[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vr/ - Retro Games


View post   

File: 9 KB, 332x79, logo.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
468619 No.468619 [Reply] [Original]

Emulation thread!

What's the best snes emulator?

Also emulation general!

>> No.468651

I tried snes9x the last couple days but I found one glaring flaw. You couldn't go diagonal directions using the D-pad. You had to use analog stick which is shit. Trying to use Dpad to go diagonal directions resulted in going 1 step down and then just stopping.

So I went back to Zsnes 1.51 myself.

I hear bsnes is good if you want accuracy, but i hear it's a mess to fiddle with and has high requirements.

>> No.468646

>pic certainly not related

nice way to start a thread faggot.

>> No.468661

Guaranteed replies?

There is no "best". There is most accurate, most portable, most faithful, most updated, easiest to use, most comfy UI, etc. Just try the ones available to your system(s) and figure out which one works best.

Personally, I use ZSNES in Dosbox and it is fine for all I need it for (and is comfy). I use Snes9xTYLcm 0.4.2 Mod Rev 11 on PSP because it is the best one I've tried (not saying much).

>> No.468682

>>468646
/v/ pls go

>> No.468680

zsnes for compatibility, snes9x for ui.

the creator of bsnes/higan comes here so get ready for a shitstorm.

>> No.468693

>>468619
>What's the best snes emulator?
ur just tryin to trick us into arguing again aren't u

The best emulator in terms of actual emulation is bSNES bar none because it accurately emulates the SNES more or less perfectly. Arguably the most usable nowadays is SNES9X, but that debatable. ZSNES is old, but runs on rocks. Plus, dat interface is sex. A lot of people still like it and, for the most part, will run most games you throw at it without issue.

Ultimately, you should use what you want. If you like ZSNES for the games you play, there's no reason to switch. Me, I use the bSNES core in RetroArch because I can run it, I'm impartial to whatever software I use (if something better comes along, I see no reason not to use to) and I actually play the, what? 9? 10 games that only work perfectly in bSNES?

Ultimately, just use what works for you.

>> No.468702

>>468661
I wonder if that's the same version I use on my PSP.
Tweaking settings, I managed F-Zero at full speed, IIRC.
All the Euphoria builds were so damn buggy...

For general emulation, I use SNES9x because it's a balance of accurate and fast. Any time I have tried bsnes, it rapes my computers, and I can't stand the sound in zsnes (which I am damned to use for certain SMW rom hacks).

>> No.468705

>>468619
>Whats the best
>Posts the worst

Gr8 b8 m8

>> No.468716

>>468702
New version a couple of days ago, test it but make a backup.

http://www.emucr.com/2013/04/snes9xtylmecmcm-v042-mod-r11.html

>> No.468730

>>468693
Oh, and your emulation general is here.
>>>/vg/32319057
Also, emulation general wiki: http://emulation-general.wikia.com/wiki/Emulation_General_Wiki

>> No.468732
File: 20 KB, 468x331, snes-wii-controller.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
468732

I use Snes9GX on my wii, it is awesome and works perfect.

>> No.468742

>>468693
if bsnes is the most accurate, then why isn't it hailed as the best? Does accuracy not necessarily mean playability?

>> No.468734

>>468716
I thought PSP emulation was dead...
I guess the Vita is giving it a small surge?

>> No.468750

Best emu for SNES?
Most accurate is definitely bsnes, now part of Higan.
Higan is pretty much the most accurate emulator for any system it emulates.
Project64 is the most accurate for N64, while Mupen(spelling might be off) is the choice of TASers.

>> No.468753

>>468702
I used Euphoria R2 2 years ago to play a while, then gave up and went back to desktop. I recently tried R5 and it was a clusterfart. Game lockups whenever I accessed the menu, sound loss, insane lag on screen wipe, etc. So I tried TYLcm Rev 3, and it was awesome except for the inability to load/save. I then tried Rev 11, and it fixed that part, but then the home button stopped working (can't access PSP menu OR Snes9x menu). But I can tolerate that. Worked on the dozen or so games I tried so far.

Here is the thread for the TYLcm revs: http://wololo.net/talk/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=31563

>> No.468745

I hate the zsnes interface.

>> No.468756

>>468734
Some emus are dead, some aren´t.

>> No.468757

>>468742
It also lacks good filters. Zsnes has kept itself up high merely by having decent filters.

>> No.468763

>>468742

high system requirements

>> No.468772

>>468742
bsnes isn't optimized, so running skyrim on max doesn't mean you can run snes roms perfect speed unfortunately.

>> No.468776

>>468742
It's very costly in terms of require specs. A lot of people actually have trouble running it. Part of this is due to its high level accuracy. The other part is because it's really unoptimized. It also has some pretty oblong file requirements, as well, and I'm not a fan of its interface.

I get over the last two due to using RetroArch and I get over the first because my computer is fairly new. That said, I still can't run the accuracy core, so eh.

>>468757
I use a lot of the shaders in RetroArch that are meant for bSNES and they work just fine. Unless you meant something else.

>> No.468783

>>468763
Doesn't Higan need like a core2duo minimum for the most accurate emulation?
That's compared with my old PC, with a Sempron Single Core 2.3GHz, that could run PJ64 flawlessly.

>> No.468802

>>468651
>You couldn't go diagonal directions using the D-pad
Confirmed for can't read good disorder.

>> No.468803

>>468783
You pretty much need an i7 for the accuracy core. So no. The performance and balance cores run fine, though. And, IIRC, you only need the accuracy core for, what? One game?

For reference, I just built my computer last January. I have an FX-6300; not a bad processor by no means for the price. I cannot run the accuracy core without slowdowns.

>> No.468807

>>468651
Could use diagnols myself just fine. Seems to be an issue on your end, m8.

>> No.468815

>>468742
>then why isn't it hailed as the best?

You need to do a cuple of things the first time, you run program to import your games to the bsnes library, take 10 minutes to sync your video and audio to prevent sound crakling and shit.

Some people have problems browsing folders, reading, the usual things.

Also, toasters don´t run it, pople get defensive.

>> No.468829

>>468783
>run PJ64 flawlessly.
We can only dream.

>> No.468823

>>468803
3770k here, accuracy runs fine.
Not saying much though. The fact that the fan speeds up when I start the emu isn't a good sign.

>> No.468846

>>468757
First of all ....

>Filters

Also, Pixelate filter on higan looks much better, and you can add most opengl filters, many already converted for use on higan.

But the creator gives no fucks, you need to compile that shit yourself.

>> No.468848
File: 176 KB, 619x597, FILTERS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
468848

>>468757
>filters

>> No.468849

>>468823
To be fair, I was testing the Accuracy core with one of the Megaman X games which are considered currently the most costly thing to emulate. That, and the Yoshi's Island title screen. Actual gameplay ran just fine.

Still, though, my fan would kick up, too.
Somehow, I don't feel like that should be happening with SNES emulation.

>> No.468867

>>468772
"optimised" is the wrong word for this, I think.

>> No.468897

>>468803
I can run acuracy on an i5 with 20% cpu use. most poeple have shit computers, either hardware or setups. Some people think a laptop i5 and an "m" gpu gaming oriented .....

>> No.468908

>>468897
I was being hyperbolic.
The point is that you do tend to need a better CPU for Accuracy.
With a Core2Duo, you'd probably be fine with Balance or Performance for sure, though.

>> No.468918

>>468772
what´s this thread abou ..

>bsnes isn't optimized

Words some read on 4chan and now we think we actually understand ?

My turn, console port!

>> No.468939

Hey bros, wanted to give Higan a test run and I was wondering how best to import saves and shit? I got how the game importing works, but where do I put saves and states?

Also, where would I put patches for soft auto-patching?

>> No.468940
File: 459 KB, 1204x944, x1_11-15-2012.jpg [6].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
468940

>>468848
>2013
>Still enforcing a shitty meme
>Especially when most emulators ship with broken filters

>> No.468934

>>468908
The thing is, compared to the rest of emus, any higan version does better, but people get buthurt when they can´t run the accuracy build.

>> No.468945

>>468939
Oh, I've been using ZSNES if it helps any, but last I checked .savs work with everything I think. States might not, though.

>> No.468963

>>468939
Well I imported libraries for all systems, on batch with purify, so all my saves got imported automatically. I guess it just checks every file on those folders.

>> No.468971

>>468934
That's something I don't understand either. Like I said in my one post, you really only need Accuracy for, maybe, one game. Performance itself only has issues with, maybe, four games. I can get not liking some of the other requirements with higan like the file requirements or whatever, but even then, you can bypass that with RetroArch.

I can get if you have a preference with your software. Like, if you prefer ZSNES because of its interface or you don't need higan's accuracy. But there are people who shit on it just because they can't run it. I don't understand.

>> No.468974
File: 2.99 MB, 320x180, 1365235485154.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
468974

>>468940

>> No.468984

>>468940
It´s a matter of taste, to me that looks horrible, you are actually obstructing the image and claming it looks better than clean and sharp. Still not as bad as smudging everything and calling it smooth ....

>> No.468987

>>468940
>using filters.

>> No.468990

>>468945
Save states won´t.

>> No.469003

How do I convert all my .smc files to .sfc for Higan?

>> No.468996

>>468867
It can be spelled both ways, and yeah bsnes is optimized poorly.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/optimized
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/optimised

>>468918
Either you're retarded, or just trying to start arguments.

>> No.469010

>>468971
You can load any file with higan, but it´s just better to import a whole folder with purify, and then you just play from the library.

i´ve been using MAME for a decade, so i´m used to it I guess.

>> No.469004

>>468971
>I don't understand.
Some people are just pissants like that.
And of course there's always bandwagoners.

>> No.469016

>>469014
accuracy*

>> No.469018

>>469003
Use SNES purify v01 (can't find this shit anywhere now) or use the newest SNES purify to have higan set up its own directory structure.

Or rename them to .sfc

Or use the bSNES core in RetroArch (since it doesn't matter what they're named in RetroArch, really).

>> No.469014

bSNES v88 accurace profile.

Higan has added nothing worthwhile to SNES emulation and has actually gone a few steps back due to byuu's new ass-backwards library system that requires you to import ROMs to a specified destination that you cannot change.

bSNES v88 runs every commercial SNES/SFC ROM perfectly.

>> No.469024

>>469003
Download the latest purify, batch convert your whole older and it automatically apears on higan library when you run theemu.

>> No.469036

>>468996
>bsnes is optimized poorly

You're an idiot. bsnes is optimized very well considering it's emulating low level functions. The system requirements are high because that's what it takes to emulate accurately.

>> No.469032

>>469003
https://code.google.com/p/higan/downloads/list

Just get the lastes stuff that runs on your CPU architechture and OS.

>> No.469042

currently using bsnes (or rather, bsnes core in retro arch), because of retroarchs multiplatform compatibility, both in what systems in it can emulate and on which OSs / devices it runs
should retroarch one day get a good UI and a library function like MAME, I'll probably use it for emulating everything

>> No.469053

Why are there always arguments over SNES emulators? Why are there never any arguments overs NES or Game Boy emulators?

>> No.469060

>>468996
Higan is CPU intensive, there is a build for several architectures and OSes.

You seem to think this is a GTA 4 on realse or a "wait for new GPU drivers" kind of situation, you ARE using the term wrong.

You either have the horse power or your don´t.

>> No.469067

>>469053
Because there are people who are still stuck in a 90s mentality with SNES emulators when there are much better options than ZSNES.

With NES emulators you pick either FCEUX or Nestopia and Game Boy emulators either VBA-M or Gambatte.

>> No.469073

>>469053
Because people want to start arguments. Some users tend to have a hate boner for bSNES and people who use bSNES tend to defend it until their death.

Really, people should just use what they want.

>> No.469091

>>469024
I downloaded purify. Selected the folder with all my roms. It ran. Were di it put those files? It didn't ask me to select an output path.

>> No.469092

Well, got my stuff batch converted, now how do I move my .savs over? Just put them in the same folder as the manifest.bml and program.rom? Do I have to name them something?

>> No.469109

>>469091
Somewhere under your home folder.
.Application Data\Roaming\higan or something like that. Higan's purify has weird file requirements and locations.

When you go to load the games in your library, it will give the exact location

>> No.469098

>>469091
Ok, you actually want to know ?, the emulator knows where, and you can´t move them. just run the emu and everything should work.

>> No.469101

>>469092

Save files are "save.ram"

>> No.469116

>>469036
>bsnes is optimized very well
Byuu plz leave

>>469060
No one mentioned gta 4. You didn't even view the definition and are assuming optimized only refers to porting rather than piss-poor coding.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/optimized

>> No.469113

>>469092
If the saves are compatible, and wre on the same folder of the roms, they were already imported and will work.

>> No.469120

>>469113
Oh, so I guess ZSNES saves don't get ported over? Sucks to be me.

>> No.469126

>>468619
>What's the best snes emulator?
Whichever one happens to be installed at the time. The differences are so minor it's pathetic that people nitpick little things that aren't emulated right. If I can play the game easily and without glaring issues, that's all that matters to me.

>> No.469127

>>469116

oh hai mudlord

>> No.469129

>>469109
I went to my appdata\roaming\higan folder.
all I see are 3.cfg files.
I want all my roms in a clean .sfc format so I can back them up and be done with it.

