing wrong with slow moving boards.
>>6449872
Then discuss what pertains to the board and take other games to other boards. Others are capable of doing so, why can't you?

>>6449854
>Outdated cluttered format for discussion
Not an argument. What matters is the community, not the format. You could have great disucssions on BBS boards too.
>Yeah, no. Keep trying
I'm not trying anything, you are the one who is trying, and way too hard.
>>6449863
>slow moving board
Slow? /vr/ is more like middle-paced. There's other boards that are very slow, like /an/, and guess what? There's nothing wrong with that.
>>6449872
>Deal with it and fuck off to some thread about the N64 being shit or why Treasure games are shit for your high quality /vr/ discussion.
You're not really helping your case. 6th gen inclusion would only increase the console war shitposting.
In fact, I'd advocate for /v2k/ to include 5th gen too. /vr/ would have more space for discussing older gens like 2nd gen, or pinballs.

>>6449890
>>6449876
>nothing wrong with that
I don't think so either but it's amazing how hard up you guys get about gen 6.

>>6449891
It's not really about gen 6 as it is about enabling begging.
6th gen wouldn't be the problem, is would be the floodgates for other beggars. "7th gen is 15 years old, it's retro!"
And yeah, you could say "no, wait another 5 years, 20 years for something to be retro". But then they could say "And who are you to arbitrarily say how much amount of time has to pass for something to be retro?", etc, etc
It's just not worth it.

>>6449903
your post is exactly what I'm talking about, get a grip

>>6449906
>your posts is exactly what I'm talking about
But I just said gen 6 is not the problem?

>>6449903
No, 6th gen would literally destroy this board forever.

>>6449903
>enabling begging
You already capitulated to begging with Dreamcast.

>>6449890
No. /vr/ is slow. /an/ is dead.

>>6449908
why are you replying in bad faith, you know exactly what I mean.

>>6449912
DC is a different story altogether, because while the rules said "systems from 1999 and below", DC wasn't allowed, despite it being released in 1998 (1999 in USA, but still fits).
>>6449915
It's not though? Other boards who have a huge community, like /cgl/, are also pretty slow, but definitely not dead.
/vr/ is mid-paced, not slow. And again, nothing wrong with slow boards.
>>6449917
What bad faith? I'm genuinely telling you, I don't have a personal problem with 6th gen, I love many 6th gen games! It'd be stupid to hate an entire generation. The problem isn't 6th or 7th gen, it's the problems it'd bring to /vr/ in particular. The act of enabling begging, I mean. And again, DC was a different situation (plus, to be fair, DC is a special case as well for being Sega's final console, and having died barely a year into the 2000s)

All you idiots have to do is wait for the new generation to be announced. Just be patient.

With that said, GBA is the only one left that kinda feels retro. Xbox will never fucking ever feel retro no matter how old it gets

>>6449948
>what bad faith
Cute anon, well if you want to protect your ego and avoid dealing with your issues, be my guest.

>>6449960
>All you idiots have to do is wait for the new generation to be announced. Just be patient.
How is that going to make 6th gen be all retroactively be released before the year 2000?

>>6449910
discussing 4 additional consoles would destroy this board.
fuck it. bring it on. if that's all it takes, it's not worth saving.

>>6450140
It's the demographic that will come with it.

>>6450146
>nooooooo you can't post on my slow board!

>>6450147
I wish that were true, but alas, here you are.

>>6450151
so the truth comes out.

>>6450157
Sorry fren but there is an entire "fast" moving board for you to shit up.

>>6450140
These 4 additional consoles would enable more people to keep spamming the board for other 4+ consoles. It's a neverending cycle of shit.

>>6450161
>shit up
all I'm doing is asking you why you sperg out about Gen 6, is that shitposting to you?

>>6449783
Hiro not making a new board is really more YOUR problem. It doesn't change the rules of this one.

>>6450173
>da rules da rules da rules
You don't have much agency in your own life, do you?

>>6450170
Not him, but the main problem isn't "Gen 6", the problem is the constant begging for rules to accommodate for different people's own nostalgia and perception of time.
If 6th gen is allowed, then fuck it, allow 7th gen too, it's also "old" for a lot of people... same with early 8th gen, 2012 was 8 years ago, that's like a million years the way a younger person perceives time.
It's just not worth to open the pandora's box. /vr/ has worked with the pre-2000 rule so far, no need to change it. This is a board for a specific time period, not "anon's childhood" board.

