/vr/ - Retro Games

>>6364881
1. Wear shirt
2. Put on a dress over it
3. While keeping the dress on, remove shirt from underneath
4. Congratulations, you did it!

>>6364895
I think what the OP is getting at is that if Kid slid the dress over her shirt then he would have already effectively seen her with it on. Instead the text seems to be saying that she slid the dress on *underneath* her shirt, which sounds... tricky at best.

>>6366550
At first I was visualizing a "taking off the bra under the shirt" sort of maneuver with a t shirt but I see what you're saying in which case they would probably be describing an oversized nightshirt. Either is fairly easy to visualize.

It's a plot hole! Cinema sins ding sound effect.

>>6366563
maybe the original text meant to convey 'under her vest'? She's supposed to be wearing a vest over a simple cloth shirt, probably a loose fitting one at that. Even knowing that though, I still have trouble envisioning her putting on that dress.

>>6364881
Whats this

>>6368568
It's a screenshot from the pathetic piece of trash "game" the ruined the chances of one of the best game's ever to have a proper, actual sequel.

>>6368568
Milking the Cash Cow: The Game

>>6368593
>cash cow
>Chrono Trigger

>>6368641
For Square (Enix), every single franchise of theirs is a cash cow. Not Nintendo tier of course, but still.

>>6366550
>>6366563
>>6364881
She slides the dress down OVER her shirt, anons. It's not rocket science
>>6368584
Fag tier take right here

>>6368584
>>6368593
Fuck off, Radical Dreamers is a nice little text based game is great visuals and awesome music, the hell is wrong with you people

>>6364881
That's kinda hot.

1) initial state
2) slide dress over peasant brown shirt
3) remove shirt

>>6368819
>>6368654
How do you guys keep missing the fact that Serge only sees what she looks like wearing the dress after she removes the shirt? If it was as simple as her sliding the dress over it, there would be no need for
>After a moment or two of shuffling around, she undoes her shirt and I see her wearing nothing but the silk dress
You normally don't have to "shuffle around" to slide a shirt off your body.

>>6364895
>>6366550
>Over

It says down. Down her shirt. If the shirt is big enough (which it sounds like a button-up or something similar), she could in theory step into it under her shirt, and then she would pull it up onto her shoulders, which places the dress under the shirt still, making it easy to undo it, leaving the dress.

The visual the text is going for is a reveal, only accomplished by removing clothing. Trying to put on a dress over heavier clothing would be very difficult, but doing it underneath would not be too difficult, and you would actually be able to zip it up underneath, which it sounds like she does based on the text, prior to undoing the shirt.

>>6368851
It's a normal expression. You're either autistic or some clueless foreigner. Here's an example you might understand >your mother slid down my huge throbbing cock last night

>>6368865
So we are on /b/ now?

>>6368873
More like /int/ except that it clearly does not stand for intelligence

>>6368865
Even if you take that as her sliding the dress down along the outside of her shirt, that still implies she steps into it, as she's lowering it. The shirt is still on top as to the rest of the text.

Generally though, your sister and daughters sliding down my fucking fire pole of a dick like they just graduated slutty little whore school is different than them sliding that same bursting hose down their tender hungry throats. You'll notice the language is similar but the action is different.

Unfortunately the framing of the OP text lends itself to both, which creates the confusing statement, and this thread.

>>6368848
>You normally don't have to "shuffle around" to slide a shirt off your body.
You do if it's under another article of clothing that you're trying to keep on.
>How do you guys keep missing the fact that Serge only sees what she looks like wearing the dress after she removes the shirt?
Because he does only see what she looks like wearing ONLY the dress after she removes her shirt.

>>6368687
reading is communism

>>6368935
That means everyone who uses 4chan is a communist.

>>6368935
Isn't communism anti-intellectual in the first place?

>>6368945
Only for things that don't praise the system, which automatically excludes 95% of all written text ever.

>>6368934
>Because he does only see what she looks like wearing ONLY the dress after she removes her shirt.
What kind of an autistic narrator makes an observation like that? If the dress went over the shirt then it covered the shirt, in which case she looks the same with or without it. It only makes sense if she slides the dress down and *under* her shirt.

>>6368584
Radical Dreamers is better than Chrono Cross in pretty much every way

>>6368641
I love this edit so much, thanks for this.

>>6364895
Girls are great at this kind of stuff. I have a sister.

>>6369396
If the Black Omen/Lavos is present across all timelines, how does killing Lavos cause the future to change?

>>6368956
>95% of written text
>things that don't praise the system
Seriously now, anon?

>>6369416
Just turn off your brain lmao

>>6368848
>>6369123
He was being polite. Gentlemen don't stare at girls tiddies while they change, they wine and dine them then sneak it in the butt

>>6369416
When was that determined?

>>6371539
When you could enter the Black Omen from any time period? And when they made changing the future the goal of the whole game?

>>6373557
Not him but you said timelines... that's not the same as the different eras the game takes place in. As far as Chrono Trigger is concerned you're only playing on one timeline that's constantly changing as the heroes go about their mission, culminating in the death of Lavos and the birth of a new future. As far as THAT particular future is concerned, it doesn't matter when you kill Lavos.

Letting the Black Omen sit in the sky for millenia would probably (definitely) fuck with how the world proceeds if not eliminated in the Dark Ages/Antiquity but CT doesn't concern itself with that. Barely anything changes in the Middle Ages and Present after the B.O. appears.

>>6369416
was it not dormant till 1999 anyway? that why you can no longer beat it in 2300
>>6373586
well of course the could ad more area and ending but it was already a lot for its time

>>6369123
>in which case she looks the same with or without it
Anon, do you know what a shirt is? Do you know what a dress is?