>> No.469131

>>469120
I have never tried, some of my snes9x ones worked tho, and i didn´t have to move anything around. Maybe not ...

>> No.469140

>>469126
>If I can play the game easily and YOU can´t actually tell if there is a glaring issue, thats all that matters

FTFY

>> No.469146

>>469129
that´s not the place, the folder is called emulation, not higan.

But once again, you don´t need to move them, and you can´t.

>> No.469159

>>469140
>autist detected

>> No.469160

>>468742
SMW hacks tend not to work on it because they aren't usually made with the actual hardware in mind. I actually recall hearing something about a lot of music hacks causing them to crash on flash carts? I'd have to look it up again.

>> No.469169
File: 93 KB, 251x231, 1347780651142.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
469169

>nobody posting SNESGT
Am I really the only person that cares about Satellaview Emulation?

>> No.469175

>>469159
>Dude, maybe a fag, maybe not, that only plays mario and zelda games detected

>> No.469184

>>469160
Use bzsnes, it runs super gameboy!.

>> No.469186

>>469146
so what you're saying is that if/when I get a new computer or decide to reformat for any reason I have to reconvert all my .smc files again?
I think i may just stick my SNES9X if that's the case :\

Also how can I not move them? When I open Higan it allows me to chose my library locations.

>> No.469190

>>469116
Except it is.

For example, the Digital Integrated Circuit Emulator (DICE) struggles to run at a stable FPS on even the beefiest hardware because it emulates games like Pong at the circuit level.

But if you want reasonable accuracy with out such high requirements, use Snes9x 1.5.3.

>> No.469183

>What's the best snes emulator?

1. RetroArch with bSNES or SNES9x cores
2. higan
3. SNES9x 1.54 git builds
4. SNESGT

Don't use ZSNES, at least not until they come out with ZSNES 2.0, because the current version is way behind all the other emulators since 1.51 is deprecated

>> No.469198

>>469160

There was some issues with the addmusic tool that let you set an echo value that would overflow on the real console, overwrite the program data in RAM and crash the game.

>> No.469202

>>469146
Now that you mentioned it was Emulation though I found it. And I can move all of them.

>> No.469203

>>469169
But how mate, they are missing data from the bradcasts, best you can hope for are hacked restored rooms like the zelda ones.

The satellaview situation will be all too common once the always online era starts, you will be rebuying every game and most of them won´t get rerealesed..........

>> No.469206

I'd really like some advice from you guys. I'm currently using a wii classic controller pro and emulators on my wii. The wii u pro controller is selling for significantly more than a PS2 to USB controller where I live but it would be incredibly useful. Has anyone used the wii u controller on their pc ?

>> No.469209

>>469175
>child of the 90s detected

>> No.469217

>>469186
No, you can move them to another computer, but they will have to be in that same folder. You don´t know much about computers right ?

>> No.469234

>>469169
I would love to see it implemented, but much like the DD for N64, it's not well known outside of Japan, and doesn't seem to attract a lot of attention.

>>469160
Forget even getting to hardware. A lot of them won't run in anything but zsnes. Mario Gives Up just yells at you in SNES9x until it freezes... I wouldn't even try it in bsnes.

>>468753
I've had this really old version for a long time. I don't know if I said it already, but I had F-Zero (NTSC) running at 60 FPS (via magic, I can only guess). Granted, I couldn't get DKC to run well.
Thanks for the link, too! I forget to check Wololo.

>>468756
I know Daedalus gets updates on a decent basis. I saw that the NeoGeo or CPS1/2 emulator also got an update somewhat recently...

>> No.469242

>>469209
> Ad hominem

>> No.469254

>>469217
Apparently I know a lot more about computers than you do. Because I just moved all my ROMs to exactly where I wanted them C:\EMULATORS\Higan\Super Famicom.sys\ROMS
No fucking problem.

>> No.469263

>>469203
B-b-but muh Earthbound-like hub
and m-muh enhanced versions of great games.
The Satellaview just interests me entirely. Gaming in a manner similar to TV or Radio Broadcasts. Not to mention, once you had the system, you were good to go. No paying for games, either.
I know there must be a way to get that info back somehow, people just need to be interested enough into it (of which will never happen)

>> No.469276

I still use ZSNES for most games. Though if I find one that doesn't work I use SNES9x, I can't be bothered setting all of my roms up for byuu.

>> No.469280

>>469120
Saves should have went over.

>> No.469289

>>469254
You just made my day, you thought I meant it was physically imposible for you to move them ?, I was speaking "dummy" so you just let them be, since it´s entirely unnecesary to move them, and you actually believed me.

It´s pointless, the default folder is unchangeable, you just rendered the home button useless.

>> No.469296

>>469186
Alternatively, you could also use RetroArch with the bSNES core. RetroArch doesn't give a shit what you call your files or saves. And then you'll still get the accuracy.

>> No.469303

>>469263
That info might be in Nintendo HQ, maybe. It´s not a sure thing, people loose files or just throw them away.

>> No.469306

>>469289

The next version of higan is supposed to allow you to set the default location.

>> No.469314

>>469306
Oh, good then.

>> No.469325

>>469296
Also, since I'm thinking about it, SNES purify v01, the original one, use to let you just convert to SFC. I can't find it any fucking where on the internet anymore, but if you just want SFC files but without using higan's folder structure, you could also hunt that down.

>> No.469337

>>469325
I'll also throw out there too that Emuparadise's SNES roms are all converted into correct SFC format for bSNES already, so you could also redownload some of your games, if you want. It's a pain to do so, but I'm just letting you know.

>> No.469341

>>469289
>you thought I meant it was physically imposible for you to move them ?
No. I thought you were being a computer illiterate retard who probably installs everything in /Program Files/ because you don't know how to change directories.>>469289

>It´s pointless, the default folder is unchangeable, you just rendered the home button useless.
I don't need to push the Home Button when I'm at MY home directory.

>> No.469358

>>469325
Whats the deal with the folder structure ? why is it bothersome for some, you never actually see them, you import on batch and all of suddenly apears on the emulators library, since you don´t browse games one by one, i don´t see whats the problem.

MAME has a library gui too, if tomorrow they release a tool to convert your rooms to folder structure, i honestly wouldn´t care, i don´t go to the windows browser to play MAME games, they are all on list !

I´m guessing you do something with your roms, something that requires you to look around for them instead of just loading them from the emu.

>> No.469369

>>469358
On second thought. I would care, they need to be ziped, that library is huge.

>> No.469384

>>469358
I switch around from emulator to emulator a lot and the new format isn't in SFC but in some strange naming style. Really, though, I don't honestly care. I was using higan with its folder structure just fine for a while. I started using RetroArch since I wanted to consolidate everything I was using into pretty much one piece of software since I was already using a bunch of individual emulators that make up RetroArch's cores and I figured it'd make things easier with only one thing to configure.

I'm just saying that if somebody doesn't want to use higan's folder structure, or if they just want to convert their collection to headerless SFC files for back-up purposes with another emulator, it's possible to do so with the original snespurify.

>> No.469430

>>469384
Ahhh, ok.

>> No.469439

>emulators
Maximum pleb

>> No.469443

>>469439
>Guaranteed replies

>> No.469464

ZSNES is fine. I've used it for over seven years with no real complaints.

>but muh Higan
>muh sound quality

Fuck off, it's not even that big of a deal. Let people choose their emulators for themselves. ZSNES is perfectly viable in 2013.

>> No.469496

>>469464
Considering OP asked for best emulator, I'm assuming he wanted recommendations. Which is why I posted >>468693 and >>468730

That said, I pretty much agree.

Unless you have a reason or want to, you don't have to run higan.
Just whatever, you know?

>> No.469489

>>469464

And seven years is how long it's gone without updating. Seriously, ZSNES is deprecated, and is only useful for very old machines from the late 90s. There's no reason to use it if you're using modern PC, SNES9x, bSNES, and SNESGT all have better emulation of the SNES.

>> No.469520
File: 186 KB, 960x720, it's kind of a bitch to save the game though.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
469520

i really wish goomba color still updated

ah well, works well enough for most games (apart from the monster that is shantae)

>> No.469539

>>469464

Windows 98 is fine. I've used it for over seven years with no real complaints.

>but muh Windows 7
>muh updated drivers

Fuck off, it's not even that big of a deal. Let people choose their emulators for themselves. Windows 98 is perfectly viable in 2013.

>> No.469551

>>469539
If people like it, sure. I'm not going to tell them what to do. I'd highly recommend going to 7 or later since you'll probably be more protected and have newer features, but if that's what you like, it's whatever.

Do what you need.

>> No.469550

>>469539

>comparing operating systems to emulators

toplel.png

>> No.469557

>>469520
How hard is it to find a GBA Micro with Famicom colors for a reasonable price?

>> No.469556

>>469520
>a tiny image on an even tinier screen
Don't your eyes hurt after playing that?

>> No.469575

>>469539
I miss 98. It was the only Windows OS that never gave me any problems at all.

>> No.469573

>>469539

You've been using Windows 98 since 2006? Do you live in Afghanistan or something?

>> No.469627

>>469067
>not using Nesticle because the icon is a testicle

>> No.469664

>>469556
nope, it looks crystal clear, you can't really appreciate it in that shitty picture

i'm pretty sure i still have a functioning gbc around somewhere, but i can't ever go back to a non-backlit screen

>>469557
no idea, i nabbed mine at a massive discount off playasia back when they were clearing their stock

>> No.469675

>>468776
>>468772
>isn't optimized
>really unoptimized

has this actually been confirmed? I've heard this multiple times before, but with no evidence or explanation, it's only conjecture.

>> No.469697

>>469675
I'll admit that I'm probably wrong with that. I should have probably worded it as slightly unoptimized, but even then, that seems to be a non-issue in the newest higan.

For reference, when running an older version of bSNES on this computer, I could barely run it. With the newest higan, I can run everything just fine.

At this point, I'd say it's probably wrong and that I was mistaken to mention it.

>> No.469705

>>468693
> Plus, dat interface is sex
Are you kidding? I can't stand that shitty UI.

>> No.469715

>>469705
Nope, I like it.
It's okay if you don't, though. There are plenty of alternative emulators that work better than ZSNES as a whole, so you're more than open to use them.

>> No.469759

>download Kawaks
>playin beat'em ups like hell yes
>want to play non-Capcom arcade games
>download MAME
What the fuck is this shit I just want to play Tekken.

Any recommended alternatives to MAME?

>> No.469791

>>469675

Supposedly byuu prioritizes code readability over code optimization but I don't know how much that affects anything since the compiler does optimizations itself.

>> No.469907
File: 49 KB, 491x349, sadfrog.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
469907

is there some sort of gooogle docs that compares all the objective features of the different emulators?

I'd make one but I am very unlearned in these details

>> No.470010

>>469791
Well you could compile it yourself on the instruction set preffered. AN 15 or 17 would run even better on AVX right ?

>> No.470013

>>470010
Wow, I have no idea how that happened, I meant i5 and i7.

>> No.470030

>>470013
Been reading some avx comics?

>> No.470062

>>469705
Zsnes has its own nostalgia.

>> No.470081

>>469907
Unfortunately, no, not that I'm aware of. Your best bet is to do some research about what you need and just try out different bits of software.

>> No.470103
File: 47 KB, 509x285, snes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
470103

>>468651
>You couldn't go diagonal directions using the D-pad.
Nigga, you dumb.

>> No.470632

>>468802
>>468807
>>470103

trying to define those functions with the D-pad on my controller didn't work. You literally need 8 separate buttons.

>> No.470652

>>470632
The pads that don't have Up-left and the like usually work just fine without them assigned

>> No.470728

>>470652

wasn't working for me, I'd hit down/right and Link would move 1 step down and then face right and just stop.

>> No.470770

>>470728
Weird. Did you try mapping diagonals to diagonal button presses?
My friend had to do that with his pad.

>> No.470872

>>470770

first thing I tried.

This was how it went:

>Why will Link only move in 4 directions?
>go to input options
>check box for enabling diagonals
>try to assign buttons
>it keeps putting it as one of the 4 PoV hat buttons (the D-Pad is recognized as PoV hat on a joystick)
>cancel
>go back in
>check enable again
>ok
>go back to playing
>try to move diagonal down/right
>Link moves 1 step down, turns right, stops
>go back into input options
>make directional controls with analog stick instead
>enable diagonals
>ok
>go to play
>it works, but using the analog stick to move in a 2D game is sloppier than using D-pad
>Link skirts around pots I want to pick up instead of walking into them so I can grab them


It's just not as good for 2D.

So I'm back to Zsnes.

>> No.470925

>>470872
eh i guess

retroarch also has snes9x core, as well.
if you wanted, you could try that

>> No.470958

>>470925

I'm not too bothered, I only tried snes9x because people claimed it was 'better" but frankly all I noticed was that bug and the fact that Snes9x has a gross smoothing filter enabled by default.

>> No.470969

>>469759
how about you actually look up how to use one of the most capable and popular emulators instead of being a lazy shit. If you're that lazy just download the goddamn playstation version

>> No.471015

>>469759
Final Burn...maybe?

>> No.471120

whats better psxfin or epsxe

>> No.471135

>>470958

SNES9x has better emulation all around and the libretro version doesn't have either of those issues you're talking about.