>>6450170
Look at the sticky you retarded nigger.

>>6450179
>it's the begging
Sure it is anon. But like it or not, this is a containment board, and every gen will gradually find its way onto the board.

>>6450181
you didn't answer my question

>>6450184
Nobody is sperging out. This simply isn't the place for discussion of 6th gen consoles, as it clearly states in the sticky. Not that it matters because the mods here do fuck all.

>>6450189
>Nobody is sperging out
are you reading the same thread I am? And are you really going to die on this retarded hill that gen 6 is so wildly out of place?

>>6450179
You're right but let's face it, the PS2 was the pinnacle and the last good console. Millennialcucks don't care about it on /v/ and in here you can't talk about it. So where do you go? 6th Gen should be the last retro gen ever IMO and this is coming from someone who grew up with the NES.

>>6450182
>this is a containment board
Source? retro games were NEVER banned on /v/, as generals were when /vg/ was made because DOTA or TF2 generals infested the board all the time.. You can still go to /v/ and make any thread about any retro game.
I don't know why exactly moot decided to make /vr/, but containment sure wasn't a reason.

>>6450193
>/vr/ isn't a containment board
anon, i like pinball as much as anybody but come on

>>6450192
/v2k/.
We all have different opinions, I personally think 3D gaming isn't "retro", I'd actually vouch for 5th gen to also go to /v2k/ if it ever gets made, and leave 4th gen as the last retro generation.
Also, the archive isn't working for me right now, but I've seen successful 300+ replies 6th gen/ps2/gamecube threads on /v/. It may be hard to get them going, but it's possible. The problem with /v/ is the speed and traffic, not that they don't care about it. There's also the /vg/ option.

>>6450197
Can you counter this argument though?
>retro games were NEVER banned on /v/, as generals were when /vg/ was made because DOTA or TF2 generals infested the board all the time.. You can still go to /v/ and make any thread about any retro game.

>>6450191
I was speaking for myself. You can argue all day whether or not 6th gen belongs here. As of right now discussion of 6th gen consoles is supposed to be prohibited on this board. That is the only point I am trying to make anon.

>>6450198
>/vr/ board has abysmal traffic
>better go ahead and make a separate board for JUST gen 6

>>6450203
it's not the point you're trying to make but okay anon
>>6450201
The same reason you don't post pinball threads on /v/ anon

>>6450202
>>/vr/ board has abysmal traffic
Not really, it has a pretty steady traffic, it's a mid-paced board, not a slow one. If a thread doesn't get any replies, it will likely be archived in 24 hours or less. The very last thread in the catalog right now has a post made yesterday 15 PM, not even 24 hours yet.
>better go ahead and make a separate board for JUST gen 6
/v2k/ would be all 2000s games except current gen, so that'd include: PSP, NDS, PS3, Wii, WiiU, Xbox, Xbox 360, etc.

>>6450205
What other point could I possibly be trying to make other than this is not the place for discussion of 6th gen?

>>6450205
>The same reason you don't post pinball threads on /v/ anon
/vr/ wasn't made as a "containment" for Pinball threads anon... do you know what "containment" really means?

>>6450207
it's definitely a slow board anon, and your solution is mindbogglingly retarded when the board is as slow as it is. The reality here is that your autism won't let you see the light.

>>6450212
>>6450209
>arguing in bad faith
Go figure gen 6 autists think they're more clever than they really are, come on anon, is that really all you have to say? Misrepresenting my argument and trying to do damage control on your own?

They are going to allow 6th gen at some point. No use fighting about it.

I'm reporting and saging this bait thread. Yeah, I know both are bannable offenses and idgaf, just get out here, /v/niggers

>>6450221
only if you admit you have no interest in upholding the 'rules' of the board and simply don't like gen 6.

>>6450216
Look anon I am not going to argue further over something so simple. As of now this board is not for discussion of 6th gen consoles. Simple as. Go back to /v/ nigger

>>6450229
>Not going to argue further
You need to grow up and stop trying to save face when everyone can see your autism laid bare before their eyes in threads like these. I don't know why you feel so self-righteous about gen 6 but that's your issue anon.
>b-but muh rules!
stop it anon, we all know what this is about.

>>6450213
>it's definitely a slow board anon
Slow boards can get threads without replies up for more than 24 hours.

