/vr/ - Retro Games

>anti-treasure shitposter false-flagging again
Yawn.

Oh, it's the weekly same Treasure thread we always have. Nothing to see here.

>>4739502
Even if he is, It's not far off. They've made some pretty great games.

>>4739508
Oh I agree, I just mean OP wants to stir up shit, he especially wants to trigger shmup autists by saying Ikaruga is the best shmup ever.

I like treasure and they make some top tier games, but they are not Konami level.

>>4739495
I miss treasure, are they even still around?

>>4739518
Yes, but they haven't made a new game since Geist Crush in 2011 or so. Their last really good game was Sin and Punishment 2 in 2010.
They're releasing Ikaruga on PS4 soon.

>>4739527
Well shit. It's been literally 7 years since they made an actual game.

>>4739513
Okay and if they get triggered we can laugh at them. But for now we may as well bask in Treasure

>>4739502
More like an anon trying to bait the anti-Treasure, pro-Konami troll that shows up whenever someone mentions Treasure.

>>4739513
I am convinced that Bangai-O's script was merely fed through a babelfish translator and they called it a day.

silhouette mirage

>>4739807
I thought it was very deliberately ironic

Treasure? More like Trash

>>4740037
Care to elaborate?

>>4740037
Your unpopular opinion? More like shit opinion.

>>4739873
treasure's worst retro game

fuck that polarity gimmick

>>4740170
Play the original japanese version on Saturn

>>4739495
>best 2D shump (Ikaruga)
Radiant Silvergun is better
>best platformer (Mischief Makers)
dynamite headdy is better
>best belt scroller (Guardian Heroes)
Guardian Heroes isn't a belt scroller
>best 3D shump (Sin & Punishment)
the sequel is better

>>4740184
>Headdy better than MM
Eh, maybe, it's a tough one. Both are definitely the best Treasure platformers (not that they did a lot), but both are also very different. I'll give the edge to MM simply because it has more replay value, but they're about on par.
>sequel is better
Technically it's probably true, but there's something about the original S&P that I still like more than the sequel, some people pointed out the pacing on the first one is better, and that the sequel drags a bit too long, which may be true, but I dunno, I just like the original more, albeit Star Successor is great.

literally any shmup > Ikaruga
Contra and Metal slug > Alien Soldier
Castlevania and GnG > any trashure platformer
any capcom run and punch > guardian heroes
Star fox 64 > Sin & punishment
try again dumb faggot

>>4740214
>trashure
Post disregarded.

>>4740214
/thread

The greatest shmup ever made is Gradius V

Which Treasure made, but that’s not the point

>>4740214
How can one post be so fucking wrong?

>>4740214
>Contra and Metal slug > Alien Soldier
only hard corps is in the same league as alien soldier. metal slug is overrated.
>Castlevania and GnG > any trashure platformer
those are action games, hardly platformers.
>any capcom run and punch > guardian heroes
guardian heroes has more depth and replay value than every capcom brawler combined.
>Star fox 64 > Sin & punishment
star fox 64 has more high and low moments, while S&P is more consistent with its quality.

>>4740260
>t. stupid cunt who only plays trashure shit

Radiant Silvergun (Ikaruga Chaining) > Radiant Silvergun >>>>>>>>>>Ikaruga

>>4740249
What happened to the anti-Gradius V guy? You know, the one who always said V sucked because it was made by Treasure and because it didn't have moais.

>>4740260
1) Super C is better than both Contra Hard Corps and Alien Soldier. Alien Soldier isn't even 2-player coop! Gunstar Heroes is a better game overall, but still not Contra-level.
2) Capcom's King of Dragons is way better than Guardian Heroes, not to mention the legendary D&D beatemups.

Treasure isn't shit- Mischief Makers, Radiant Silvergun and Gunstar Heroes are all good games- but they're not Konami or Capcom.

>>4740249
R-Type Final is a better game

treasure made great games. and their games have a unique quirky charm to them. people who say treasure sucks are rabble-rousers.

>>4740559
Quoted for truth. They're not perfect, and a few of their classics are rough around the edges (Silvergun and Gunstar, most notably), but they've made their share of great, idiosyncratic games that are rightly mainstays of the medium.

There are plenty of other developers more deserving of the shit they get from some people here.

>>4740547
Gr8 b8

>>4740547
>>4740547
>>4740547

Are you crazy?

I love R-Type. And Final is no exception, but the game that is without a DOUBT better is Gradius V.

Final was more of a send off moody thematic schmup with remnants of the arcade mode from the first two.

>>4740652
At least R-Type Final doesn't drag on for 90 minutes or have retardedly broken mechanics like the option aiming or Freeze in V. What is it with Treasurefags and making games easier for casuals, like what they did to Castlevania IV and Simon's multi-whip?

>>4741447
Post your WRs of Castlevania IV and Gradius V then.

>>4741476
No, because speedrunning and scoring are autistic.

However, certain games can objectively be easier than other games. Do you believe Mario Bros. is on the same difficulty as Ghosts & Goblins?

>>4741497
Nice excuses.
>Mario Bros.
>GnG
Different kind of games, Mario Bros. is a single-screen competitive 2 players arcade game and GnG is a side-scroller.
Their objectives are different, although I get what you mean, GnG is "harder" on casual play, but in hardcore play (for score), Mario Bros. might actually have a higher skill ceiling.

>>4741502
>Nice excuses.
Nice false dilemma. Just because Treasure casualised Gradius and Castlevania doesn't mean the games they worked on are as casual as for example Cookie Clicker and that just anyone could obtain a WR in them with minimal effort.

>Mario
I was referring to the NES game, not the arcade CAG. I figured that would have been obvious, but apparently not to an aspie Treasure fanboy that takes things too literally and goes off on a pointless tangent.

>scoring in Mario could be more difficult than G&G
This is simply wrong, and delusional. Go back to playing and idolising your dumbed-down Treasure and Nintendo shit instead of discussing real games, you're clearly out of your element on the matter.

>>4739495
>belt scroller

What the fuck is this meme anymore?

It started as a dumbass joke about final fight type beat em ups, and now apparently refferences anything the poster wants it to.kind of like the "mwtroidvania" situation, and I've seen tards using other "vania"s as well...

Like, are you a teen, and trying to be ironic? Did you fall for a moronic meme? What!?

>>4739495
Treasure is very hit and miss, honestly. If you don't like brainless button mashers or repetitive gameplay, their games tend to be mediocre at best. There are some gems, of course, but I'm talking in general.

Like, Astro Boy the Omega factor. It's repetitive as fuck, but it's stupidly fun. I was hooked on that shit, until I got the teue ending.
Then you have the Gunstar heroes games, which start out fun, and by the third level you're bored to tears (that's an IMO, by the way)

I guess maybe their games just aren't for me.

>>4739495
ikaruga isn't even good

>>4741548
Trying way too hard with your treasurefag and nintendo boogeymen. Not everyone grew up a bitter console warrior like you.
>real games
Post a WR to see how real you are. See if you live up to your bullshit pseud elitist talk.

>>4741590
What are your favorite games?

>>4740037
Sorry your shitty indie games aren't doing any success.

>>4741653
FUCK YOU

>>4739495
>another trashure thread

Gross

>>4739495
>off-shoot of Konami
*Citation needed

FUCK treasure and FUCK treasure basedboys

>>4742267
Did a treasure fan date your crush or something? You seem abnormally angry