>> No.471145

>>471120

Mednafen and PCSX-Reloaded

>> No.471159

snes9x-gtk > snes9x on Windows

>> No.472089

>>470958
>I only tried snes9x because people claimed it was 'better"

It IS better. I used to primarily use zsnes as well, but as soon as I heard more accurate sounds and less buggy visualizations in a large number of games, I made the switch. I'd switch to bsnes if I could, but my computer can't run it for now.

>> No.472132

>>468732
Is this a legitimate Nintendo product?

>> No.472138

>>468619
Use ZSNES or Snes9x for ease of use, or BSNES for accuracy, if your computer's a tank. I don't think there's a single official ROM that can't be played.

>> No.472148

>>472138
>zsnes of snex9x for ease of use
>zsnes

Zsnes is not easier to use than bsnes or snes9x.

>> No.472192
File: 24 KB, 640x480, gfs_11288_2_60.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
472192

>there will never be a decent saturn emulator

>> No.472232

>>472148
Computers aren´t really harder to use than consoles either......

>> No.472247

>>472192
Not a lot of games that interest me there, but I thought SSF was doing good, I played SotN there, it ran rather bad, but it ran like that on the actual saurnt.

>> No.472263

>>472192
Saturn is just a bitch in every way.
People hated coding for it, because of the hardware.
Now the emulation of said hardware is even worse.

>> No.472270

>>472192
>not using SSF

>> No.472394

>>472192
SSF is pretty much your best bet.

........though from my experience (shit comp and all) it's definitely not the perfect one but it was getting there.

>> No.472414

>>472148
I'd imagine it's "easier" to use in that "It's easier for me to keep using this piece of shit that I downloaded eight years ago than it is for me to put the tiniest bit of effort into finding something better."

>> No.472537

>>472414
Pretty much

>> No.472551

>>468651
You have to set up the diagonals for the Dpad on the input configuration window too, take a look

>> No.472610
File: 69 KB, 696x204, mednafen.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
472610

>>468680
>>468693
>>468750
Hey, how does this compare to other emulators that incorporate BSNES? i know it's slow, but is it any worse than others?

>> No.472992

>>472610

It's using a very old version of bsnes with some patches, but I've never used it so I don't know how well it runs.

>> No.473145

>>472610
It is certainly not bsnes level of slowness. On my system it load only 25% of one core of Core 2 duo.

>> No.473220
File: 2 KB, 125x87, 1351986460155s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
473220

http://nocash.emubase.de/sns.htm

I don't want to start a fight or anything, but why people just assume no$sns is a speedhack fest with specific game fixes when it features a debugger/VRAM viewer/IO maps proving it can run and check any straight code and view the results on the supposedly emulated machine? Like, you could make your own games, or reassemble stuff from the ROM trying to trigger inaccuracy bugs and then he couldn't know what the code in question was to adlib a fix on the go like some cheap game-related hack. I don't think he's trying to fool anyone if he includes a debugger.
Assuming this, its emulator is still more accurate than Snes9x under certain constraints, while less on others (he still has to implement a couple of final features and hi-res mode). Like Yoshi's Tetris Attack VS screen, it still glitches on Snes9x and bsnes non-accuracy core, while it runs flawlessly on no$sns, designed for pre-2000 computers. I didn't even use other emulators by the guy before and I know he was in for some jewish shenanigan, but he says he works on nothing but emulators then why are you guys so harsh on him?

He also claims to work on anything but emulators and he's literally holed up in his house like a mental case and no means of a job, powered only by passion.
I mean, he's included a way of seamlessy communicating with the real hardware's cart port and bumping results from the board as it goes, isn't this the same thing the Byuu did? He did the same with the GBA as far as I get, that's why he was selling his ultimate GBA debugger to professional developers as tool for testing stuff, he wouldn't have done so if it wasn't extremely accurate. Then again it might have been a scam to sell it for that much, but usually you have to make your own tools to debug your own game these days, and those same things also cost a lot of money to develop/acquire.

I tried his PSX emulator, and yes, it blows, he's got a lot of work to do but at least he admits it's not accurate.

>> No.473291

Since this is emulation thread, can someone direct me where I can find a good wealth of rom hacks? An example, I hear there are great Super Metroid rom hacks that almost have as much content as a new game. I've seen several SMW hacks played on Twitch, but no idea where they are getting them from. Anyone?

>> No.473389

>>468848
/thread

>> No.473462

>>469759
MAMEUI is great, but it's authors aren't.
I have literally three different versions (.111u1 32-bit, .142u2 64-bit, .148u2 64-bit) because the programmers are anal about having the current "correct" ROM in the new versions (roms with non-matching checksums won't run, although the new versions have slightly better compatibility with newer roms)
I even upgraded outright, was dissatisfied with the mixed compatibility and wanted to downgrade only to find out you can't find old MAME versions online (this is supposedly due to old versions listing what roms you _don't_ have, and the authors thought this was a little too much pirate aid)
Luckily, I had .111 on my old computer's hard drive from when I started my MAME collection. .111 lets you run even "bad checksum" romsets, but the compatibility for newer romsets is at a standstill, thus why I need to keep multiple versions, along with a ~30GB romset that I've merged with newer sets twice.
Maintenance and configuration are a pain, but there's great arcade stuff that you can't find anywhere else.

>> No.473524

>>473462
I stick with the MAMEUIHighScore version myself

>> No.473643

>>473220
Martin Korth made it possible for me to trade pokemon and battle with my friends on crystal, his GB emu was a pure dream back then, so I can forgive him being a jew.

>> No.473774

I use ZSNES. Why would I use anything else? I want to play SNES, ZSNES lets me play SNES, so I use ZSNES to play SNES. Simple, effective and fucking works.

Tried SNES9x and it wasn't as good as ZSNES. Still good. Just not as good.

Tried bSNES/higan/whatever and it was too much of a hassle. Accuracy means nothing to me and 98% of everyone else who wants to play SNES. Because that's all I want. I just want to play SNES. If bSNES can't emulate SNES without being a fucking performance hog then bSNES is not a good way to play SNES. Maybe it'll change over time. But then again fucking ZSNES haven't changed over time so hey.

>> No.473786

I never tried any besides ZSNES since it's very reliable.
Never had it crash, freeze or glitch, except twice,
but Theme Park and Spawn aren't great games anyhow.

>> No.473787

You know, it's funny.

If someone asked "What's the best NES emulator?" and someone said "NESticle!" they'd be trolling.
If someone asked "What's the best PS1 emulator?" and someone said "Bleem!" they'd be trolling.
If someone asks "What's the best SNES emulator?" and someone says "ZSNES!" that's... a legitimate answer and a perfectly functional emulator? What?

>> No.473803

>finally get a i5
>bsnes still not full speed

>> No.473801

>>473774
You're in luck!

http://byuu.org/bzsnes/

>> No.473821

>>473801
Byuu can't even remove his old April 1st joke from his webzone. Why would I trust him to make a good SNES emulator?

>> No.473830

>>469303
Agreed. Sega has lost a lot of its System 16 and System 24 game source code. Including some wonderful Saturn Era games. Panzer Dragoon Orta used the PC version for the unlockable original PD. Nobody wants to say why but in an old interview with Yukio Futatsugi he hinted at people fighting. And there's been a couple rumors that the code was lost due to the fire that Sega had a few years ago.

>> No.473839

>>473821
Why would he remove it?, it works.

>> No.473843

>>473821
Because it's a completely functional emulator that renders zsnes completely obsolete and continues to be appropriate to link fans of zsnes to.
Why on earth would he remove it?

>> No.473846

>>473821
He actually did it though. He just removed the screens and program.

I don't even remember where I found it, but it took long enough.

>> No.473852

>>473843
>>473839
Why would I want to update software that's still working perfectly?

>> No.473859

>>473852
>Why would I want to update software that's still working perfectly?
It's fine if you don't want to update software that's working well enough for your low standards. That's fine. Feel free to do that.

Just don't recommend it to anyone else, ever, and don't make false claims such as "it works perfectly."

>> No.473854

>>473852
If you believe it´s working perfectly, well no reason. Seen Shallow Hal ?, horrible movie ....

>> No.473868

>>473854
Is Shallow Hal the movie with Jack Black and Gwyneth Paltrow where he thinks Gwyneth is a hot babe when really she's a hot babe in a fat suit or something?

Think I saw a trailer for it.

>> No.473874

>>473859
>>don't make false claims such as "it works perfectly."
But it does, my emulation enthusiast friend. Take your cock out of your foreskin and smell the coffee.

>> No.473885

>>473874
>But it does
False. The worrisome thing about your trolling isn't concern about convincing you that you're wrong, but the danger of your misinformation being taken seriously by the less informed.

>> No.473882

>>473852
Because it was portable, while ZSNES was not.
Kind of a moot point since he deleted the source and it's virtually lost now, but hey.

Here's the binary though:
http://www.mediafire.com/?dta0lhcggx37kcl

>> No.473891

>>473874
Go play, StarOcean, or mario rpgs, or any game that emulates 3d, or Kirby games, or... well, 90% f the library .....

>> No.473895

>>473885
Look, friend. If you want to play SNES then ZSNES and Snes9x ARE the best options. There's no way to get around that.

Why should bSNES or Billy Bayou's ZSNES even be considered an alternative for the people who just wants to play some SNES?

>> No.473906

>>473891
I have played Star Ocean, Mario RPG and the Kirby games on ZSNES. What was wrong with it? Clearly I lack your augmented vision.

>> No.473907

>>473895
>Look, friend. If you want to play SNES then Snes9x is the best option.

FTFY

>> No.473904

>>473895
Because maybe they don´t want to play those 8 games over and over, that sound like shit to anyone who has actually heard them on a snes.....

>> No.473908

>>473895
I'm even willing to let SNES9x slide. That's a far better option than ZSNES, and if for some reason you're hellbent on not using bSNES, it's perfectly viable.

zSNES hasn't been updated in nearly a decade. It's inaccurate, and no longer being updated. It's time to drop it, and stop perpetuating the myth that it's accurate.

>> No.473912

>>473906
Obviously, they lack all effects, not that you would notice if you never knew to expect them...

>> No.473916

>>473907
It's okay. I prefer ZSNES too.

>> No.473913

>>473904
If they all just want to play "those 8 games" why not? It's not like ZSNES is limited to "those 8 games". I don't understand you, friend.

>> No.473914

>>473906
>I have only played Star Ocean, Mario RPG and the Kirby games on ZSNES.
Fixed.

>> No.473915

>>473906
http://byuu.org/bsnes/accuracy

>> No.473925

>>473913
Ignorance is truly bliss.

>> No.473928

>>473908
I'm not saying it's accurate. I'm saying it something that works. Out of the winrar. Just pop the rom in and go. bSNES doesn't have that type of simplicity or performance.

I repeat, if all you want to do is play SNES, you go to the option that lets you play SNES without hassle. ZSNES might be outdated but until bSNES can offer the same performance I'm not upgrading.

>> No.473934

>>473914
Hahaha. Well, if you need to resort to nonsense like that, alright then.

>> No.473935

>>473928
And again, that's fine. If you like doing things a wrong and dumb way because you're too simple or lazy to be bothered to do it correctly, that's great.

Just don't encourage others to do it the wrong way alongside you with misinformation and bullshit.

>> No.473941

>>473928
Higan also loads roms on the go, just choose import instead of open so it loads any rom, browse and open, 3 clicks.

>> No.473939

>>473935
I wasn't aware there's a wrong way to have fun.

>> No.473947

>>473939
>I wasn't aware there's a wrong way to have fun.
I wasn't aware we were talking about "Having fun". I thought we were talking about obtaining and using an emulator, which there is a wrong way to do.

>> No.473948

>>473934
The argument is quite valid, you´re like one eyed man arguing that 3D sucks, it sucks indeed, but you wouldn´t know the difference.

>> No.473958
File: 44 KB, 600x506, 04b700f59ff957614bd43cf6f60f1fca.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
473958

mfw emulation elitism

implying it matters which emulator you use
since the best way is still playing the actual console itself

>> No.473959

>>469358
>Whats the deal with the folder structure

It's fucking autism bullshit. If I wanted shit like that forced on me I'd get a mac and install iTunes.

>> No.473963

>>473958
No one argus that mate, sometimes you just don´t the actual games, or want to try a translation.

>> No.473964

>>468619
Higan (formerly known as bsnes). Alternately, use RetroArch with the bsnes core.

Or, if your hardware is 4+ years old and can't handle it, Snes9x. (or RetroArch with the snes9x core)

>> No.473962

>>473935
You seem irritated. Not gonna lie, I actually kind of like that. Even though it's quite absurd.

Look, dude. If you want to play SNES, ZSNES will let you do this. There's no misinformation there. No bullshit. It's easy to use and doesn't require a high-end computer. It's casual gaming.

>> No.473972

>>473958
I agree with this.

>>473948
What if I can see the difference but simply doesn't care about it? Gameplay is unaffected and that's all I care about.

>> No.473974

>>473947
Pro-tip: Playing games is meant to be fun.

And no, the wrong way to obtain and use an emulator to play snes games would be to download dosbox.
Zsnes is fine.

>> No.473975

>>473963
That's why flashcarts are Best Solution oN Every Solution.

>> No.473979

>>473962
>Look, dude. If you want to play SNES, ZSNES will let you do this.
ZSNES will provide you with a mediocre imitation of the way a SNES should actually work.