>>6450234
people starting diverse threads with minimal interaction doesn't mean this is a 'fast board'

>>6450235
Never claimed this is a fast board (that'd be /v/), this is a medium-paced board. Also, there is nothing wrong with actual slow boards.

>>6450245
I didn't say there was anything wrong with a slow board but starting a new containment board when this containment board is slow is profoundly retarded, and all of you niggers know this.
>medium paced board
I like that you ignored the 'tough' part of the post you quoted.

>>6450246
>containment
There's that word again. /vr/ isn't a containment board.
>I like that you ignored the 'tough' part of the post you quoted.
Your claim that threads here have minimal interaction? The last thread on the catalog right now, has 50 unique IPs.

>>6450251
>/vr/ isn't a containment board
one way or another that isn't a license to ignore other points
>50 unique IP's
this one has 18

>>6449754
not retro

>>6450253
>one way or another that isn't a license to ignore other points
What points? That /vr/ needs 6th gen? Again, that'd only open the gates for 7th gen begging questioning, just like how you're doing right now. No. /v2k/ is the most sensible solution, win-win.
>this one has 18
Yeah I guess not many people are interested in 6th gen after all, especially when probably more than half of those 18 IPs are against it.

>>6450261
>what points
why are you niggers always arguing in bad faith, pretending not to have read the conversation that you're substantially invested in (for some reason)?
>/v2k/
you need to admit that you just have an autistic attachment to this containment board and don't want to see it move any faster

>>6449754
>thread full of anti gen 6 spergs
>Dreamcast is fine though
Wonder why

>>6450301
1998.
Also premature death and Sega's last console. But really just 1998 is enough, fits the board's rules.
>Arbitrary!
Yes, rules are meant to be arbitrary.

>>6450303
>rules are meant to be arbitrary
what do you have against gen 6? why does the second playstation get you so angry?

>>6450306
>what do you have against gen 6? why does the second playstation get you so angry?
I don't have anything against 6th gen, I like the PS2 too.
Read: >>6450261
>Again, that'd only open the gates for 7th gen begging questioning, just like how you're doing right now. No. /v2k/ is the most sensible solution, win-win.

>>6450309
>only opens the gates for 7th gen begging
why? gen 6 and gen 7 were many years apart. Are you sure you aren't just arbitrarily gatekeeping because you want to indulge in your sega autism but not allow people to indulge in sony/MC autism?

While we're on topic, when can I expect Xbox emulation to get to PCSX2's level? Another 5 years?

>>6450312
>why? gen 6 and gen 7 were many years apart.
Well, the same way some people are saying "PS2 is retro now, it's been X amount of years", anyone could come up with the same questioning: "PS3 is X amounts of years already! It's retro! what do you have against 7th gen?", etc, etc.
It has nothing to do with indulging in specific consoles or brands, it's about not disrupting /vr/'s board culture. This is a board for pre-2000s gaming, simple as that.
I'm open for a /v2k/ board, I'd enjoy it and visit it.

>>6450316
What is the point of /v2k/ when there is /v/?

>>6450316
You're being disingenuous and you know it. Your cucked and retarded slippery slope argument won't actually postpone gen 6 being included on this board.
>/v2k/
isn't this one of the slowest boards on the site? why do we need another vidya containment board?

>>6450320
>won't actually postpone gen 6 being included on this board.
fine. fuck off until then

>>6450326
I think I'm gonna stick around and lobby for gen 6 tolerance anon, why should it just be sega that gets love?

>>6450317
Well, a lot of /v/ is current console warring, and when there's some new big game that comes out, or events like E3, the board goes crazy with the traffic. It's why /vr/ was made.
The point of /v2k/ would be to have a board to discuss modern 2K gaming that's not current gen, so you'd have PS2, GC, Xbox, Wii, PS3, Xbox, PSP, DS, etc, etc.... with all the console warring that those also bring, of course (which is the main reason it'd be harmful for /vr/).
>but then, allow 6th gen here as well
Yes but that'd mean allowing 7th gen too, otherwise we're going to have the same problem with people begging for it and questioning the rules all the time.

>>6450320
>isn't this one of the slowest boards on the site?
Not even close. Try browsing something other than /v/ and /pol/.
Sometimes fucking /mu/ is slower than /vr/.

>>6450330
>that'd mean allowing 7th gen too
stop this forced meme at once

>>6450334
>/mu/
i didn't realize you had such a low opinion of /vr/

>>6449754
Oh wtf. Fancy seeing this game here of all places. I fucking love this game.
You should head over to the AC general on /m/.