Other emulators, such as bSNES or even SNES9x, will provide you with a much better, more accurate experience with more options.

If you want to go on using ZSNES, that's great. Good for you. Keep it to yourself. There is no reason whatsoever to recommend it to anyone else when SNES9x exists.

>> No.473986

>>473974
No, the wrong way would be to intentionally choose an inaccurate emulator that does a poor job of emulating its intended console.

>> No.473992

What's happening here?

Did I miss something?

Is bSNES charged?

Is that one guy arguing in here the author?

>> No.473993
File: 2 KB, 124x126, 132183438665.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
473993

>>468661
>ZSNES in Dosbox
>mfw

I mean, using ZSNES is in itself bad enough - it's long-dead, outdated and buggy... but running an even more ancient DOS version of it in DOSBox when there are even Windows versions of it that work just as well (or rather, just as badly)?

That's kinda like running a Wii homebrew SNES-emulator in Dolphin in order to play SNES games. Or ever running any other non-PC emulator in an emulator when native alternatives exist.

>> No.474007

>>473992
Byuu always comes to defend his shitty emulator.

>>473979
But I won't keep it to myself, friend.

>> No.474003

>>473986
It's not wrong if I get to play Snes games.

Geez, pal. You have some problems in your life.

>> No.474005

>>474003
>It's not wrong if I get to play Snes games.
It's wrong if you suggest it to others.

>> No.474009

>>473993
Come to think of it, were Wii N64 emulators (the ones included with VC releases) appositely made for the game they were included with, or it worked with pretty much anything? Why didn't people exploit this?

>> No.474012

>>473972
>Gameplay is unaffected
F-zero
Starfox
All those games that don´t even load ....

Also, it´s not that you can´t tell the diference, is that you have no point of refeence to spot it.

>> No.474014

>>468742
>if bsnes is the most accurate, then why isn't it hailed as the best
It is. Where have you heard otherwise?
Wait, don't tell me... emulator-zone...
Let me inform you that that site is generally extremely outdated, and complete garbage. Sometimes, it may be a decent way to get an overview over the emulators that exist for a system, but its lists are incomplete and outdated, so do not take it for granted that any of its rankings are at all relevant.

>> No.474017

>>474007
>I won't keep it to myself
Then expect to be shit on for being an idiot.

>> No.474021 [DELETED] 

>hey /o/, I want to buy a car for casual driving
>you should totally buy a porsche boxster
>but I have kids and stuff, so I need at least 4 seats and I don't really need a sports car, what about sedans?
>hurrr buy your shitty sedan then, have fun buying cars the wrong way, porsche is boss

>> No.474026

>>474003
You're actually playing ZSNES games, which happen to be programmed the same way as SNES games. Keep enjoying your ZSNES games, they're fun. If your game crashes or you notice flickers missing graphics, you wouldn't mind it cause you're having fun right?

>> No.474027
File: 12 KB, 250x250, costnaza.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
474027

>>468757
>using filters
>caring about filters

>> No.474034
File: 63 KB, 630x352, vlcsnap-00008.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
474034

>>474021
That's a great analogy, except for the part where it's completely wrong and misleading.

OP asked for the best emulator. There is a best emulator. It's bSNES.
If, for some reason, you want a "sedan" version, there's SNES9x.
ZSNES is, well... pic related.

>> No.474041
File: 74 KB, 883x606, ye olde street fighter.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
474041

>>474026
>You're actually playing ZSNES games, which happen to be programmed the same way as SNES games
Oh god, this guy.

>> No.474043

>>474007

>anyone who positively speaks about bsnes must be byuu

Stop trying to play the shill gambit because you're losing the argument.

>But I won't keep it to myself, friend.

Why would you recommend something deprecated like ZSNES? SNES9x is simply superior for most machines.

>> No.474052

>>474034
>There is a best emulator. It's bSNES.
Yes, according to it's author and 2 people on 4chan.

>> No.474047

>>474021
>>hey /o/, I need to get places and traposrt heavy stuff
>>Shop aroud for a good car that you can afford
>>but I used to ride a mule 15 years ago, so I need that grip when yu pull them by the hair wile sprinting, and I don't really need a car, i´d been having fun on a mule for a while and it get me places
>> buy your shitty mule then

>> No.474049

>>474034

>vlcsnap

Yes, pic is related

>> No.474054

>>474052
You do realize that "best emulator" isn't a subjective thing, right?

>> No.474056

>>474027

filters are shit but you can do some nice things with shaders, like what the pixellate shader does

>> No.474060

>>474017
Hahahaha, oh wow. Emulation sure is some serious business, isn't it? There's no reason to get upset, Bayou Billy.

>> No.474061

>>474052
>Math is a matter of opinion

Talking about software here, not ice cream flavors.

>> No.474068

>>474052

>argument ad populum

>> No.474069

>>474054
That's right, but what if the people who call it the best emulator are retards who don't know shit about emulation?

>> No.474072

>>474069
> Every single game works 1:1
> You can even run Super Gameboy
> Only emu that does this

Snes9x is solid second.

>> No.474078

>>474069

Here's the way I see it: it's the best SNES emulator for modern PCs. Obviously you shouldn't try to use it on smartphones.

>> No.474076

>>473774
Because ZSNES runs on x86 assembly and can't be ported to say, an ARM (Android) or PowerPC (Wii)
Snes9x has the best portability and featureset, and it's more current.
I don't touch bSNES, Byuu is one of those "simple software" autists, meaning he'll perfect the emulation code, but will never add very useful features like plugins, save states, code hacking and the like. Though I do like the work that he does cataloging boxes, manuals, PCBs, etc.

>> No.474083

>>474076
Higan has savestates, and filters, and fast foward. What are you on about?, if you want more just download retroarch and use the bsnes code.

>> No.474090

>>474007
>Byuu always comes to defend his shitty emulator.
>implying he ever comes to 4chan
Unlike most other emulator developers, he actually seems to get shit done. If he spent all day in here defending his emulator, he wouldn't have.
He doesn't need to either, because his work speaks for itself by its superiority to all others.
Granted, Snes9x will emulate most games just as well, and in some cases, perhaps so will ZSNES, but that doesn't change the fact that it's long-dead, outdated and buggy to the point of having severe problems with some games. (Mario RPG comes to mind... it was one of the last games I played on ZSNES before I realized that it was time to move on to something better)

ZSNES's original appeal back in the 90s and early 2000s was that it was feature-rich (by that time's standards), easy to use and ran well on the shitty hardware that was common back then due to use of assembly.
It's now 2013. Unless you're running on 4+ years old hardware, running one of the Higan/bsnes variations (or corresponding core in RetroArch) should not be a problem. In the case that it is, Snes9x is still a better alternative than ZSNES. Most other SNES emulators now have comparable feature-sets to ZSNES, if not even better, and the performance thing is really not an issue unless you're gonna run it on a really ancient computer.

>> No.474098

>>474041
If the games were coded in such a way that they only run on ZSNES's emulation core, and fail on actual SNES hardware or an actual accurate emulator, then he's absolutely right.

>> No.474101

>>474090
>Not playing snes on a 90s casio watch

>> No.474105

>>474052
ZSNES trolls pls go.

>> No.474109

>>474098
You think he knows about that stuff, or cares, ballpark is good enough for him, sound crackling and missing detail gives him nostalgia, don´t you just love when jrpgs die and you hadn´t saved in 2 hours ?, how I miss zsnes ...

>> No.474115
File: 6 KB, 160x160, my sides.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
474115

>>474101

>> No.474119

>>474109
To be honest, I suspect he's probably the OP, and the sole purpose of this thread was to troll by vehemently claiming ZSNES to be best.

I don't really care. It makes for amusing debate.

>> No.474120

>>474083
Like I said, it's been a while since I used it and the whole "my file extension is better than yours" thing killed Higan for me. The emulator shouldn't care if it's an .smc, .fig or something else, if it can discern that there is SNES code in there. Encourage people to use the cleaner header/format, yes, but don't force people into it.

>> No.474121

>>473852

Because it's very far from perfect

https://zsnes.bountysource.com/development/bug_report

The developers aren't even supporting the current ZSNES, which has broken netplay and SA-1 emulation, in favor of the eventual ZSNES 2.0 rewrite

>> No.474130

>>474120
If you don't force people into doing the right thing so that we can have a universal, standard format, then they simply won't do it.

Case in point: the people still using ZSNES. The only thing that will ever take it away from them is the depreciation of 32 bit windows applications, if that.

>> No.474131

>>474120
It doesn´t, you can load smc, but the library is SFC with folder crap. I minded that first time, but it´s a batch conversion, you just pick your room folder and then it´s all done, it´s all in the library.

>> No.474132

>>474120

He isn't forcing that anymore either, the import game function automatically handles any .smc or .sfc ROM

>> No.474134

>>474034
>is mad about people using an inferior snes emulator
>uses vlc player
scumbagmario.jpg

>> No.474138

>>474134
>uses vlc player
Not on your life, pal.

>> No.474143

>>474134
File names are kept when you download the orginal file with the 4chan extension.

>> No.474145

>>474121
I hope they realize that x86 is slowly dying, and code it in something more reasonable like C this time, instead of Intel assembly.
I want an emulator that lasts the ages, something that I can put on my Google Glass 4 10 years from now.

>> No.474149

>>474143
Or when you use google image search to find a picture of a reliant robin.

>> No.474153

>>474130

That would be like what happened to Nesticle, since it was DOS only. Nobody defends that old emulator because they can't run it.

>> No.474152

>>474145
You think 2.0 could overtake snes9x ?

>> No.474156

>>474145

It's being rewritten in C++

>> No.474163

>>474153
Basically, yeah. And eventually it'll happen to ZSNES too, give or take another 5-10 years. Then we'll finally be rid of it.

>> No.474176

>>474120

.sfc has been around for many years, he just decided to be the one to take a stand and force people to stop using GoodSNES .smc ROMs and start using more updated ROMs from more updated ROMsets

>> No.474178

>>474120
>"my file extension is better than yours" thing killed Higan for me
I agree that the import system is utterly stupid, but by using the bsnes cores with RetroArch that issue is avoided, as it uses regular rom files.

>> No.474190

>>474176
Where would I find these "more updated ROMsets"?
It seems to me that 99.9% of the roms found around the net are still .smc files. If there are superior .sfc roms for most or all games out there, I'd like to know where I could find them.

>> No.474192

>>474130

The ROM sites are mostly to blame here, most of them continue to carry ROMsets that are way behind what No-Intro's database has

>> No.474193

>>474178
>I agree that the import system is utterly stupid
Why? It left SNES roms in a variety of formats with a bunch of nonsense headers that shouldn't be on the ROMs.

It's shit that needed to go.

>> No.474202

>>474190
Emuparadise, romnation, private trackers, any place that maters, not on angelfire or geocities domains tho ..

>> No.474201

>>474190

Torrents.

ROM sites are the cancer, if they'd stop carrying years outdated ROM sets, nobody would be complaining.

>> No.474209

>>474145
They'd pretty much just have to rewrite the whole thing from scratch to make it decent I think. There's probably still leftover legacy code from the 90s in there.

>>474156
Any proof of this actually being done?
Like a development repository or something?
I was under the impression that the devs did nothing but occasionally post in the forums about the stuff they'd like to see done in the future at some point but are far too lazy to ever actually get started on.

>> No.474214

>>474209
From what I've seen, it's basically a bunch of "We'd like to eventually do this, and we're probably going to. Someday. Eventually."

That and "You guys are fucking idiots for writing your romhacks and translations to rely on bugs in ZSNES. You know we're going to fix those, right?"

>> No.474216
File: 128 KB, 625x564, laughing_neckbeardb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
474216

>>468680
>zsnes for compatibility

Holy fuck I'm dying

>> No.474220

>>474202
Ahh no, aparently emuparadise has an old romset with a bunch of hacked trash games. Get themon bitgamer or gazelle.

>> No.474235

>>474190
UG will have it. It's also golden week. Best time to get the best of the best. And it usually has open invites.

>> No.474226

>>474202
I've been using ROMnation, but most roms there are generally .SMC files.

>angelfire or geocities domains
I remember those from the 90s, but do they actually still exist?

>>474201
Got any good torrent links for that?

>> No.474231

>>474220
>bitgamer
Too soon.

>> No.474241

>>474235
UG?

>> No.474248

>>474231
I meant blackcats man.

>> No.474249

>>474241
Undeground Gamer

>> No.474246

>>474226
I was kiddng, I just checked emuparadise and their individual roms are sfc, but the packaged one is outdated.

>> No.474252

>>474246
>their individual roms are sfc, but the packaged one is outdated
So... there's more than one way to download roms there?

>> No.474257

>>474252
Packaged romsets and bowsing the full list and picking the ones you want.

>> No.474268

>>474246

They have up-to-date full No-Intro sets on their forums

http://www.epforums.org/showthread.php?56293-No-Intro-Collection-(Complete-ROM-Sets)*

>> No.474281

>>474007
Go away mudlard.

>> No.474294

http://board.byuu.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3823

>> No.474296

>>474090
Dude spends a lot of time on /a/. Nowhere else though afaik.

>> No.474314

>>474268

Speaking of No-Intro, aren't they working on a DS and PSP set now?

>> No.474317

>>474294
Why can't I hold all those aspergers?

>> No.474345

>>474294

>blargg is a brony

Everyone has their flaws, I guess

>> No.474348

>>474317
Because he's actually doing something, and knows his stuff, so he's the best at doing it. And that's fine for us.

>> No.474353

>>474249
>>474235
Thanks for the tip. I created an account and started downloading some No-Intro torrents.

>> No.474360

>>474268
>>474314
So, how does that work?
Are No-Intro some sort of group that has some sort of ability to dump and verify "guaranteed good" roms?

>> No.474363

>>474360

No-Intro strips header info out of roms that are put there by cart readers. I think Byuu had a whole article about it.

>> No.474378

>>474360
They dump games, and record the hashes.
Then they redump games multiple times, and verify the hashes are the same. They basically build a database of hashes that can be used to verify ROMs and build a set from.

>> No.474383

>>474378
Nice.

>> No.474524

>>473958
>since the best way is still playing the actual console itself

lolno, emulators are superior. Any input device you want, graphical tweaks, hacking, savestates for games without saving/shit-ass password systems, save backup/trading, easy screenshots, recording variable window size, no hardware limitation shitting up a game with flickering/slowdown, etc etc.

Non-shit emulators, anyway. Not MUH PERFECT EMULATION bullshit like pissness

>> No.474979

>>473291
Anyone?

>> No.475020

>What's the best snes emulator?
bsnes

>> No.475038

>>474979
Most SMW hacks you'll find if you poke around smwcentral.net

Sonic hacks you'll find on Sonic Retro (be aware some of it is haphazardly put together, but it's generally all there).

Youtube will usually have the link to the hacks (or look up the name of the hack).

As for the rest? Hit or miss. Good luck.

>> No.475041

>>472610

GET.FUCKING.XEBRA
Seriously, you guys are getting repetitive,

>> No.475047

List of Recommended Emulators:
http://emulation-general.wikia.com/wiki/Recommended_Emulators

For Higan/bsnes, the interface can be a little annoying. Use Retroarch and the bsnes cores. Much easier.
http://emulation-general.wikia.com/wiki/RetroArch

>>468619

Don't use Zsnes. List of problems here:

http://emulation-general.wikia.com/wiki/ZSNES

Please read that. It gives

>> No.475064

I'm using zsnes. This PC is way too crappy to run bsnes and snes9x always crashes when I try to change the video settings. Also, the ntsc filter of zsnes is simply delicious.

Such cases.

>> No.475072

>>475064
>always crashes when I try to change the video settings.

Have you tried changing it from OpenGL to D3D or DX modes? I've noticed that in windows OpenGL doesn't play nice with snes9x.

>> No.475073

You bSnes droids are the worst, if someone questions your emulator god's ideas and statements the first thing you do is post the accuracy "essay" byu's wrote.
Get this, bsnes is unoptimized as fuck, and all it does is correctly show shadows and a couple of effects on 7 or 8 games. Wow, it's fucking nothing.

>> No.475093

>>475073
You could at least type it correctly. It's bsnes, not BSNES, bSNES, bSnes, Bsnes, BsNeS or anything like that.

Just bsnes.

>> No.475097

>>475064
>Also, the ntsc filter of zsnes is simply delicious.

Snes9x has the same filters.

>>475064
>This PC is way too crappy to run bsnes and snes9x

What are the specs? I would recommend upgrading your system. You don't need anything fancy. A standard laptop after 2007 should run both just fine.

Oh, and have you tried Retroarch? It has bsnes and Snes9x cores, and seems to run faster than the regular bsnes program.
http://themaister.net/retroarch.html

Try running Snes9x-Next, which is the "optimized" (runs faster) version aimed at lower end computers.

>> No.475102

>>475072

It crashes as soon as I click on the video setting tab. I was using snes9x until a few years ago, then it suddenly crashed on my. It's a mystery.

>> No.475105

>>475097

Guide:
http://emulation-general.wikia.com/wiki/RetroArch#Using_RetroArch

>> No.475125

>>475102

Have you tried a newer version?

Beta:
http://www.emucr.com/2013/03/snes9x-git-20130327.html

Stable:
http://www.emulator-zone.com/doc.php/snes/snes9x.html

>> No.475121 [DELETED] 
File: 11 KB, 224x225, deal.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
475121

>>475093
oh, what a huge typo, a capital letter on the first S.

Sup, byudrone?

>> No.475142

>>475102
Have you tried any of the releases after BearOso started working on it? It's much better these days.

>> No.475161

>>475125
>>475102
>>475142
https://sites.google.com/site/bearoso/snes9x/snes9x-1.53-win32-x64.zip?attredirects=0&d=1

https://sites.google.com/site/bearoso/snes9x/snes9x-1.53-win32.zip?attredirects=0&d=1

There, now we don't have to use someone else's pay wall.

Also, I highly suggest using the new version linked. Things are better this side of the sun.

>> No.475175

>>475073

While bsnes has its problems, zsnes is much, much worse. Many games have freezing or crashing problems. Romhacks made for zsnes basically only work in zsnes. The damn thing is never going to be updated ever again because its coded in Assembly. Sound is completely off.

Some say they're okay with it, but I see no reason to accept a substandard product when better alternatives exist.

Snes9x is so much better. It's meant to be a middle ground between the two. Pretty much any post 2005 system should be able to run it. It focuses on compromise.

Bsnes is even probably unoptimized, and is a bit of a pain to use. That's why I just use the bsnes cores in Retroarch.

>> No.475181

>>475161
>pay wall.

Those sites aren't behind a "pay wall" though. Anyone can access them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paywall

>> No.475190

>>475181
I used the wrong term. Been up way too late. Sorry about that.

Just think it's better to get files from the coder's source instead of seeing ads or whatnot.

>> No.475202

>>475190
>Just think it's better to get files from the coder's source instead of seeing ads or whatnot.

I agree. I even feel sorry for being nit picky.

>> No.475209

>>475202
If I were more awake I would have called me out on it. No harm done.

>> No.475243

>>474090
>implying he ever comes to 4chan

Someone claiming to be him came into /vg/'s Emulation General. He said he mostly went to /a/.

>> No.475247

>>474120
>Encourage people to use the cleaner header/format, yes, but don't force people into it.

We should, and I think the best way would be for rom sites to just switch over first.

>> No.475278

>>472132

It is! But not that one.

http://www.joystiq.com/2008/04/15/unboxing-the-super-famicom-classic-controller/

>> No.475297

>>475175
But i wasn't even defending ZSNES, i use Snes9x for the games that i don't own.
And the thing about zsnes is, the people that are still using it and the people that complain that others are still using it are equally retarded, it's an old piece of software meant to be used more than 10 years ago. Still, i miss it's interface, gives me a nostalgia of it's own.

>> No.475298

>>475278
>But not that one.
>it's the same thing

>> No.475312

>>475297
*its

>> No.475326

>>475297

While that's fine.

The concept of bsnes is great. I just don't like the specific implimentation of higan. This is however the beauty of open source software. You can just take the bsnes code, and use it for something else. Which is why I use bsnes core in Retroarch. All the benefits, without the losses. And for whatever strange reason it runs faster.

We need obsessive autists like byuu in emulation. We need someone who is willing to challenge convention. He's right about everything, but half the stuff isn't really worth fighting over, so that's why I just use the core of bsnes, but not higan.

>> No.475343

>>469053
Mostly because about all NES emulators are accurate, so which one is not even something to discuss.
For Gameboy its not even a argument because there is only 1 decent emulator, which ships with okay filters.
For SNES, Zsnes was the fucking best for a long time, because of features.

>> No.475356

>>473220
He earned a lot of money on his Gameboy and DS emulator.

>> No.475370

>>475298

>it's the same thing

Is it?

I've seen some chinese copies here.

>> No.475390

>>473220

I swear I've seen this same copy pasta before.

>> No.475382

>>475343
>Mostly because about all NES emulators are accurate, so which one is not even something to discuss.

Not really. Check here:
http://tasvideos.org/EmulatorResources/NESAccuracyTests.html

JNES is kinda popular, but one of the least accurate.

Nestopia is pretty popular and what most people use, and it's accurate enough, with an 80% rating.

>> No.475385

>>475326

>We need obsessive autists like byuu in emulation.

I agree with you, the thing is snes emulation was never that bad to begin with. It feels like wasted effort when there's still so many things to accomplish in other areas.(ie. mame and n64 emulation)

>> No.475392

Are there any NES emulators that don't flicker, slow down or show lines of garbage on one edge?

>> No.475403

>>475382
>A real NES having anything other than 100% accuracy.

>> No.475408

>>475382
So basically there exists ROMs which needs very odd pieces of special hardware, which has some issues on various NES emulators?
Seems legit.

>> No.475417

>>475403
If you mean NES (+Power Pak)

That's an NES with Power Pak which is a flash cart.

>> No.475428

>>475385

>I agree with you, the thing is snes emulation was never that bad to begin with.

Yes it was. Zsnes was, and still is one of the most popular SNES emulators.

Now, you could argue that it might have made more sense to just contribute to Snes9x code to make it more accurate. In an optimal world, this is what would have happened and wouuld have reduced the amount of replicated efforts.

I imagine that there would have been massive differences in philosophy, and that byuu is a bit of an oddball autist who doesn't like compromise. So whatever.

>> No.475430

>>475392
That's how an NES does things, too bad.

>> No.475442

>>475430
>>475392

That's the No Sprite limit option. Nestopia has it.
http://0ldsk00l.ca/nestopia.html

>> No.475445
File: 47 KB, 612x767, 1365791012259.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
475445

So guys, what is the reccomender SNES, nDS, GB, GBA, PSX emulator on Android (Samsung Galaxy S II to be extact, still dual core, not quad core)

>> No.475456

>>475445

Retroarch android is the best you're going to get.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.retroarch&hl=en

>> No.475507

Anyone know the most compatible version of MAME? I'm trying to play gradius and it is just not compatible with the version I'm using.

>> No.475515

>>475507
>>475445
>>475392

These are great questions. Take them to /vg/'s Emulation General.

>> No.475612

Bump

>> No.475621

>>468619
>>>/vg/32319057

>> No.475726

>>475621
That thread is slow as fuck chief.

>> No.475746

why does every emulation thread end up being a bunch of asshurt bsnes/higen supporters who can't cope with the fact that most people can't run it and get good framerates?

>> No.476007

One day I'll have a fucking monster PC that can run Higan acceptably well, plug it on a gigantic LCD screen and use CRT filters for amazing win.

One day...

>> No.476018

>>475746
Because there will always be a subset of people who would rather emulate a game perfectly then actually have fun playing it.

>> No.476062

>>475746

Because Byuu is the most autistic and socially awkward piece of shit to grace the emulator scene, and people like that fanatically look up to him. It's a cult of personality, an elitistic circlejerk where fedora clad fatasses can feel like special little snowflakes because they can run Adult Manga v2 and Lion's Porno Party at +20fps on bsnes.

>> No.476080

I wasn't aware emulation was this serious.

I just thought there were different emulators.

>> No.476117

>>476062
What is it with extremely unpleasant individuals and silly hats?

>> No.476141

>>476080
Emulation has always been serious from the start because of how you develop them. You need knowledge of each and every console from the ground up, every little nut and bolt.

>> No.476151

>>476141
I figured as much for people creating emulators.

>> No.476170

>>476080

The emuscene has always centered around one or two online forums, with a few people who actually know how to program shit and the rest sucking their dicks. These people then get into all sorts of drama, and their huge fanboy armies follow suit.

It's sort of like ancient Greece really.

>> No.476184

>>476170
>It's sort of like ancient Greece really.
It's funny because Rome emulated Greece later on.

>> No.476202

>>476062
>I'm talking out of my ass

Byuu is the man, and his ideals are the only things that matter to him, he would be ready to sacrifice everything meterial to honor them. When people struggle with his ideals over some petty complains with an immature and closed mind, he activates full-on hate to defend his ideals over changing, he does so to keep coherence and the more extremist he gets, the more chances of honoring his ideals.

He also doesn't give a fuck about the rest of emulators and tells others to download SNES9x if it's their first emulator, and even contributes his code over.

>> No.476209

>>476202
>byuu is autistic

that's what I said anon.

>> No.476239

>>476209
Yes, but you skipped the part where I'm a moron and need a sleep because I cannot into reading comprehension, please pardon me.

>> No.476264

>>468619
I'm going to put the most popular /vr/ into one simple list, or at least try to:

>Genesis
Kega Fusion, does about everything pre-Saturn too so it's nice for one stop emulation once you get the BIOS right. Works the best on older rigs.

GenPlus GX if you're not going to fool with Sega CD and if you like accuracy.

>SNES
SNES9x for speed
BSNES/Higan for Accuracy, high-end comp required.
Don't touch ZSNES unless you use it already.

>NES
FCEUX if you like messing with the ROM and having fun with them. Also useful if you have an ancient graphics card.
Nestopia if you just want to play games.

>GBC
bgb if you like Super GameBoy boarders and options.
VBA-M or Gambatte otherwise, VBA-M is the best for GBA

>PS1
Xebra for accuracy.
ePSXe otherwise, but it's really tedious.

Retroarch has everything in one package with a little fooling around but it's worth it, Mac has OpenEmu which is very similar but the latest version is in closed beta.