>>6450335
7th gen started in 2005 anon. There's 20 year olds who were 5 when Xbox 360 came out. What makes you think the begging won't start once 6th gen is allowed?

>>6450329
The PSX is allowed. Why have you spent all night trolling the autist here? lol

>>6450341
>what makes you think
brain usually anon
>antibegging autism
does your 4channel not come with filters?
>>6450342
what do you mean trolling?

>>6450340
Sadly this thread isn't about AC anon, it's just about /v/ wanting to change /vr/'s rules.

>>6450347
lol ok anon. have fun I guess.

>>6450348
>/v/
take your meds
>rules autism
this isn't about rules at all anon, why won't you admit that?

>>6449754
My solution is to separate 90's, 2000's and 2010's+ into a new board. Having this divide between young and old is harmful for the board.

>>6450350
yeah you too, you seem like a nice guy

>>6450348
I don't care. I'm just happy to see someone else who enjoys this game in the current year.

>>6450352
>Having this divide between young and old is harmful for the board

It's 4chan, dude. Get a grip. You sound like the type of fella who bought out all the eggs and toilet paper two months ago.

>>6449754
/2v/
/P2v/
/Mv/
2000's Video games
Pre-2000's video games
Modern video games
Easy fix and you can just go on each board for whatever you need.

>>6450376
>more boards is the solution
had a few too many pints already this morning?

>>6450376
>>6450352
/v2k/ is the suggested solution, and has been for many years now.

>>6450369
Well it's the facts.
A lot of stupid debate threads pop up and everyone just goes beserk. The board isn't the same anymore with all the newer and younger folk demanding sixth gen be retro too.

>>6450381
>autistically refuses to acknowledge the second playstation
>thinks it literally needs its own board
>posts on one of the slowest boards on the site in the meantime
why do you hate board traffic?

>>6450378
Yes and yes.
But a fools word may still be good. Or not I'm drunk.

>>6450386
>why do you hate board traffic?
We hate zoomers, not traffic

>>6450393
are you sure you don't just hate seeing yourself in the zoomers that post on here?

>>6450386
>the only 6th gen console is the second playstation
Also, /v2k/ would also include 7th gen. And once 9th gen rolls out, it'd include 8th gen as well.

>>6450386
I don't want it but the divide between old neckbeards and young geek zooms is to the point in which a debate happens every 3 days or so. If either side wins then the other will riot. Best just to separate the two.

>>6450396
why would it include 8th gen? why should /vr/ be such a niche containment board when it's already so slow?

>>6450386
>>posts on one of the slowest boards on the site
Not true. Visit boards other than /v/ some time.
t. /m/ goer.

>>6450402
I don't go on /v/ because it's all ad-posting, but /diy/ moves faster than this dinosaur board

>>6450401
>why would it include 8th gen?
Because /v2k/ would be for 2000s games other than current gen.
>so slow?
It's not that slow, it's mid-paced. Threads can get archived in less than 24 hours here while still getting 50+ unique IPs.
You want 6th gen because you think it's old enough to be /vr/, but there's also people who think 7th gen is old enough to be retro, too. And soon enough, kids who were toddlers when PS4 came out and are now teenagers will also think PS4 is retro, once PS5 comes out.

Young and old
Locked in perpetual combat
Months have passed, still going
Who'll win?

>>6450403
>but /diy/ moves faster than this dinosaur board
Why do you lie? It has less threads, and the last one in the catalog was made in May 15. Last reply from last friday.

>>6450406
>other than current gen
but current gen came out in the 2010s, would that need its own board too?

>>6450409
/diy/ threads get more than 20 replies, unlike this board. Face the facts anon.

>>6450410
No, once 9th gen is out, 8th would move to /v2k/. That's the idea, at least.
>>6450412
Not true, you keep lying. The last thread on the catalog of /diy/ has 5 unique IPs, 8 posts, and the last reply was last friday. Meanwhile, the last thread on the catalog here has 28 unique IPs, 50+ replies, and the last post was yesterday at 4 PM, not even 24 hours.
/vr/ is not as slow as you think it is.