>Android
There are a ton of emulators that nearly all port the same thing, except for that Imagine engine series. The guy who makes SNES9X EX+ does a lot of apps with well founded emulators at the cores like FCEUX and VBA-M. His stuff costs money outside of SNES, honestly worth it but they can be sideloaded if you believe in not paying for things that were free in the first place.

>> No.476283

>>476264
>ePSXe

all of my WHY?

>> No.476297

>>476264
I thought Kega was pretty accurate.

>not PCSX-R for PS1

>> No.476303

>>476283
Last I checked, Xebra can't run everything quite yet.

>> No.476315

>>476303
Yeah, so you would then switch to PCSX-R. ePSXe is fucking trash.

>> No.476336

>>476315

Because it takes some time to configure the correct plugins for each game?

>> No.476385

>>476336
>correct plugins for each game

Nah m8, ePSXe runs a rotten core on it's own, you can stop it from stuttering and all the timing goes to hell. Even psxfin does a better job giving a stable output. And PCSX-R uses the same plugins, and has a widescreen hack. There's literally no reason for keeping that other mess.

>> No.476443

>>476264
GenPlus GX does SegaCD just fine from my experience. I've been playing Pier Solar with CD audio and Lunar for a while now just fine. Really, the only thing I don't think it does now is 32X. Otherwise, it's just as good, if not better than Kega with everything else.

I'll also say that for PS1 emulators, the general consensus is PCSX-R is better than ePSXe. It's essentially the new ePSXe since PCSX-R does everything ePSXe does but better. Same plugins, same graphic options, etc. More accurate and less stuttering, too.

So for PS1, I'd say Xebra/Mednafen PSX (they're both pretty equal in terms of accuracy) or PCSX-R.

>> No.476508

Has a decent PC-Engine emulator been developed, or are we still stuck with a lot of kinda-sorta ones?

>> No.476523

>>476508
MagicEngine (Which worked with most things I played the last time I tried it; mostly Working Designs games and fan-translations) or Mednafen. That's about it. I have no experience with the latter, but I've heard it's just as good/better than MagiceEngine, so...

>> No.476541

>>476523
Thanks for the mednafen tip, I'll have to check it out.

>> No.476560

>>476541
IIRC, there's two Mednafen emulators or something. One is speed focused, the other is accuracy. The speed focused one doesn't work with as much stuff. If you're using RetroArch, the current one included is the speed one. The accuracy one is only with Mednafen itself.

I have no experience with either since it's been a long time since I've emulated anything from the TG16. Been wanting to play some Bonk for a while now, though, so maybe I'll check it out.

>> No.476635

>>476560
I meant this for TG16 emulation, that is.

>> No.476812

>>476264

There's already a list. Similar to yours.
http://emulation-general.wikia.com/wiki/Recommended_Emulators

>> No.476826
File: 94 KB, 468x468, 496292-berserk_guts_3215.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
476826

>>475726

And? It's actually filled with people who know things about emulation. Wait an hour and you'll have a few good responses. Better than /vr/, where your thread will either get no responses, or have retards.

Current thread:
>>>/vg/32666863

>> No.476831

>>475746

Because zsnes is trash, and /vr/ is filled with morons who still use it.

>> No.476853

>>476508
Ootake

>> No.476854

>>476508
>Has a decent PC-Engine emulator been developed, or are we still stuck with a lot of kinda-sorta ones?

Retroarch. Uses Mednafen core.

>> No.476860

>>476853
forgot link http://www.ouma.jp/ootake/

>> No.476871

Is ZSNES the only emulator that allows automatically redefining controls for each game? I need that functionality.

>> No.476886

>>476523
>>476541
No on MagicEngine. Timing's off everywhere I hear, and you actually need to pay for it when you can get far better.

Medafen still has the best PCE emulation out there, and Retroarch uses it's core. PCE.emu or Retroarch for android.

>> No.476895

I just found out that almost all emulators for the Wii output in 240p. Thank god my PVM takes component input

>> No.476905

>>476895
Which is ironic because Dolphin.

>> No.476908 [DELETED] 

>ZSNES Defenders
Geez, I thought with /vr/'s background the threads would be less retarded.

>> No.476915 [DELETED] 

>>476908

>MUH AUTISM

Fuck off

>>>/out/

>> No.476918

>there are people in the world who get visibly upset about people using different emulators

Thank God I don't suffer from whatever brain disease you guys have. You want to tell me how to wipe my ass and organize my refrigerator, too?

>> No.476925

>>476915
No really, I'm legitimately surprised. I never hear anything about Z outside of here anymore.

>> No.476951

>>476925

>expect people who talk about 90's games like they are serious business not to have nostalgia about 90's emulators

Software is software man.

>> No.476954

>>476925
It's because emulators are generally hard to keep up with unless you're "in the know," and Z actually works so some people still use it.

That said...
>>476918
What the fuck did you expect from 4chan talking about what emulators to use, asspats for using something that isn't even updated anymore?

>> No.476982

>>476951

This actually raises a very good point. Everyone on this board are discussing playing old games and enjoying the nostalgia, yet admitting to use old emulators is suddenly a bad thing?

>> No.476993

>>476918

Zsnes is indefensible in 2013 though.

>> No.476991
File: 80 KB, 500x564, typical bsnes user.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
476991

>>476925
>>476908

>> No.476997

>>476993

Just like old fucking outdated shit games.

>> No.477002

>>476982
>This actually raises a very good point. Everyone on this board are discussing playing old games and enjoying the nostalgia, yet admitting to use old emulators is suddenly a bad thing?

Yes. Emulation was not perfect in 1999. Zsnes focused on speed. Think of it as being 50% of a real snes. Modern emulators are more like 85-95% of a snes.

Which one would you prefer to use?

>> No.477014

>>476997

Many of them are still the best in their genre.

Zsnes was a snes emulator, but didn't do the job well enough.

>> No.477018

>>477002

Gaming was not perfect in 1991. SNES focused on 2D graphics. Think of it as being 1% of a XBOX360. Modern consoles have like 85-95x more processing power than than a SNES.

Which one would you prefer to use?

>> No.477026

>>477018

This is just trolling. I'm going to just assume any other zsnes defenders in this thread are just trolls and do something more productive with my day.

>> No.477040

>>477026

No it isn't.

I'm trying to point out to you the reason why we all cling to things from our childhood / teens. Nostalgia. It's the same thing for old emulators as it is for old games.

>> No.477049

>>477018
>Modern consoles have like 85-95x

Snes: 3.58 MHz
Xbox360: 3,200 GHz

Yes, I'm aware that simple clockspeed comparisons between different cpus is inaccurate, but it gives some sense of the scale. You're off by a whole order of magnitude.

>> No.477062

>>477049

Yes, I admit that. I was simply parroting his post, and my point was still made.

I played games like Chrono Trigger and Super Mario RPG for the first time on ZSNES, because they were not released in my country. I get as giddy and nostalgic loading the rom on ZSNES as some folks get loading the cartridge to an actual system.

>> No.477058
File: 40 KB, 450x340, ngbbs4e585e74c929e.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
477058

>>477040
>I'm trying to point out to you the reason why we all cling to things from our childhood / teens. Nostalgia. It's the same thing for old emulators as it is for old games

>> No.477074
File: 148 KB, 648x595, 1330490468168.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
477074

>tfw there isn't a single emulator out there that will give you the feeling that you're playing your favorite game for the first time all over again

inb4 people suffering with amnesia getting to feel this feel

>> No.477075

>>477062
>I played games like Chrono Trigger and Super Mario RPG for the first time on ZSNES, because they were not released in my country. I get as giddy and nostalgic loading the rom on ZSNES as some folks get loading the cartridge to an actual system.

That explains it. And this is all nice. But Snes9x and bsnes are objectively better emulators than zsnes. You just have your nostalgia.

>> No.477098

>>477074
That said, there are good points about emulators:
>Able to play brand new games that were never released.
>Easier to find games you missed to play for the first time.
>Romhacks

That feeling can be neverending if you try.

>> No.477107

>>477098

Flashcarts are best of both worlds.

>> No.477113

>>477075

Yeah, and I'm certain quite a few anons who say they still prefer ZSNES are this way. They are accustomed to it and feel comfortable using it. Same goes for Nesticle or No$Gameboy.

When I replay Final Fantasy, I always use Nesticle, even if I am aware it rapes both the sound and the graphics. But to me it feels original and authentic, the way the game was meant to be, because it's connected straight to the joy of playing the game for the first time in my childhood.

>> No.477115

>>477107
Can flashcarts emulate special chips yet? I keep hearing that even the best can't.

>> No.477127

>>477113
>When I replay Final Fantasy, I always use Nesticle, even if I am aware it rapes both the sound and the graphics. But to me it feels original and authentic, the way the game was meant to be, because it's connected straight to the joy of playing the game for the first time in my childhood.

This is just straight up trolling or parody levels now.

>> No.477140

>>477127

I don't get it. Why can we so readily accept that people have nostalgia towards old games, old operating systems (Win 3.1 threads pop up pretty often), old hardware... but somehow old emulators are trolling or parody territory?

>> No.477132

>>477115
>Can flashcarts emulate special chips yet? I keep hearing that even the best can't.

For snes, no. But that's relatively few games. Most of them aren't even worth playing honestly. StarFox was just a technical achievement but not much of a game.

>> No.477146

>>477140

Because it paints zsnes defenders as utterly irrational and blinded by emotion.

>> No.477156

>>477140

Think of it this way. You can have your nostalgia. But you sure as HELL should not recommend zsnes to other people in 2013.

>> No.477170

>>477156

I would never do that, and I don't ever see anyone doing it in these threads. All I see is some people stating that they still prefer to use ZSNES and byuufags immediately sperg out against it.

>> No.477172

>>477140
>old operating systems (Win 3.1 threads pop up pretty often)

>wanting to relive Windows 3.x and 9x

"The following application has caused a fatal exception 0E in location 3422:00044eff"

Nope.

>> No.477178

>>477170
>All I see is some people stating that they still prefer to use ZSNES and byuufags immediately sperg out against it.

Then zsnes guys should be open that it's purely a nostalgic thing and that other emulators are what should be recommended to new people.

>> No.477198

>>477178

I agree with you. I think the general recommendation should be to go snes9x if you just want to quickly emulate SNES and get bsnes / higan if you care about the authenticity of the experience.

I'd just prefer to cut off all the shit flinging that happens mainly between ZSNES nostalgiafags and the never ending circlejerk around bsnes. Them bickering over who is a retard and who is not doesn't really bring anything to the table.

>> No.477207

>>477170
>byuufags

Nope, I use 9X. Mostly so I can share saves between devices, and I have a mac, windows, and android.

>> No.477237

>>477198


ZSNES is mostly x86 assembly. Once we migrate past 64-bit those old 32-bit programs will be long gone, unless someone uses a VM. ZSNES will die, like Nesticle did, it'll just take time.

>> No.477303

>>477237
>Once we migrate past 64-bit

You'll be dead before that happens

>> No.477363

>>476264
>Android
I use Retroarch, but it is a bit slow. I hear about that .emu line mentioned and after using SNES9x EX+ I will say the GUI is a fuckton better and it runs smooth as butter on minimal specs when the priority is at it's highest.

>> No.477402

>>477363
Even Kirby?

>> No.477412

>>477402
Kirby's Super Star lagged a bit, but even it was playable.

>> No.478134
File: 1 KB, 128x66, sansa clip plus informativebeauty.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
478134

>>473291
>>474979
I found a good amount of rom hacks AND chiptune music files here:
http://www.planetemu.net/index.php?section=menus&machine=12
just a slight issue, it's in french, and the hacks are in the form of pre patched roms, whether that's a good thing or a bad thing.

I really wish I knew of another site like this.

There's also zophar's domain, also for various things. And I just noticed the genesis chiptune file for battle toads and double dragon there, unlike on the previous site.
http://www.zophar.net/music/vgm.html
no roms here though.

>> No.478709

>>476062

oh u mudlord-kun

>> No.478771

>>477363

SNES9x EX9+ has frameskip enabled by default. If you're not getting full speed on RetroArch's SNES9x Next, you're definititely not actually full speed on SNES9x EX+, you're actually skipping every other frame.

>> No.478980

>>473882
>deleted the source and it's virtually lost now
Binary:
http://snesemu.black-ship.net/emus/bsnes/bzsnes_v151w.zip

Source:
http://snesemu.black-ship.net/emus/bsnes/bzsnes_v151s.zip

You were saying?

>> No.479085

>>478134
>google search
>"parent directory" "last modified" +likelyfilenameforroms.ext

Super_Metroid.zip
Starfox.sfc
S3&K.smd
SOR3.smd

Et al. I run across open directories of roms all the time.

>> No.480403

>>468940
what game is that

>> No.480417

OK guys, we don't need two emulation generals going on at the same time.

Pick one and go there. This one is teh better one though.

>> No.480746

>>468750
>Higan is pretty much the most accurate emulator for any system it emulates.
>Project64 is the most accurate for N64, while Mupen(spelling might be off) is the choice of TASers.

These are both false btw.
bSNES is the real attraction of higan currently
PJ64 is still lacking even compared to other imperfect emus.

>> No.482642

>>480417

which is why I'm bumping this.

>> No.482686

>>474009
>Why didn't people exploit this?

These n64 emulators are tailored to specific games. The Wii is likely not powerful enough to have a general purpose N64 emulator. They're more like ports really.

>> No.482689
File: 96 KB, 471x363, grumpy old man.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
482689

>>468661
>Personally, I use ZSNES in Dosbox

>> No.482915

>>482689
He's obviously trolling, anon. Don't respond.

>> No.482954

>>482915

With Zsnes-drones it's hard as fuck to tell.

>> No.482959

>>482954
Indeed. Still, running it in DOSBox is just a little bit too over the top to be serious.

>> No.482969

>>482959

even so, you still need an i7 or higher to run bsnes consistently. my i7 has major slow down on super god damn mario. that's bullshit

>> No.482985

>>482969
What, people don't have an i7?

>> No.482984

>>482969
That's odd, because my 4 year old Core 2 Quad PCs ran bsnes at full-speed most of the time. Even my old 2008 laptop, which is weaker than that desktop PC ran it mostly at full speed, with some occasional audio "crackles", and it could barely even run WoW.

My current laptop and gaming desktop are both Ivy Bridge i7s, and I haven't had any problems with them.

>> No.482986

>>482985

Not everyone can shell out money for nasa computers every few years.

>> No.482990

>>482985
Depends on whether he's talking about the original 2009 i7s or the current Ivy Bridge i7s.
If your PC is old enough to have something weaker than one of the original Nehalem i7s, then it's seriously about time for an upgrade anyway.

If that isn't an option... Snes9x!

>> No.482991

>>482990

>Buy an 800-1500 dollar computer every three years

Fuck you

>> No.482993 [DELETED] 

>>482986
What so you expect? Everyone on a video game board assume you can con your parents/wife/boyfriend into upgrading your computer every two years

>> No.483000

>>482991
>every three years
That shouldn't be necessary, but every four years or so, yes. The only reason I didn't build a new computer sooner was because I never had any trouble running anything on my 4-5 year old desktops, so I never bothered until last fall.

>> No.483009

>>483000

That you need a modern super computer at all is beyond insane. Fuck that. It's a god damn sense. My watch has more CPU power than that.

>> No.483064
File: 28 KB, 331x319, hahaha.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
483064

>>483009
>less than 4 years old
>modern super computer

>> No.483068 [DELETED] 

>>483064

>riddit face

>>>/out/

>> No.483069

>>483009
Be happy you're not living in the mid-late 90s. Back then computers were painfully outdated after less than a year.

>> No.483072

If you fucks keep this up, they're going to have to wordrilfter "zsnes" on this board.

>> No.483074 [DELETED] 

>>483068
>implying I go to riddit
>implying I didn't get it from here
>implying I give a shit where it came from

>> No.483080

>>483072
Honestly, that might be for the best. As it is, any troll can just post a zsnes thread and watch the rage unfold.

>> No.483083 [DELETED] 

>>483074

>riddit meme faces is okay if it comes from here
>It's okay sir, the cancer came from inshide his body and not without

>> No.483091 [DELETED] 

>>483083
See >>483074
>>implying I give a shit where it came from

>> No.483095 [DELETED] 

>>483091

Enjoy the fact that you are the cancer killing 4chan.

>> No.483105

>>480403
battletoads

>> No.483103

>>483095
Do you enjoy derailing the thread with your shitposts?
If you're gonna troll here, at least talk about zsnes.

>> No.483205

>>480403
terranigma. was only released in japan and europe. in the same set of games as Soul Blazer and Illusion of Gaia/Time.

>> No.483209

>>483205
Is there a fan-translation of the Japanese version? Would be nice to be able to play it in the full 60Hz while still being able to read it.

I've played through it before, but that was probably the PAL version.

>> No.483220

>>483209
http://www.romhacking.net/hacks/541/

>> No.483398 [DELETED] 
File: 448 KB, 3840x2160, 1364473641045.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
483398

>bsnes vs. ZSNES Vs. snes9x
>every time
Guaranteed.

>>483068
>>483074
>>483083
>>483091
>>483095
Pic related.

>> No.483415

>>483398
>Guaranteed.
Yeah...
Someone should make a giant wall-of-text copypasta describing in detail why ZSNES sucks compared to current versions of other emulators. Would save a lot of time explaining the same shit over and over again, and if all they got was the same copypasta over and over again, trolls would eventually stop bothering trying to stir shit up with it.

>> No.483447

>>483415
>Someone should make a giant wall-of-text copypasta describing in detail why ZSNES sucks compared to current versions of other emulators. Would save a lot of time explaining the same shit over and over again, and if all they got was the same copypasta over and over again, trolls would eventually stop bothering trying to stir shit up with it.

http://emulation-general.wikia.com/wiki/ZSNES

We at Emulation General have started a wiki, and have made that page. It lists many of the faults of zsnes. Feel free to add it or modify it.

>> No.483452

>>483447
Ah, very nice! Gotta remember that one.
Is that a new site?

>> No.483453
File: 29 KB, 500x375, 1357640022896.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
483453

>>476184

Five star post, anon.

>> No.483461

>>483452
>Is that a new site?

Quite new. Week or two. That's why much of it is very much just starting off. A lot of is is copied over from the previous Ddoc and pastebins we used. So they're quite well written. Others are just started and only contain a single line.

>> No.483462

>>483447
>bZSNES
Is this some sort of joke by byuu?
Why would he even bother wasting time on that?

>> No.483464

>>483462
>Is this some sort of joke by byuu?
>Why would he even bother wasting time on that?

It was released on April 1st, 2011. And it appears to be real. I haven't tested it, but it should work with zsnes romhacks.

>> No.483469
File: 9 KB, 231x238, 132171665711.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
483469

>>483464
>April 1st, 2011
Right...

>> No.483470

>>483469

However, as far as I can tell the program itself is legit.

>> No.483471

>>483464
Seems legit.

>> No.483473

>play with Zsnes and all games that i play are great, not a single game has all that bugs

>Tried bsnes because /vr/ cum's all over it. It sucks, have to configure 12452346 things, don't have filters, don't have slow/fast modes, don't let you do video capture

So tell me again /vr/ what's good about not having fun? Is this turning to the new /v/?
Because i rather have fun with my ZSNES that me and my gf play all weekend and we don't have any problems. Ofcourse that there is some games that have bugs, but if you read the bug list, is all about random games that no one plays anymore, there is like 2 maybe 3 games on that list that i might have played

So yeah, you elitist are worse than /v/ and their console wars

>> No.483475

>>478134
>sansa clip plus
Mah negroid

>> No.483482

>>483473
http://emulation-general.wikia.com/wiki/ZSNES

>> No.483490

>>483473
>have to configure 12452346 things
No you don't.
Pretty sure nothing other than the controller input actually requires configuration.

>don't have filters
Never checked, but filters are shit anyway.

>don't have slow/fast modes
Yes it does, although because of its higher requirements fast forward won't go completely bananas and run at 100x speed like it will in some of the less demanding emulators.

>> No.483486

>>483482
>hurrr durrr 2 games are wort playing on this list, but all other randons count too !
>go play my GOD's emulator so i can suck his dick all day !

Not anymore, go away, elitist cunt

>> No.483492

>>483473

In case of not troll. Just use regular bsnes before Higan. Or Use Retroarch.

>> No.483498

>>483473
By all means, if you want to torture yourself using that old crap, use ZSNES all you want, but don't try to defend it as being in any way better.

That's like going to an AV enthusiast forum and going on about how using composite cables is superior to component and HDMI, because you have the cables already and know how they work, and they produce an image on your screen, so it makes no difference right?

>> No.483509

>>483498
This isn't an AV enthusiast forum.

>> No.483512

>>483482

>- Games crashing - Der Langrisser (freezes after 2-3 hours), Super Mario RPG (freezes in many different points of the game), Star Ocean and many other games have freezing and crashing issues
So i cleared SMRPG without any freezes, other games? All random shit

> Bad sound emulation - A ton of games just sound terrible on
SNES Pseudo Hi-Res translucency
Added by SonofUgly
ZSNES, Earthworm Jim 2 has no sound effects

Say's ton of games, only listen EJ2.....

> Super FX not clocked correctly - Star Fox runs twice as fast as it should

WOW what is Starfox 64?

> Transparency - Kirby Dreamland 3, Mecarobot Golf, Jurassic Park and any game that uses Pseudo Hi-Res translucency wont display correctly.

MUUHHH ALPHA !

Nope, try again

>> No.483513

>>483509
No, it's a retro gaming (and by extension, emulation) enthusiast forum. Hence why we are discussing emulators and not video cables.
I'm just pointing out how stupid it is trying to defend ZSNES as being better with pointless arguments that basically amount to "It works for me, I can't notice the flaws because I don't know better, and I'm too lazy to switch."

>> No.483519

>>483517

>Responding

You're as bad as him.

>> No.483517

>>483512
>WOW what is Starfox 64?
Certainly not a SNES game, so you won't be able to run it on ZSNES - or any other SNES emulator - hence, it is completely irrelevant to this thread.

>> No.483518
File: 50 KB, 277x542, just like my japanese animes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
483518

>>483512

0/10

Needs some work.

>> No.483527

>>483490
>No you don't.
Pretty sure nothing other than the controller input actually requires configuration.

You can play right after downloading? Nope, so you're wrong

>Never checked, but filters are shit anyway.
Stay elitist

>Yes it does, although because of its higher requirements fast forward won't go completely bananas and run at 100x speed like it will in some of the less demanding emulators.

Bugged as hell and wants to talk about others

>> No.483535

>>483498
> AV enthusiast forum
Ah, you mean the type of place where people are buying wildly overpriced digital cables, $1K+ wooden stabilizers for record players, and other magic fairy dust items? And then they gather around to justify their crazy purchases with the mighty force of collective woo?

An apt metaphor, though not the way you meant it I'm sure.

>> No.483530
File: 79 KB, 264x408, 1364902208421.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
483530

>>483513
I don't think anyone's said ZSNES is 'better', they've said 'it works' and 'i don't need to configure shit'.

Using your example, someone mentions they use said cables in passing whilst posting up their setup. Automatically, poster is belittled for daring to share with the community, haha what a fag, 'such pleb' etc. Elitism everywhere and for what purpose? To drive off the 'casual' retro enthusiasts? This board is already in the process of dying, largely due to this imported /v/irgin attitude.

Yes, there are some trolls, but they're on both sides. There are some seriously mad people here who need to learn to live and let live.

>> No.483532

>>483527
>You can play right after downloading? Nope, so you're wrong
Do tell what else it was you had to configure in it that you didn't have to in ZSNES.

>Stay elitist
>stating facts is elitist

>Bugged as hell and wants to talk about others
I'm not following. What was the message you were trying to convey here?

>> No.483540

>>483527
ZSNES requires just as much configuring as bsnes/higan, if not more.

And it does support both filters and shaders, there aren't any included by default.

>> No.483543

>>483530
>they've said 'it works'

Which is true, but only from their very limited understanding. Many of these people did not play the games on a real snes, so Zsnes is what's "real" to them. They might have tried a few games, big well known ones and they "worked". They don't know about many others that have serious problems.

And even big games like Super Mario RPG have problems. I tried playing that on zsnes a long time ago, way, way back when. Maybe 2003. Lots of freezing.

>> No.483545

>>483509
You've obviously never stopped by the CRT threads.

>> No.483546

>>483498
I'm talking about your elitism crap

I have fun all weekend playing with my gf, i don't have to wait and configure 325613 things on a elitist emulator

I play retro games for fun, not for "muh accuracy for random games that no one play"

If i was wanting to read that, i can go to /v/ and see the same crap on console wars

>> No.483552
File: 3 KB, 224x158, ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
483552

>>483546
>gf
Maybe you're in the wrong place.

>> No.483553

>>483546
>I play retro games for fun, not for "muh accuracy for random games that no one play"

Then you don't like the actual Super Nintendo. You have a cheap Chinese knockoff that has a ton of bugs, doesn't play the sound right. You're saying you're okay with that. Okay, whatever.

>> No.483550

>>483530
>Elitism everywhere and for what purpose? To drive off the 'casual' retro enthusiasts? This board is already in the process of dying, largely due to this imported /v/irgin attitude.
No, to inform those ignorant that there are better alternatives. Sure, 4chan posts can sometimes be a little more derogatory sounding than they're really intended to be in all seriousness, but that is only to be expected on 4chan.

There is nothing wrong with having used ZSNES because you didn't know better - but defending it as being better or even equivalent of the far superior alternatives whilst openly being too lazy to even seriously give the alternatives a try is just being a complete ass.

>> No.483558

>>483530

Which is the #1 reason to strive for accurate emulators from now on.

People stick with what they know. People choose what's popular. If an innaccurate emulator gets too popular, there's too much inertia to change. It's a real mess.

>> No.483567

>>483530
The problem is not that people are using ZSNES and enjoying it, the problem is the spread of misinformation that accompanies said posts.

Claiming that ZSNES is in any way an accurate emulator, or that it is superior to any emulator for any reason is completely bogus. Claims that bsnes/higan take a ridiculous amount of power to run at full speed is equally ridiculous, as any computer made in the past 6 years or so should have no trouble running bsnes at full speed on the balanced configuration. Claiming that bsnes/higan is a pain to set up is also false, as generally nothing needs to be configured aside from input.

It's a bunch of nonsense that people are spreading around and it's the only reason threads end up like this.