>>6450414
Why would 8th gen move to /v2k/ if it came out in the 2010s not the 2000s

>>6450417
Well, the same way /vr/ isn't exclusively for only 1 decade, /v2k/ would encompass 2000 and onwards, not just the 2000s decade.
It's just an idea though, it could be /vm/ for Vidya Millennium or whatever. I personally think /v2k/ sounds/looks better.

>>6450420
that doesn't make any logical sense, and trying to forcefit it into the concept is only proof positive that the scope of /vr/ should merely be expanded

>>6450423
>proof positive that the scope of /vr/ should merely be expanded
Here's the thing, once we open the gates for 6th gen, 7th gen begging will start, and then if 7th gen is allowed, 8th gen begging will start.
Everyone has different perceptions of times, and different nostalgia, you may think PS2 is retro but PS3 isn't, but there's someone out there who thinks PS3 is perfectly retro, too.
So that would make /vr/ be a general video game board for practically everything except current gen. It depends on whether you think this is a good idea or not.
And before you think "no, but we could make the rules be that it needs 20 years to be retro", the same way you guys are questioning the rules now, new people could question the new rules and start spamming the board for the rules to be changed to 15 years, 10 years, or 5 years. it'd be a never-ending shitpost war until everyone gets "pleased"... and then what? And then... console wars. PS3 has no games! Wii U sucks! Xbox One sucks!... truly retro.

>>6450427
>7th gen begging will start
stop this forced meme

>>6450430
What makes you think it won't happen?

>>6450436
it's a silly slippery slope fallacy and either way a more rational temporal policy for the board would prevent it from happening. you're just an autist who can't stand gen6, but refuse to acknowledge the inherent contradiction in 'gen 6' not including the dreamcast.

>>6450437
If I couldn't stand gen 6, I'd just tell you to fuck off,report you for off-topic, and not even mention the possibility of /v2k/.
It's not a fallacy, I think it's a valid foresight. If you guys are so riled up about 6th gen not being included here, what makes you think 7th gen people will remain silent once 6th gen is allowed? After all, 7th gen is 15 years old. Who are you to arbitrarily claim 20 years have to pass for something to be retro? 10 years could be enough... yeah, it's not worth it. /v2k/ is just a more sane solution, I don't see how wanting a board for 2000s gaming is a bad thing, honestly. It'd leave /vr/ with its own culture, and we'd have a board for discussing 2000s game culture too. It's win-win.
I think you're just obsessed with wanting 6th gen here no matter what, but you're obviously against the idea of 7th gen being retro, so that's a bit unfair for people who are nostalgic for 7th gen, in their eyes.

>>6450443
Why are you being so disingenuous, is it really so tough to admit that you merely have an axe to grind with gen 6 and are attempting to gatekeep discussion of gen 6 for reasons other than "da rules"?
>I think you're just obsessed
what do you mean?

>>6450447
I'm being 100% honest, though.
>what do you mean?
You claim I'm autistic or a gatekeeper, but you're just as much into the whole discussion and being adamant about your views. I'm telling you that there could be another option, make another board, not only for 6th gen, but 7th gen and then every subsequent non-current gen, but you don't want that, you just want 6th gen here on /vr/. Your claim about /vr/ being a slow board has been proven wrong, also, /vr/ is a mid-paced board.
So, I ask you: Why are you against the idea of having a board for both 6th and 7th gen?
Otherwise, would you be OK with 7th gen being included on /vr/ along with 6th gen?

>>6450460
>adamant about my views
my view is that gatekeeping gen6 is silly considering you already allow part of it to be discussed. Why are you so hostile to that? If one Gen 7 console was already allowed on the board, I'd similarly find it strange that discussion of Gen 7 is prohibited.

>>6450179
Don't even pretend thats why, its so the retarded demographic gen 6 would bring doesnt pollute actually good discussion. I say this as someome who wants gen 6 here but id be monkey paw'd in an instant. Do you really want /v/ tier discussion? Utter shithole. If gen 6 could be discussed but the level of discussion could remain id do it in a heartbeat but you just know thatd never happen. Eh i guess we can ppst about gen 6 gems on emugen or something

>>6450464
No hardware made past 2000. You know exactly what /vr/ is, you choose to ignore to win a meaningless war. Do you realize people like you have the whole internet available to ruin? Why must you act like a pathetic little nigger that wants the one thing he's not allowed to have? I'm sure you will try very hard to find another semantic loophole to tell me how wrong I am or that pre 2000 PCs are technically able to run mid 2000s games. You're just pathetic.