>> No.483561

I'm 100% convinced Zsnes defenders are trolls. No one can be this pig headed.

>> No.483565

>>483546
This >>483553
Go on using your inferior crap - we don't care. Just don't defend or brag about it here.

>> No.483568

>>483561
I'm leaning towards that belief as well, but it's hard to tell sometimes.

>> No.483570

>>483561
Maybe they just have really shitty PCs from the late 90s (you know, the last time it was worth it to use zSNES).

>> No.483573

>>483567
This.

>> No.483582

>>483567
>don't run some games
>not accurate
>bsnes
>don't have a LOT of features
>MUH ALPHA
>MUH RANDOM GAMES

God you're stupid.

>> No.483583

>>483550
All the guy said is that it's "good enough" for him.

Which is apparently enough to bring the neckbeards out in force to pontificate about how only lesser lifeforms or the hopelessly 'ignorant' would willingly suffer the indignities of less that perfect emulation, etc.

If I just want to have fun and play through a game, and I decide to play it in SNES9x or ZSNES instead of BSNES, nothing of value has been lost. Oh noes, perhaps some translucency wasn't quite right. Perhaps some obscure games I'm not even playing have horrible bugs on my terrible choice of emulator! Perhaps the audio clock isn't 100% accurate with respect to the original hardware. WHO. FUCKING. CARES.

>> No.483580

>>483567

Don't sage. Bump it. Let people read this.

>> No.483581

>>483570
Realistically, it was probably the best choice a bit longer than that. Until the mid 2000s or so probably. Even just a few years ago, Snes9x had some jittering issues, and I'm unsure exactly when bsnes came around, but I'm sure back when it first became an option hardware incapable of running it properly would have been far less common. However, as of the last 2-3 years or so, there is really no excuse other than laziness.

>> No.483590

It's not the information.
It's not the message.

It's the attitude.
It's not rad.
It's not even tubular.

>> No.483589

>>483583
>WHO. FUCKING. CARES.
Evidently a lot of people do.

>> No.483591

>>483583
>All the guy said is that it's "good enough" for him.

Which means he has no standards. It's like accepting some Chinese SNES knockoff called Super Boy, and after someone points out that Super Mario RPG freezes on it, he says "works for me". Why not just use a real snes?

And this situation is even worse, since a god damn emulator is free and takes 15 seconds to download, and 2 minutes most to set up.

>> No.483598
File: 93 KB, 474x442, 128 days in microsoft paint.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
483598

I get what byuu is trying to do, and I applaud him for it. It's cool that we should have accurate emulators.

I don't get what the rest of you cocksuckers are trying to do, and I condemn you for it.

Whatever. I'll take my i5 16g ram and go back to playing retro games on whatever emulator I feel like using, because bitching about what someone else is doing wrong doesn't get anyone anywhere.

>> No.483601

>>483583
This is what i'm trying to say the whole time, but you explained it better.

I'll add some things through.

All those neckbeards claiming that bsnes is better are those who can't let others have fun with things they don't like, just like /v/'s "MY CONSOLE SHIT IS BETTER, YOU CAN'T PLAY ON OTHER PLATAFORM"

I'm sure i have fun with ZSNES and i don't have fun with bsnes, that's what i'm trying to say from the start.

ZSNES sure have buggs, but i'm not having them on the games i play and neither everyone should suck your GOD OF EMULATION dick because some effect that does not add a single thing in terms of fun

>> No.483605

>>483598
This.

>> No.483623

>>483601
>ZSNES sure have buggs, but i'm not having them on the games i play
It's not just about bugs. Try playing the same game on a bunch of different emulators. I'm sure you'll notice a difference in "feel" between them as well.

I've done this with NES games, and they generally have at least a slightly different "feel" to them with regards to controls and smoothness for each emulator. As such, I would prefer to play the game on the emulator that most closely matches the originally intended behavior.

I don't give a damn whether people use ZSNES, but don't go recommending it to anyone or spreading the misinformation that it's a good emulator.

>> No.483636

>>483591
"Ignorant". "No standards". etc. Same themes over and over again.

OK, we've established that you are an emulation ubermensch with impeccably high standards. You lord over these unwashed proles with their shittier emulators.

Now how bout you go enjoy your immaculate emulation rig and play some fucking games, instead of prescribing the One True Way to other people, and doing it so obnoxiously to boot?

As someone who grew up with the original systems, I find it downright bizarre for you to be hung up on what other people choose to emulate with, characterizing other emulators as equivalent to 'some Chinese SNES knockoff'. Guess what? If said cheap knockoff plays a great game well enough to enjoy all of the qualities that made it a great game, your autistic nitpicking amounts to sweet fuck all.

>> No.483639

>>483623
>feel

SERIOUSLY? FUCKING HAHAHAHA

Might as well put an:
>tfw no gf

Seriously, i just download 4 different snes emulators and they all are the same, ZSNES still is better because it has features other than "muhh alpha" or "muhh accuracy"

>> No.483642

>>469053
I dunno, I've never had a problem with ZSNES. It has always worked just fine for me, looks fine, and runs fine. I'm missing all these problems other people claim to have with it.

>> No.483650
File: 21 KB, 296x442, Tony DISAPPOINTING.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
483650

>>483601
But the real problem with ZSNES is that it's quite old.
And the sound qualities are shit as it turns the sound effects in games such as FF6 and Super Mario RPG into complete shit.

>That explosion sound in SMRPG on ZSNES

>> No.483653

>>483591
>Chinese SNES knockoff
>playing on a emulator
>not playing on a actual sufami on a fucking CTR
>thisiswhatelitistactualybelieve.jar

>> No.483657

>>483650
NEVER had ANY problem with sound other than Earthworm Jim 2, so the problem, guess what, is with your PC.

>> No.483658

>>483636
>OK, we've established that you are an emulation ubermensch with impeccably high standards.
>implying there's anything wrong with wanting to use the best emulators available rather than stick indefinitely with using outdated shitty ones

>> No.483664

>>483623
Ah, the 'feel'. Now we really are deep into the same retard zone that audiophiles exist in.

The $3000 phono cartridge I bought for my record player... it changes 'the feel' so very profoundly... I can hear all kinds of things from the original recording that fewer than a hundred people on earth have ever perceived before... lesser mortals can't hear it, but I CAN....

Et cetera, et cetera, ad nauseum. Meanwhile most of the rest of the world is perfectly happy to actually enjoy music, without being hopelessly preoccupied with such ultimately irrelevant gearhead horseshit.

>> No.483674

>>483623
>tfw no gf

In other news you are a virgin neckbeard.

>> No.483679

>>483658
>best emulator
>because my GOD OF EMULATION says so
>MUHH ALPHA
>MUHH EJ2 SOUND
>MUHH FEEL

Captcha: The HOMOLOSS

>> No.483680

>>483664
>>483674
>>483679
>zsnesfags

>> No.483684

>>483680
>tfwnogf fag
>neckbeardvirgin fag
>bsnesbyuucocklicker fag

>> No.483690

>>483664
>>483674
>>483679
What's your excuse _not_ to try a different emulator other than "It works" and "I'm too lazy to spend 1 minute downloading it"?

>> No.483701

>>483690
As i said on other post, i've tried
Conclusion: It's the same shit without features of ZSNES, i'm not playing on a featureless emulator just to have sound on EJ2, a game that i don't even play anymore

>> No.483704

>>483701
>Features of ZSNES
Such as?

Also, that shit hasn't been updated since January in 2007

>> No.483706
File: 24 KB, 311x311, enlighten me.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
483706

>>483701
What features does ZSNES have that bsnes doesn't?
Netplay?

>> No.483708

>>483680
Get the fuck back to /v/ already. Neckbeard elitism is much more at home there.

>> No.483714

>>483708
>implying I ever go to /v/
New games are shit.

>> No.483727

>>483690
I use BSNES whenever I emulate SNES. Never said otherwise. The fact that you're assuming that and putting words in peoples' mouths speaks volumes though, doesn't it?

You guys are lunatics. People express their own opinions, mildly, and you manage to interpret it as an all-out assault on everything you hold dear, if not your entire existence.

>> No.483730

>>483706
Netplay, filters, can use more than 1 controler for the same input or 2 inputs on the same controller, fast foward and slow for shits 'n bricks, can open .zip files, i don't have to configure 1123513 things like bsnes had. And all that just because EJ2 Sound and Alpha on some games? Really?

>> No.483745

>>483730
>Netplay
Has been broken since forever

>can use more than 1 controler for the same input or 2 inputs on the same controller
What possible use could that ever serve?

>fast foward and slow for shits 'n bricks
bsnes _does_ support that, and has for a VERY long time. I used it when I was playing through FF6 several years ago.

>can open .zip files
Granted, that's very convenient, but hardly enough to offset all the downsides.

>i don't have to configure 1123513 things
What 1123513 things? The only thing you _need_ to configure is the controller input.

>And all that just because EJ2 Sound and Alpha on some games? Really?
No, for accuracy and an overall better emulator.

>> No.483768

>>483745
>Has been broken since forever
Still, i play with 2 friends almost every weekend, my gf play with her brother on the other side of the country with almost any delay

>What possible use could that ever serve?
I say the same about your alpha

>bsnes _does_ support that, and has for a VERY long time. I used it when I was playing through FF6 several years ago.
But it don't, try to use slow without your LOVED sound go apeshit, try to fastfward without bugging the whole game

>What 1123513 things? The only thing you _need_ to configure is the controller input.
Oh you like filters? DOWNLOAD A FUCKING SHADER OR FUCK YOU. You want to play on 2 screens? FUCK YOU AGAIN GO DOWNLOAD ANOTHER THING THAT MIGHT WORK

>No, for accuracy and an overall better emulator.
Explain to me why your loved accuracy do with any game that is somewhere good and not some random japanese game

>> No.483816

ITT: Fat neckbeards who are alone and must have "feels"

>tfw no gf

>> No.483826

>>483768
>I say the same about your alpha
> implying I care about alpha

>> No.483835

>>483768
>Oh you like filters?
No, I don't. Filters are shit.

>> No.483850

>>483826
>>483835
>top point of accuracy is alpha on some games
>b-b-b-ut i don't care about it
>filters? I rather play on a pixelated mess because i'm hardcore !

>> No.483949

>>483850
>I'm so new I can't handle visible pixels

>> No.484209

>all these retards saying bsnes has high requirements
>running it on a 2001 laptop perfectly
>even Megaman X
plebs please

>> No.485110

>>484209
>running it on a 2001 laptop perfectly
I know they're exaggerating its requirements, but... a 2001 laptop? Seems legit.

>> No.485157

>>485110
Maybe he's running Performance? Might be possible.

Anyway, this thread is shit and should die.

>> No.485223

>>483069
But back then, new games didn't suck so much, internet was generally civilized, and you could back stuff up to optical discs(though the quality of those had gone to shit), and warez legal persecution wasn't so huge and scary, and game controllers were better - more varied.

>> No.485510

>>483462
If you had bsnes's core engine in zsnes it would be better than both of the two shitty emulators combined. Because it mostly fixes major problems with each of then. Bsnes/Higan have a terrible interface, shit options and it's buggy, but great emulation. Zsnes has all that shit more or less decent, but the emulation itself is shit. By combining the two, it would make one far superior emulator.

>>483473
Bsnes is shit, few people really disagree with that except when strictly speaking about the emulation.

Snes9x is really the best middle ground current, where it supports enough shit, has a flawless interface, and emulates better than zsnes, but not quite as good as bsnes.
If you actually like to use emulators, snes9x is pretty much what you've got. It's not perfect, but it works.

>> No.485618

>>483598
>Whatever. I'll take my i5 16g ram and go back to playing retro games on whatever emulator I feel like using, because bitching about what someone else is doing wrong doesn't get anyone anywhere.

There's lots, and lots, and lots of misinformation and confusion when it comes to emulation. One of those bits of misinformation is that zsnes "just works" or that it is all you need. There's no problem educating the public.

>> No.485639

>>483636

If someone uses zsnes and thinks its the best emulator, I can safely say that they are ignorant of emulation in general.

>> No.485669

>>483730
>filters

Bsnes has a lot more filters available. They used to use any .filter file, now they only support .shader files. That's a lot of stuff. Examples:
https://github.com/libretro/common-shaders/

Retroarch is even more extensive and uses both formats, whereas Higan only uses .shader.

>> No.486146

>>485639
Show me one person on this thread making the claim that zsnes is 'the best emulator'. You keep boxing with these shadows, but I see no evidence that they exist.

>> No.486197

>>485669
But that's my point, if i have to download filters, the emulator is not to use on the fly, i do not said that i CAN'T have any filters

>> No.487368

>>480746
What would you recommend instead of PJ64? I've always had that one recommended to me...

Also, I had just assumed that, since bSNES' creator was so stringent on accuracy, the other emus were just as accurate.

>> No.487558

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=19677&atid=119677

Remember, ZSNES "just works" and if you tell anyone that they should use something better you are Hitler.

>> No.487931

>>487368

It took 7 years of reverse engineering, testing the real hardware's behavior, and coding all those behaviors into the emulator for bSNES to reach the level it has.
In contrast, all of the other emulators in higan, bNES, bGBC, bGBA, and Cydrak's DasShiny are all relatively new and haven't been through nearly as much development, and they all are all offshoots of bSNES development in some way.